Slashdot Mirror
UN Debates Rules Surrounding Killer Robots
First time accepted submitter khb writes "It seems that the UN has started a debate on whether to place limits or bans on robots that can kill without manual supervision. It seems that bombs are viewed as 'kinder' than robots which might be programmed to achieve specific ends (e.g. destroy that bridge, kill anyone carrying a gun, etc.)."
So, tell me how a cruise missile that's autonomously guiding itself via GPS or TERCOM toward a target after being launched isn't already a "killer robot"?
It was commanded to launch, yes, but isn't a robot that's being commanded to head out on a mission where it could kill just being given a longer lifetime to act?
You can bring up the choices robots have to attack or not based on what target it sees, but how is this different from existing CAPTOR mines that can ignore one type of ship and go after another?
I think this Pandora's box has already been open for a long time.
One of the problems that I have long had with the idea of robot soldiers is that it makes war too easy. When you have huge emotional and financial costs to war your government will think twice about either getting involved or at least be pressured into "Bringing the boys home." but if you are sending robot planes with loads of robot warriors, why not have a war, or two, or five? A bunch of dead dehumanized "others' is not so bad especially seeing that it generates jobs at homes and pork spending for politicians.
War is rarely the correct solution. In fact it it usually a clear sign of a long series of failures or the sign of a madman.
Plus robotic warriors are, for the next short while, going to be the plaything of western countries. But how long before some tin-pot nut job flies the same machines into NYC or LA? Or even a homebrew nutjob? Again the key is that the consequences are potentially far less for the perpetrator. You can't usefully arrest the bot. You mightn't even end up with the slightest clue who sent it. Again the same problem. This tool makes waging whatever stupid war that pops into your head too easy.
Robots have the potential to turn this planet into Utopia or into Distopia. I suspect that some governments are philosophically predisposed toward Utopia and others Distopia in regards to using robots wisely. A simple question: If your country can, using robots, vastly decrease the cost of running prisons will your country increase its incarceration rate?
Obsolete robots should be programmed to pace suspected minefields until their mechanisms wear out.
2 birds, 1 stone.
Add live streaming and betting pools, and it might even be profitable.
1: If you refer to your audience as sheep you immediately lose all credibility.
2: If you are the only one that sees the light and you've taken it upon yourself to spread your message to the masses, double check your work because it's incredibly improbable that you're more aware of both current and historical events than everyone else around you.
3: The most likely case is that you're wrong and basing your stance on emotion, feelings, and the opinions of others rather than the actual evidence.
Step back and ask yourself, does your fear of the UN stem from logic or faith? The clear answer is to ban religion from UN consideration, to hell with who ever it offends. Christians should be silenced just as Muslims. As men and women we can talk, but lets keep religious faith out of all government at all levels.