Slashdot Mirror


Syria Falls Off the Internet Again

New submitter briancox2 writes with news that all internet traffic from Syria has disappeared. Umbrella Security Labs explains: "Routing on the Internet relies on the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). BGP distributes routing information and makes sure all routers on the Internet know how to get to a certain IP address. When an IP range becomes unreachable it will be withdrawn from BGP, this informs routers that the IP range is no longer reachable. For example, one of the name servers for the DNS zone .SY is ns1.tld.sy with IP address 82.137.200.85. Normally our routers would expect a BGP route for 82.137.192.0/18. Currently that route has disappeared and we no longer have a way to reach the nameservers for .SY that reside in Syria. ... Currently there are just three routes in the BGP routing tables for Syria, while normally it’s close to eighty. ... Effectively, the shutdown disconnects Syria from Internet communication with the rest of the world."

68 comments

  1. Obviously.... by 14erCleaner · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...they use Centurylink.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  2. oh, goody by swschrad · · Score: 2

    has the nation Syria also fallen into a black hole? please?

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re:oh, goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been that way since the 7th century, when it got conquered by the Arabs. Prior to that, it was just fine.

    2. Re:oh, goody by odigity · · Score: 0

      This attitude disturbs me. If I wanted to read retarded, barbaric "bomb them all into the stone-age" rhetoric, I'd go to Fox News. I expect better from Slashdot. There are millions of people in Syria. Some are children. Some are atheists. Some probably contribute to open source software and are active in Arab-spring-style activities.

      Are you really comfortably advocating that all those human beings should die? Why? Because the actions of the Syrian government that claims ownership over those human beings do things you disagree with? Because I feel the same way about all governments. That's no excuse for cheering on the death/genocide of that government's domestic victims.

    3. Re:oh, goody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If I wanted to read retarded, barbaric "bomb them all into the stone-age" rhetoric, I'd go to Fox News"

      What are you talking about? Who on FNC said this, or anything like it? When did this happen? Do you have copies of this video or transcripts? Because if you do not then you are lying.

      Why would you lie about such a thing is what I wonder. What news source is it that you rely on to provide actual reporting of news, how can you be sure that this source is not biased. Because the truth is that a statement such as you made 'bomb them all into the stone-age' is itself an indicator of bias worse than anything I have seen on FNC. Does this cognitive dissonance not impact you at all or are you just flat out brainwashed and stupid?

      Please understand, this is a real question; present citations of this war mongering from FNC or we will all understand that you are just a drone.

      Take your time.

    4. Re:oh, goody by operagost · · Score: 1

      Do you think you're any better with your DailyKos-style talking points? Are the Christians in Syria OK with you, or should Obama hit those with a drone?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  3. Oh Snap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh Snap the net is down!

  4. Crossover Cable by WillgasM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well someone plug it back in! Also, I'm pretty sure you have to use a crossover cable when connecting one Internet to another.

  5. Isreal by Synerg1y · · Score: 2, Funny

    Had absolutely nothing to do with it!

    1. Re:Isreal by sconeu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Isimaginary, on the other hand...

      Seriously, guys... LEARN TO SPELL. It's "Israel", not "Isreal".

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Isreal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he really meant that Israel had nothing to do with it.

      Israel on the other hand is responsible for cutting their Internet, and training birds to spy on arab countries.

    3. Re:Isreal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spell it Israhell.

  6. Umbrella Security Labs explains... by flayzernax · · Score: 2, Funny

    Glad to know Umbrella Corp is diversifying. When can I order my clone of Milla?

    1. Re:Umbrella Security Labs explains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to know Umbrella Corp is diversifying. When can I order my clone of Milla?

      Don't you mean you want your own copy of Project Alice??

    2. Re:Umbrella Security Labs explains... by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      Yes =P

  7. Re:Censorship != Damage by rogueippacket · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "non-TOR" internet does not route around damaged sections.

    Forgive me for a moment, but that's exactly what the Internet was designed to do. This is accomplished via routing protocols which store multiple routes to a single destination in the event of failure.
    Unless you're trying to imply that TOR is a superior "type" of Internet, in which case it should be pointed out that TOR is simply an application which runs on top of all of the fiber, copper, and wireless links built by current providers. So it really doesn't matter if someone either physically cuts the cord or starts filtering your routes, TOR will not function without the underlying layers of physical and network connectivity.

  8. Why Is There No Second World? by rmdingler · · Score: 2

    When a government attempts to squelch dissent, too often they wind up resorting to suppression of the freedom of speech and access to information. The internet, a luxury to many of us living large 1st-World lives, is the epitome of freedom in the Third World.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Why Is There No Second World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would be waging the 2cnd world war and against who?

