Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Oculus VR Co-founder Andrew Reisse Killed In Auto Collision

Posted by timothy on from the sad-news dept.

ccguy writes with this excerpt from a sad report on CNET: "Oculus Rift co-founder and lead engineer Andrew Reisse was hit in Santa Ana, where he was a resident, by a speeding car being pursued by police." Reisse was killed, says the report, when the car "slammed into two vehicles during the pursuit before hitting Reisse at Flower Street and MacArthur Boulevard."

6 of 302 comments (clear)

  1. FTA by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Police were pursuing a vehicle for an unnamed offense which ran several red lights before striking Reisse's vehicle at an intersection. The cynic in me says the offense wasn't extremely grievous if it has thus far gone unnamed: these testosterone-fueled police chases kill far too many innocents.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:FTA by dunkelfalke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let us be fair. Cars kill too many innocents. Cities should be for the people, not for cars!

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    2. Re:FTA by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Informative

      Police were pursuing a vehicle for an unnamed offense which ran several red lights before striking Reisse's vehicle at an intersection. The cynic in me says the offense wasn't extremely grievous if it has thus far gone unnamed: these testosterone-fueled police chases kill far too many innocents.

      the offence was fleeing after a firefight.. apparently the perps were on probation too(and had warrants on their heads).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:FTA by kurt555gs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cars don't kill people, people kill people.

      --
      * Carthago Delenda Est *
    4. Re:FTA by Jappus · · Score: 5, Informative

      If cars were banned people would just leave the cities. Might be a good thing after generations of living like rats.

      Actually, the opposite would happen.

      If you would ban cars, people would leave their suburbs in droves and return back into the city core.

      After all, that's how it was from the very first cities of Mesopotamia (~65k inhabitants for the city of Ur in 2000 BC!) over the cities and city-states of Ancient Egypt and Ancient Greece (~100k inhabitants in 1000-500BC), continuing with Ancient Rome and the first large cities in South America (up to 250k inhabitants) all the way to the metropolises of the industrial Revolution (London, Paris, Berlin; with millions of inhabitants) and finally the mega-cities of today; like Tokio, Shanghai, Singapore, Mexico and New York City with each near or exceeding tens of millions of inhabitants.

      As you notice; all the way up to the very recent histories, these cities grew from ~65k people to over 6 million people; all without the help of cars. The jump from then to now (when cars were available) only pushed that up by a factor of 2.

      Cars are actually the reason why cities grew slower than before, with the suburbs and "greater metropolitan" areas soaking up most of the excess population that'd otherwise live much closer to the city core where they could make use of public transportation much more easily. You would see nearby cities grow together, until the boundary between them vanishes; like the Ruhrpott [1] (which grew without the presence of cars) which is more like a huge city with multiple city cores.

      So tldr; : No cars would mean even bigger cities. Not in terms of density, but sheer diameter and area filled with people.

      [1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruhrpott

  2. Last words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It's so real, it's like it's coming right at me !"