Slashdot Mirror


Feds Drop CFAA Charges Against 'Hacker' Who Exploited Poker Machines

FuzzNugget writes "According to Wired, the two CFAA charges that were laid against the man who exploited a software bug on a video poker machine have been officially dismissed. Says Wired: '[U.S. District Judge Miranda] Du had asked prosecutors to defend their use of the federal anti-hacking law by Wednesday, in light of a recent 9th Circuit ruling that reigned in the scope of the CFAA. The dismissal leaves John Kane, 54, and Andre Nestor, 41, facing a single remaining charge of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.' Kane's lawyer agreed, stating, 'The case never should have been filed under the CFAA, it should have been just a straight wire fraud case. And I'm not sure its even a wire fraud. I guess we'll find out when we go to trial.'"

2 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Not sure about that... by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had a vending machine once display "WINNER" on the LCD, then it proceeded to give me my item and ALSO refund all the money I put into it!

    It was very, very rare as used that machine quite often and it only happened once. But it does show the people that program them might easily have put in things that favor the person using the machine...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  2. Re:Of course, it's only illegal if the house loses by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yeah, fuck that poor slob who owns the vending machine. He can afford it.

    So what was your limit? If the owner had forgotten to lock it would you have taken all the contents? How about if someone had accidentally left a crow bar nearby? Would you have pried open the machine? What's the line you won't cross?