Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Cosmos Remake Coming To Fox In 2014

Posted by timothy on from the cool-swirly-spooky-music dept.

TheSync writes "The long-awaited remake of Carl Sagan's amazing Cosmos series, Cosmos: A Space-Time Odyssey, will be coming to Fox television next year. It will star astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson. Surprisingly, Seth MacFarlane of Family Guy fame is an executive producer. MacFarlane was introduced to Carl Sagan's widow Ann Druyan by deGrasse Tyson, and MacFarlane helped them pitch the show to Fox executives."

10 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. Let me guess by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the Fox version the Universe is 6000 years old and the Earth is at the center of the Universe.

    1. Re:Let me guess by T.E.D. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Think of it as a Neil deGrasse Tyson show done a bit in the style of Carl Sagan's Cosmos.

      The guy is so enthusiastic and charasmatic that he's a regular vistor on the late-night talk show circuit, and I believe currently holds the record for the most guest appearances on Colbert. He has 1.2 million followers on twitter. I think he's got what it takes to pull this off.

    2. Re:Let me guess by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The original show is far out of date. I watched a couple of episodes a few years ago. The visual effects were dated of course, but a lot of the science had gaps as well. When the original Cosmos was produced, the Hubble Space Telescope had not been launched. Exoplanets had not been discovered. The universe was known to be expanding but its rate of expansion was presumed to be decreasing, not increasing. The source of gamma-ray bursts had not been identified. We knew a lot less about black holes. I don't think dark matter was considered important. And, back then, Pluto was a planet. ;-) (Sorry, couldn't resist!)

      All that is just off the top of my head. Astrophysics has really advanced since 1980.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    3. Re:Let me guess by cyberchondriac · · Score: 5, Funny

      lol.. that would take Billions upon Billions of pixels!

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    4. Re:Let me guess by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's also been quite a lot of new physics and cosmology since 1980. We have Hubble. We have the CMB. We have all kinds of other interesting things...! Tyson is perfect for this. His enthusiasm is infectious (if you've listened to any of his audio books).

  2. Re:*sigh* by Kreigaffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From what I understand, if something is even tangentially related to astronomy, and it's possible to bring him in.. people will want to do that, because he's a likeable guy, he's smart and blunt but not demeaning or haughty, he's passionate but relatable, and he's smart AND cool.

    Honestly I'd much rather hear his opinion on non-science matters rather than celebrity opinions on anything that isn't acting or singing or sex tapes or whatever else got them famous.

    --
    ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
  3. We leave Saturn for the deeper regions of the by funwithBSD · · Score: 4, Funny

    cosmos and come upon Uranus...

    *giggity giggity goo*

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  4. As Carl once said... by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "If you wish to make a science show from scratch, you must first invent the universe."

  5. Re:Worst disaster since the Tunguska Incident by ArcadeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    With so many people spinning in their graves, you'd think free energy would be reality by now.

    --
    Get free satoshi (Bitcoin) and Dogecoins
  6. sorry by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Neil you killed Pluto. Fuck you.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.