Slashdot Mirror


Special Ops Takes Its Manhunts Into Space

Wired reports on a cluster of mini-satellites that will soon be launched into orbit that will assist U.S. special forces personnel during manhunts. "SOCOM is putting eight miniature communications satellites, each about the size of a water jug, on top of the Minotaur rocket that's getting ready to launch from Wallops Island, Virginia. They’ll sit more than 300 miles above the earth and provide a new way for the beacons to call back to their masters." When special forces are able to tag their target, the target can be tracked and located through the use of satellites and cell towers, but coverage is poor in many areas of the world. The satellites going up in September will help to fill in some gaps. "This array of configurable 'cubesats' is designed to stay aloft for three years or more. Yes, it will serve as further research project. But 'operators are going to use it,' Richardson promised an industry conference in Tampa last week."

32 comments

  1. Re:Laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Please Google: NASA secret space program

    How am I supposed to monetize and strip the privacy from "NASA secret space program?"

    Or, did you mean perform a web search for NASA secret space program?

  2. I spy with my satellite eye. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    We're getting closer to "Enemy of the State".

    1. Re:I spy with my satellite eye. by BlueStrat · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      We're getting closer to "Enemy of the State".

      "Closer"!?!?

      Not trying to admin somebody else's systems, but...maybe you should consider upgrading your news feed to RFC 1149 or something else a bit swifter. Seems your current one is experiencing...umm...latency-related....uh...shall we say, "issues".

      We (in the US) are already there. Just go read the recent news. IRS/TEA Party/medical records seizures, DoJ/reporters, etc etc. It's not "ooh, shiny!" Hollywood, but what in the real world ever is? The results (and the violation, terror, and suffering of innocents) are the same.

      "But never mind all that stuff, I heard a fresh rumor about the new i-$DEVICE!!!1!!one!!"

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    2. Re:I spy with my satellite eye. by charles2678 · · Score: 3, Informative

      We (in the US) are already there. Just go read the recent news. IRS/TEA Party/medical records seizures, DoJ/reporters, etc etc. It's not "ooh, shiny!" Hollywood, but what in the real world ever is? The results (and the violation, terror, and suffering of innocents) are the same.

      Not following the news (retractions) much? That same audit targeted liberal groups with equal opportunity -- it did focus on organizations with political-sounding names, but didn't pick bones about which side of the fence that organization was on.

    3. Re:I spy with my satellite eye. by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      This was moderated "Flamebait"? Really?

      Good job striking a blow for oppressive, intrusive government and against those uppity serfs thinking they have rights.

      This isn't about political parties. In case you haven't noticed, the government (regardless of which Party is in office) is spying on and violating the rights of *everyone*, including the present administration's "friends" in the mainstream press (AP).

      Reminds me of an abused wife that attacks the police who are trying to arrest the husband for beating her bloody.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    4. Re:I spy with my satellite eye. by cpm99352 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, accidentally hit redundant instead of insightful -- undoing moderation -- I wish there was some confirmation before hitting a negative moderation!

    5. Re:I spy with my satellite eye. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Not following the news (retractions) much? That same audit targeted liberal groups with equal opportunity -- it did focus on organizations with political-sounding names, but didn't pick bones about which side of the fence that organization was on.

      I'm sorry, but you are completely wrong.

       

      IRS approved liberal groups while Tea Party in limbo

      WASHINGTON -- In February 2010, the Champaign Tea Party in Illinois received approval of its tax-exempt status from the IRS in 90 days, no questions asked.

      That was the month before the Internal Revenue Service started singling out Tea Party groups for special treatment. There wouldn't be another Tea Party application approved for 27 months.

      In that time, the IRS approved perhaps dozens of applications from similar liberal and progressive groups, a USA TODAY review of IRS data shows.

      As applications from conservative groups sat in limbo, groups with liberal-sounding names had their applications approved in as little as nine months. With names including words like "Progress" or "Progressive," the liberal groups applied for the same tax status and were engaged in the same kinds of activities as the conservative groups. ...

