Slashdot Mirror


Wi-Fi Signals Allow Gesture Recognition All Through the Home

vinces99 writes "Forget to turn off the lights before leaving the apartment? No problem. Just raise your hand, finger-swipe the air and your lights will power down. Want to change the song playing on your music system in the other room? Move your hand to the right and flip through the songs. University of Washington computer scientists have developed gesture-recognition technology that brings this a step closer to reality. They have shown it's possible to use Wi-Fi signals around us to detect specific movements without needing sensors on the human body or cameras. By using an adapted Wi-Fi router and a few wireless devices in the living room, users could control their electronics and household appliances from any room in the home with a simple gesture."

122 comments

  1. What about false positive gesture recognition by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The last think I want it the system to detect me fapping and turn the tv to CSPAN and turn all the lights on!

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
    1. Re:What about false positive gesture recognition by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Funny

      The last think I want it the system to detect me fapping and turn the tv to CSPAN and turn all the lights on!

      No, but you might want it to react that way when you're rushing to hide your boner from your mom, who just walked through the door.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:What about false positive gesture recognition by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What, a trebuchet? That can really hurt aiming down there.

    3. Re:What about false positive gesture recognition by bp+m_i_k_e · · Score: 2

      The first malware will turn on your webcam when such fapping is detected.

    4. Re:What about false positive gesture recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      CanHasDIY: "This isn't what it looks like!"
      CanHasDIYs mom: "I sure hope so because it looks like you are jerking off to CSPAN"

    5. Re:What about false positive gesture recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gesture for that is the Jedi mind trick wave. You saw nothing. I was never here.

    6. Re:What about false positive gesture recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of nerdgasms, I'm having one.
      Maybe in 20 years, kids will be going to gesture recognition classes where they perform karate kicks to learn how to control their houses as well as any services offered in the building they're in. Need an elevator? Judo-chop! A non-keyboard interface for those pesky ocular implants? Five-Palm-exploding-heart punch! These will be combined with voice recognition to reduce ambiguity and to function in locations that are deficient in wifi or that have too many users.

    7. Re:What about false positive gesture recognition by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 0

      You have won the internet with that comment. The game is now over.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    8. Re: What about false positive gesture recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha

    9. Re:What about false positive gesture recognition by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 4, Funny

      CanHasDIYs mom: "I sure hope so because it looks like you are jerking off to CSPAN"
      CanHasDIY: "No Mom. They call it journalism now."

    10. Re:What about false positive gesture recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be strong and remain master of your domain.

    11. Re:What about false positive gesture recognition by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      Man, there's nothing to say after that.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    12. Re: What about false positive gesture recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .....like Newt Gingrich who got bj's while watching CSpan...

  2. "Machine Learning" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They use "machine learning" to train the computer to recognize each gesture. You'll have to retrain the computer every time you change position of yourself or any object near you. It's a cute parlor trick, but nothing like what a real radar could do.

    1. Re:"Machine Learning" by Nimatek · · Score: 1

      That's not how machine learning works.

    2. Re:"Machine Learning" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They use "machine learning" to train the computer to recognize each gesture. You'll have to retrain the computer every time you change position of yourself or any object near you. It's a cute parlor trick, but nothing like what a real radar could do.

      Wow, seriously? UW has some of the top Machine Learning faculty now. If you really think the best they can do is diff a bunch of patterns, you are badly mistaken.

      Well, if your concept of learning lacks generalization, I suppose you won't really gain anything from me pointing out your error. You will just make the same mistake unless we teach you for every single example...

    3. Re:"Machine Learning" by Causemos · · Score: 1

      You have a very dim view on technology. Not so long ago voice recognition was near impossible without training.

  3. if any random movements can turn on/off electronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't the hitchhiker's guide have something like this? Once you got your environment the way you wanted it then you couldn't move or you ended up resetting everything?

  4. In other news: DOJ demands back doors by EvilSS · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't the DOJ just LOVE this if they could force manufacturers to give them remote access. With a warrant, of course (wink wink!) Is there nothing in a modern house that can't be re-purposed to spy on us anymore?

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    1. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wouldn't the DOJ just LOVE this if they could force manufacturers to give them remote access. With a warrant, of course (wink wink!) Is there nothing in a modern house that can't be re-purposed to spy on us anymore?

