Slashdot Mirror


New Prenda Law Shell Corp Threatening to Tell Your Neighbors You Pirated Porn

It appears that Prenda Law, freshly defeated, has formed a new shell company named the "Anti-Piracy Law Group," and has resumed sending threatening letters to supposed porn pirates. But this time, they've expanded their threats (from a letter (PDF) sent to Fight Copyright Trolls): "The list of possible suspects includes you, members of your household, your neighbors (if you maintain an open wi-fi connection) and anyone who might have visited your house. In the coming days we will contact these individuals to investigate whether they have any knowledge of the acts described in my client’s prior letter" Naturally, the letter also notes that the recipient can avoid having the list of videos they supposedly copied sent to their neighbors and family if they settle for a few thousand bucks...

25 of 258 comments (clear)

  1. Haha, let them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. I am not ashamed to admit I watch porn.

    2. Watching porn is something I do with the windows open so my asshole shithead neighbor across the street's wife can watch.

    3. Yeah you asshole. Your wife likes to watch me stroke.

    4. I am not ashamed to admit I watch porn.

    -- Posted anonymously for obvious reasons.

    1. Re:Haha, let them. by MiKM · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Posted anonymously for obvious reasons.

      I thought you said you weren't ashamed to admit that you watched porn.

    2. Re:Haha, let them. by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not ashamed of my sexuality. I don't pirate porn, largely because the majority of it is fake and really poor quality (I'm not in the target audience), but let them tell my neighbours. They'll get hit with a defamation lawsuit pretty quickly.

      And my neighbours have been able to wrap their heads around the fact that I'm a tree-hugging dirt-worshipping lesbian hippie who goes to festivals where witchcraft is practiced from time to time, I think they won't have any problem understanding that I may look at porn occasionally too.

    3. Re:Haha, let them. by cdrudge · · Score: 5, Funny

      majority of it is fake

      Wait, what!?!? It's fake? Crap. I guess I probably should go back to pirating movies and TV shows since those are real then.

    4. Re:Haha, let them. by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah I usually don't share my fetish for tranny midget shieser porn until the second date.

    5. Re:Haha, let them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dont pirate porn because watching it more than once feels too much like a relationship.

    6. Re:Haha, let them. by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Funny

      "....lesbian...."

      "...not ashamed to rub one out to porn with the shades up..."

      Where do you live, again?

      We may have solved some of the porn-piracy problem right there.

      --
      -Styopa
    7. Re:Haha, let them. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't pirate porn, largely because the majority of it is fake

      You mean he wasn't a real plumber?

      Though that explains why he did such a poor job fixing things I suppose.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  2. Black mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is black mail, and illegal.

    =]

    1. Re:Black mail by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It really is blackmail. This is a threat with menances in order to get someone to comply with the sender, and it is not a reasonable way of enforcing the request. If they simply send out the letters, while questionable in other ways it is not blackmail. These threats however are genuine straight up blackmail. I'm not sure whether this is criminal or civil offence in the US, but in the UK you'd be in a lot of trouble for this.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Black mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but your porn is black male.

    3. Re:Black mail by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is in fact illegal in the US as well.

      Although "blackmail" is such an ugly word. I prefer "extortion" - the X makes it sound cool.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  3. They've shot themselves in the foot legally by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The list of possible suspects includes you, members of your household, your neighbors (if you maintain an open wi-fi connection) and anyone who might have visited your house

    So you just say it must have been a neighbour or visitor, ask them to add all the visitors to neighbours' houses, the post man, delivery men, etc. and let them get on with it. If they go to court quote their own words - it could have been any of these!

    1. Re:They've shot themselves in the foot legally by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We should just do away with copyright already. From now on, the only way to get paid for porno is by the cameraman who offers you 500 euro while he's giving you a ride to your friend's house. He'll have no way to recoup, other than taking money from investors who convinced him to release the footage on Bittorrent.

      Hot Legal Teens Fucking on a BMW. Brought to you by BMW.
       
