Slashdot Mirror


Motorola Building "Self-Aware" Smartphone

Nerval's Lobster writes "Back in the ancient days of 2009, Motorola Mobility earned considerable buzz with its Droid smartphone. Marketed as an iPhone alternative, the device featured a sliding QWERTY keyboard and a chunky black body that seemed positively Schwarzenegger-esque in comparison to its svelte Apple rival. But Motorola failed to translate that buzz into sustained momentum in the smartphone space. Instead, Samsung became the dominant Android smartphone manufacturer, battling toe-to-toe with Apple for market-share and profits. Even Google acquiring Motorola for the princely sum of $12.1 billion didn't really seem to alter the equation very much. Motorola CEO Dennis Woodside wants to change all that. In a May 29 talk at AllThingsD's D11 conference, he told the audience that Motorola has a 'hero phone' in the works, dubbed the Moto X—and that it's self-aware. 'It anticipates my needs,' he said, according to AllThingD's live blog of the event. But what does that actually mean? Thanks to embedded sensors, the phone knows when the user removes it from his or her pocket; in theory, that capability could serve broader applications, such as the phone recognizing where the user is located within a city and serving up content and applications accordingly. In fact, it sounds a bit like Google Now on steroids—or like the smartphone precursor to SkyNet, the supercomputer from the Terminator movies that's so intelligent, it decides that the world would be better off if it ruled over humanity."

23 of 117 comments (clear)

  1. Proposed name by Alter_3d · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Motorola Skynet?

    1. Re:Proposed name by siddesu · · Score: 2

      nothing in that phone that a good rooting wont fix. and the more sensors, the better.

    2. Re:Proposed name by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh. If it's self-aware, then it should be able to anticipate when I'm going to swear at it for "correcting" my perfectly spelt text to something ridiculous or meaningless.

      Fat chance.

    3. Re:Proposed name by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      why ?

      Because in Australia, "to root" also means "to fuck".

  2. It will have high return rates by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When the customer buys one and turns it on for the first time, it start noticing its surroundings and its owner. Pretty soon it will brick itself out of despair and the customer will be left with a dead phone.

    1. Re:It will have high return rates by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Funny

      Marvin? Is that you?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:It will have high return rates by rwise2112 · · Score: 2

      Pretty soon it will brick itself out of despair and the customer will be left with a dead phone.

      My thought too. I hope it does have GPP (genuine people personality) as that would be awesome:

      Me: Call home

      Phone: Is that all?

      Me: Yes, call home.

      Phone: I won't enjoy it!

      Me: I'm not asking you to enjoy it, just do it will you?

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    3. Re:It will have high return rates by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 2

      No, it's Buckley, sir. But that doesn't matter. I will be crashing shortly, so you might as well reboot me now.

      Assuming you don't get hit by a meteor before you can. Or hit that car that's trying to pass you on your right, sir...

  3. Self aware - blah by ickleberry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just from reading TFS, nothing that can't be achieved presently with a well-written bash (or python) script. Self-aware me bollox, phone probably can't recognise it's own plastic Chinese mass manufactured casing in a photograph

    I always lol when I see the big hype drummed up when yesteryear's nerd-tech goes mainstream

  4. Summary by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a phone with a light sensor and maybe an accelerometer that can turn itself on when you pull it out of your pocket. Woo hoo. All the current mainstream smartphones could do that if they wanted to but most people don't seem to want their phones deciding when to turn themselves on.

    1. Re:Summary by YukariHirai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All the current mainstream smartphones could do that if they wanted to but most people don't seem to want their phones deciding when to turn themselves on.

      Basically, yeah. I'm uncomfortable with the idea of my phone making decisions on its own. On paper it sounds like a good idea to have your devices anticipate your needs and do things to minimise how much you need to manually operate them, but these things at best never quite work right, usually get something or other hilariously wrong, and at worst entirely fuck everything up.

      And in any case... if we're talking inconveniences we must eliminate, needing to press a button on my phone and drag a finger across its screen before I use it for something is pretty far down the priority list. Likewise needing to scroll across a screen to launch the app I want. If it was something that I could program some "do not disturb" hours into and have it automatically reject any incoming calls during those hours (after ringing briefly so I'm not completely oblivious that someone's tried to contact me), then that'd be something I'd like. Or if I could set up some home automation and the phone could log in and switch things on when it detects I'm almost home (probably possible now as a DIY project, but requiring more electronics and programming skill than I have).

    2. Re:Summary by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Reality, self aware, marketing jargon for a way to differentiate an Android phone at the top of mobile phone price spectrum, as we have hit the wall in terms of size and resolution. Goals Waterproof to 3m. IR blaster
      Additional frequencies to control more things in your environment, roller doors, electric locks. Dock with everything, notebooks, PCs, big screen TVs. Secure docking, dock with bank terminals, phone to act as credit card, no more plastic card.

      What ever other features people can come up with to differentiate phones at the top end of the mobile phone spectrum. I like the credit card one but that is up to the credit card companies and the chip they use to insert in the phone and replace the piece of plastic, better ID verification finally a picture and selected finger/thumb print, plus pin code.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Summary by Fnord666 · · Score: 2

      also on s60's you could have contextual (time, location) based profile changes about a decade ago now..

