Slashdot Mirror


Dell's New X18: 5 Pounds, 18 Inches

MojoKid writes "Dell recently combined two trending PC design styles into a single system and called it the XPS 18 Portable All-In-One Desktop. The machine has all the power of an AIO desktop system and some of the portability of a tablet. To be clear, Dell isn't suggesting you'll want to tote this thing across town in ways that you might use an iPad. It's portable in that you can snatch up the 18.4-inch Full HD display from your home office and take it to the living room to switch gears from Google Docs to gaming with the kids, or take it upstairs for some late night surfing before bed. ... The main attraction, however, is that the PC itself is a portable display featuring an 18.4-inch IPS panel with a 1920x1080 resolution and full touch support. Performance-wise the XPS 18 holds its own versus mainstream all-in-one touch PCs, but with added ability to pick the 5 pound system up go virtually anywhere with it on a moment's notice."

32 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. This looks horrible by Maudib · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Really, its the worst of all worlds.

    1. Re:This looks horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A weak dual core CPU that's more power hungry than an ARM CPU, a battery that'll last an hour in real-life conditions within a year, a weight that makes it a pain to lug around, a size that makes hand holding it or carrying it anywhere a joke -- despite having lower resolution than an iPad or a Google Nexus 10, a small 32GB SSD that'll be more than half filled by Windows 8 which nobody wants of, a flimsy to stand it at an angle that'll break and can't be replaced. And again, you're stuck with Windows 8 which is far worse than even Vista.

      This high end dual core computer with 8GB of RAM and an integrated GPU, or roughly the same specs as the Core 2 Duo computer you bought 5 years ago (but can't be upgraded), can be yours for only $1350! Enjoy your blocky fisher price interface!

      This should sell almost as well as the Surface did.

    2. Re:This looks horrible by jalefkowit · · Score: 2

      No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

    3. Re:This looks horrible by Forever+Wondering · · Score: 2

      Too underpowered to be your desktop, that is. Or mine. Or most of Slashdot's. (But then, so are basically all All-In-Ones and pre-builts.) But to the "average" home user who only uses a computer for email and web browsing, it'll be sufficient.

      A lot of home users expect to be able to play video games. After the email/web is done for the day, they turn the system over to their children. A friend of mine recently wanted to purchase a desktop. His personal requirements were modest [as you mentioned], but he wanted his 8 year old son to enjoy/use the system. So, we had to go up a notch or two to get a gaming system.

      The Dell system is too bulky relative to its power. The detached keyboard is just an extra item to lug around. Because it's running Win8, the keyboard is pretty necessary despite the attempts to make it touch friendly. Win8 still isn't a true tablet OS ala iOS or Android.

      Because the system specs in like a laptop, and a laptop is more convenient, there isn't any advantage to it. As the article mentioned, the real differentiator is the touch screen display [which, at 18" could go into a laptop]. If they had made the display 24", they might have something.

      This whole thing smacks of a laptop design that was hurriedly modified to get this unit to market to stop the perceived bloodbath relative to tablets.

      It's an interesting idea, but not practical for my use and costs more than I'd be willing to pay for such a thing.

      Yes, and I believe just about anybody would say it's too pricey for what it offers. I know my aforementioned friend would.

      And with Haswell based laptops already coming out this month [which use far less power], the i5 in this system is already obsolete.

      --
      Like a good neighbor, fsck is there ...
  2. I've got one on the way by Monoman · · Score: 2

    I'm going to try one out. The home computer form factor is going to change. I have tried the Asus Transformer and like it. The removable keyboard works great but to be a primary home computer it needs to have a larger display and larger keyboard. I was hoping Asus they would release something in the 15-17 inch range in the Transformer series but I don't think that has happened yet. The Dell XPS18 is a bit larger than I was thinking but it is getting decent reviews so I'll give it a shot ... it will be my first shot at Win8 too (sigh). Sure it isn't a lightweight but its no Sony Tap 20 @ 11 Lbs.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  3. Also the title of my autobiography. by decora · · Score: 4, Funny

    5 pounds, 18 inches baby

    1. Re:Also the title of my autobiography. by Richy_T · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why would anyone care about your attributes when you were born? That's nothing unusual for a baby.