      Why would they have to force them? If history is anything to go by, your ISP will bake the function voluntarily into their dreadful CPE shit so that they can sell the data for advertising purposes, at which point the feds can just ask them for it...

    2. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Good point. I think I'm just going to go find a nice cozy cave to live in. Wait, that hasn't worked out so well for other people lately either. Damn.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    3. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by maharvey · · Score: 1

      No problem for the watchdogs. They'll figure out how to do this with cellular signals and keep and eye on the whole city. Though a cave might offer useful shielding... hmm...

    4. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you also be concerned about an Internet-enabled fridge?

    5. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by hawguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wouldn't the DOJ just LOVE this if they could force manufacturers to give them remote access. With a warrant, of course (wink wink!) Is there nothing in a modern house that can't be re-purposed to spy on us anymore?

      The DOJ doesn't need access to the lights and appliances in your home to keep track of you when the power company's smart meter will give them nearly the same information. With detailed power usage, they can easily tell when you're at home, when you go to bed, when you wash your clothes, etc.

    6. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is notoriously difficult to find Batman when he's hiding in a cave..

    7. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      That was Linksys, not the ISPs.

      Assign blame where its due.

    8. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by anubi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ummm... the government already has this technology. It does not need your WiFi. Any radio or TV station does fine as a signal source to illuminate the area with an RF field.

      I am sure you have noticed if you have ever used a rabbit ear TV antenna that your TV became quite sensitive to where people were in the room. Even changing your position on the bed was quite noticeable if you were trying to receive a weak signal.

      By using multiple antennas, triangulation, and signal processing to correlate the signal each antenna received, it is quite do-able to triangulate onto anything moving in the RF field, and determine each moving things position, velocity, direction, and acceleration.

      This is quite useful for "seeing" what's on the other side of opaque walls. Light does not make it through the wall, but RF does.

      Its a fascinating thing to see these things work. I have a hankering to build a 3D version of one being 3D glasses are becoming available that do not require me to lug around a huge display screen.

      Rudimentary ones can be built with little more than the business end of the 10.525 GHz microwave source commonly used for supermarket door sensors.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    9. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by Antipater · · Score: 1

      Screw caves, just wear a tinfoil hat!

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    10. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Sounds like we will be putting tinfoil hats on our routers in future. There's a Soviet Russia joke in there somewhere.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any radio ...

      The wavelength for radio is kind of large, and while you standing right next to an antenna can have some near field effects, it would be quite difficult to resolve what someone is doing more than a couple wavelengths away.

      ...or TV station

      At least UHF has a more reasonable wavelength, but it would still seem impressive to tell what is going on from outside a house, instead of just that something changed in a particular room. The work discussed in the article here would at least be using shorter wavelengths, with much shorter distances to transmitters and receivers.

      I have a hankering to build a 3D version of one being 3D glasses are becoming available that do not require me to lug around a huge display screen.

      Maybe before worrying about a flashy front end, make (or link to...) some thing demonstrating just how doable it is for a random hacker... as making a prettier output should be the easy part, not what is holding up such a project.

    12. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking of the plot point in The Dark Knight wherein Lucius Fox gives Wayne the ability to effectively become omnicient via cell phones and etc.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    13. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

      oh not this bullshit again

      Hey I have a hot conspiracy idiocy for you. Barcodes are the mark of the devil! As soon as they get out of the research labs in a few years they will send all of us straight to hell sonny boy.

    14. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what part of grandparent's post do you think is a conspiracy theory. I work (DBA/developer) for the local power company (not in the USA). About a year ago, the country government demanded all our detailed cross-referenced info on our clients energy usage and geographical location, and we gave it to them (not like we had many options, democracy around here is still rather feeble and our current government is rather aggresive sometimes).

      Now, we still have older meters that only give you a single number every time you read them (in person, not remotely), but we have already started limited trials of new smart meters that give us more detailed usage info, as well as allow for remote reading. It will be still at least a decade before these new meters are deployed state-wide, but what do you think will happen then? The government will ask for that info as well, and we will give it to them.

      If the info is out there, and there aren't proper laws in place preventing them from doing it, the government will have access to it.

