Slashdot Mirror


Bigelow Aerospace Investigating Feasibility of Moon Base for NASA

littlesparkvt writes in with a bit from Space Industry News about Bigelow Aerospace's plans for the moon: "NASA and Bigelow Aerospace are in the initial planning phases for a moon base. 'As part of our broader commercial space strategy, NASA signed a Space Act Agreement with Bigelow Aerospace to foster ideas about how the private sector can contribute to future human missions,' Said David Weaver NASA Associate Administrator for the Office of Communications." Bigelow will be performing the study for free too. Robert Bigelow chatted with a radio host a few weeks ago about Bigelow's long-term space plans. They include refueling depots and a commercial moon base, since NASA isn't planning to go there.

4 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Gravity? by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can repair a china cup. But it isn't fully recovered. As grandma will clearly notice.

  2. Re:Real Estate by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whoever can get there and defend it from invaders.

  3. Re:Feasibility - in terms of what ? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the oddities that people overlook in spaceflight, is that people with excess fat would make ideal colonists.

    I don't think there is a more cost effective means in terms of payload to transport 'food and water' in a form usable to humans than fat people. I'm not talking morbidly obese, but an astronaut with 20kg extra weight is carrying pre-processed nutrients/energy/water in a form that requires the least amount of energy to turn back into work. As the astronaut burns off the excess fat, the wastes produced can be collected and reprocessed into useful water and fertilizers.

    Consider the two options:
    A healthy astronaut with 20kg of fat
    A healthy astronaut with 0kg of excess and 20kg of food/water.

    kg for kg, the stored fat will be much more efficient than 20kg of extra food/water.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  4. The future of space is private! by BlueCoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't care about the nay sayers. The problem with NASA is funding and politics. Space projects take decades and commitment. And for at least a few decades you can think of private space companies as nonprofits.

    It's better to just have NASA raise funds, devise national policy and sign contracts; an extension to what they were doing anyway. They just won't be micromanaging anymore. It also allows other governments or even individuals or corporations to contract with the same people and get it on the act.

    Having private companies allows more insulation from political influence. It allows them to better focus on achieving something rather than making politicians happy. The same people that would have worked at JPL will instead be working for private equivalents. It's the same people, just a different letterhead.