      The rich use to own nations and lead "races". They got into it with each other starting the 1st world war, everyone else followed for ideological reasons or because they were being invaded.

      The 2cnd happened because of ideological reasons as the previous losers were recovering under the dictatorship of someone who had gained an absolute tyranny while reforming the German economy and rebuilding them. The impoverished people were more then happy to keep the engine going and crush everyone who didn't agree with them.

      The alightment of countries who are enemies is much more un-even now. The U.S. and China and Russia have basically the same agenda. African countries are playing catch up with the U.S. and China and are perfectly happy with whatever voice their given in the U.N.

      The muslim countries are divided up the middle with some perfectly happy to work in the international community since they have not earned some crazy embargo. The rest are all completely embargoed and not part of the club. This numbers pretty small... Iran leads these.

      Iraq is no longer party of this, were doing commerce by colonization Haliburton style. Their government is going to be reliant on western technology and methods to keep order ;p

      N.K.is an exception. Everyone wonders why China has not decided to just Anex them after politely asking the U.S. as a courtesy. Probably because they would "Loose face" and don't want to play the same imperialist game just as they are reforming their economy.

      So we have Turkey, Greece, Syria, Jordan, Somalia, Iran. They don't have the ability to wage a world war.

      Georgia, the "stans", khazicstan, afghanistan.. Are out of the picture, Pakistan is in a perpetual civil war and has India to contend with.

      The power is no longer divided 50/50 amongst the power elite.

    2. Re:Why Is There No Second World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S. I fail at reading comprehension (2cnd World) not world war...

      There are second worlds. Look at Puerto Rico. South Korea. Maybe some regions in China (people assume all of China is one big mess, it's too big for that).

    3. Re:Why Is There No Second World? by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      To address the question in your title- the 1st/2nd/3rd world thing is a throwback to the Cold War. Traditionally it was defined as 1st World = America, Western Europe, Australasia + Allies, 2nd World = USSR, China, other communist countries + Allies, 3rd World = everyone who isn't 1st or 2nd World, in practice most of Africa, South America and south Asia. The connotation of 3rd World being impoverished is based on the fact that 3rd World meant "not aligned to a super power".

      The whole terminology is largely meaningless now, but 3rd World remains a convenient shorthand for "less economically developed countries" (the official term).

  9. how do you remove a country from the internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously I don't understand networking all that well. How do you cut off a whole country from the internet?

    1. Re:how do you remove a country from the internet? by FireFury03 · · Score: 2

      Obviously I don't understand networking all that well. How do you cut off a whole country from the internet?

      By severing all the international links (either physically, or by withdrawing all the routes from BGP).

    2. Re:how do you remove a country from the internet? by budgenator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All it takes is a couple F16s with 500 pound bombs.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  10. How are they connected? by cpghost · · Score: 2

    It would be interesting to find out how Syria is physically connected to the Internet, and who the operators on both sides actually are.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  11. Skynet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Releasing the Skynet virus into Syria requires them to be disconnected from the rest of the world.

  12. Don't be so quick to assume! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This might not have had anything to do with Basar Al Assad (or whatever) and his fight with rebels. It could just be they tried to migrate Syria to Windows 8...

  13. This is great news by scarboni888 · · Score: 2

    If Syria can't make it back to technological civilization can we have their IPV4 address space,then?

    1. Re:This is great news by CrashandDie · · Score: 3, Funny

      What do you need those 4 addresses for, exactly?

    2. Re:This is great news by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      To send spam from, of course!

  14. It could be just a technical problem by Dorianny · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone assumes that this was done deliberately but Syria is in the middle of a civil war and technical problems could be just as likely. I imagine router replacement parts would be hard to come by at the very least.

  15. A serving of freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously Syria hates freedom, someone should feed them a helping heap of freedom!

  16. Re:Censorship != Damage by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    Censorship != Damage ........

    Now I do wonder, what the true issue is?

    Snarkieness aside something is wrong. I wonder what it is.

    In conflicts communication traffic analysis is commonly used to predict offensive or other major actions. Total communication blackouts will often hide troop movements (either side) or block information about movements so defensive or counter offensive actions can take place.

    The optimist in me wants to believe a backhoe dug up a cable.

    The pessimist in me wonders about a major escalation that could be internal or at a border. What if the rumor that Sadat moved his WMD to another country for what might now prove to be unsafe keeping.

