Slashdot Mirror


TSA Decides Against Allowing Small Knives On Aircraft

New submitter lemur3 writes "After multiple months of discussing possible changes to the prohibited items list, the Transportation Security Administration in the United States has determined that it is best to go ahead without any changes to the list of items passengers may have in their carry-on baggage when traveling by air. Under the proposed change (discussed previously on Slashdot) pocket knives and other items, such as hockey sticks and ski poles, would have been allowed."

60 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. There goes another Swiss Army knife by cusco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've carried a pocket knife since my dad bought me one for my 8th birthday, not having that weight in that pocket doesn't feel right. Since this foolishness started I've lost at least six to the TSA, since I tend to catch flights too early to be properly awake.. Going on vacation again in a couple of weeks, and I'll probably lose another either on the way there or the way back.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    1. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While i think the TSA sucks bozack.. you'd think after the 2nd or 3rd time you'd learn how to avoid losing things to them

    2. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I always carry a Leatherman Micra. I lost one once, and managed to buy a whole bag of them from those confiscated from an airport. At least one (given to someone) has returned to where it came from.

    3. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

      They should just charge a $5 fee and mail it to you if you don't want it destroyed.

      It is kind of silly, though. Post 911, nobody can take over a plane with a few knives. The only reason to not allow them is that they can result in more injuries on a plane, but that seems so unlikely as to not be terribly persuasive.

      I once walked into a secure federal building with a knife by accident; the guards thought about it and then didn't care. Which is really the right result.

    4. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Insightful

      this also ends my plans for Ackthpt's Small Knives And Pointy Objects Emporium in airports from coast to coast.

      Yeah, now you know why the TSA rescinded the order - they didn't want you to compete with their current side business selling pocket knives. (I think my uncle bought a box of corkscrews by the pound).

    5. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      They should just charge a $5 fee and mail it to you if you don't want it destroyed.

      Most major airports have kiosks for explicitly this purpose.

      Which ones? I've never seen one.

      Here's a list of airports for one company's checkpoint mailers, there are probably other companies that do the same thing in other airports:

      http://www.airportmailers.com/airportlist.php

      There was a company called ReturnKey that did the same thing (I linked to an Engadget article that mentions them in another post), but their domain is dead, so they seem to have gone out of business.

    6. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Jockle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem isn't the TSA

      Just because you've had different experiences doesn't mean the problem isn't the TSA.

    7. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Post 911, nobody can take over a plane with a few knives.

      Post 9/11, nobody's ever going to take over a plane again, period. Someone might be able to destroy one, but the days of "just do what the bad man says" are over.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    8. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "I was about to say the same thing... I've traveled many times since 9/11, and have lost precisely nothing to the TSA."

      Wish I could say the same. I have not flown very often in recent years, but the last time I did, a rare and expensive (and perfectly legal) laser was missing from my luggage when I picked it up at my destination. I have little doubt it was stolen by the TSA baggage inspectors. Even if they (wrongly) thought it was illegal, they are required to inform you when they confiscate something. So it wasn't that... it was simply stolen.

    9. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No the problem can at times be the TSA. Let me illustrate...

      Look at the jolt cola can referenced by this link: http://bevwire.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/jolt-cola-soon-to-be-discontinued/

      I was at SD West (last one btw), and they were giving out the jolt cola awards, and cans. I managed to get a can, put it into my backpack with my notebook. The next morning, too early (as I was flying to Europe) I forgot the can was in there. So off I go into the search, and they asked "what's this?" I said its cola, and they asked if I wanted to drink it. I said, "na, just throw it away, its too big for me to drink right now".

      Well, apparently that was the wrong answer. One agent said "we have never seen this type of can!" I was like, really? Never, apparaently it was a new can design. So off they go and search my entire body and took my entire backpack apart. I was there 45 minutes! It was not funny and of course they found nothing. This was a stupid search and because the TSA had never seen one of their products from their own country I was dodgy! Come on people!

    10. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Could also have been the airline baggage handlers.

      The best way to "handle" this theft problem is to have windows allowing passengers to see their luggage being searched and see it being handled by the baggage handlers. There is no reason why it needs to be done privately, unless someone is up to no good.

