Slashdot Mirror


Portal Now Available On Linux

alancronin writes "Valve have released Portal for Linux through the Steam platform. If you have a copy of the Windows version you will automatically have a copy of it for Linux in your account. There are also rumors of Portal 2 coming soon."

66 of 115 comments (clear)

  1. Finally... by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linux users now can do cake jokes.

    1. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You realize that the plan is to have Linux 2013 = Windows 2013 in the near future, right?

      Sadly true: Gnome 3 is desperately trying to be a worse UI than Windows 8.

      If Linux 2013 = Windows 2007, I'd be quite happy. That was the last Windows UI that didn't try to force some designer's idea of how it should work on you.

    2. Re:Finally... by alhirzel · · Score: 1

      "What the fuck?"

    3. Re:Finally... by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      linux is not POSIX certified, the nt POSIX subsystem was at some point

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    4. Re: Finally... by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    5. Re:Finally... by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 1

      "early 2013"

      Slightly off the mark (it's about half-way through 2013 now) but still, nice.

    6. Re: Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Obamapacman.com has nerfed your link. I'm too lazy to try to find whatever it was :)

    7. Re: Finally... by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

      http://imgur.com/4mHWB

      fuck obamapacman.com

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    8. Re:Finally... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Linux users now can do cake jokes.

      Hah. The guy in the chair is so me. It was beginning of 2013 when I completed Portal 1 (last year: GTA4). But seriously, if you're a Linux dude and haven't tasted the cake yet, support Valve and get Portal soon, it's an excellent game.

    9. Re:Finally... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Really? I target POSIX specifically because of its cross platform consistency.

      Linux is the only OS I know of that isn't POSIX compliant, so I think you're just a bit confused.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    10. Re:Finally... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      You must be new. Cerfification does not imply functional. :(

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    11. Re:Finally... by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      It felt like a long series of tutorials and the entertaining end sequences were just the start of the actual game. and then it ended. I like the direction that portal 2 took the story though.

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    12. Re:Finally... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Well it's tutorials all the way till you escape from the shiny areas and get into the service tunnels. Then it's purely using what you've learned. But the tutorials themselves are fun.

    13. Re:Finally... by asola · · Score: 2

      Ubuntu's Unity and Gnome3 != Linux 2013

      There are a set of refined DEs for Linux which provide you with a better than "Windows 2007" desktop experience. KDE is the most prominent of them but MATE and XFCE are also strong contenders.

      You get a refined desktop experience with Linux Mint MATE.

    14. Re: Finally... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I work for a smaller game studio, and whenever I ask about doing Linux ports, I just get laughed at.

  2. Re:So Jealous! by duguk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The thing I found weird about this, is I've been running Portal in Wine for ages, and it seems to run better than it does under Windows!

  3. Portal 1 is out but not Portal 2 by liamdawe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since Phoronix claimed originally it was both just to clear it up only Portal 1 is out for Linux, there are no hints about Portal 2 despite this article stating it and linking to a source for Portal 2 (the source of that info is an idiot). Daily linux gaming news can be found on www.gamingonlinux.com by the way :) where we actually check facts properly ;)

    1. Re:Portal 1 is out but not Portal 2 by cstdenis · · Score: 2

      Source engine has been ported so they are very likely to eventually port all the games that use it.

      --
      1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual.
    2. Re:Portal 1 is out but not Portal 2 by phorm · · Score: 1

      Left 4 Dead 2 is still a favorite at many of the LAN events I attend.
      If that one gets ported, it will probably do well for moving some users over to 'nix.

      For my part, it'll be installed in the PXE-boot gaming platform that I've got at my place.

    3. Re:Portal 1 is out but not Portal 2 by liamdawe · · Score: 1

      Well yes I bet they will but for a website to claim it's coming as it's in their all games list is just stupid, it as the name implies, lists all your games.

  4. Re:Valve is a single entity, not a plurality.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    In British English company names are considered collective nouns, and given that Timothy is British there does not appear to be any error here. For once.

  5. Re:So Jealous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shhh, don't say this too loud, you might hurt some Windows' users' feelings.

  6. Re:Valve is a single entity, not a plurality.. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So you believe proper English speakers should speak in cockney slang? I don't care what the common, profane speech might dictate; I only care what is correct.

    It's not slang, it's standard English. And the name of the language is a clue as to who gets to say what's what.

    You can do whatever you like with the American fork of the language though. Feel free. So long as you don't claim it's genuine English.

  7. Don't clean your cake knife just yet. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    "Released" is a bit strong a term; the port is still marked "beta."

    1. Re:Don't clean your cake knife just yet. by TuxThePenguin2205 · · Score: 1

      I played it through over the last couple of days and haven't encountered any problems with it. Now for some L4D2 :-)

  8. Re:Finally, 2007 is here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You mean I can now play a six year old game on Linux?

    No, you could play it in Linux six years ago through Wine (just like, say, Half-Life 2, Left For Dead and L4D2). Now you can play it native, if you prefer that option.