  4. apples price for the same thing $1800 base by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2, Informative

    apples price for the same thing $1800 base

    1. Re:apples price for the same thing $1800 base by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Reality: Apple doesn't have a direct equivalent of this. But the closest (desktop OS, nearest to 18" screen) is the base model iMac. Which gives you a 21" screen for $1300, vs this Dell for $1350.

    2. Re:apples price for the same thing $1800 base by cbhacking · · Score: 2

      A 21" screen without touch, in a vastly more heavy case that doesn't have a battery, in a machine that can't be operated without (realistically) both mouse and keyboard.

      I don't deny that Apple doesn't have any equivalent of this thing, and thus the GP's post was silly, but that base model iMac costs almost as much and yet is missing all of the things that are designed to appeal about this computer. It really is a giant tablet which is designed to also be used like a desktop (contrast with the Surface Pro, a tiny laptop / slightly thick tablet).

      With that said, the iMac (or almost any other AIO) has better specs for the price. This is not a computer you buy because you want a desktop that you might have to move sometimes. It's much more aimed at being the new Desktop Replacement laptop (I have a 4-year-old 18" laptop; it weighs almost twice what this thing does and lacks a touchscreen).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    3. Re:apples price for the same thing $1800 base by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      I don't deny that Apple doesn't have any equivalent of this thing, and thus the GP's post was silly

      Indeed.

      As to touch screen the iMac is indeed lacking it. But it's uselessness of a touch screen for a desktop OS is demonstrated by the photo of the product on the first page of TFA. What's that sitting next to the keyboard?

      If Microsoft had pulled off Metro as a new interface for Windows, maybe this product would have a point. But the reality is no one likes Metro, and Microsoft is having a rethink of the software and (another) re-org of the company in order to change direction.

  5. Am I missing something? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This seems to be a mediocre, unnecessarily page-broken review of a machine with mediocre hardware specs. Did I miss anything important?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Why would you only want an 18" screen on a Desktop by PastTense · · Score: 2

    18" desktop screens are something from a decade or so ago--why go back?

  7. Throw away screen. by mspohr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've always thought it was a bad idea to build the computer into the screen. The problem is that when the computer becomes outdated, you have to dump a perfectly good screen. I have LCD screens that I've used for many years with different computers as I upgrade the hardware.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    1. Re:Throw away screen. by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's one side. The other side is of the traditional separate component PC is the tangle of cables cascading down the back of the desk onto the floor, which typically doesn't get touched by anyone who vacuums, resulting in a long standing pile of detritus and dust.

      It also means you can't easily pick the computer up and take it to another room, or put it in the car to take to another place, when you want.

      And finally reusing a screen means you don't get the benefit of the latest screen sizes or resolutions.

      Swings and roundabouts. You pay your money and you take your choice.

    2. Re:Throw away screen. by radarskiy · · Score: 2

      Apply all-in-one models have a display input so that you can keep using the screen after the internals have been superseded.

    3. Re:Throw away screen. by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      " The problem is that when the computer becomes outdated, you have to dump a perfectly good screen."

      Umm, we have these things called standards. I took a screen from a DV-6000 and threw it into a much older Toshiba Satellite. I'm using that screen right now to read your hilariously wrong words. The best part? I could take this Toshiba apart, and toss it inside my 32" Samsung A550 TV, and using the laptop connector cable plug it right in and it will work. I've done it before with my defunct DV-7 laptop.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Throw away screen. by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      I can't even go out and buy an LCD that's as high resolution / pixel density as the two CRTs I just gave away (20" visible, 2048 x 1536)

      And yet rather than keep them and use them you gave them away, buying an LCD instead. So your implication that screens haven't got better is given the lie by your own actions.

      Yes there are other improvements beyond "screen sizes and resolutions" that one would miss out on when reusing a monitor from an old computer. The size advantages of LCD over CRT was one. And resolution comparisons between the two aren't quite as simple as you suggest. LCD enables sub-pixel rendering. That wasn't possible on CRT.

    5. Re:Throw away screen. by mspohr · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must be a whiz with duct tape.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    6. Re:Throw away screen. by damnbunni · · Score: 2

      I gave them away because the phosphor coating was wearing out and they got very, very dim.

      The person I gave them to didn't have a working monitor at all, so 'dim' was better than 'nothing'.

      CRTs wear out after ten, twenty years of use. LCD backlights get dimmer over time, too.