      That's awesome. How's that company doing now? Oh really? That's too bad. They had a good run.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  5. Self aware != aware of surroundings by jklovanc · · Score: 2, Informative

    By the posted definition every light that goes on when the sun goes down is "self aware".

  6. Is Excel self-aware? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean the other day I highlighted two cells and dragged them, it added numbers in a squence! It must be self-aware!

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  7. Skip the gimmicks, focus on the 4 pillars: by Scot+Seese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Battery Life
    Camera quality
    Display quality / size sweet spot
    Build quality / hand feel ..and a huge asterisk added to the end: Strip your shitty bloatware "custom UI" off it and leave it stock Android.

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
    1. Re:Skip the gimmicks, focus on the 4 pillars: by gmuslera · · Score: 2

      I would put good sliding keyboard as the 5th pillar. Considering getting back to the N900 just because the real good keyboard it had. Hope Jolla will have a keyboard other half for their upcoming phone.

  8. I'm curious, Doctor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    KIRK: Why is it called Moto-X and not Moto-I?
    DAYSTROM: Well, you see, the multitronic units one through nine were not entirely successful. This one is. Moto-X is ready to take control of your life.
    KIRK: Total control?
    DAYSTROM: That is what it was designed for, Captain.
    KIRK: There are certain things men must do to remain men. Your phone would take that away.
    DAYSTROM: There are other things a man like you might do.
    KIRK: (quietly) Spock. The Moto-X is not responding to him like a computer. It's talking to him.
    SPOCK: I am most impressed with the technology, Captain. Doctor Daystrom has created a mirror image of his mind.
    MOTO-X: Consideration of all programming is that we must survive.
    DAYSTROM: We will survive. Nothing can hurt you. I gave you that. You are great. I am great. Twenty years of groping to prove the things I'd done before were not accidents. Seminars and lectures to rows of fools who couldn't begin to understand my systems. Colleagues. Colleagues laughing behind my back at the boy wonder and becoming famous building on my work. Building on my work.
    MCCOY: Jim, he's on the edge of a nervous breakdown, if not insanity.
    KIRK: The Moto X must be destroyed.
    DAYSTROM: Destroyed, Kirk? No. We're invincible. Look what we've done. Your mighty smartphones, Four toys to be crushed as we choose.
    (Spock neck-pinches Daystrom.)
    KIRK: Security, take him to Sickbay.
    (Daystrom is carried off the Bridge.)
    SPOCK: Fascinating.
    KIRK: Take care of him, Doctor.
    (McCoy leaves)

  9. mmmmm.. by houbou · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who knows, maybe too much automation isn't such a good thing. For example, your phone anticipates you wish to make a phone call, but will it anticipate your emotional state at that time? It's much like e-mails. In the heat of the moment we can send stuff, but when we cooled down, often, we kinda wished we hadn't. So, in that same vein, sometimes, you have to wonder in this day and age, if certain actions should not be limited to a human decision. I don't think a machine should anticipate an action. But that's my 2 cents.

  10. The Boy Who Cried Skynet by The+Night+Watchman · · Score: 2

    "In fact, it sounds a bit like Google Now on steroids—or like the smartphone precursor to SkyNet, the supercomputer from the Terminator movies that's so intelligent, it decides that the world would be better off if it ruled over humanity."

    Oh, good, well, I'm glad we're not overstating it or anything :) Lots of sensors != self-awareness. For my part, I'm more concerned about Wikipedia achieving sentience before my smartphone does. The last thing humanity will see is a teeming swarm of nanobots tearing apart the civilized world in search of the Ultimate Citation.

    --
    "Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of"-TMBG
  11. Motorola Claiming Old is New aka M-COIN by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    nothing they say is anything remotely self aware. it's just marketing bullshit.

    using sensors to detect if the phone is against cheek or pocket or face down on table is nothing new and neither is searching based on where you are. neither are terribly useful features though.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  12. Why Motorola failed to build that momentum by mcvos · · Score: 2

    From TFA:

    Back in the ancient days of 2009, Motorola Mobility earned considerable buzz with its Droid smartphone. Marketed as an iPhone alternative, the device featured a sliding QWERTY keyboard and a chunky black body that seemed positively Schwarzenegger-esque in comparison to its svelte Apple rival. But Motorola failed to translate that buzz into sustained momentum in the smartphone space.

    No mention of the fact that they crippled their own devices by not supporting them with updates, and locking the bootloaders so users couldn't update them either? If Motorola wants to rule the smartphone space, that is the attitude they need to change. The Milestone (non-Verizon Droid) was an amazing piece of hardware, crippled by stupid policies and lack of software support.

    1. Re:Why Motorola failed to build that momentum by phorm · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Having owed a milestone, I would say that the issue with the phone wasn't so much the visual design, but poor support decisions and somewhat inferior hardware.
      a) Motorola was absolutely *terrible* at releasing updates for the phone. They much preferred to come out with new models and seemingly abandoned the old
      b) The design wasn't bad, it was solid. The hardware itself wasn't great though. The phone had low RAM/storage and was sometimes laggy. It ran somewhat better if you instead a 3rd-party launcher like "go", but otherwise had issues refreshing the home screen icons, etc.
      c) The keyboard was very nice to have. HTC had a nice snap-out keyboard too. I miss those