    Time to watch the news.... or in the case of a large conflict watch the city wide smoke signals.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  17. Re: Not a civil war. by Dorianny · · Score: 1

    civil war - A war between citizens of the same country. Al-qaeda affiliated terrorists or not as long as the vast majority of rebels are Syrian citizens, which they are, than its a civil war

  18. Syria goes off the air by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 2

    And nothing of value was lost

  19. Must be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    those Dell "PCs" that they bought!!!

  20. Re:Censorship != Damage by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    THeres a limit to what it can do. Thats like saying "if my RAID6 array fails when 3 drives go down, then its not providing redundancy". Sure it is, you just exceeded its capacity to do so.

  21. Re:Censorship != Damage by rogueippacket · · Score: 4, Informative

    If Syria has dropped off the internet due to the inaccessibility of the .sy domain, then, the internet is not routing around the damage.

    I see where you are coming from, but I think you're still confusing the issue. The .sy domain is inaccessible as a result of Syria withdrawing its routes from the global BGP table. Since Routing Protocols like BGP operate at a lower layer than DNS and TOR, these services are unavailable as a result. So while TOR may be able to help if Syria were simply filtering DNS, this is not the case.
    It's like having your arm chopped off and wondering why you can't move your fingers.

    Get with the times and stop posting rubbish that is 20 years out of date.

    The Internet is still built on routing protocol which is almost 20 years old. This is the reality that we face. Whether you believe it to be rubbish or not is irrelevant - if a country can control which routes it advertises in this manner, a major redesign (or a new global routing protocol) would be required to work around it.

  22. Re:Censorship != Damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't just route around something like this, something has happened (or been done on purpose) to remove the Syrian IP blocks from the Internet. Tor runs on top of the existing infrastructure (IP, frame relay, whatever) and cannot function without it. Tor can do nothing to fix a problem like this.

  23. Re: Not a civil war. by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

    Then every other country US (and it's allies) indirectly invaded is in fact a civil war of that country.

    To quote a wikipedia article on the subject:
    "Due to significant involvement, both direct and indirect, of foreign nations and militant groups, the conflict is sometimes described as a proxy war.[442]"

    Civil war.. with dozens of countries involved and same number of dodgy groups linked to cia and al-qaida. Right. If it makes you feel better.

  24. Re:Censorship != Damage by coastwalker · · Score: 1

    Interestingly I saw a prediction of this in the comments section of the Guardian newspapers Syria coverage a couple of weeks ago. The comment noted that this would be in order to hide violent action by government troops.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  25. Re: Not a civil war. by coastwalker · · Score: 1

    Correction to a factual error. The Israelis bombed Syrian government installations - reputedly to destroy weapons en-route to Hezbollah in Lebanon.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  26. Re:Censorship != Damage by coastwalker · · Score: 1

    Here you go https://yallasouriya.wordpress.com/ - a well known "rebel" blog says:

      #yallasouriya 12:39 am on May 8, 2013 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment

    #Syria Internet dial up info
    Pass this to #Syria, a way to get back into internet

    Dial up access #Syria: +46850009990 +492317299993 +4953160941030 user:telecomix password:telecomix OR +33172890150 login:toto password:toto

    IT HAS STARTED – INTERNET CONNECTION IS BEGINNING TO GO OUT IN SYRIA!
    The local news media in #Homs, Syria said it would happen and it has begun. Warn your Syrian friends to be prepared for the worst, and pray for the best. God Bless Syria!Black heart (cards)

    via Anonymous News Network & Hope Merrett

    URGENT: Please share with media and humanitarian organisations

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  27. Boston PD Falls Off Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Boston Police Department is under surveillance by the FBI, CIA, Treasury and even DoD units.

    The Chief, when learning of the undercover investigation made a rash decision to pulled the plug on the Main District Office sending 5 blocks of Boston into darkness. This was necessary for the Chief to go to the basement and start dismantling the Meth Lab installed there and disposing of raw cocaine and other assorted drug culture items beloved by the 'Officers' of the BPD.

  28. Who benefits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America, Russia, and China all benefit from keeping their proxy war semi-secret.

  29. Decentralized? by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I am curious, would it be possible/feasible to create a more decentralized infrastructure eg. by using (many) wireless transmitters instead of just "one big cable"? I am also wondering the same thing for big cities ... why the heck doesn't my house have an inbuilt network (that is owned by the house owner, not some isp) and is directly connected to its neighbor buildings? I mean, seriously, if enough people do this then it should be possible to route most traffic through that internal network instead of having to rely on the ISP (and it also promotes people to offer their own content/services/whatever as they have a pretty awesome connection by default).