      The difference is, I can't go buy a new CRT any more. Otherwise I sure as hell would have.

  8. Re:Am I missing something? by cbhacking · · Score: 2

    Umm... no, we haven't. Existing all-in-one desktop PCs, or even 18" (~45cm) laptops, have weighed way more than 5lb (about 2.3kg). Usually more than twice that; 11-20lb (5-9 kg) is more common amon AIOs. Even if they were designed with a carrying handle, they were not designed with portability in mind; the handle was to make it easier to get the from the box to the desk. Additionally, while consumer touchscreen monitors have existed for a while now, they haven't generally been designed for any kind of portability either.

    This thing weighs only a little more than my work laptop (which is admittedly a beast, but I carry it around a lot) without its power brick, and a lot less than my old (9lb) 18" "desktop replacement" laptop. Neither of those have touch, either, meaning they need space for a keyboard when in use and it's hard for more than one person to interact with one at any given time.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  9. Underpowered by GoJays · · Score: 4, Informative
    I ordered a XPS 18 at launch to use to demo our website at a trade show. It was ordered because it was the largest screen "tablet" in production. At 5 pounds with an 18 inch screen expectations were high for the device. However on testing, the machine is very under powered. The i5 processor runs at 1.8Ghz, it is advertised to run "up to" 3.2Ghz and doesn't list base speed, and we upgraded to 8GB of RAM. The hard drive is advertised to have SSD available, however it is only really a boot drive, anything installed is run off of a traditional 5400 RPM drive. The battery life was average at best, 4 hours with moderate use.

    We were using the tablet to demo our website, since a solid wifi signal or internet connectivity is not guaranteed at these types of shows, we have to rely on a VM running a LAMP server on the computer. Even with only a CLI version of CentOS running using 1GB of ram, and minimal processing specs, it caused the system to run at a crawl. It was painful and very disappointing. Needless to say, we returned the machine and went with the Lenovo Yoga 13 IdeaPad instead, and it did the job.

    1. Re:Underpowered by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Does your website mine bitcoins or something?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. Re:Am I missing something? by Monoman · · Score: 4, Informative

    It has a touch screen with an OS designed for a touchscreen, a decent weight, decent display quality, decent performance .... not a great price. Theoretically price will come down if it catches on.

    Please link to "similar crap" if I have missed something.

    --
    Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  11. Re:Apples Tablet Pricing by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...and its hurting them across the board.

    You're talking about the most popular tablet by far.

    Ironically the exception was the launch of the original ipad which started at $500 the device closest to this one...and (stupidly) its latest model is still that price.

    Of course. Apple typically don't reduce the price of their premium model, they just rev the hardware each year. For example it's double the dpi of the first gen.

    But they do sometimes introduce lower priced models. Such as the iPad mini in this case. At $329.

    This business model has made them the biggest, highest earning, most successful tech company today. Stupid? No, they know their business far better than you do.

  12. Home Office->Living Room->Bedroom . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    So for the average Slashdotter, that would mean:

    Mom's basement->Mom's basement->Mom's basement

    I don't see the portability value there.

    For me, personally, it would mean more like:

    My sofa->My sofa->My sofa

    It cuts down on my commuting, so it must be good for the Global Carbon Warming Footprint, or something like that.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  13. Is that all? by idbeholda · · Score: 2

    Mine is 5lbs 2oz and 19 inches. Oh, wait, they're talking about portable desktops. My bad.

  14. Re:Why would you only want an 18" screen on a Desk by Khyber · · Score: 2

    Because lugging a 22" around makes you look like a tool?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  15. Wasted article by Stoutlimb · · Score: 2

    Why is some mediocre product launch even news on Slashdot? Maybe I'm jaded on this, but it's not exactly new technology. Haven't tablet pc's running a Windows OS been around since windows XP was new? I can hear 2002 calling, they want their tablet back. I can't see anything remarkable about this. This is not news, this is advertising. What blows my mind is that some people post like they're excited about it. It makes me question giving up Slashdot altogether.

