Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft CFO Quits

McGruber writes "NBC News is reporting that Microsoft's Chief Financial Officer Peter Klein is leaving the company to spend time with his extended family, as Microsoft 'struggles with sharply declining personal computer sales and a lukewarm reception for its new Windows 8 operating system.' Klein is the latest in a line of top-level executives to leave the company, following Windows head Steven Sinofsky last November."

20 of 295 comments (clear)

  1. Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    do the right thing.

    1. Re:Come on CEO... by peragrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      why? I think Ballmer is doing a fantastic job and he should keep up the hard chair throwing work.

      Because for every chair thrown another bad quarter for MSFT happens.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Come on CEO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you ever SEEN Ballmer? I have talked to him in person once and have seen a talk (incoherent rant) by him once. He is the bigges problem they have at MS. They have others but he is by far the biggest. He has the same reality distortion field Jobs had, but it affects only him.

    3. Re:Come on CEO... by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you ever SEEN Ballmer? I have talked to him in person once and have seen a talk (incoherent rant) by him once. He is the bigges problem they have at MS. They have others but he is by far the biggest. He has the same reality distortion field Jobs had, but it affects only him.

      Hmm, sounds like he's such an ass that instead of a distortion field he's become large and dense enough to collapse into a singularity.

      Interestingly, it seems something like Hawking radiation is occurring at the edge of the singularity's influence: The Chief Officers begin radiating away from the company's event horizon giving one reason to those on the outside, while the actual reasons for departure fall back inward toward the singularity.

      If only there were a name for such phenomena where you become so dense and toxic that no intelligible thoughts escape you and everything within your reach turns to crap -- Sort of like a social version of a blackhole... hmm. Any ideas?

    4. Re:Come on CEO... by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep, Balmer is definitely the problem.

      Ever wonder how Steve Ballmer keeps his job. Well, here it is:

      Bill Gates is Chairman of Microsoft's Board of Directors and Microsoft's largest stockholder

      Steve Ballmer was best man at Bill Gates' wedding.

    5. Re:Come on CEO... by Talderas · · Score: 5, Funny

      If only there were a name for such phenomena where you become so dense and toxic that no intelligible thoughts escape you and everything within your reach turns to crap -- Sort of like a social version of a blackhole... hmm. Any ideas?

      Politician.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    6. Re:Come on CEO... by gtall · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, Ballmer's doing to MS exactly like some of us would like to do to MS. MS deserves Ballmer.

    7. Re:Come on CEO... by nojayuk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Saying that the Ballmer is no worse than Fiorini is no reason to keep Ballmer - there are far better alternatives around."

      Such as? Who's available, with the sort of deep knowledge of where MS came from, where it is today and where it is going tomorrow and who can step in and make MS even better than it is today with minimal disruption to the financial bottom line? Hmmm, tricky...

      Some day MS is going to have to cope without Steve B., hopefully not in the same way that Apple is handling the loss of Steve Jobs but that day isn't here yet. I find the idea that Ballmer is some kind of liability to MS quite amusing considering what would/will happen to the business if/when he does leave.

    8. Re:Come on CEO... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Interestingly Microsoft is starting to realize, too late, that it has been a "Windows(TM)" company, and not a technology company. The fact that they tried to tie everything to Windows(TM), is the problem. Replace Windows(TM) (with say .. Android or iOS) and all of a sudden, your whole core is gone and all the supporting products are worth less. And that is what is happening. People are realizing that you don't need Windows(TM) to get stuff done. And in fact, you don't need Windows(TM) most of the time.

      And since people are realizing this, they are exploring other options.The days of being able to sell Windows 95 for $150 and have people line up around the block have long since been over. The Windows ship has sailed.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  2. hardly cause for concern by Sadsfae · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It'd be bigger news if he quit for another company, while Microsoft is on the decline it's going to be a very slow death spread across
    a decade or two. They've still got considerable assets which will take a long time to bleed out.
    http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=msft+balance+sheet&annual

    --
    Have a squat over at the hobo house.
    1. Re:hardly cause for concern by Raumkraut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IANAA, but there's "creative accounting", and then there's fraud. One is perfectly legal, the other not. It's like the difference between "tax avoidance" and "tax evasion".

      The thing with creative accounting is not that it hides or creates money from nothing (which would be fraud), but that it moves it around from other places/times. If you see a really good quarter now, it's possibly because some income has been moved from elsewhen. So it might be expected for the next few fiscal quarters to be more disappointing.

      The old guy gets to leave on a high, and the new guy gets to "improve" the company's financials after an initial few bad quarters. It's an accountancy win-win.

    2. Re:hardly cause for concern by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How is that an unhealthy situation?

      Because partners who've been closely tied to their success are now looking at alternatives.

      "Vendors in China have revealed the Intel has begun to promote Android based convertible tablet/notebooks. Intel is concerned that Windows 8 has been unable to stimulate global demand for notebooks, and since global sales of Android tablets have been increasing, they are looking at reducing their reliance on the Microsoft OS.