    11. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem isn't the TSA

      The problem isn't the TSA either way. The TSA realizes that the restrictions on small knives and tools are silly and a waste of resources. They wanted to make the change. But they got too much push back from politicians and "think of the children" citizens. So they caved in.

    12. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by mosb1000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem isn't the TSA

      That's the stupidest thing I've read on /. today. Of course the TSA is the problem. Taking peoples pocket knives is a pointless knee-jerk reaction.

      the problem is the grandparent is an idiot who won't take responsibility for his own actions.

      That's a pretty big problem too, but then no one said there was only one problem.

    13. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should mail yourself stuff. UPS can even make custom boxes and packaging for you to use. The money you spend mailing it to yourself is money that you save when you don't have to buy a replacement for it.

    14. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by hawguy · · Score: 2

      I agree. But by that logic we don't need the TSA either so...

      I don't follow that logic.

      Just because a passenger won't be able to use a small weapon to coerce the pilot and passengers to let him take over the plane does not mean that TSA can't be useful in preventing someone from taking a bomb or other device on board that can take down the plane (which would be just about as bad as taking over a plane).

      That doesn't mean that I agree that TSA's security theater is the best way to prevent this.

    15. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The TSA only exists because of Low IQ citizens and Politicians. the TSA is not needed at all and is a huge waste of money.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by mjwx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem isn't the TSA

      That's the stupidest thing I've read on /. today. Of course the TSA is the problem. Taking peoples pocket knives is a pointless knee-jerk reaction.

      Given all the excesses of the TSA, is not being allowed a small knife onto a plane really your biggest concern?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    17. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by mjwx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Every rights violation is a concern.

      Not that I disagree, but shouldn't you be focusing on the bigger issue?

      I mean getting the TSA to "allow" pocket knives whilst they continue their other abuses with reckless abandon seems to be a pyrrhic victory at best.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    18. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by ATMAvatar · · Score: 2

      As 9/11 was the only significant terrorist-based airline disaster in my lifetime (and I have more years before 2001 than after), I am quite comfortable saying that we don't need the TSA.

      But even if we say that there's a slightly increased chance of a disaster without the TSA... terrorists could detonate a bomb aboard two 747 flights every day, every year, and it would still be a distant third cause of death for US citizens.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    19. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by thesandtiger · · Score: 2

      Why do people keep saying this? There have been hijackings since 9/11 in which the plane was not destroyed and the hijackers took control of the plane.

      For an assuredly incomplete list, check out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_hijackings

      Pay particular attention to the 10+ ones listed after September 11, 2001.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    20. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by mysidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do people keep saying this? There have been hijackings since 9/11 in which the plane was not destroyed and the hijackers took control of the plane.

      Which one of those was a flight originating from inside the US on a US airline?

    21. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      I agree. But by that logic we don't need the TSA either so...

      Personally, I've through that each airport should have a wing for people who are willing to fly at their own risk. Tickets would cost less, you could get there 15 minutes before the flight, etc... It will never happen, but it would be a nice idea.

    22. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Well you know your real mistake. You only need to catch the right flight once and from their on in avoid the TSA for the rest of your life, emmigrate. It seems the US is going out of it's to drive it's own citizens out of their country, seriously take the hint, likely you'll be better off ;).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    23. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by ShakaUVM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In this case, the TSA was responding to flight attendants who were reportedly up in arms about people being able to carry swiss army knives on planes again.

      So put blame where it is due - the TSA was trying to do the right thing here, but got shouted down by the masses.

    24. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Informative

      They should just charge a $5 fee and mail it to you if you don't want it destroyed.

      Back in the eighties, they did. Well minus the charge. If you had a dangerous item (knife, drafting compass, ...), you handed it in at the security checkpoint, it would go into a box in the cargo hold (together with similar items of other passengers), and you got it back on arrival.

