Slashdot Mirror


Interviews: McAfee Says House Fire Was No Accident

According to reports a bush fire burned down John McAfee's home in Belize on Thursday. The local fire department was unable to to contain the blaze and the the two main buildings were completely destroyed. Property Manager Noel Codd (who was not there at the time) estimated the value of the buildings at $250,000 each. Despite the reported cause of the fire, McAfee says that the destruction of his compound was no accident. We caught up with him to talk about why he thinks the fire was set and what he plans to do now. Read below to see what he had to say. samzenpus: What have you been told about the fire and what do you think happened?

McAfee: Well, the investigators say that it was arson, in spite of the local police saying that it was a brush fire. People don't set brush fires in high winds, so this was the last of the properties. The government took everything away from me. I mean they've got so blatant that at the very end they were coming in, in broad daylight and carrying off, you know, millions of dollars worth of electronic gear and camera gear. And one time they took 300 stun guns that I was going to give to the police department, in broad daylight. But one property was not in my name, and that was the one at the river. And so, finally in one last desperate attempt to get at me, they just set fire to my two major buildings. It was at least a half a million dollars worth of buildings plus art work and invaluable items on the inside that all went up in smoke. But there it is.

samzenpus: Was anyone living there?

McAfee: Just a caretaker.

samzenpus: And he's okay?

McAfee: The caretaker was not there at the time.

samzenpus: This was your last property in Belize?

McAfee: That was my last property in Belize, went up in smoke. It's a very freeing sensation to have no burdensome taxes to pay or wages for upkeep and electricity and what have you. So they did me a favor.

samzenpus: Did anyone see anything suspicious or anyone hanging around?

McAfee: The police have actually arrested a couple of people. But if they're the ones who started the fire, they have nothing to do with it really. Just someone, you know, paid them $25 to "go and set that house on fire." The people responsible, I know who they are, and they're the same ones who've been responsible for taking all of my stuff since I was in Belize. And now there's nothing left for them to take. They must be pretty pissed off.

samzenpus: They haven't said anything to you directly or anything of course?

McAfee: No, of course not. And once I left the country, all attempts to do any formal charges simply disappeared because there was no way that they could do any formal charges. They had no evidence. They had nothing on me other than I refused to give a $2 million donation back in 2012. You know, so all they can do now is cause me a little bit of chaos and inconvenience, which I think they can cause me no more now.

13 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. McAfee is an attention whore loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stop feeding this loser's paranoia and fame, he is an irrelevant person, that hasn't mattered in decades.

    1. Re:McAfee is an attention whore loser by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Irrelevant?" I found his legal troubles far more interesting than any antivirus software. "Attention whore?" If you read news, even news for nerds, you will come across people who are trying to get attention. Actually, let me back up further. If you take part in the human world, you will encounter people who are seeking attention. This guy isn't particularly bad either. It seems that he actually has an interesting story beyond the usual attention whore "Oops, I had sex while a camera was pointed at me and now it's everywhere."

      ... That said, samzenpus and McAfee, don't get any ideas. Please do not release a sex tape involving John McAfee. Ever.

    2. Re:McAfee is an attention whore loser by Firethorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Forgive me, but psychoactive suppositories?

      Maybe it's my cynical nature, but I tend more towards 'Bath Salts? Really? You're a millionaire, get the good stuff!'

      The difference between a lawyer and a stocker is that the lawyer is expected to keep a handle on his coke habit.

      Meth, 'Incense', and 'Bath Salts' are for poor people. Rich people should be able to afford the real stuff with fewer side effects. :( (sad for the poor people, everybody should be able to get decent drugs if they're going to do it)

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  2. And Yet You STILL Refuse to Name Them? by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, of course not. And once I left the country, all attempts to do any formal charges simply disappeared because there was no way that they could do any formal charges. They had no evidence. They had nothing on me other than I refused to give a $2 million donation back in 2012. You know, so all they can do now is cause me a little bit of chaos and inconvenience, which I think they can cause me no more now.

    As I tried to ask during the first interview who are these people? What have you got to lose in naming them right now? Do they have power in the United States? What's holding you back?!

    They can cause you no more chaos or inconvenience and yet you refuse to name them -- WHY? This could only be further evidence in your accusations! Do I have to buy your book to find out or something?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:And Yet You STILL Refuse to Name Them? by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You don't name them because sometimes you have had enough trouble. He has no more interest in Belize; so he might be right they have done all the harm they can to him there and it should be over. Lets further speculate that they were not just interested in harming McAfee, they wanted to extort money from him like he says.

      What has happened. Well they have used what leverage they had to get what they were able to out of him. There interest was always money they got what they want, they'll now move on. It sucks for McAfee but if the system is as corrupt their as he claims than its a safe bet anything he could do get restitution would cost him more than he could hope to recover. He'd probably have to hire his own goon squad. So for him it may be best to leave it alone now. Let these guys move on to more accessible targets.