    15. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is a funny tag when you need it?

    16. Re: In other news: DOJ demands back doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you dont think governments will abuse technology then you havent been paying attention to history or recent events. Its not conspiracy theories when one is concerned about being rounded up by police because you are tracked online as having shared unapproved opinions. It's normal news today. Now drones are leading to sanctioned and unlimited government power to murder foreigners and soon citizens without trials.

      And with this now, they would be able to monitor the exact positions of people in a home by monitoring the wifi signals in my router? How would this not make it too easy for someone (police or criminal or both) to know exactly where to place a high caliber round for assassinations with impunity through walls from arbitrarily far away? Its bad enough they know your position in public with impunity, lets please not bring this indoors, candy coated as some consumer electronics bullsh*t to control your TV channel.

      Its not a conspiracy theory if they are indeed out to control and subjugate you. Its not paranoia if they really are watching you.

    17. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been quite well-established in the literature that smart meter data can be used for this purpose. Research has also shown that smart meters in the US aren't the most privacy-preserving ones around. In either case: whether "they" can obtain this data, to which granularity, from whom and with what evidence is of course an entirely different matter.

    18. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      The wavelength for radio is kind of large, and while you standing right next to an antenna can have some near field effects, it would be quite difficult to resolve what someone is doing more than a couple wavelengths away.

      Also- wouldn't the spook on the observing end need to know something about the placement of the antennas/rf-generating gizmos to make any sense of the spatial temperament of room he's spying on?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    19. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, access point scans YOU!

    20. Re:In other news: DOJ demands back doors by anubi · · Score: 1

      Both of you are quite right, as far as the lower frequencies being hard to resolve and knowing where the RF gizmos are.

      I would have a hard time resolving anything in the AM band, but having high powered TV or WIFI routers around illuminates the area with known stable frequencies of wavelengths I can more easily resolve the phase differences as the multipath environment changes.

      My intended application is a device to track whatever moves outside or inside my house, and make an intelligent decision whether such movement poses a threat. I do not want my system getting all excited over an unannounced trip to the bathroom, but I do want it to let me know if something is meandering about a window, or especially if it goes through a window. At that point, I want my tracker to tell me where this thing is.

      It would probably be better to use optical technologies ( motion detector cameras ) for this, but for me, this is kinda a toy curiousity.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  5. The 1920s called... by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

    ...Leon wants his Theremin back.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    1. Re:The 1920s called... by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

      No, no, these intrepid scientists have discovered a method of radio-frequency detection and ranging. They must rush to the patent office immediately to protect the intellectual property of R-FDAR.

  6. I can't wait by intermodal · · Score: 1

    Think of all the gestures that could trigger Marvin Gaye songs and soft lighting.

    But more disconcerting ins the fact that even if rolled out with the best of intentions, this will inevitably lead to parents, flatmates, and siblings using it to spy on each other in some way.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:I can't wait by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Given that wifi punches through walls reasonably adequately, for most values of 'wall', you wouldn't really have to share a residence with somebody, it would likely work on at least the adjacent houses or apartments if sited correctly.

      A vehicle could presumably also scan a building for movement from outside. Possibly even get decent location accuracy with some directional antenna tricks...

    2. Re:I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would be surprised if surveillance vans didn't already have some kind of more precise device that doesn't interfere with a usable spectrum to detect movement. Heartbeat sensor anyone?

    3. Re:I can't wait by maharvey · · Score: 1

      Just wait till Google upgrades their van and offers X-ray Street View! The pr0n industry won't like it when you can just get a free live Google feed from your hot neighbors' house. Though sadly, none of my neighbors are hot.

    4. Re:I can't wait by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      The Supreme Court already ruled government needed warrants to use IR detectors on houses. One presumes the inevitable case would result in the same thing.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:I can't wait by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      This is real life, not Call of Duty.

      How are you supposing a heartbeat sensor would work?

    6. Re:I can't wait by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      How are you supposing a heartbeat sensor would work?

      Microsoft says the Xbox One can monitor your heartbeat using just the camera.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    7. Re:I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like it difficult to see naked people on the internet for free.

      and the p0rn industry soldiers on.