    25. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There really isn't enough talk about this. The TSA exists because we have too many stupid people who continue to think it's a good idea. Period. I know it's a fairly easy way to figure out someone's intelligence by making a TSA joke and seeing who laughs, but go search for pictures of the idiotic flight attendants and pilots who were picketing against this small little rules change that would have done nothing except ease off on the harassment of the flying public. These people should know better, and yet there they were--protesting against even a tiny bit more freedom because the very thought of it sent their brains into complete and utter irrational fearful overload. People whose minds are governed by emotions have no business trying to tell anybody how to do anything, and to me, have no business being responsible for a large fast moving object full of humans. Freedom of speech is very important, even ultimately important, but it cannot come without consequences because this particular message causes direct harm to others. I do not and will not advocate that speech be restricted by the government. However, those "protesters" should be removed from their jobs and from the aviation industry permanently. I do not trust any one of them with my life after they have demonstrated a complete lack of ability to make rational decisions concerning risk.

      It's illustrative of a very big and very bad point: the TSA can't change even if they want to as long as we have in our midst anti-freedom citizens who make decisions absent any hint of rationality. If they can't do this relatively simple thing, what's going to happen if they decide to get rid of the lunacy of removing shoes at checkpoints, or doing away with the stupid liquid restrictions? Remember, both of those things were political reactions to total failures of attempted "terrorist attacks". It was assumed by lots of people that at the time that this was just another TSA power trip, and it might well have been--but what if it was the TSA giving in to political pressure to "do something"? There seems to be ample evidence now that the entire Bush Administration "terror alert" system was manipulated for political gain, and the TSA with it. Sure, the terror alert system is gone, being another stupid idea in the first place, but the fear based decision making and manipulation remains.

      This, unfortunately, is going to take a while. If our parents and grandparents were as stupid as some of us are, we'd never have made peace with Japan after WWII because they'd be too busy living in fear of another Pearl Harbor attack.

    26. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by WorkingDead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The TSA is a government jobs program. It employs over 55,000 people with little to no marketable skills or training. It's obvious to everyone that the TSA is a waste but its not going away because it would spike the unemployment rate and hurt our economic recovery.

    27. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      You put an expensive, fragile item in checked luggage?

    28. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by SirGarlon · · Score: 2

      Of those 10+ you claim, only five are supported by citations. The other five, I consider works of fiction. Of the five cases supported by citations, three resulted in the passengers overpowering the hijacker and the other two resulted in the hijacker being arrested on the ground. So yes, there have been two documented hijackings since 9/11 where the hijackers took control of the plane: in Mauritania and Cyrpus.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    29. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by RobertLTux · · Score: 4, Informative

      easy way to ensure your luggage does not get opened by the TSA (in transit)

      PROPERLY CHECK A FIREARM

      once they check it at the airport it is considered a SEALED PACKAGE and can not legally be opened by anyone without you present.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    30. Re:There goes another Swiss Army knife by chihowa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A starter pistol is great for this. The TSA treats it like a real firearm, but many cities and states that have strict firearm laws don't consider them firearms (especially if you don't bring the caps for it).

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  2. Another reason I no longer fly. by slasher999 · · Score: 2

    Besides the horrible service and the conditions (ie personal space mostly) on aircraft today, they continue with these absurd bans on common items. I never leave home without a knife, many times a SAK, other times a Spyderco or Queen. To me that would be like leaving home without pants. You just don't think about it, you just do it. When I do need to fly I'm very much aware that I'm without my knife or even the P-38 I keep on my keychain (I'm sure they would figure out how to take that away as well).

    1. Re:Another reason I no longer fly. by Intropy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had to look that up to figure out why you were trying to take a P-38 Lightning through TSA.

    2. Re:Another reason I no longer fly. by slasher999 · · Score: 2

      I was curious which people would think I meant - the plane or the gun! Nope, just the can opener. But try to explain that to TSA.

    3. Re:Another reason I no longer fly. by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      Well in most Australian states, it's now illegal to carry even a small Swiss Army style keychain knife anywhere, Period.

      Well, that's Crocodile Dundee fscked then.

    4. Re:Another reason I no longer fly. by Intropy · · Score: 2

      Well, if I'm being honest, I assumed you didn't mean the plane and that P-38 must also refer be something small, like a pocket knife. I looked it up and found it was a can opener. I am deeply ashamed that I ever implied that I thought you might actually be carrying around a WW2-era fighter.