    1. Re:Decentralized? by welshie · · Score: 1

      Yes, entirely possible. Routing will be a challenge when dealing with millions of fiddly small route entries. At the moment, the Internet routes at a very high level using BGP. The ISPs then internally know how to route their own customer allocations. Even when the route advertisements are for large allocations the routeing tables get very large indeed. If you start announcing routes for a single /32 (IPv4) to multiple peers or a /64 (IPv6), the amount of memory needed on the routers becomes rather enormous. Your typical cheap home router wouldn't have the capability. They typically have barely enough memory for a state table let alone worry about dynamic routeing. Of course, there's nothing to stop you (with permission) hooking into your neighbour's wifi as a client, and privately peering traffic with their public IP addresses. I have yet to see any router hardware or firmware that allows for that sort of thing out of the box with minimal configuration. Persuading your neighbours "upstream" links to offer routes to your network via their connection if yours went down is another matter entirely.

    2. Re:Decentralized? by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

      Well, i am not sure about what memory sizes we are talking, but cmon, ram is cheap these days. And the point was rather to have one bigger router "in the basement" for the whole house instead of a shitty one for each flat. Regarding routing you could then group together whole cities or parts of cities which in turn interconnect on that level. Point is, it would be best if there would be 2-3(max) levels of nodes (local - area/city - city/province) and each node has at least 3 connections to other nodes of the same level. And obviously all connections belonging to the people (and interconnects belonging 50/50 to the people it interconnects). Oh well, my socialist side is taking over ;)

  30. Sharks by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    This is obviously the work of sharks trained by the US government.

  31. Re:Censorship != Damage by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Both sides in this conflict are evil, so I'd say nothing is lost if news about Syria can't be accessed from the internet.

  32. Re:Censorship != Damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    TOR would route around these issues with minimal effort. The internet as it is now known, is being controlled and censored. The internet as it was, is now TOR. Get with the times and stop posting rubbish that is 20 years out of date.

    So you are seriously claiming that TOR will work when the computer it is installed on has no IP address or no connection to the Internet at all???

    Really?

    Go install TOR on a laptop. Unplug it from the ethernet and turn off the wifi card.
    Just TRY to use TOR that way, and you will find out exactly how stupidly wrong you are.

  33. Can the rebels take over the infrastructure? by Cacadril · · Score: 1

    But would it be possible for the insurgents to take control of the physical network in the areas they control, negotiate and set up new connections to networks in the neighboring countries?

    I guess the telco(s) i Syria have more or less a star topology infrastructure with the hub in or near Damascus, and I guess the international connections use dedicated fibers from the hub to similar hubs in other countries, as well as satellite links and possibly some forms of terrestial point-to-point radio links.

    How hard would it be to reconnect equipment they get hold of, and reorganize the topology?
    If some of the dedicated fibers carrying international traffic, pass through rebel territory, can they connect to these links, eg. at the repeaters?

    --
    There is no substitute for common sense. Especially, no body of rules will do.
    1. Re:Can the rebels take over the infrastructure? by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't keep your hopes up for Syrian Freedom of speech no matter who wins. A lot of these rebels have strong islamist (dare I say Taliban-esque) views as well about freedom of speech. The rebels may not have any interest in restoring Internet either.

      --
      ...in bed
  34. Hell hath no fury by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    like The Onion scorned.

  35. rebels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    al-CIA-da rebels backed by israel have cut the cables, so Syrian people can't post about the incasion

  36. Re:Censorship != Damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Internet is routing around the damage, the damage in this case happens to be called "Syria."

  37. No connection by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    I am sure this is not connected to Israel's deniable nuclear weapons...

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  38. Re:Censorship != Damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's "pretty bloody obvious" is that you have no clue about how the Internet works.

  39. cable towed by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    There was a problem was cabling in the sea, is that it again???

  40. Re:Censorship != Damage by sjames · · Score: 1

    Theere's only so much routing around damage that can be done, particularly when authoritiesb don't want the damage routed around.. This is technology, not magic.

    OTOH, if some people around the borders put up radio links into less oppressive places, they can route around the damage to an extent.

  41. Misleading by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    From the article, one of Syria's tld nameservers is unreachable. That shoudln't affect in any way the ability of folks in Syria to access any website that doesn't have a .sy extension, and it also shouldn't affect the rest of the world's ability to access any websites in Syria that have another tld. The headline is misleading.

    This is akin to saying that I've fallen off the Internet if the DNS servers for my domain name are offline. While you can't get to my website, you can certainly get to other websites on the same server if they're using other DNS servers, and I can still continue to work normally because my ability to resolve my own hostnames is not a requirement for me to access the rest of the Internet.