    8. Re:I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even cheap webcams can pick up color changes from blood flow. Although in a lot of situations, if you already have a person visible on camera, you no longer have need for a heartbeat sensor, and that trick doesn't work through opaque walls...

    9. Re:I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't presume. At one time the SCOTUS rule separate but equal was unconstitutional, then reversed the decision.

    10. Re:I can't wait by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      How do they even make money anymore? Advertising?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    11. Re:I can't wait by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      Like this?
      www.designnews.com/document.asp?doc_id=223320&dfpPParams=aid_223320&dfpLayout=article

  7. that is cool! by houbou · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine? who needs a remote control? now, if only you could have a few WI-FI control robots to answer the door and throw away the garbage.. :)

  8. Gift for noisy neigbours. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh Hi! I noticed that you like play industrial metal goth core all night long. I support your habit, and will give you this fancy Wi-Fi router that connects to you amp and allows remote control from everywhere!

    Now I can turn the your music up from my apartment, so I can hear it better ya know.

  9. Triggered by gestures anywhere in the home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this way, a smart home could become a reality, allowing you to turn off the oven timer with a simple wave of the hand, or turn on the coffeemaker from your bed.

    I don't understand it; whenever the mailman shows up to give mom a special delivery in her room, the coffeemaker suddenly starts turning on---off---on--off--on-off-on-off-on-off---on-----off.

  10. Why not an app? by hawguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Few people have an app or web page to control their home appliances, but we're supposed to believe that we want gesture control?

    Home automation is nothing new and there are certainly people that *can* control their home lighting and appliances remotely, but few even bother because it's not that useful in practice.

    If I forget to turn off the lights when I leave the house, I'm probably not going to remember that the lights are on when I'm at the office and turn them off from there. I'd be better off with a smarter house that turns on the appropriate level of lighting when I walk in a room and turn off all the lights and appliances for me when I leave.

    Gesture based music control would probably be more handy than remote lighting control.

    1. Re:Why not an app? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but remote lightning control of say guests that stayed too long etc would be a nice thing or?

    2. Re:Why not an app? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2

      Some more interesting things:

      Turn off/down AC/Heat till calculated time it takes to reach desired temp before you arrive back home. Apps can help tie in gps tracking and calendar info for starters.

      Same thing for blinds and other window treatments.

      Start the kettle (coffee maker for those thus inclined) so that it ready at desired time.

      Overall we need more standard API's on devices and less attempts to make smart ones. Would rather upgrade software/hardware on a single controlling device than all my appliances.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    3. Re:Why not an app? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Remote appliance control is moderately popular in Japan, where major manufacturers like Panasonc, Toshiba and Sharp have been putting it in their products for a few years now. Actually way back in 2004 I remember seeing a Toto bath that could be commanded to fill remotely so it would be ready when you got home from work, and these days it is becoming a more common feature on air conditioning units.

      If I forget to turn off the lights when I leave the house, I'm probably not going to remember that the lights are on when I'm at the office and turn them off from there.

      Current systems usually give you a dashboard app that gives you can overview of all your devices, so if you checked it now and then you would notice your mistake. The Android versions sometimes support widgets so you can see right from your home screens.

      In the future I'd expect something like Google Now that just figures out when you probably want the lights off based on your habits and reminds you if you forget, or just does it automatically.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  11. The Force? by Jhon · · Score: 4, Funny

    So... maybe "The Force" or "magic" is just an accumulation of old wifi products?

    1. Re:The Force? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      So... maybe "The Force" or "magic" is just an accumulation of old wifi products?

      The Greys posing as Moses? the sneaky bug-eyed devils.

      "Behooollld, the sea parteth!" (Swooooosh!)

    2. Re:The Force? by neminem · · Score: 1

      Orson Scott Card actually wrote a series like that, where everyone believed in magic, but it was actually a mind-reading computer in a satellite, that the civilization had long since forgotten about. Was a neat idea, even if the later books got increasingly, annoyingly mystical and lost sight of the "this is supposed to actually be sci-fi" (a problem later books in Card series often fight with...)

    3. Re:The Force? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      Orson Scott Card actually wrote a series like that, where everyone believed in magic, but it was actually a mind-reading computer in a satellite, that the civilization had long since forgotten about. Was a neat idea, even if the later books got increasingly, annoyingly mystical and lost sight of the "this is supposed to actually be sci-fi" (a problem later books in Card series often fight with...)

