Slashdot Mirror


Israeli Army Retweeting 1967 War As It Happened

An anonymous reader writes "This is a new one, twitter as a form of historical reenactment: 'Israel's army is giving a "live" blow-by-blow account of the 1967 Six Day War, tweeting each air strike at the exact time it occurred 46 years ago ... @IDF1967 "is an official Israel Defence Forces account that is aimed at re-tweeting the events of the Six Day War in live time", ... The account was tweeting key events in the battle against the armies of Egypt, Jordan and Syria that took place from June 5 to 10, 1967 and includes pictures and videos, the army said. The tweets are mostly in Hebrew, with some translated into English. "In response to repeated provocations by Egypt, the State of Israel and the IDF are going to war. We will not sit idly as the enemy forces tighten the noose around our necks," the opening tweet said around 8.00am (1500 AEST) on Wednesday when Israel landed its first preemptive air strike 46 years ago.'"

13 of 317 comments (clear)

  1. Eyeroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Interesting piece of propaganda

  2. Worthless propoganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since when did Slashdot become horribly biased in supporting Israel?

    I assume the tweets will come strictly from an Israeli perspective.

    Can we have a counter channel with a play-by-play according to the other sides? Then it would actually be historically interesting, and not pure one-sided YAY WAR, YAY ISRAEL propaganda.

    When I read an international news story from an American outlet, I also try to read the Al Jazeera version in an attempt to extract the truth from somewhere in the middle. This is kind of like that.

  3. Re:now they are nazis by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oddly enough, the article doesn't say anything about anyone being "cleansed" from their city in 1948.

    What it does say is that:

    A local fisherman Atar Zeinab, 80, said that as a teenager during the final months of fighting in 1948 he helped to collect the Arab dead in the area south of Jaffa.

    They were then brought for a quick burial in the cemetery, the areaâ(TM)s main graveyard.

    'I carried to the cemetery 60 bodies during a period of three or four months,' he told AFP. 'We used to find the people in the street and most of the time we didnâ(TM)t know who they were.'

    He said that the danger of being hit by flying bullets or grenade fragments was such that bodies were dumped one on top of the other in existing family crypts in the cemetery, contrary to Muslim custom.

    'We carried them early in the morning or in the night. We put women, children and men in the same place... nobody prayed for these people.

    Note that there is no mention as to who did the killing, though the "danger of being hit by flying bullets or grenade fragments" suggests ongoing fighting between the Jews and Palestinians (which means that any particular death was just as likely to be to a Palestinian bullet as a Jewish bullet)....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  4. Re:now they are nazis by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You talk nonsense. People were murdered and their home stolen. After pushing them onto reservation-type camps, they are still subject to things like collective punishments - which include mass aerial bombardment of civilian homes with white phosphorus, or the interruption of potable water.

    Both are war crimes.

    None of this can be justified in any way by the alleged rhetoric of some ill-defined "arabs" saying something that - if you are understood correctly - would amount to: "If you leave your property that you own, and your orchards and shops, then after you are refugees, you might be able to squat on the couple of Kibbutz those Poles stole from your parents, instead!"

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  5. Re:now they are nazis by phantomfive · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How do you feel about the way the Arabs treat Palestinian refugees? That is the test to see if someone is a hypocrite or ignorant on the topic.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  6. Article is Flamebait by ThePeices · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why post this article on Slashdot? Its obvious flamebait, bringing out all the hatred, hand-wringing and dubious justifications from all sides of this conflict.

    Nothing good is going to come from all the comments in here, ive already seem my fair share of sheer hatred in the comments so far.

    Why post this Slashdot? Because its on Twitter?

    1. Re:Article is Flamebait by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Why post this Slashdot? Because its on Twitter?

      Because it's an interesting use of technology. Pretending difficult issues like the Israel/Palestine thing do not exist may prevent arguments on slashdot but it's certainly not going to do the world any good. Flamewars on this site are the least of the middle-Easts concerns.

    2. Re:Article is Flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no, no its not an interesting use of technology at best its a stunt

  7. Re:now they are nazis by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No. But it does equate to a double standard. A different standard is applied to Israel than to everyone else. What's worse is that the other Arab countries are treating their own people like shit.

    That's like you pissing on your family. That's actually WORSE than some stranger doing it.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  8. Re:now they are nazis by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is there a logical or rhetorical fallacy you won't ignore, in the pursuit of your defense for the outlaw nation?

    Yeah, on both sides. Did you know that the Jews globally lost more property than they gained in 1948? After Arabs lost the war, Jews everywhere in the Middle East were essentially evicted and all their stuff was confiscated, depriving them of wealth amounting to almost three billion dollars (1948 dolllar value, try adjusting *that* for current value) and lands larger than the 1948 Israel.

    But the people murdered by Stern and Irgun were innocent. Those who lost homes and property were not even indirectly responsible. It's like claiming Catholic farmworkers should be exploited because there are priests who molest children.

    It's funny that countries such as Jordan and other, despite supposedly being the same ethnic group, don't actually want these troublemakers.

    Yeah. Like why England and Finland weren't asking to accept the whole nation of Croatia in the 90's. Hey! There the same ethnic group. Your racism is vile. "Troublemakers"? They were just born there, descendents of Ancient Greece, Phoenecia, Rome, Egypt, Sumer and - dare I say Judea. But that's "causing trouble".

    "Mass aerial bombardment"? And do you actually have anything to support this claim?

    Operation Cast Lead

    I may be wrong, but isn't it the case that Israel actually provides the water to the West Bank and to Gaza at their own expense, essentially at a loss?

    "Here, we stole your aquifers. Aren't we forebaring and even magnanimous in trickling some back, after diverting it to water illegal colonial settlements? Gosh. What's a little matter of war crime, compared to our virtues?"

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  9. Re:now they are nazis by Smauler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A different standard is applied to Israel than to everyone else.

    Yup, like nuclear weapon arming, and massive military investment from the US. The soviet union is long dead.

  10. Re:now they are nazis by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are on the wrong side of history

    You're projecting, with the usual bullshit handwaving and the usual canards to justify the unjustifiable. The formation of Israel was impossible without massive land theft from the native population, from a bunch of immigrants just off the boat from Europe.

    Then there's the other bullshit in the form of headscratching that the victims of land theft and ethnic cleansing feel some sort of animosity towards their oppressors. Do you also spend a lot of time yelling at the Sioux for being pissed that the Black Hills were stolen from them? Still calling Nelson Mandela a terrorist because he resisted Apartheid?

    Zionism is amoral sociopathy. A sense of entitlement to other people's land and property is bullshit, whether it was the Spaniards, the Pope, or the Germans doing it to Jews, and it's bullshit when Zionists do it to the people who have lived in Palestine for centuries.

  11. Re:now they are nazis by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The point is, if you really cared about helping Palestinians, you would focus on helping Palestinians, because flaming Israel isn't going to accomplish much. Israel is the smallest of the Palestinians' problems.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."