Slashdot Mirror


Astronauts Fix Phantom Space Station Ammonia Leak

astroengine writes "During an unscheduled spacewalk on the space station's exterior on Saturday morning, NASA astronauts Tom Marshburn and Chris Cassidy carried out the mother of all plumbing jobs: They detached a suspect ammonia pump, replaced it with a spare and watched for any further ammonia leakage. The emergency spacewalk was carried out in response to a troubling ammonia coolant leak that was discovered on Thursday. The coolant is used to maintain the temperature of the vast solar arrays the space station uses to generate electricity for its systems. 'It will take some diagnostics, still, over the course of the next several days by the thermal systems specialists to fully determine that we have solved the problem of the ammonia leak," said NASA commentator Rob Navias during the live NASA TV spacewalk broadcast. 'But so far, so "good."'"

12 of 54 comments (clear)

  1. Chris Cassidy is a fucking hero by cachimaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Meet him once, he's awesome, very humble and funny in person. There is a documentary about him even before he became an astronaut. He certainly have the right stuff.

    1. Re:Chris Cassidy is a fucking hero by cachimaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      He is great but he doesn't make miracles ;)

    2. Re:Chris Cassidy is a fucking hero by demachina · · Score: 3, Funny

      There has been massive hero inflation in recent years. Heroes have been devalued to the point you need a train load of heroes to save a little old lady from an out of control semi.

      Not sure if the devaluation was due to 24/7 news networks, unscrupulous policians or social networks. Probably some of each.

      --
      @de_machina
    3. Re:Chris Cassidy is a fucking hero by baegucb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Two Bronze stars as a Navy SEAL might qualify him. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Cassidy

  2. Imagine a day by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine a day when a ship springing a leak would have been international news, commented upon by the wise and witty. Now imagine a day when such an event was too commonplace for even the crew to comment upon it around the watercooler.

    That day will come.

  3. Phantom? by sylvandb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We have a phantom space station now?

    Or was it a space station phantom leak?

    I wonder where/why Discovery came up with "phantom" ? Really poor editing, Discovery!

  4. Re:News for nerds by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, really? You read, two days ago, about how they fixed the ammonia leak this morning? You're a freakin' genius, you idiot.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  5. Wetware Controller advantages by ThePeices · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is why having humans onboard beats robotics. An event like this on an unmanned craft could be crippling. With humans onboard, it was quickly found and fixed.

    Though it is only a question of time before robotics will be dexterous and smart enough to go out and replace a broken module like what just happened. In the meantime, Humans +1 | Robots +0.

    1. Re:Wetware Controller advantages by pehrs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you remove the humans you can also remove the large, heavy and complex life support systems they need. The life support systems are a major consumer of power on the ISS, and a reason they have so many solar panels that can fail, as well as a constant source of small and large breakdowns in itself.

      In the end it is a matter of what you want to do with the spacecraft. Unmanned spacecraft are cheap and reliable. Manned craft are a little more flexible, but expensive and unreliable. Even with the ability to repair stuff humans have they are hampered by the lack of tools and spare parts in space, so it's very unlikely that manned spacecraft will ever be as reliable as the simple robotic probes.

    2. Re:Wetware Controller advantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is why having humans onboard beats robotics.

      On the other hand we've dumped robots on Mars, flung them around the Moon and shot them far out into the depths of the solar system for decades without having to worry about food, water, or suicide due to sheer boredom.

      The right tool for the right job and all that.

  6. Re:Phantom? by itsdapead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or was it a space station phantom leak?

    Pro-tip for astronauts: If the ISS computer suggests another spacewalk to put back the original part so they can wait to see if it fails... watch your back!.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  7. Re:Phantom? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Phantom implies that it's not been identified.

    In maintenance, we have problems all the time. I've referred to not-yet-identified or intermittent problems as "phantom" problems in the past. One such problem was finally identified just yesterday. The machine did some simply crazy shit from time to time, suggesting some kind of electrical supply problem. We've crawled all over that machine, testing boards and cards, probing all the electrical supplies, everything. Finally - the 460 volt transformer crapped out. I can't explain how or why the transformer was doing weird shit intermittently, but we're all sure that replacing that transformer will cure all the phantom problems we've been having.

    We should know for certain by the end of this coming week . . .

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br