      I was given a Magic Wand remote control for Xmas. It's a standard IR learning remote in the shape of the stereotypical wizard's implement with accelerometers that allow it to distinguish about 11 different types of gestures.

      One of the nice things about Linux is that it's quite easy to wire just about any function you want into an IR sensor daemon. Or if you prefer, a Wii Remote, which does essentially the same thing, only via Bluetooth.

      Then again, jack in a Kinect and you can use a #2 pencil for the same tricks.

    4. Re:The Force? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      spoiler alert There's also a pretty decent Anime with that as the theme called Scrapped Princess. /spoiler When I saw the reveal I applauded.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:The Force? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was increasingly mystical because the Homecoming series was a retelling of the Book of Mormon.

    6. Re:The Force? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. There's something... by YeTr2 · · Score: 1

    There's something in the Wi-Fi. This whole world is swimming in Wi-Fi. We're living in a Wi-Fi soup. Suppose something got inside it... suppose there was something living in the Wi-Fi harvesting human minds! Imagine that.

    1. Re:There's something... by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

      Pass the bong.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:There's something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's something in the Wi-Fi. This whole world is swimming in Wi-Fi. We're living in a Wi-Fi soup.
      Suppose something got inside it... suppose there was something living in the Wi-Fi harvesting human minds!
      Imagine that.

      > Allwhoseethis(ignore_lastpost:thispost)
      > Targetmind(YeTr2)
      > Execute(yum_yum_yum)
      > Incinerate(Body,SpontaneousCombustion)
      > DeleteAllWebEvidence(YeTr2)

      >profit!

    3. Re:There's something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice quote :-)

    4. Re:There's something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail at Dr. Who references. Turn in your geek card at the door on your way out.

  13. re: hand gesturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This feature will not be made available in Italy.

  14. Re:if any random movements can turn on/off electro by canadiannomad · · Score: 1

    I think the motion was going to change the radio station...

    --
    Hmm, the humour and sarcasm seem to have been be lost on you.
  15. Douglas Adams, always before his time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A loud clatter of gunk music flooded through the Heart of Gold cabin as Zaphod searched the sub-etha radio wave bands for news of himself. The machine was rather difficult to operate. For years radios had been operated by means of pressing buttons and turning dials; then as the technology became more sophisticated the controls were made touch-sensitive--you merely had to brush the panels with your fingers; now all you had to do was wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope. It saved a lot of muscular expenditure, of course, but meant that you had to sit infuriatingly still if you wanted to keep listening to the same program.

    Zaphod waved a hand and the channel switched again.

    1. Re:Douglas Adams, always before his time by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Douglas Adams, always before his time

      Sadly true, in the end. He nailed with that bit you've quoted though. Practically prior art for Kinect.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  16. Where's the ethics of people who write this stuff? by Picass0 · · Score: 2

    "I've written new software that can use the wifi signals bouncing around in your home to help you change channels on your TV, or possibly give surreptitious surveillance to any law enorcement agency that can get a bullshit warrant from a rubber stamp judge. We promise it will only be used to help you change the TV channel."

    Do programmers even filter this stuff through their conscience any more?

    .

  17. Roke Manor by A+non+moose+cow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Branching from an idea from over a decade ago. http://tech.mit.edu/V121/N63/Stealth.63f.html

    1. Re:Roke Manor by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing but couldn't remember any of the specifics. I'm glad you had the link handy. This note is in lieu of mod points, since I don't have any right now.

  18. Invitation to Upgrade by abirdman · · Score: 1

    This is not unlike 3D video, a sort-of-possibly-good feature that requires upgrades to a large subset of your electronics. I have some old but serviceable stereo components, and my TV is 5 years old, which is old in the TV industry as it is-- heck, the remote control on the TV doesn't even work, so changing inputs is tricky. Most of my stuff will not work with this rig. Airport is similar. It kind of works, with lots of gotchas (no oggs in your library, right? And that iPod Touch is too old to stay connected after it goes to sleep, and then requires a power-off reset, right?).

