Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The Balkanization of Chatting

Posted by Unknown on from the just-use-xmpp dept.

JThaddeus writes "Slashdot's own (or former) CmdrTaco has a posting on the Washington Post's website where he discusses how chat apps have overtaken SMS. Yeah, they are cheap. There's no telecom fee per message or for some number of messages per month. However 'The problem of course is that these systems are annoyingly incompatible with each other. My phone can buzz with chat notifications from 3 different apps at any moment. My desktop has even more scattered across browser tabs and standalone apps.' Ditto, nor do I want to hassle learning some app or trying to understand its who's-listening settings. I'll stick to email and to occasional SMS."

5 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Come back by Zerth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IRC still loves you.

    1. Re:Come back by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Informative

      IRC is in fact still a robust system for talking to people by text. Data organized into relevant streams called channels, with mechanisms for self-policing built in. There's a lot of modernity to, say, skype, but fundamentally, IRC has all the basic mechanisms done well in an open way. But unlike these services, IRC is automatically balkanized, not only do your friends have to use the same technology, they have to use the same IRC networks.

  2. vulcanization of chatting apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ....fascinating. (arches eyebrow)

  3. Didn't Trillian do this? by trazom28 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back in the pre-SMS days, http://www.trillian.im/ Trillian did this nicely. You would think there would be an app to combine all as well. Couldn't be that hard if it's been done once before.

    --
    {} ------ When I think of a good sig, I'll put it here
    1. Re:Didn't Trillian do this? by Tog+Klim · · Score: 5, Informative

      pidgin does it everywhere for free, and it can do SMS via AOL.