Slashdot Mirror
Brain-Computer Interface Makes Learning As Simple As Waving
vinces99 writes "Small electrodes placed on or inside the brain allow patients to interact with computers or control robotic limbs simply by thinking about how to execute those actions. This technology could improve communication and daily life for a person who is paralyzed or has lost the ability to speak from a stroke or neurodegenerative disease. Now researchers have demonstrated that when humans use this brain-computer interface, the brain behaves much like it does when completing simple motor skills such as kicking a ball, typing or waving a hand (abstract). That means learning to control a robotic arm or a prosthetic limb could become second nature for people who are paralyzed."
I already saw this jack-in thingy you speak of in the original Matrix.
without conetlo this would never work, i mean, speaking and suddenly your thoughts are heard? no way jose for me
Now this is cool. I can finally be competitive in track. I just need to upgrade my legs to the faster version. :)
Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
Title is misleading clickbait
"Brain-Computer Interface Makes Learning As Simple As Waving"
And here I was thinking of learning Kung-fu Matrix style :(
always be wary of "Statist-of-the-arts" medical procedures.
If an electrode is implanted in a specific place, whats to stop a crystalline-chain from phorming and tapping the electrode? results are insane
MIT (purportedly "respectable") released studies on micro-pulleys, micro-cabling, and micro-gearing in the early nineties.
Micro-scale tech (adaptable for medical application) OVER TWENTY YEARS AGO; Why is there no public diclosure regarding micro-implantation over the last 20years? Why no disclosure on cloned Chinese apples nano-scale growths/formations/assemblies (since the faux-Foxcomm scandal)?
More than likely, the potential public good will be restricted due to covert applications.
IP anyone?
Its all in the "experimental" stage...
WHO funding?
The article seems to be highlighting that thinking about movement to achieve control in a BCI is some sort of breakthrough. I when I started my PhD on the subject in 2005 that was a well established fact. It's called motor imagery and although it's been too long since I've finished my research to remember the actual citation, I think it's been established since at least the early nineties.
This is not the Brain-Computer Interface you are looking for...
"Look at you, Hacker. A pathetic creature of meat and bone. Panting and sweating as you run through my corridors. How can you challange a perfect, immortal machine?"
results are insane
I infer that you're one of the results.
Ezekiel 23:20
imagine what one can do when one isn't paralyzed and yet can also work with these inputs...
Waving isn't truly simple. Look how long it takes an infant to "learn" how to to control the muscles to wave their arm. Just because we do it without thinking doesn't mean we should trivialize what a stroke victim may have to go through, even with brain implants.
remember how easy it was to learn to wave? it only took years. Remember how long it took to learn to kick a ball? maybe 10 - 12 years.
That is a VAST overgeneralization.
If it made "learning as simple as waving", I'd wave myself some organic chemistry or advanced thermodynamics courses.
- Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
Compared to other BCI's, this does sound like the easiest to learn to control. Some of the other fastest versions rely on what are called steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) which rely on entraining your visual cortex to the same frequency as a flashing light on a computer screen. Once entrained, deviations by looking at other parts of the screen can be detected. This however leaves you with fairly few options for different commands on the screen at a given time. Another one of the faster acquisition BCIs is based on the P300 brainwave. These work typically for selecting a character from a grid of letters/numbers on a computer screen. The computer will cycle through all the characters, flashing each one for a brief moment. The user's task is to focus on the character they'd want, and when it comes up flashing, the brain has a slightly stronger response about 300 milleseconds afterwards. While both the SSVEPs and P300 systems only take about 10-15 minutes to figure out how to use (compared to 6-8 hours for learning to control a brain rhythm like the mu wave), they leave very few options in terms of commands you could execute.
On to the practical side of controlling artificial limbs by thinking about them, this is missing a crucial piece of the puzzle - feedback! How well could you close your cyborg hand around a fragile plastic cup without dropping it or smashing it if you can't 'feel' the surface and the flexibility of your object in hand? Executing the movement is indeed fancy, but to do it well you'll need to implant some more electrodes in the parietal cortex where you map body sensations, which connect reciprocally with the motor representations of the same body parts. Also, this would likely only work for someone who becomes paralyzed or loses a limb. Those with congenital problems, unless turned into a cyborg during infancy, would never develop the proper representations of limbs they don't own/can't use.
i don't know karate, but i know ca-razy
I am a total MENTAL athlete!!!
I can "think" faster than I can move. I want my mind controlled exoskeleton now!
I only look human.
My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
well, for a one-liner, thats a huge re-snort. You may be referred to the MIT micro-machine program of the early `90`s, and "keep in mind" micro-scale, although normally invisible, is HUGELY larger than nano-scale. So a question might be posed something like, have you ever seen a nanocrystal growing, and if so, could you detect a pattern, and if detection was had, are your synapses firing in order, and if not, have you considered adjusting the gap? Oh shoot, the warranty on my electron-microscope expired!
Yup, but they dont sell it as "weapons" they sell it as "do-away-with-torture-we-read-minds-electronically"
ask anyone like Rahm Emmanuel where they put the money!
wheres the nano-finance in this? is it a secret?