Slashdot Mirror


No New S-300 Air-Defense System To Syria Says Russia — But Maybe Old Ones

An anonymous reader writes "Yesterday, Russia's Foreign Minister declared that Moscow would not sell any new surface-to-air missiles to Syria, although there is a catch. He said old contracts are being honored. Could old contracts just be code for an already signed, but undisclosed deal for the S-300? Lavarov certainly left the door open: '...when questioned in particular about the S-300, his reply was not clear if the "earlier contracts" were for the S-300 or something else.' With Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu going to the Black Sea town of Sochi early next week for talks with President Vladimir Putin, it seems they may have something to talk about."

3 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. Why is this on Slashdot? by couchslug · · Score: 3, Informative

    They make MILITARY news sites for this sort of thing.

    Hey, much love on my part for modern weapons tech, but on Slashdot this is clutter.

    Any techies who are interested know how to keep track of such events.

    Anyone interested also knows any missile systems sold to Syria can be countered by standoff weapons launched from outside Syrian airspace in most cases. Extended range JDAMs and Spice kits mean expensive anti-aircraft missiles would have to be used against small, relatively inexpensive, "smart bombs".

    Those can also be used to destroy Syrian aircraft in their shelters as well as SAM sites.

    http://defense-update.com/20130505_israeli-standoff-attack-capability-against-terrorists.html

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  2. Re:Not your problem by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Informative

    One wonders what could possibly go wrong regarding Syria.

    Turkey claims evidence of Syrian chemical weapons use
    UN accuses Syrian rebels of chemical weapons use
    An Al-Qaeda Alliance in Syria Demands Response From U.S.
    Al Qaeda's track record with chemical weapons

    Even if there are chemical weapons laying around, they would still need to get them somewhere where they could be used. They would probably need help for that. Is any available?

    US teen accused of seeking to join al Qaeda-linked Syrian group
    Danish jihadist killed while fighting for Muhajireen Brigade in Syria

    Iran recruiting volunteer troops for Syria
    Hezbollah Steps Up in Syria as Israel Tries to Ease Tension

    US Congressman: Hezbollah agents in US worse than al-Qaida
    Peter King warns: Hezbollah agents in U.S.

    Border porous for obvious reason
    Official: Book of suicide bombers found in Arizona desert

    . . .the book is published in Iran and contains biographies of Islamic suicide bombers and other Islamic militants who died while carrying out their attacks. . .

    Yes indeed, what could possibly go wrong?

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  3. Re:Are they aligned? by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 4, Informative

    Only the British ever really managed to contain it with their moto of: 'Don't fight or we will kill you'. Remove the "evil" dictator who is supressing the groups and you soon find yourself with out of control groups willing to spend the next 1000 years fighting each other of patches of sand.

    Think about why this is. Look at the Qur'an and hadiths. Mohammed had Muslims not under his direct control killed (burned them alive in the unauthorized mosque they built without his permission, he discovered it when they asked him to come and bless it). This set the example for all Muslims that sectarian warfare is not only ok, it is mandatory to fight against other apostates, which are other Muslims. That's why when people say if Islam ruled the world there would be peace. That is false, besides the violent jihad against non-Muslims, and the severe oppression of Muslims, there would also be endless sectarian warfare. This shows up in the bloody statistics of Muslims killed every day by Muslims of another sect and in the fighting of Sunni vs Shia in Syria:
    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

    Most of the West never knows or cares about the colossal amount of violence that wracks all of the Muslim World. It is the political ideology of *Islam* that is driving this constant violence. Islam is not a religion of peace as the ignorant or taqiyya-practicing liars tell you. Islam is an evil totalitarian ideology of oppression, exploitation and violence. It is against all the human rights we hold dear. Don't let the liars fool you. Oppose Islamicization of the West.