Slashdot Mirror


Full Details Uncovered on Chinese Tianhe-2 Supercomputer

An anonymous reader writes "With help from a draft report (PDF) from Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Jack Dongarra, who also spearheads the process of verifying the top of the pack supercomputer, we get a detailed look at China's Tianhe-2 system. As noted previously, the system will be housed at the National Supercomputer Center in Guangzhou and has been aimed at providing an open platform for research and education and to provide a high performance computing service for southern China. From Jack's details: '... was sent results showing a run of HPL benchmark using 14,336 nodes, that run was made using 50 GB of the memory of each node and achieved 30.65 petaflops out of a theoretical peak of 49.19 petaflops, or an efficiency of 62.3% of theoretical peak performance taking a little over 5 hours to complete.The fastest result shown was using 90% of the machine. They are expecting to make improvements and increase the number of nodes used in the test.'"

7 of 56 comments (clear)

  1. The problem with a Chinese supercomputer by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Half an hour after you get the results, you have to run the simulation all over again.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  2. The interesting details. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Informative

    The machine uses a mixture of Xeons and Xeon Phi's communicating over PCIe, and the nodes seem to communicate over a home-grown chipset hanging off the PCIe bus. The efficiency number (65%) while not stellar is typical of such machines (i.e. about the same as Titan.

    It would seem therefore that the interconnect is competitive, or at least not restrictive. Given how close it is to Titan, I would not be surprised if the lack of efficiency comes from the relative pain of using fast co-processors which lack decent single threaded speed or memory.

    Anyway, it sll seems respectable enough, though I was hoping it would be a bit more interesting and use the Longsoon variant they've been trying to build a supercomputer out of.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
    1. Re:The interesting details. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Funny

      ) ... because I hate forgetting to close brackets and slashdot spoiled the joke by not allowing a single close bracket on the grounds of lameness.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  3. but... by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...can it run Crysis 3?

  4. Re:They're chicken. by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

    There are trade restrictions on the export of advanced lithography machine tools to China. It will always be two process generations behind until the Chinese develop their own lithography tech.

  5. Re:Is is made in China? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

    Im not trying to make this an us vs them thing. Its just absurd to claim that the US is declining into irrelevancy when a lot of the top tech in the world comes from the US...Intel, AMD, nVidia, Google, Microsoft, Apple-- these are all US companies.

    Again, this isnt intended to be a knock on anyone, but the reality is that China's home-grown processors are about 4 generations behind what Intel is doing and about 3 behind AMD. "They" seem to "need" US tech as evidenced by the fact that the Tianhe-2 is built entirely out of US parts and technology.

    South Korea is closer to displacing the US as a tech giant than China is, honestly.

  6. Re:How does this compare with current supercompute by Cassini2 · · Score: 2

    30.65 petaflops is about double the 17.6 petaflops of the current top performer on the TOP 500 list.

    Of course, the devil will be in the details. It is easy to deliver high peak scores in supercomputing, and more difficult to hit high average scores. Also, the current list is from November, and it is possible that the American supercomputers are newer / faster / better too.