    This new feature is an invitation to upgrade a bunch of tech. Of course, logically all that tech needs to be refreshed every 5 years or so anyway. I don't think the motion input is a compelling feature, and hence not worth the investment. I don't use Siri on my phone either. Maybe I'm just too old to learn a new input method.

    --
    Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
  19. "Mommy, why are our neighbor's lights flashing?" by sehlat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll tell you when you're older, dear.

  20. Disney Sequel: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "Luke, pull my finger!"

  21. Doppler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its basically in hole Doppler radar powered by wifi. It can see motion toward and away from the transmitters and receivers. Thanks to having multiple antennas, multiple transmitters, and reflections, it can see motion in many places, in many directions. However, I don't think they have a good way to get absolute location, or absolute direction in most cases. This means it can minimally pick up some gestures, isn't great at general spying (it can't tell who you are, or where). All the demoed gestures seemed to be multi-part sequences, I assume to prevent most false positives, which suggest its accuracy is quite low (as expected).

    So in short, it might work for the intended use, but is pretty bad at general spying without significant knowledge of the space its installed in, and a good deal of work. (If you knew where the doorways and rooms were and where the device is, I bet you could detect which ones were open, when people passed between room, when people were home etc, but not much beyond that). Thats still pretty creepy.

    It might be useful in security contexts: put it in your workplace, It can log/notify when things are moving around when the shouldn't be. Darn cheep multi room security (unfortunately it might also be able to see outside and get some false positives, or that might be useful in some cases)

    This is just another example of why I wish my modem and router and wifi were separate (like they used to be): I could install cool tech like this if I wanted, without replacing the whole thing, and be able to configure my router (which would not at all controlled by the ISP/modem) to block any attempt for it to send outgoing stuff. The whole integrated modem rounter wifi thing is a horrible concept.

  22. Anime Powers by deadcrow · · Score: 1

    So, all of those fancy gestures they make in anime to make their powers work is just them communicating with their weapons on a wi-fi network?

    --
    I'm just "this guy", you know?
  23. Re:Where's the ethics of people who write this stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You don't already set your wi-fi routers to active countersurveillance doppler scrambling mode? All mine continuously inject few-Hz distortions into the transmissions that simulate a large crowd constantly milling about the house; distinguishing actual individuals is practically impossible. Heater wires in the walls to scramble thermal signatures help, too, and applying vibration transducers on all windows defeats laser microphone pickups with a constant background of random mixed voice fragments. Faraday cages on inner rooms is the only way to defeat more active scanning; but then the surveillors give away their presence, too. Remember, only *real* tinfoil works for EEG-blocking hats --- the aluminium stuff is a trick for the unwary.

  24. Meh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Batman had that years ago...

  25. I see a problem by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay, I'm working on a report on my laptop while watching Sean Hannity. Sean says something annoying, I give him the finger - and then my laptop shuts down without saving my work!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  26. Clarke's three laws by drainbramage · · Score: 2

    And here is one now:
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  27. NOT like Kinect in an important way... by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to TFA, this detects *movement* by Doppler shift in the wireless signal - yet it describes it as "similar to Xbox Kinect" but with a bunch of advantages.

    However, Kinect doesn't just detect motion - it detects and reports skeletal position regardless of movement. Major differences in potential applications there (especially as the Kinect 2.0 has the resolution to detect finger position/movement as well) - probably not that great for most games.

    One thing I can think of that this could be great for - home security. The current crappy IR motion sensors have to have semi-line of sight and (despite what they advertise) are NOT very pet-friendly (especially for large dogs). So, as long as it can tell the difference between a St. Bernard and a guy in a St. Bernard costume...

    1. Re:NOT like Kinect in an important way... by stenvar · · Score: 1

      Of course, it's not actually as good as a regular, cheap motion sensor.

    2. Re:NOT like Kinect in an important way... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Of course, it's not actually as good as a regular, cheap motion sensor.

      Apparently it works off of ambient RF in the house with a single AP that can detect motion (including specific gestures) anywhere in its range. *IF* it does what they say it does (who knows...) then it's WAY better than a cheap (IR) motion sensor. Especially if it can be programmed to ignore my cat and dog :)

    3. Re:NOT like Kinect in an important way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current crappy IR motion sensors have to have semi-line of sight and (despite what they advertise) are NOT very pet-friendly (especially for large dogs). So, as long as it can tell the difference between a St. Bernard and a guy in a St. Bernard costume...

