Slashdot Mirror


Physicists Attempting To Test 'Time Crystals'

ceview writes "This story at Wired seems to have lots of people a bit confused: 'In February 2012, the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Frank Wilczek decided to go public with a strange and, he worried, somewhat embarrassing idea. Impossible as it seemed, Wilczek had developed an apparent proof of "time crystals" — physical structures that move in a repeating pattern, like minute hands rounding clocks, without expending energy or ever winding down. ... [A] Berkeley-led team will attempt to build a time crystal by injecting 100 calcium ions into a small chamber surrounded by electrodes. The electric field generated by the electrodes will corral the ions in a "trap" 100 microns wide, or roughly the width of a human hair. The scientists must precisely calibrate the electrodes to smooth out the field. Because like charges repel, the ions will space themselves evenly around the outer edge of the trap, forming a crystalline ring.' The experimental set up is incredibly delicate (Bose Einstein Condensate), so it implies this perpetual motion effect can't really be used to extract energy. What is your take on it? It's unlike to upend anything, as the article suggests, because at a quantum level things behave weirdly at the best of times. The heavy details are available at the arXiv."

11 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Wait. What? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is your take on it?

    Yes, Any other Nobel Prize-winning physicists / Slashdoters with Bose Einstein Condensate experience please chime in.
    But first, let me get some pop corn ... /sarcasm

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Wait. What? by six025 · · Score: 4, Funny

      But first, let me get some pop corn ... /sarcasm

      Unlike the experiment, I predict a great deal of energy will be expended by lay people chiming in.

      Like the experiment, I proclaim this energy to be perpetual while at the same time achieving nothing. ;-)

  2. Re:Bose never got a Nobel by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    How the heck is it that Satyendar Nath Bose didn't get a Nobel prize?
    I guess back then they didn't know how awesome his ideas were?

    Actually, he only created speakers. Generally awesome speakers, yes, but just speakers none-the-less.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  3. Re:Bose never got a Nobel by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, there are four sides to that question. It's going to take simultaneous 24-hour corner days to come up with an answer.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  4. Re:What does this have to do with time? by narcc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, after we produce 6 time crystals we can assemble the key to time. Frank Wilczek is really the Black Guardian in disguise, but the Berkeley physicist heading up the project won't figure this out until the last Slashdot article in the series.

  5. Its the auditors... by shadowmas · · Score: 3, Funny

    OMG the auditors are back at it. Somebody find Susan.

  6. Re:Bose never got a Nobel by crutchy · · Score: 2, Funny

    bose makes girly sound systems

    real men spend thousands of dollars trying to cram four 18 inch subwoofers into their supra, along with nitro and a v12 chevy... no hood required

  7. Re:Yuck by delt0r · · Score: 3, Funny

    /. was always off the cliff. You just old enough to notice now.

    --
    If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
  8. Re:Bose never got a Nobel by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the sound system doesn't give you involuntary bowel movements, it's not a real sound system.

    Is that a "true sharts, man" argument?

  9. Re:Newton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Being observed is performing work.

    That's not what my boss says!

  10. Re:Newton? by yahwotqa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, just ask any stripper.