Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk Hates 405 Freeway Traffic, Pays Money To Speed Construction

S810 writes "Elon Musk, one of the main people behind PayPal, Space Exploration Technologies and Tesla Motors, has paid $50,000 to help Los Angeles speed up construction of the 405 Freeway, making it better and says that he will pay more if needed. From the article: 'Musk said he is open to pay the cost of adding workers to the widening project "as a contribution to the city and my own happiness. If it can actually make a difference, I would gladly contribute funds and ideas. I've super had it." — Musk quips that it's easier getting rockets into orbit than navigating his commute between home in Bel-Air and his Space Exploration Technologies factory in Hawthorne.' For those who aren't familiar with this issue, the 405 Freeway runs from the northern end of the San Fernando Valley all the way down to El Toro and runs by LAX. Residents are getting frustrated that this widening project is over budget and well over the anticipated time frame that it was supposed to completed by."

12 of 431 comments (clear)

  1. SD Freeway isn't the problem by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it's all the cars on it.

    if they built the sort of light rail which the region desperately needs it could cut down on the traffic hugely.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:SD Freeway isn't the problem by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Its the only thing which will make life easier for drivers. Widening this road will just encourage more people to drive, increasing congestion everywhere.

  2. Dear Elon by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You aren't in traffic, you are traffic.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  3. Re:$50k enough? by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This project was budgeted at $1 billion dollars, and is currently projected to cost $1.1 billion. So no, $50k is not significant. Also, he didn't even spend the $50k on construction: he paid it to a lobbying group, Angelinos Against Gridlock, whose goal is to speed construction. The group actually looks like one worth supporting (they have a vision that includes both roads and rail improvements and it seems reasonably thought out), so that $50k might be well spent. But it's spent on an advocacy organization, not on construction.

  4. Commuting is the problem by TubeReceiver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He lives in BelAir and commutes to Hawthorne ?? Give me a break... that was ridiculous 30 years ago and still is. One word, listen closely... MOVE. Everyone seems to think it's normal to drive these ridiculous long commutes and it's actually a symptom of a screwed up society in love with their crappy cars. Try living closer to work and walk there, or ride your golf cart or something.

  5. May I contribute $5 ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since Elon Musk is so wealthy and he's only paying $50,000, may I contribute my $5 ?

    The $5 from me to me is worth much more (by ratio of my wealth) than the $50,000 to Mr. Musk, btw

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:May I contribute $5 ? by sanman2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Immorally gotten wealth? You mean anyone who earns more money than you has automatically done it immorally?

    2. Re:May I contribute $5 ? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you think that construction companies, union workers and prevailing wage workers are not already soaking this government project, then you have no idea how government contracts work in California.

      This is an American problem. In other countries it doesn't work this way. I lived in Japan and China for several years, and public construction projects in both of them are done amazingly fast.

      In the USA, the construction crew will show up, tear everything up, and put out lots of traffic cones, ... and then disappear. For months there is no activity. The machinery just sits there. Everyone now and then you see some guy in a hard-hat drinking some coffee, but nothing is getting done.

      In Japan and China it is completely different. A construction site is a beehive of activity from start to finish. They set up giant lights so they can work through the night. When I lived in Shanghai, they build the middle ring freeway past my house, and it was annoying to hear the din of construction all day and night. But in three months it was over because they were done.

      I really don't understand why America is so bad at managing these kinds of projects.

    3. Re:May I contribute $5 ? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anything you can earn through labor is moral. Anything you acquire through investment is immoral.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  6. Re:$50k enough? by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You seem to have no idea the scale of work the goes into turning virgin terrain into a proper road. It involves hundreds of men working hard labor, dozens of machines that cost $10M each (or about $15K a month, if you want to rent) and are backordered for two years and burn 100 gallons of diesel a day, and hauling thousands of tons of rocks across large distances to poor on the ground. Then you take the amount of time to do all that and quadrupal it if you actually want to drive on it faster than 35MPH and not have your transmission fall out. None of that pays attention to the cost of surveying the land and planning out what angle is needed on the banks, determining just how much you can safely slope the road so both compact cars and big trucks can safely drive on it, to securing right-of-way from landowners,....

    But yeah, it's public money, so we can ignore all that and complain that they should work for free so no tax dollars are wasted while we still get roads that you don't need a horse to traverse.

  7. Re:$50k enough? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It gets worse. Until the 405 gets into the mountains, it's solid city on each side. Widening means buying property, expensive property. It's an elevated freeway, so it's hideously more expensive to build than on the ground.

    Sadly, it's not going to fix the problem. Twice as many lanes would still not be enough. There's a choke point where the 405 meets the 101 in the San Fernando Valley that backs at least 2 miles every workday, and has done so for at least 30 years.

    It may get better, but it's not going to be fixed.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  8. Re:405 by bogjobber · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or maybe it's because there are 7 million more people in LA County than in Orange County?

    You can't move a population of 10+ million people around every day by automobile without traffic jams. It's an impossible task. You can eke out tiny improvements, but just as quickly they are overtaken by increased usage and then you're looking at an even larger, more expensive and time-consuming upgrade to keep traffic moving . The 405 is a perfect example of this.

    Auto travel does not scale efficiently and over the long term LA is going to have to significantly improve its mass transit (ie subway, light rail, street cars NOT buses) to have any chance of improving congestion. Thankfully the government understands this and is moving beyond 1950s urban planning policies.

    But it's LA, and no place on earth is more beholden to the notion that a car is freedom and taking public transit is for the unwashed masses. Even when it's obvious to everyone involved that upgrading the freeway system is a huge, inefficient pain in the ass and a waste of public money you still get people like yourself clamoring that they should do *more* of it. It's absurd.