      If you have a St Bernard inside your house, the alarm should go off.

    4. Re:NOT like Kinect in an important way... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Actually, now that I think of it, if you have a St. Bernard in your house, you probably don't NEED an alarm :)

  28. Gesture control is so Space: 1999... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gesturing hands over pastel multicolored panels? Keith Wilson is spinning in his grave! What are needed now are the cool-as-all-heck pulsating droning sounds like "reh-reh-reh-reh-reh/wehhhhhhnngooooowehhhhhhhnngooooo".

  29. As seen on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Continuum, S1 E7

  30. Think of the surveillance possibilities! by bmk67 · · Score: 1

    /me puts tinfoil hat on wireless router.

    1. Re:Think of the surveillance possibilities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Governments and PIs will likely have something better then a Pringle's can. If this sort of thing gets truly well developed, we should probably consider a Faraday cage etc around the house and getting off the grids. As technology develops, who knows the limits on being able to scan waveforms and particles that can pass right through most anything and transform it into visible and/or auditory information. There is almost always more bandwidth on wiring and fiber it seems, just find a different frequency to use and a way to create and read it, similarly with other waveforms, just have to tighten the control on the signal for transmission, reception and interpretation. Our bodies produce and react to such things as well, such is the reasoning on StarTrek's Tricorders and ship's scanner dish futuristic predictions. Virtually any wiring can act as an antenna, transformer, etc, results variant on length, ratios, and other factors.

  31. Re:Where's the ethics of people who write this stu by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

    "I've written new software that can use the wifi signals bouncing around in your home to help you change channels on your TV, or possibly give surreptitious surveillance to any law enorcement agency that can get a bullshit warrant from a rubber stamp judge. We promise it will only be used to help you change the TV channel."

    Do programmers even filter this stuff through their conscience any more?

    .

    Yes, we do. However, on the one hand, we come up with ways to make life (allegedly) easier and more entertaining. On the other hand, you have people who would gladly snoop by bouncing rocks off your house and listening to the echoes if they could et away with it. Bouncing light beams off glass windows to "hear" what was being said inside, in fact was a spy trick that probably dates back to the 1950's.

    People with evil intent are with us always, and as far as I'm concerned, the most evil of the lot are the ones who do it because they're "the good guys". To them, inventors and programmers are just one more set of tools to be exploited.

  32. Not for Italian grandmothers by wcrowe · · Score: 2

    It's great until your Italian grandmother comes by for a visit.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Not for Italian grandmothers by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      "What happened here?"

      "Grandmother visited from Italy."

      "Were there any survivors?"

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  33. Can you use it to monitor movements? by Gax · · Score: 1

    Neat, though I wonder about the privacy issues of its widespread use. If you can scan for a doppler frequency shift in the next room and record change over time, you could capture your neighbours position over time and render their movements on-screen.

    Obligatory sci-fi reference: Continuum did something like this last year.

  34. Welcome to 1956 by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    "These walls are solid Krell metal" said Dr. Morbeus. He waved his hand over the electrode and the walls slammed quickly into place.

      -- Forbidden Planet

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:Welcome to 1956 by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Well, but, except for the krell metal, we could do that since 1948 (when the phototransistor was invented).

      Now, just making cabalistic gestures at empty air and making complex things happen... I'm trying to think of a non-fantasy story that had this.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  35. What wifi hardware outputs doppler shifts? by Wierdy1024 · · Score: 1

    So this tech seems to use doppler shift of signals.

    While I am sure some wifi hardware measures doppler shift to try to correct for it and get better reception in moving vehicles, none that I know of makes this info available to the driver, let alone exposes it to any program running on the router/laptop/phone.

    So how does this work?

  36. Hope you can opt out better than with smartphones by dAzED1 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I had an S3, and the damn thing drove me insane. One can turn off gestures for the core phone, but then you have to turn it off for every app as well, and guess what...some apps don't allow one to do so. Such as, I dunno, the default web browser. Which is just awesome for someone with a movement disorder such as mine (somewhat similar to parkisons). The damn phone was damn near unusable.