  9. Re: So Jealous! by Bert64 · · Score: 2

    And yet if the game looks the same and plays the same, then what were those functions even being used for in the first place?

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  10. Re: So Jealous! by SAXAHOID · · Score: 1

    Well, if I can not differ the feature complete version and the "bare minimum approximation" by eye, then I think of it as of complete version. Especially if it runs faster. What if I do not have money to upgrade or just do not want to do it? Is there an option in official DX to enable such bare minimum approximation and make system requirements less demanding?

    Did not try Portal in wine so my opinion is based on the virtually same "runs faster" situation with Audiosurf.

  11. Left4dead 2 (beta) also by symbolset · · Score: 2

    Left4dead 2 (beta) is also in there. That's a new game.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Left4dead 2 (beta) also by natex84 · · Score: 1

      It's ~3.5 years old.

    2. Re:Left4dead 2 (beta) also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's ~3.5 years old.

      Hey! That's fresh out of the gate in Valve time!

        What's their release schedule for Half Life games again? Every eight years or so?

    3. Re:Left4dead 2 (beta) also by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Ironically, L4D was pretty much the game that got me running Windows on my main graphics PC :-P

  12. Steambox should ship with free games by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    Valve should consider Portal and Portal 2 along with a few other AAA titles to give away with SteamBox. That would give gamers an incentive for giving it a shot.

    1. Re:Steambox should ship with free games by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      What portion of the target market already has these games, have played through them repeatedly and knows every single hook and nook by heart?

    2. Re:Steambox should ship with free games by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

      Exactly why to provide these titles, and some... besides, existing Steam aren't the primary "target market" - console gamers are. Steam users will see the benefit without a prod of free games, but you need to hook console gamers.

      Not just the Portal games, of course, at least one or two other AAA titles, and maybe some smaller, indie titles.

      The purpose of the steambox is to GROW their market, not provide existing users another way to play Steam games.

    3. Re:Steambox should ship with free games by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      Console gamers are a fussy bunch. Giving them 6 year old games for free is unlikely to be much of an incentive, live and PSN already give them access to cheap or free games, they all look forward to their next Mario, Zelda, Halo, Gears of War, God of War, Uncharted etc. Unless Steam can entice them with something new that competes for their fanboi love I think Steambox will fail miserably at appealing to a new audience, it is going to have to rely on existing Steam fans.

  13. Re: So Jealous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And yet if the game looks the same and plays the same, then what were those functions even being used for in the first place?

    They were the delay loops Microsoft put in to ensure the Xbox ran faster on slower hardware.

    Less sarcastically, it's hard to not produce a feature-complete Direct3D now because most of the work is done with shaders. To emulate it, you have to take the DirectX shaders and convert them to OpenGL shaders, and everything should look the same. This is probably why Wine's implementation of new Direct3D versions seems to run more games than the older versions with lots of fixed-function APIs.

  14. Re:Valve is a single entity, not a plurality.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately nobody cares about your very own delusional personal definition of "correct". You can define "horses" to mean "banana" all you want, but If you want to communicate with the rest of the world, you have to communicate using words that your audience understands and understands to have the same meaning too.

    Alternatively, you can of course go back to your dark and cold basement and hug your computer.

  15. Re:Finally, 2007 is here! by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 2
    Don't you think as they keep porting they'll get back and faster at it? And use the experience for future games?

    I do not believe you are reading between the lines.

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
  16. Re:So Jealous! by duguk · · Score: 1

    It runs better under Linux, i.e. at a higher framerate. Sorry for not clarifying that.

  17. Re:Valve is a single entity, not a plurality.. by newcastlejon · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...there does not appear to be any error here. For once.

    The night is young.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  18. Re:So Jealous! by duguk · · Score: 2

    Thanks :) Going by the other replies, it seems like I already have...

  19. Excellent news :D by popoutman · · Score: 1

    Excellent news - more and more reasons to stay in Ubuntu and less and less reasons to boot to Win7. Hats off to the devs that have ported this. Does this mean that we can expect HL2 etc to follow shortly, given it's the same engine?

    --
    - This sig deliberately left blank. Nothing to see, move along.
    1. Re:Excellent news :D by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that we can expect HL2 etc to follow shortly, given it's the same engine?

      Yes.

    2. Re:Excellent news :D by diego.viola · · Score: 1

      HL2 is now out for Linux.

      http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTM2OTM

      Enjoy. :-)

  20. How has it not yet been posted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm making a note here: HUGE SUCCESS

  21. Re:What? by zakkudo · · Score: 1

    Portal being ported is a sign of bigger things to come and a general change in how Linux is viewed. Some people prefer to see the forest for the tree just so they can crap in everyone elses cornflakes. You just have to ignore them.

  22. Whiner by puddingebola · · Score: 1

    I'm going to be a crybaby and point out OpenGL won't play my Portal copy on Steam with my crappy Intel GMA 950 graphics in Ubuntu 12.04. Mod me down. Using the worst in computer hardware since 1997.

