Slashdot Mirror


XCOR COO Warns That Proposed State Department Rule Could Cripple Space Tourism

MarkWhittington writes "Andrew Nelson, the chief operating officer of XCOR Aerospace, a company that proposes to take paying customers on suborbital jaunts on its Lynx rocketplane, posted some good news/bad news concerning some proposed rule changes from the State Department on June 3, 2013. On the good news side, the Department of State has proposed changes (PDF) that would move satellites from the Department of Defense's Munitions list, where they have been since 1999, to the Department of Commerce's commerce control list. 'This is a great step for the industry. Since the time commercial satellites were placed on the munitions list in 1999, the commercial satellite industry was almost wiped out.' On the bad news side, the State Department proposes to place commercial manned spacecraft on the DOD munitions list, making it very difficult if not impossible to fly them outside the United States. 'This is the same backward path provided to the US satellite manufacturing and launch community two decades ago that almost decimated that industry.'"

3 of 105 comments (clear)

  1. So use Russian launchers... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Informative

    After all, it's Soyuz that keeps the ISS manned, and Proton that provides most of its supplies. No US components or technology (maybe some really ancient/proven stuff).

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  2. Re:It is obvious. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's because people are worried that US space technology will get to Iran or North Korea. Even though both those countries already have space programmes there is no reason to accelerate them.

    For the US classifying stuff as a munition is just a way to control its export, like they did with strong encryption for years.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. Re:No, it is very American by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1, Informative

    None of those groups were actually denied non-profit status

    Having your tax exempt status held up for years while they hassle you any way they can think of, asking for donor lists, copies of everything you publish, everyone who's ever worked for or with you, any other groups you associate with, etc... so that you can be discouraged from doing anything and your efforts can be delayed beyond election dates is a total abuse of power. Especially while similar, but left-wing groups are sailing through and other Obama-related groups are getting special treatment with approval times measured in a few days to get fast tracked to the head of the agency and approved for retroactive tax exempt status back years instead of fined for never applying, but claiming it.

    The bias and abuses of power are practically endless. Here's comprehensive coverage from the TaxProf.

    Look, when even Jon Stewart is making fun of the IRS and their "being audited", you know it's bad.

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.