    If my whole house started doing such as a requisite for simply getting bloody internet access, I would officially flip the fark out - sell off everything I own, and move to Costa Rica where I'd spend the rest of my days drinking whiskey from a coconut, while sitting on the beach in Punta Uva. Which really, sounds like a win, but my wife said she won't let me unless I legit go insane...and damnit, she knows.

    Sidebars aside, sucks that some companies make their interfaces go such directions. Somewhat like back when it became impossible to find a cell phone which was only a cell phone and had no camera, I fear much will continue going down the route of touch and gestures...things which I, alas, can't do with finesse. (is this where I tell you punk kids to get off my lawn?)

  37. Voice recognition is a must by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, there needs to be something that distinguishes accidental gestures with legitimate ones. Most likely, people will just use voice recognition to activate controls, with physical gestures for fine tweaks.

    Me: "Computer, I want to dim the lights."
    Computer: "How much??"
    Me: Spreads hands apart as the lights dim, till I'm satisfied.

    Or maybe I'll just be happy to state that I want the lights dimmed by X percent. Maybe I'll get used to that and find that hand gestures suck.

    All this article shows is that we'll have whole-home gesture recognition sooner, rather than later. The usability of such a system still needs work.

  38. Begs the question by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    How long before they can "see" what people are doing inside their homes by reconstructing movement and position data through listening in on the electric cables down the street? Tin foil, anyone?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Begs the question by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, I need to go shut off my router.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  39. Any sufficiently advanced technology.... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...you know the rest. This could get interesting.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  40. Total Surveillance is now here, forever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it will be so convenient to have 'remote control' of your media devices just by waving your arms in the air, unfortunately that same technology will end forever any sort of 'freedom', this will bring our wretched society into the total surveillance state.

  41. And you call yourselves geeks! by QuickSilver_999 · · Score: 1

    No one remembers this from Isaac Asimov's Robots of Dawn? Seriously?

    --
    - No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades really cramps his style.
  42. The Clapper by mea2214 · · Score: 1

    Clap on. Clap off. The Clapper.

  43. I have a few selected gestures for the jackboots by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 1

    but 2.4 GHz into 299,792,458 m/s is about 12 cm, probably too long to recognize my middle finger.

    --
    Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
    Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
  44. heartbeat is trivial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been done. Being done. move along.

  45. what about keyboard logging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A laptop in a busy coffeehouse would give you a nice reference signal on where to focus for finger movements in relation to the built in wlan card. If you know the laptop model you should be able to work out the key presses

  46. Privacy no longer exists. Period. by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    This actually sends chills down my spine. Like, literally. This is only a few steps away from any Tom-Dick-or-Harry being able to see through every wall around them. Police surveillance? Military reconnaissance? Peeping on the neighbors?

    And just like those infrared camcorders that were abruptly pulled from shelves, after people started using them for more than just "bird watching"... there is an absolute guarantee that this technology will be abused. Nothing you do in your own home or anywhere else will be beyond observation. Nothing.

    Now, where did I put that tin-foil hat? ...

    1. Re:Privacy no longer exists. Period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see a bright future for building insulation materials that just happen to include a surprisingly thick metallic layer... ;)

  47. object designed for it may improve gesturing by PJ6 · · Score: 1

    I was thinking, it might be nice to have an object to wave, perhaps in a wand shape, to increase the accuracy of gesture recognition. And maybe you could speak a command while you're doing it - special Latin or nonsense words, so it doesn't get confused with normal English conversation.

    Wait, where have I seen that before...

  48. What about WiFi Force Feedback then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wondering... :D

    - *swipe in the air*
    - *SLAP* (Computer voice:) Don't you put your finger in my v-ass ever again!

  49. Re:I have a few selected gestures for the jackboot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but 2.4 GHz into 299,792,458 m/s is about 12 cm, probably too long to recognize my middle finger.

    That isn't quite right, as the dielectric constant of your finger is close to that of water (81), so the wavelength in your finger would actually be about 12 cm / sqrt(81) or a bit over 1 cm, and thus your finger might still be useful...

  50. Nyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a 3 Stooges slap-fest should get an interesting strobe-light effect...