      Product placement would be an easy way to fund free porn. And really, how much more Pavlovian can you get than to have someone masturbate while looking at your product?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  4. Wow ... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These guys might find themselves getting some pretty major smackdown from a court beyond what has already happened.

    This is straight up extortion, and at this rate, I wouldn't be surprised to see someone slap them with RICO charges or something.

    They don't have any evidence which can stand up in court, so they're resorting to smearing you in front of your family on the assertion that you must have violated a copyright they don't own.

    If ever lawyers needed some sanctions from the court, it's these guys. Epic douchebags.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  5. They Learned From SCO by some+old+guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure they are perfectly aware that their claims are groundless and probably illegal. They're also aware that their lifespan is shrinking rapidly.

    I think what they're doing is seeing how many poor schmucks they can scare into settling for a few quick bucks before the whole scheme implodes.

    Clearly, SCO's "Linux Licensing" was a model modus operandi for trolls everywhere.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
  6. Re:As long as they're honest about what kind. by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

    They can know I watch it, just as long as they aren't telling everyone I watch the wrong type.

    another brony?

  7. Re:Good luck with that by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just read the letter in the linked article. Reeks of troll. Typical Nigerian-type content: they refer to material stolen from their client, without naming either. Not who that client (presumably copyright holder) might be; nor what content was allegedly stolen. I'm seeing similar vaguely worded e-mails time and again - and most of them are Nigerian scams. They are also intentionally vague, trying to have the reader fill in the gaps (which people automatically do), and make the reader feel as if it's targeting them while it's really a standard letter sent to hundreds if not thousands of people.

    If I'd receive such a letter, I'd probably just toss it in the trash, like I do with similar e-mails. They'd at least have to identify the alleged stolen content, and with that, who their client would be.

    Or would it be possible to file a complaint with police, and have them initiate a criminal investigation? May be hard in practice for a single letter but if more people are targeted they may act on it.

  8. Next on... BLACKMAIL by EvilXenu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Monty Python beat these guys by several decades: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrRZVCg31fE

  9. Stick to accurate accusations by slim · · Score: 5, Informative

    From TFA:

    infamous scumbag Steve “Lightspeed” Jones, a pornographer who specializes in “barely legal” genre (i.e. he recruits and films very young girls)

    (emphasis theirs)

    Now, by all means call him a scumbag on the basis of his extortion and blackmail. By all means find actual ways in which the way he produces porn is scummy.

    But the "barely" in "barely legal" means they're above the age of consent, and hence not "very young". Indeed, since he's in the US, and they're (barely) legal, they must be 18 (2 years older than the age of consent in many countries), and capable of making their own decisions.

  10. They need the cash by goodmanj · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, cut the Prenda guys some slack. They really need to earn some spending money, what with their upcoming dismissal from the bar and possible RICO prosecution...

  11. RICO by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Straight from copyright troll to racketeering? Impressive!

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  12. Re:Skyclad? by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I watch porn. I enjoy adults performing a natural function. And I have no reason to pirate porn. LITERALLY a search engine away and you have streaming porn. I mean, You have to really enjoy a certain actor to go as far as pirating a video. And then, why not show that you enjoy their work by paying for it? And to those that don't think performing on screen while performing sex acts is work, I would disagree. While I personally have never done so, I can imagine it is quite uncomfortable at times. "Hey earl, Stop, stop, stop! You are doing it wrong, You see her face? She should be begging and you aren't performing like you should. Get out of the way, john, take earls place, he is terrible today." I know that would hurt on a professional and emotional level. >.>

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
  13. Re:Wow by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Secretly?

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  14. Re:When is the scum going in the slammer? by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right about now, I'm thinking. Up until now, everything they did was at least ostensibly legal, albeit unethical. This, however, is pretty much open and shut blackmail and extortion, both of which are federal crimes in the United States and nearly every other country in the world. In the U.S., a single letter like this is enough to qualify the sender for two separate federal charges with a maximum combined sentence of three years in federal prison, on top of various state and local charges that may also apply.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.