Slashdot Mirror


Canada Revenue Agency To Tax BitCoin Transactions

First time accepted submitter semilemon writes "The Canada Revenue Agency has started paying attention to BitCoin transactions, as it says users will have to pay tax on all transactions using the currency. From the article, "The CRA told the CBC there are two separate tax rules that apply to the electronic currency, depending on whether they are used as money to buy things or if they were merely bought and sold for speculative purposes. "Barter transaction rules apply where BitCoins are used to purchase goods or services," Canada Revenue Agency spokesman Philippe Brideau said in an email. In this situation, that means whatever you've received in exchange for your $1 worth of vegetables must be documented as a taxable gain of at least $1 somewhere. When it comes to trading BitCoins for profit, the tax man says there are tax implications there, too. "When BitCoins are bought or sold like a commodity, any resulting gains or losses could be income or capital for the taxpayer depending on the specific facts," ruled the CRA."

4 of 297 comments (clear)

  1. Kind of innevitable and entirely reasonable by sg_oneill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All seems reasonable to me. Our civil society is founded on the fact that since the government actually costs money, then people need to pay tax. Trying to hide money in bitcoin ought be seen as tax evasion, unless they are paying taxes on that money.

    Libertarian types trying to sponge off the taxes of hard working tax payers via tax evasion need to stop being so greedy and stealing other peoples money.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    1. Re:Kind of innevitable and entirely reasonable by synaptik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I haven't heard any libertarians espousing bitcoin as a means of evading taxes. I just sold mine from 2010, and I am well aware of the need to pay income tax on the net proceeds. Just like anything else.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    2. Re:Kind of innevitable and entirely reasonable by olip85 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Good move by the government, and it is a good thing that this is happening sooner rather than later. Yes, taxes suck, yes I want to pay lower taxes, etc, but roads and healthcare don't pay for themselves.

    3. Re:Kind of innevitable and entirely reasonable by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It has a larger government measured by percentage of GDP: government spending equals 50% of GDP. It's true that it has lower debt, because it also has much higher taxes (around 50% of GDP as well), so it pays for its spending rather than selling bonds to pay for it.