Slashdot Mirror


Florida DOT Cuts Yellow Light Delay Ignoring Federal Guidelines, Citations Soar

New submitter zlives writes in with news that Florida's DOT changed some language in their yellow light timing regulations, leading to a decrease in the yellow delay. Especially at lights with red light cameras. "From the article: 'Red light cameras generated more than $100 million in revenue last year in approximately 70 Florida communities, with 52.5 percent of the revenue going to the state. The rest is divided by cities, counties, and the camera companies. In 2013, the cameras are on pace to generate $120 million.' I wonder what the camera company cut is?" At least one area has promised to undo the reduction now that they have been caught.

18 of 507 comments (clear)

  1. Citations? They need to be sued heavily by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has been proven to put the public at risk of property damage, of injury and of loss of life.

    The people who made this decision need to be removed from office at the very least and potentially criminally prosecuted for endangerment [of a child].

  2. Short yellow lights are a safety hazard by gstrickler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There must be sufficient time for a fully loaded semi-trailer to react to the change, and safely come to a stop, or proceed through the intersection, from at least 5mph under to 5mph over the posted speed limit, in wet road conditions, or it's not safe. These cities are risking your safety to raise more money from bogus fines.

    --
    make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    1. Re:Short yellow lights are a safety hazard by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think it's just Florida that's abusing traffic citations for profit. I visited Santa Cruz, CA on Sunday and parked by the beach. There were cars on either side of me, white space dividing lines and a meter right in front of the space where I parked. I got a $48 citation for "parking in a red zone". So I called them up and asked what this meant, it means "no parking at any time under any circumstances". That means the ticket was quite obviously wrong as no-parking zones don't have parking meters in them.

      I don't see any way this can be an honest mistake. You can't write out a ticket saying a car parked in a no parking zone whilst standing next to a meter with plenty of time left on it.The ticket itself, their contact line and their website all make the appeals process rather prominent so apparently they get a lot of appeals. Unfortunately you only get two weeks to appeal, I'm not staying in California, I'll be on vacation next week and then I return to my home in Europe. So I'll probably just pay the $48, there's no way it makes sense to appeal a parking ticket for a rental car from the other side of the world whilst on vacation.

      This whole incident leaves a bad taste, it appears to be open and unchecked corruption on the part of municipal governments. The kind of thing I expect in a banana republic, not America.

    2. Re:Short yellow lights are a safety hazard by D1G1T · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, do pay it. Otherwise the ticket will be charged to the rental agency, who will charge your credit card for the fine and probably a large processing fee as per your rental agreement. Your $50 fine can easily become $250.

    3. Re:Short yellow lights are a safety hazard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Stop insulting banana republics.

  3. Not only citations but accidents I'm sure by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Informative

    The #1 thing you can do to reduce collisions in an intersection is lengthen the yellow. Go ask AAA, they've got plenty of data on it.

    Shit like this, and this is not the first time it happens, proves that traffic cameras are 100% NOT about safety, they are about money.

    1. Re:Not only citations but accidents I'm sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Absolutely.

      And.. Fuck Florida.

      With a condom on. Because some of us care about safety.

    2. Re:Not only citations but accidents I'm sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The "Yellow phase" - is actually a fixed 3 second Amber period in the UK.

      What is key the the time from the green of one phase ending to the start of a green on the conflicting phase starting. This is known as the inter-green period. This is calculated based upon distance between the two conflict points.

      The leaving amber period is fixed (3 seconds) the Red-Amber period is fixed as 2 second - hence any intergreen period that need to be longer then 5 seconds - both signals are at red (all-red) period.

      Posting as anonymous, so I do not have to pass this through the press office. Yes I am a Traffic Engineer.

  4. Re:Citations? They need to be sued heavily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wont someone think of the kickbacks?

