Slashdot Mirror


BBC Clock Inaccurate - 100 Days To Fix?

mikejuk writes "The BBC home page has just lost its clock because the BBC Trust upheld a complaint that it was inaccurate. The clock would show the current time on the machine it was being viewed on and not an accurate time as determined by the BBC. However, the BBC have responded to the accusations of inaccuracy by simply removing the clock stating that it would take 100 staffing days to fix. It further says: 'Given the technical complexities of implementing an alternative central clock, and the fact that most users already have a clock on their computer screen, the BBC has taken the decision to remove the clock from the Homepage in an upcoming update.' They added, '...the system required to do this "would dramatically slow down the loading of the BBC homepage", something which he said was "an issue of great importance to the site's users". Secondly, if the site moved to a format in which users across the world accessed the same homepage, irrespective of whichever country they were in, it would be "impossible to offer a single zonally-accurate clock."'"

8 of 487 comments (clear)

  1. They are waiting by sidevans · · Score: 5, Funny

    For a new Time Lord!

    --
    I'm not signing anything
  2. Re:Not-so-accurate source by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems simple until you start working through it. First you have to start tracking every goofy fall/spring variation in the world so you don't display a time that's an hour early or late. Then, do you just trust that the user has the correct time zone entered on their computer? Maybe they're travelling 3 time zones away. Do you use ip geolocation to get their approximate physical location and display that time? Say you do that. What if they're in NYC and surfing through their company VPN in Los Angeles? I guess on a tablet or phone, you might be able to get the location from the GPS. Wating for location fix...waiting for location fix...waiting for location fix.

    At some point during the discussions, someone pointed out that it's a silly thing to worry about since any device accessing their website already has the time displayed or available at the gesture of a mouse or finger.

  3. BBC cannot win by NeeNahNye · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The situation is crazy and I have every sympathy with the Beeb. The clock design itself is very nostalgic for those of us of a certain age who have grown up with the BBC. They naturally created a simple clock that reflects the user's local time. A handful of morons who cannot set their computer's clock properly complained that the BBC's clock was inaccurate. The BBC cannot be expected to implement a global solution which cannot rely on the local host having any accurate time information and takes into account time zones, geographical location etc even if the issue of running an accurate server-synchronised clock is trivial. Also note that everything they do is heavily scrutinised by rabid right-wing politicians and licence-fee payers. My only gripe with the Beeb is that that it's acquiesced to these stupid complaints and withdrawn the clock rather than telling the complainants where to go.

  4. Re: Not-so-accurate source by spacec0w · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think most would consider the licence fee a sort of tax.

  5. Re:100 days by ssam · · Score: 5, Funny

    I assume it took me about a day to write that comment. its hard to tell without a clock on this web page.

  6. Re:Not-so-accurate source by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think that's 100 programmer hours to fix the problems, and 100 staff days to field calls from a nation whose hobby is complaining about things that don't matter.

    Dear Points of View,

    I would like to raise two problems with JamesH's post of the 6th of June. Firstly, he mistakes us for "a nation", despite the constitutional recognition of our 4 different nationalities within the united state.

    Secondly, he alleges that we tend to complain about things that don't matter, which is a scurrilous accusation with no foundation in fact.

    Yours faithfully
    Disgusted
    Tunbridge Wells

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  7. Re:Not-so-accurate source by war4peace · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of a joke.

    A guy applies for a public sector job. The interviewer asks him if he drinks any coffee, guy says "no, I'm not allowed to have coffee because of the surgery I've done in the past. You know, when I fought in Iraq, a bomb exploded and mangled my balls, so they have been removed."
    The interviewer remains silent for a minute then says "OK, you're hired, you will come to work at noon every day and leave at 4 PM".
    Applicant protests: "Look, I know work starts at 8 AM and I don't want to be advantaged because I'm invalid".
    Interviewer says "No, it's nothing like that. See, we come to work at 8 AM, and have our coffee until 10 AM and then we scratch our balls until noon. So there's nothing that you CAN do until noon, no point in coming in at 8 AM."

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  8. Re: Not-so-accurate source by cgt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you own a window, you hereby agree to receiving my brick through it. Of course, this wonderful service is voluntary, so if you do not want to receive my brick through your window, simply remove any windows from your property.