      China-based vendor Lenovo will be first to release Intel driven Android systems in May, while Hewlett-Packard (HP), Toshiba, Acer and Asustek Computer will launch theirs in the third quarter."

      http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20130419PD208.html

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    3. Re:hardly cause for concern by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unhealthy... where to begin?!

      Sure, it's a nice arrangement when the success of the PC industry is the success of Microsoft. But how healthy is it when the failure of Microsoft is the death of the PC industry??? The influence that a software maker has over the hardware industries is VERY unhealthy.

  3. Why? by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a mystery to me why extremely rich men like Balmer continue with the daily drudgery of running a business like Microsoft. Personally I'd buy a huge yacht (inc. surface to air missiles) and sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines. For the rest of my natural life...

    1. Re:Why? by robnelle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a mystery to me why extremely rich men like Balmer continue with the daily drudgery of running a business like Microsoft. Personally I'd buy a huge yacht (inc. surface to air missiles) and sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines. For the rest of my natural life...

      For some people it's not necessarily about just the money, it's about the power. Controlling one of the biggest and most ubiquitous companies in the world = a lot of power.

    2. Re:Why? by c · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Personally I'd buy a huge yacht (inc. surface to air missiles) and sail around the world with a harem of supermodel concubines. For the rest of my natural life...

      Ah, the John McAfee package. Seems to be popular with the techie crowd. We're also having a special this week on the Kim Dotcom plan, if you're interested?

      Ah... anyhow, there's probably a reason that these people are extremely rich and you're not. Luck is obviously a factor, but it takes a certain kind of drive to keep playing the game well after you need to.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
  4. Micro$oft by tuppe666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And you expected something different here? Microsoft's latest numbers are actually astoundingly good, better than even most of the optimists predicted. They speak of a very healthy company, not one in decline at all.

    Microsoft s numbers were *always* very good,, they deserve a $ on their name. 75% Gross profit margin is amazing, but that's not really the news here, because that is consistent. The news is that even with its primary product (Windows) taking a deserved beating they have made the difference up elsewhere (Servers; Gaming...well Live and Cloud...well Office).

    The original poster I suspect was being a little sarcastic, but the Irony is not lost on me. From a financial point of view. Microsoft more diversified product line has saved it in the short term financially, but from where RMS and the rest of us look...Windows has proved to be a trainwreck, and Microsoft is weaker as a monopoly. Its high fives all around.

  5. No no no no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My company supplies office furniture to Microsoft - like chairs - and ...and ...and... Balmer is NOT the problem. No Sir!

  6. Orderly succession by MrMickS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's nothing really to see here. He's been CFO for over three years, been at the company for much longer. Why not cash in on his various options and enjoy his life?

    The doom and gloom about Microsoft on here is all wishful thinking. PC Windows is on a decline in the marketplace and has been since the the iPhone/iPad changed the game. Android has accelerated this by making smart touch devices available at a lower price point. Microsoft are aware of this, the speed of change has caught them out and they are going to stumble a little before they make the right move.

    In the long run Office will survive because its a standard, nothing else can claim this. Office 365 gives them the ability to make money from Office without owning the OS. This is the future of Microsoft. Google may have been doing this longer but Office is Office.

    Cloud computing/storage is going to be a big money earner going forward. Microsoft have positioned themselves for this. Going forward they would rather provide Windows servers using Azure than sell the OS. As unit sales of Windows server decline, look to Microsoft aggressively market and price Azure as an alternative. Especially in the SME space. Why run your own servers when you can get a reliable DR capable cloud solution from Microsoft. This is where the market is heading.

    Xbox Live. The next Xbox is going to be a money earner. They are currently making money with the current service. The new one should come in at a reasonable price and allow them to continue this. It will also leverage cloud based services.

    Consumer Windows is the bad news. This will move to become a phone/tablet OS which is where the consumer market is going. The chances are that they will come good, they have a lot of smart people working there.

    Oh, and before the accusations start I'm not a Microsoft shill. I've never bought a computer that runs Windows. I just like to look at things a little more realistically. I still expect to get modded down because that's what happens on Slashdot.

    --
    You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
  7. Re:Microsoft is in deep shit now! by dingen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Even though this is modded down, it's really the bottom line: with Windows XP the operating system was basically done. Complete. Finished. No more features are required. Everything that was added later was either cruft or could just as easily have been implemented in Windows XP. The only reason why Microsoft kept certain things from XP (like proper 64-bit support, IE9+ and DirectX 10+) was to artificially create a reason for people to switch to future versions of Windows, not because XP didn't offer a decent platform for these things.

    Same thing applies to Office by the way, the other big part in Microsoft's revenue stream: both Office and Windows are "done" and have been so for years. And since Microsoft hasn't been able to make any profits in markets outside of the Windows/Office ecosystem, the future of the company currently depends on how much longer they can convince people to keep buying new versions of the same old software. How long before the general public realizes they don't need to "upgrade" because they don't get anything they already have now? Looking at Windows 8 sales figures: not very long.

    --
    Pretty good is actually pretty bad.