    5. Re: Another reason I no longer fly. by starless · · Score: 2

      With "TSA-Pre" (which you can get e.g. by signing up for global entry) you can avoid many of
      these inconveniences. e.g. you can keep shoes on, keep computer inside bag, keep liquids in bag.
      Global entry has other major advantages for international travelers (avoid immigration lines).
      http://www.globalentry.gov/

    6. Re:Another reason I no longer fly. by Jockle · · Score: 2

      Are conditions really bad enough to stop people flying?

      People's rights are violated when they try to get on a plane. What do you think the answer is?

    7. Re:Another reason I no longer fly. by ninlilizi · · Score: 2

      Sup Dawg. I heard you like planes. So I put a plane in your plane, so you can fly while you fly.

    8. Re:Another reason I no longer fly. by Richy_T · · Score: 2

      He convinced me they hang bread on walls and use a blowtorch to make toast.

    9. Re:Another reason I no longer fly. by Macgrrl · · Score: 2

      Only on special occasions.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    10. Re:Another reason I no longer fly. by SailorSpork · · Score: 2

      I was just impressed that he could fit a Walther P38 on his keychain.

  3. No surprise really by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they allowed knives back on, and any kind of terrorist attack occurred with knives, then someone would be held responsible for that decision, no matter how wise it seemed at the time. If they disallow knives, people will kick and scream, but won't actually change their flying behavior much, and everyone's job will be safe.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:No surprise really by Jockle · · Score: 2

      Why don't imbeciles just realize that sometimes bad things happen, and freedom is more important than safety? The TSA needs to be destroyed.

    2. Re:No surprise really by Jockle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IMO they should allow anything that won't endanger the integrity of the cabin.

      Actually, the TSA should just be eliminated outright. Problem solved.

    3. Re:No surprise really by cusco · · Score: 2

      My co-worker is ranked #17 in 8-ball in the US. He can't take his expensive pool cue in its case on board the plane, instead he has to check it and pray that it makes it to Las Vegas.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  4. Whew! TSA flew much too close to sane policy ... by pissoncutler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Instead of making folks discard completely non-threatening items, TSA should look into *actual* security.

    The airport should have a series of series of checkpoints. Every vehicle that pulls onto the property goes past a guard that asks you how your day is going (screen #1). At the ticket counter, a friendly agent asks if you are enjoying the weather (screen #2). Drop off your bags, some other random, friendly question (screen #3). Lastly, at the x-ray / metal detector / body scanner, the attending agent looks you in the eye and chats with you again (screen #4). Every station should be manned by trained security personel empowered to flag you for greater scrutiny. Add to that randomized patrols and searches.

    The staged checkpoints also reduce the likelihood of an attacker targeting that massive line to get through security. (In the TSA system, no one waiting in that line has been through any prior screen.)

    Stagger the checks and ensure redundancy. It's not cheap, it would require TSA to hire/pay much better than they do now, but it would get you better security. Banning Swiss Army Knives and hockey sticks doesn't make anyone safer.

  5. Doesn't affect me so I don't care by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't carry knives, don't even like them. I use spears.

  6. My CarryOn-Jutsu is Stronger than Yours by decipher_saint · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Sir please remove your arms and legs, you can't take them on the plane"

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:My CarryOn-Jutsu is Stronger than Yours by RussR42 · · Score: 2

      Oh, oh, I see! Running away, eh? You yellow bastards! Come back here and take what's coming to you! I'll bite your legs off!

  7. X-actly by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, hockey sticks and the other stuff should be fine. Actually small knives would be, too.

    Prior to 9/11, the policy for a skyjacking was sit tight and wait for ransom demands, or to fly some idiot to Cuba.

    That morning it changed forever. Passengers will revolt. Pilots will bounce people around in the cabin. Threats to kill people will correctly go unheeded and the cockpit door will stay closed. Even flights with insufficient other passengers still won't lose control.

    So...so what about small knives and X-acto box cutters? Such a takeover will never work again.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  8. OK, TSA, please tell me why... by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    why do restaurants after security at Chicago O'Hare give customers metal knives, while restaurants at DFW do not?

    And in the past, I have been given a metal knife when flying in first class (obviously, first class passengers cannot be terrorists!)