  5. Class action lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doing this *endangers* the public. Switching from yellow to red too quickly for drivers to safely stop will end up causing accidents, either from slamming on their brakes or paying more attention to the light instead of the road. The point of the traffic lights is to regulate traffic flow and keep the public safe. Adjusting the time so that fewer drivers can safely stop and need to have lightning reflexes and be staring at the light instead of the road will lead to more accidents.

    I smell a lawsuit brewing which will undo all the revenues. $120 million dollars? Well, now the lawyers for the next person to get run over at one of these modified lights can sue the government for on account of the timing adjustments to "increase revenue". And you just know some lawyers out there are going to advertise their services in these areas...

    The trick is to prevent people thinking of this as revenue. It's indication of a problem. You don't want that indicator to go up. Perhaps state or federal law should pressure local governments to make that indicator go down.

  6. San Diego by jtara · · Score: 5, Interesting

    San Diego (and several surrounding communities) recently discontinued it's red-light camera program, citing inflated fines to motorists with minimal payouts to the city, and and *increased* accident rate after installations of the cameras.

    We also had the short-yellow problem several years ago when they were first installed, which was quicky fixed after public outcry.

    Our new mayor is a jerk. But in this case, at least he is being a jerk to folks that deserve it.

  7. Re:Citations? They need to be sued heavily by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like any government agency, police departments don't exist with the main priority of protecting and serving. Their primarily purpose is to generate revenue.

  8. Re:Citations? They need to be sued heavily by bondsbw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This pisses me off so much. Research studies have shown that increasing amber delays is one of the best ways to reduce both fatal and non-fatal collisions at intersections.

    These municipalities think that more red light camera revenue = more money = great and glorious government. They forget two things:

    - Fines, cost of repairs, and insurance premiums eat away at their citizens' bank accounts. Less money = less spending = less sales taxes, and a lot of angry, pissed off citizens.

    - It's not a zero-sum game within the closed system of citizens and the government. The vendors get a lot of those fines.

    So the net result is a slower economy, tax revenue is not nearly as high as expected, and vendors line their pockets.

    (I recently worked for years in the highway safety sector, and one of my colleagues, a former cop, did a research paper on this subject. He started the research with a high opinion of red light cameras, but found that red light cameras had no significant effect on fatalities while significantly increasing non-fatal collisions.)

    --
    All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
  9. Government killing people for money. by romco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked as a traffic accident investigator for a few years. Part of my job was figuring out the timing of traffic lights and if they were the cause of an accident. Shortening yellow lights kills people, old people and big trucks dont stop very fast. This is the Florida government killing people for money.

    The really sad part is if they were really clever they would shorten the yellow 1/2 a second but keep the whole intersection red for a 1/2 a second. That way they could rip off Floridians without killing them.

    --
    AdFuel
  10. Re:Citations? They need to be sued heavily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where do you live, rural Alaska? In many urban areas, if you do that you will in fact get someone merging into that space about every 5 seconds.

  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. Re:Citations? They need to be sued heavily by anagama · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In my town, the walk/don't walk signs have a display that counts down the seconds left for the "walk" time. Then the red "don't walk" symbol pops up, and shortly after that the light turns yellow.

    It's extremely helpful -- if I'm half a block away and the sign says 12 seconds left, I know I'm going to get through the light on green. If I see 2 seconds left, I know it'll be red and there's no point in doing anything other than coasting.

    The signs we have look sort of like this (but without the glasses looking symbol on top): http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/ped_scdproj/webinar052809/las_vegas/images/image081.jpg

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  13. Re:Citations? They need to be sued heavily by toddestan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One thing that would be cheap and effective in my mind would be to take the yellow time multiplied by the speed limit, and paint a line on the road that distance away from the light. That would take some of the guesswork out of yellow lights. That is, if you are driving the speed limit and the light turns yellow - if you past the line you can proceed through the intersection, and if you are behind the line you need to stop. No having to make a quick judgment of your speed and your distance from the light and guessing of the length of the yellow. This would have a secondary benefit that once the line is in place, it would make it tougher for them to arbitrarily change the yellow light time because then they would have to send a crew out to repaint the line on the road.