      Lawmakers say IRS targeted dozens more conservative groups than initially believed

      The IRS targeting of conservative groups is far broader than first reported, with nearly 500 organizations singled out for additional scrutiny, according to two lawmakers briefed by the agency.

      IRS officials claimed on Friday that roughly 300 groups received additional scrutiny. Reps. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said Tuesday that the number has actually risen to 471. Further, they said it is "unclear" whether Tea Party and other conservative groups are being targeted to this day.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    6. Re:I spy with my satellite eye. by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but you are completely wrong.

      Well to be fair, he's only completely wrong on the *facts*. Other than that... :)

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  3. ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um thats MESSED UP. a man can't outrun a sattelite, thats simply not fair.

  4. "In your face from outer space" by Animats · · Score: 2

    "In your face from outer space" - Motto of the USAF Space Warfare Center, Falcon AFB.

    That's from 1996. SWC never really quite lived up to that motto, and their successor, the Space Innovation & Development Center, is more of an R&D operation. It's becoming closer to reality, though.

    We'll know it's real the first time some space-based weapon zaps an individual on the ground.

    1. Re:"In your face from outer space" by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      That would take some Real Genius.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:"In your face from outer space" by nanoflower · · Score: 1

      I guess you will be providing the popcorn?

    3. Re:"In your face from outer space" by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      "In your face from outer space" - Motto of the USAF Space Warfare Center, Falcon AFB.

      but can they perform dual use missions such as "Space Patrol" on wandering asteroids? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbYjzZIQwlw

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  5. last week? by ouachiski · · Score: 2

    Is it a time machine??? How can he promise a conference last week?

    --
    sorry for my comments, I'm drunk
    1. Re:last week? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Is it a time machine??? How can he promise a conference last week?

      Its cheaper, you just have to tell all the interested parties "sorry you missed it"

  6. Manhunt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when have we accepted this term into our everyday language? Where is the justice in a "hunt"? Hunting ends with a kill, not with a prosecution. Honestly I don't know why we tolerate such dehumanisation. All I have to say is fuck Soulskill for posting this and contributing to the decline.

    1. Re:Manhunt? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Since when have we accepted this term into our everyday language?

      Sorry, that was not PC. How about Personhunt?

      Where is the justice in a "hunt"? Hunting ends with a kill, not with a prosecution. Honestly I don't know why we tolerate such dehumanisation. All I have to say is fuck Soulskill for posting this and contributing to the decline.

      I think that "hunt" is entirely accurate in describing what special forces do, and in the case of Muslim terrorists entirely justified.

    2. Re:Manhunt? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      except we've killed innocent people in a ratio of over 100 to 1 over terrorists with our "War on Terror"

      The two major exports of the USA are death and destruction

    3. Re:Manhunt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to do something to get that trade deficit down.

    4. Re:Manhunt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck yeah

    5. Re:Manhunt? by Saethan · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see the scavenger hunts you've been on.

  7. Sequestration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a way to save money.
    It's a GPS for bad boys, so they can track all of them all the time and wait until they meet in some remote location where they need to use only 1 hellfire missile to kill several of them.

    They killed several people all the time, but usually it was their wives and kids and cousins and they had to pay a couple of hundred dollars of blood money per capita for those.

  8. Re:Hunting men in space by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Or plutonium nyborg.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  9. Been done already by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1
    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  10. Another military boondoggle by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

    Kim Dotcom is already visible from space.

    --
    Sig. Sig. Sputnik
  11. Not Enough for Continuous Coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At 300 miles high, eight satellites is not nearly enough for continuous world coverage, so this would only be able to provide semi-periodic updates. Good enough for research, and to supplement whatever they have now. I used http://www.ringbell.co.uk/info/hdist.htm to calculate the footprint at 3142 miles in diameter, and the Earth is about 24860 miles around (going through the poles), so the coverage circles would be spread apart, and of course moving continually.

  12. The space junk problem is about to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weaponization of space will only encourage the deployment of more anti-satellite missiles. How many more can we frag before there's an impenetrable wall of shrapnel that prevents us from using any satellites at all?