  16. Re:Am I missing something? by davester666 · · Score: 2

    Windows 8 was NOT "designed for a touchscreen". It is Windows 7, a non-touchscreen OS, partially updated to be touch-enabled. The first layer or two has been revamped to work reasonably well for touch, to the detriment of 'regular' mouse/keyboard use, but lots of it hasn't been redesigned to be used with touch, keeping existing small controls which are designed to be easily [for most people] to interact with using a mouse, but much more difficult to properly select using your finger.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  17. Subpixel rendering isn't exactly a panacea by tepples · · Score: 2

    In theory, subpixel rendering triples horizontal resolution, boosting 1920 pixels across to 5760. In practice, because of the low-pass filtering needed to avoid color fringing, it boosts perceived horizontal resolution by 50%, giving the equivalent of 2880x1080 for a 1080p monitor. It's analogous to how 480i is blurrier than 480p because of the filtering needed to avoid interline twitter. Because the vertical dimension has no subpixels (at least in monitors that don't pivot), it doesn't make smaller point sizes readable and thus doesn't help the user fit more text onto a monitor. Furthermore, a lot of frameworks appear to apply subpixel rendering only to text, not to bitmaps or vectors. Or has this changed on recent operating systems?

  18. I don't get the hate. by BrianH · · Score: 4, Informative

    My office was on the pre-launch wait list and we got some of the first XPS 18's Dell shipped. For your average person, with average computer needs, it's actually a really nice solution. First off, this really isn't meant to be used like a typical tablet, and is more of a "lap computer". The foldout legs allow it to work beautifully as a presentation piece (I've been using it to do R&D demos), and when reversed it actually makes a very nice tabletop touchscreen.

    Is it the most powerful computer in the world? No. Mine is the i5 with 8Gb and it's performance is about average for a modern desktop computer. You're not going to run the latest games with everything cranked all the way up (the lack of discreet graphics puts an end to that), but my son plays SW:ToR and it averages about 40fps with everything turned up. That's nothing amazing, but it's really not bad either. You have to remember that the XPS 18 isn't meant to compete with powerful desktops...it's an Ultrabook in a tablet form factor, and it delivers Ultrabook level performance. When viewed through that lens, the performance is just fine. On the Windows partition, I've run everything from Office to Visual Studio with no real complaints.

    The battery life on mine has been fairly good. From a full charge, it will do about 4.5-5 hours of light duty work (web browsing, etc) with the screen brightness turned down a bit. When my son was playing SW:TOR, he got about two hours out of it with the brightness all the way up. That's not the greatest, but you have to remember that we're talking about an 18" 1080 screen.

    The portability is actually better than you would expect as well. You're not going to be walking around using it in your hand like an iPad, but it's very well balanced and much easier to handle than it looks. I purchased the messenger bag style case for mine, and usually carry it around like a laptop. When I'm moving around the room, I just tuck it under my arm, where it feels much lighter than its advertised 5lb weight. The back of the XPS 18 is metal, there's a heavy rubber bumper all the way around, and the "gator glass" screen is slightly flexible, which make it fairly durable. Mine has already taken a few falls without any marks or damage.

    There are a couple of things I'm less than thrilled about. The power button is poorly placed and is exceptionally easy to accidentally press by hand. I had to reconfigure it in both Win8 and Xubuntu (yes, it dual boots just fine) to ignore inputs from the power button entirely. The foldout legs are well built and seem like they'll last a while, but Dell's folding mechanism uses a poorly designed magnetic holder. Basically they placed magnets on the back of the legs and then placed the regulatory stickers over the top of them to hold them in place. It took two weeks for the stickers on one to peel loose, after which the leg began flopping out on me. It was an easy fix with a bit of superglue, but it was a disappointing to see them cheap out on such a simple detail. Like others, I'm also disappointed in their choice to use a 5400RPM hard drive over a SSD, or even a 7200. The HDD is probably the biggest performance killer in the design. Finally, I'm irritated that, even after a month of tweaking, I haven't managed to get the touchscreen working in Xubuntu 12 LTS. I don't know what Dell did with the drivers for this thing, but none of the standard Linux touchscreen drivers work at all. Because of that, you can only use Linux on it when it's sitting at its base station with the physical keyboard and mouse. It makes a fine Xubuntu workstation when sitting on the base, but I'd really like to get the touchscreen working on it so I can use it as a tablet.

    All in all though, I'm fairly satisfied with it. I'm not going to use it to replace my desktop, but since getting it a month ago I've nearly stopped using my previous tablet (Xoom) and have completely stopped carrying my Ultrabook around. My Apple wielding co-workers have largely reported the same. If Dell would offer this in a 15" version a

    --

    There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.