Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

European Commission Launches $12 Billion Chip Support Campaign

Posted by timothy on from the there-would-be-this-thing-called-comparative-advantage dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Neelie Kroes, European Commission vice president responsible for the digital economy, wants to use 5 billion euros of European Union tax payers' money, together with matching funds from the chip industry, to recreate European success in semiconductors similar to that of Airbus. Because of its strategic importance to wealth creation Kroes wants Europe to reverse its decline in chip manufacturing and move back up from 10 percent to 20 percent of global production."

2 of 111 comments (clear)

  1. I am willing to go along ... by pablo_max · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Assuming that what comes out of it is able to be used by ANY EU based (i.e. PAYING taxes here) firm. I think another stipulation to using any of the research money or outcome of said research should be that the firm which is also based on EU, must also produce the resulting products inside the EU. Not spending my money to gain a competitive advantage and then turn around and outsource all production to China or Brazil.
    Basically, if we are paying, we better get real benefits.

    1. Re:I am willing to go along ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not as simple as that.

      Improved infrastructure provides a moderate benefit to a great many individuals and businesses which can add up to a net profit for the country. This doesn't mean that it would have been a good investment for a private company to build the infrastructure, because it is not possible to capture all the value that the infrastructure creates. For example, a toll road operator doesn't get paid for the reduced pressure on surrounding roads, but the users of those roads still benefit.

      Similarly, this EU investment may make a net profit for the EU but that doesn't mean a corporation would make a profit doing the same thing.

      Or it may be a giant waste of money. But the fact it wouldn't work as a corporation tells us nothing either way.