      On the other hand if he starts naming names and cause unwanted attention to be paid to these people now suddenly they might find motivation to shut him up. These are the type of people who commit extortion and arson, If I were him unless i had some way to get the upper hand in the situation I don't think I'd be especially inclined to find out if they are above murder. I'd want to disentangle myself from them.

      Know when to hold'em, know when to fold'em. Fighting is best left for conflicts you can win; and revenge tastes just as sweet cold.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  3. Oh dear by Xest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The day that Slashdot finally became a gossip mag has arrived.

    Tomorrow on Slashdot we interview Britney Spears about her new tits and on Wednesday we'll have an interview with Taylor Swift about how many times she feels she's been shafted by her boyfriends.

    Really, McAfee is the best celebrity you can get Slashdot? He's not even had anything to do with tech for what, 20 years?

    1. Re:Oh dear by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It seems /. has a particular relationship with mr MacAfee, that allows /. to get some kind of confessions directly from him, that you won't see anywhere else. Well, Torvald, Ballmer or Steve Jobs (from the Dead) would be better, but that's a start.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Oh dear by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      I think I'd rather start with the tits and shaft, that is certainly "stuff that matters".

      I'm not sure that former owners of anti-virus companies are really all that interesting, and this one seems to have a fuller life than most.

    3. Re:Oh dear by guttentag · · Score: 2

      The day that Slashdot finally became a gossip mag has arrived.

      I'd say it's becoming more like the techie version of the Howard Stern Show. McAfee is just one of the premier members of The Wack Pack, like High Pitch Erik. People are fascinated by train wrecks:

      • CrackAfee (John McAfee)
      • Crazy Lauren Guy (Lauren Weinstein)
        The name informs people up front to take Lauren's submissions with a grain of salt, and heads off all the uninformed incorrect gender-specific pronouns that inevitably get applied to him
      • Nick the Troll Prostitute (Nerval's Lobster)
        The name informs people up front that Nerval's Lobster is actually Nick Kolakowski, slashdot "editor" and self-described "literary gun for hire" who writes brief provocative opinion pieces (often about stories we've already discussed) and sells them to generate page views by pushing slashdotters' buttons (he's a paid troll)

      I'm just surprised they didn't go with "McAfee's Home Set A Belize" for the headline.

  4. Re:I don't get it... by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Jobs doesn't have anything to do with Apple any more, but that doesn't stop all these articles about Jobs in tech, financial, and political news. Still not sure why he changed his first name to H-1B. Star Wars Droid fan?

  5. Enough already by sjbe · · Score: 3, Informative

    McAfee says that the destruction of his compound was no accident.

    Remind me why we care about this guy? Just because his name is on some software that he is no longer involved with doesn't make it relevant. Every story I've had the misfortune of coming across regarding this guy leads me to believe he is a (possibly paranoid) publicity seeker who is telling a bunch of tall tales in order to get attention. Enough already.

  6. Re:Pronunciation by kaizendojo · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Mick-kaf-fee" or "Mack-uh-fee"? Never gotten a straight answer.

    It's pronounced "crazy as a fucking loon"; all the letters are silent. (BUT WHO SILENCED THEM?!?!?!?)

  7. Mod parent up. by bussdriver · · Score: 2

    Wish I had mod points... Escaping from being a target is one thing, waging war is quite another matter. Corrupt and even small organized crime eventually dabbles in drugs (readers do realize Belize is a drug haven??) and that market has a FAR reach not just with money but the employees in that industry are dangerous and some quite desperate. Bring attention to some mild players who may draw attention to some bigger "job creators" who don't want the attention and they can cheaply and easily afford to mark you for death. Hell, too much sunlight might bring up CIA connections causing even more troubles... it's McAfee... who will be thinking beyond just reasonable theories.

    He is right about the $25 to some nobody to burn down a house. Could be somebody who just thought he was a crazy prick paid somebody to do it. Hell, if he could get insurance or publicity, he could wire somebody down there to do it to himself with little chance of it tracking back to him.

    I don't find his story that crazy - clueless nerds living on the computer without much exposure to corruption, having hardly left the basement or cubical... Many people will sound a bit nuts when in a new unknown situation in a panic; it would be normal to be extra paranoid until adjusting to the reality. People who are odd or eccentric or a little crazy are often easily dismissed like a retard eyewitness. What they say could be completely correct and it is foolish to completely dismiss their word. I bet a lot of nerds on here would be hard pressed to win public support if they were accused of molesting children... the introverted nerd types who are not well known and popular are easy targets for people's imaginations... You don't even have to have any flaws to be mischaracterized.