    Do TSA rules ban equipment to sharpen metal dinner knives? I doubt it.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:OK, TSA, please tell me why... by dlgeek · · Score: 2

      And none of the 9/11 Terrorists flew first class because why spend the extra money if you're going to crash or blow up the plane?

      Uhhh, dude... all but one of the 9/11 Hijackers flew first or business class (mostly first) on their various flights.

  9. Re: Whew! TSA flew much too close to sane policy . by Mabhatter · · Score: 2

    It's the "Disney" approach. If you go to Disney, they break up the long lines with spaces, corridors, and choke points. Disney does this so it doesn't appear you are in a crazy long line for teacups. But it would work for security too.

    Then you insert various detectors along the moving sidewalks and other places in the airport where "single file" lines naturally occur. The biggest thing is to have lots of "helper" agents in the middle looking with eyeballs.

    The problem is that our airports were built like shopping malls, intended to be a destination to pickup/ drop off people and have dinner, etc. they have few "compartments" to their designs for the passenger spaces.

  10. Re:Whew! TSA flew much too close to sane policy .. by aXis100 · · Score: 2

    The pilot radios the nearest airport, lands, and the SWAT team takes over?

  11. Misssing the point. by westlake · · Score: 2

    What worries the stewardess is the out-if-control passenger with a knife.

    The flight crew may be safe behind their armored door.

    But she is out there, utterly exposed --- and you are wedged in your seat five rows back and in no position to help her.

    The TSA weaved and bobbed around answering the question of how many casualties it was prepared to accept in an incident like this --- and that in the end was fatal.

  12. Re:Whew! TSA flew much too close to sane policy .. by pissoncutler · · Score: 2

    I didn't just invent this model, it's used at Ben Gurion in Tel Aviv.

    The checkpoint screens take a few seconds each, they aren't reading you a long prepared statement and checking to see if you respond yes or no. They are looking you in the eye and asking you about your day; they are trained to pick up on your reaction and filter through lots of people quickly. This doesn't move the line outside the airport, as you suggest, it divides the crowds into smaller pools of potential victims and creates "rings" of security. If a terrorist detonates a bomb in the outermost ring, they will likely take out themselves, the security officer and maybe the vehicles immediately adjacent. Worst case, 10-15 people MAX. If the same terrorist makes it to the security line on a holiday weekend, how many people are within the blast radius? I think 10-15 would be a minimum.

    As I said in response to the comment above, I'm more of the opinion that the risk/reward equation for a terrorist attack on an airport has shifted and the September 11th attacks would be very difficult to replicate. The passengers on three of those planes assumed (like we all did) that hijackers just wanted money, or to make a speech and that smartest move was to let the authorities deal with it. No one will make that mistake again.

    Today's terrorists (homegrown or otherwise) want to maximise casualties, and leave the speeches to be found after the fact. The best way to handle this is to screen and isolate, or to accept that such attacks represent such a statistical minority of deaths from violent crime and spend our security money elsewhere.

  13. Re:Obama by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    The war on the american people started on 9/12 IT was started by the Bush administration and the Obama Administration is working hard to continue the war.
    9/11 was used as an excuse to trample on those pesky rights, and the people were stupid and soaked it up. Sadly, most americans are still ragingly stupid and are happy about all the rights that were lost.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  14. Another TSA reminder by lexsird · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Another TSA reminder that the "terrorist won" or I should say the opportunistic fear mongering traitors and the bureaucracies, and traitorous policies they implemented won. Every time I'm reminded of these pseudo Nazi pricks stripping and frisking my 70 year old mother and fucking up her luggage as they rifled it while on one of their "show my ass because I have authority" power trips, I have to edit what I say lest I end up in Gitmo. Imagine that, being afraid to say what you really think in America.

    --
    Take the Red Pill.
  15. Re: Whew! TSA flew much too close to sane policy . by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a very widely understood phenomenon. In countries where terrorism is actually a problem, terrorists bomb the checkpoints because of the lines. Security thus staggers the checkpoints and streamlines procedures in order to prevent any kind of lines from forming. This means that terrorists can't kill more than a few people regardless of the size of any bomb they might be carrying.

    Here in the USA, these procedures are not used and checkpoints are not bombed because, as all sane people know, terrorism is not a problem in this country.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.