Slashdot Mirror
PETA Wants To Sue Anonymous HuffPo Commenters
MarkWhittington writes, quoting himself: "PETA is incensed over an article in the Huffington Post that details that organization's unsettling practice of euthanizing animals in a Virginia facility that many have assumed is a no kill shelter. According to the New York Post, PETA wants to sue some of the people who have left comments on the article. The problem is that, following the practice of many on the Internet, many of the comments are under assumed names or are anonymous. PETA is attempting to discover the true identities of their critics so that it can sue them for defamation."
Now, PETA, sue me over my opinion.
Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
Yes, PETA - Recycle your pets.
Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
If we weren't supposed to eat animals, they wouldn't be made out of meat.
Unfortunately, my local recycling center only takes animals labeled PETA 2, 3, and 5 (your general small furries). PETA 1 (reptilian) and PETA 6 (aquatic) need to be hauled all the way to the next county, so nobody really bothers. And god forbid you have a wolf or black bear to dispose of - NOBODY takes PETA 7.
If they really want us to recycle, they'll make this damned system easier...
No, It's People Eating Tasty Animals!
-- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
Pets Euthanized and Touted as Adopted
I used to donate to the WWF, until I watched one of their TV shows where they were fighting over the money in some kind of big metal cage instead of using it to save pandas.