    1. Re:Whiner by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      My 7600GT is good enough for me (almost, it's maybe badly cooled) but not for Source games even though it has recent drivers, is the tech found in the PS3 and ran Left4Dead fast enough under Windows.

    2. Re:Whiner by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      It's actually a bad issue, you can buy games on Steam without any notice as whether you will be able to run them.
      My card supports OpenGL 2.1 and was made by the best OpenGL vendor so I thought it would do the job, until you try to run the game and it say bullshit about gl_pixelcolorbitmaps or some shit like that.

  23. Plays Well by jaminJay · · Score: 1

    Looks the same, plays the same, but a little lag when PackageKit ran. Interesting that GNOME Shell notifications appear over the game. Can't wait for Portal 2 to be released so I can finally try two-player (I only have one machine that has a Windows install capable of running it).

    --
    Leela: "Is all the work done by children?" Alien: "No, not the whipping."
  24. Re:So Jealous! by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    And his statement was ... WTF kind of computer do you have that can't run Portal at your monitor refresh rate? Faster than your monitor refresh rate is dumb for Portal. If you're getting faster than refresh rate it probably means its not doing vsync in which case, it doesn't look the same.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  25. I don't mean to be a cynical bastard but by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Great of Valve to release Steam for linux and to port their games - but bloody surprising all the Steam engine, Valve made games weren't ALL read at the actual time of launch of the product. I'm sure it's not a 5 minute task to port their engine - but once they did so, one would've thought the other products would be, somewhat trivial.

    Good work but not a flying start for what some speculate may be Valves long term future.

  26. Nice by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let me know when there's a DRM free version; preferably FOSS.

    1. Re:Nice by Rhacman · · Score: 1

      Let us all know when you finish coding it. You could call it: "Doorways: The Toaster Strudel is a Fallacy".

      --
      Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
  27. Re:Valve is a single entity, not a plurality.. by chilvence · · Score: 1

    Valve are considered a team of people, so they go in the same bracket as 'they have'. Also, English has no umbrella regulating body, it simply follows general consensus. Occasionally, people with OCD feel that they are doing the language a service by pointing out the real or imagined mistakes of others loudly and publicly while insulting the intelligence of their target with vulgar language. The rest of us who care notice anyway but do not feel the need to be a total prick about it. What you are going around doing is the literary equivalent of "AHAHAHA LOOK this fucking douchebag doesn't know how to tie shoelaces!". I hope you feel proud of your valiant effort to preserve the English language exactly as you found it. If you could just please re-introduce the u when you spell colour, and use ise instead of ize, that would be lovely.

  28. Re:So Jealous! by duguk · · Score: 1

    This was a few years ago now, and was an AMD Athlon 64, so I was getting less than my screen refresh rate under Windows XP. Not all of us run gaming hardware!

  29. Re:Finally, 2007 is here! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It's news because if Portal is here now then Portal 2 is probably just a hop, skip, and jump away (even though there is no Portal 2 news yet.) You act like a slashdot headline is a big thing. It isn't. It's just what nerds are talking about, maybe.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  30. You asked for it! by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Because in Soviet Russia, everything made in China!

  31. Played it last night by Kimomaru · · Score: 1

    Played Portal on Ubuntu last night - crashed on the tutorial and I needed to reboot. Maybe it was a one time thing. Left 4 Dead 2 was also released and it runs amazing. Just wish Guild Wars 2 would be released on GNU/Linux.

  32. Is Linux a game dev money sink? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    In an ideal world, code is 100% portable, and not a single line of code ever needs to be changed when porting. The reality of software development, however, and especially game development in my experience, is that software deadlines don't generally give the programmers the luxury of testing for every single platform. Producers expectations are nothing more than "make it work", and "make it work on time", without any regard for what might really be under the hood. Writing code that is portable and extensible is just not a luxury that some game programmers are given in the first place. And so when the time comes to even consider a port, the task is quite commonly either infeasible or else a whole lot of time is going to put sunk into it. Even on so-called "portable" platforms like Unity, because a codebase may not be actively developed on all of the platforms simultaneously, machine-dependencies can still creep in... and often in no small number, as programmers are simply compelled to just make do whatever they have to just to get it to work on the platform being tested.

    And this blind charging (because that's all a smaller game studios ever seems to have the time to do) turns the effort of porting something that is supposed to be platform independent into one long grievous headache that requires a huge amount of developer time.

    And so is it worth it for Linux, accounting for perhaps only 2% of the total desktop computing marketplace?

    1. Re:Is Linux a game dev money sink? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Okay.... but what do other game studios think?

  33. Re:So Jealous! by duguk · · Score: 1

    I have, and I still do. If you think I'm lying, try it yourself; anonymous coward.

  34. Re:Finally, 2007 is here! by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    Don't you think as they keep porting they'll get back and faster at it? And use the experience for future games?

    I do not believe you are reading between the lines.

    I do not believe you're old enough to remember LokiGames. We've been through this whole song and dance before.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  35. Re:Finally, 2007 is here! by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

    Didn't know about that, looked up the history there. I now see your point.

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory