Google Maps have yet to fully augment the 2D image of the map that's currently viewable on your screen. Google developers minds are still stuck too closely to the paper maps they're modelling.
A paper map weakness: you can only print the name of the street so many times. One visually finds the line representing the road they want. Then they have to trace their finger up or down that line to find the printed name. Then they can return back to the point on the map they're interested in.
The mobile app still relies on this "hunting" model. It's worse, in that you sometimes have to scroll several screen lengths to find the street name. Each screen repaint can potentially take a long time on a slow connection, as the device struggles to pull up EVERYTHING about the new viewport, which is way, waaaay more than just that one street name you're trying to find. When you do find it, you will have to do more scrolling/zooming to get back to where you came from, which depending on caching, can cause more repaints and network hops.
The app needs to MOVE the names of every street to match the viewport. NOT make you fiddle with the viewport to match the street name. If the line density is high, there needs to be a gesture to reveal/hide street names around your finger without causing a change to the viewport.
Fitbit collects the wearable data. The employer only sees it in aggregate form across its entire employee population. The employer does not collect the health information, nor have access to it in an identifiable way.
Will all the gestures/options be supported? Does Apple protect any with patents, thus cannot be ported? (Or even offered by another piece of hardware) You laugh, but look at all the silly mobile device UI patents all the Big Players engage in.
I only had to click on four related links before an article author FINALLY bothered to explain what a notch in this content even $%^&ing means! Arrogantly, one article began, "You’re all aware of the smartphone notch takeover."
If the state can persecute you for "false speech", then it's not free anymore.
The state can and does. See libel, slander, defamation, and fraud. You are free from government consequences if you state an opinion, even if later you re-evaluate it and think it's wrong yourself. At the time, you thought it was right. But if you knowingly utter falsehoods, especially with intent to harm, you can be persecuted.
You started off Comcast's quote with an opening double quote, but you never closed it. So it looks like the rest of the summary is the quote when it's clearly not.
Even if an infrared device can read all your conscious thoughts, it still can't inject them as-is into another brain. It has to be tokenized. The tokens are transmitted to the recipient brain. That brain has to run the tokens through its own neural net to hopefully produce a lossy facsimile, assuming it has all the contextual clues and enough cultural touchstones in common with the sender.
This won't be telepathy. But maybe it can produce a system of generating and parsing tokens that's faster than speech or typed natural language.
Twice I've reported a non-live video posted to Facebook with homicide in it. Not an artistic re-enactment or imaging. Actual people being killed. Within an hour I got a response saying it didn't violate Community Standards. So clearly, hiring a bunch of people is not enough. They have to know how to enforce policy. Higher-ups also need to draft a better policy.
you're not trying to teach a behavior, you're trying to change a behavior. I've go GPG implemented. It's completely unused because nobody I know cares.
It's actually worse than that. You're not trying to change your behavior. You're trying to change everyone else's behavior. Your GPG implementation relies on everyone sending emails to you to cooperate.
And yet flagging non-fictional snuff videos does nothing. They promptly reply it's not against Community Standard. AKA, there are No Standards. Except a female human nipple.
In Carl Sagan's Cosmos, he lamented that for decades 50% of the world's scientists were devoted to the nuclear arms race. Today the best mathematical minds are financially enticed to become quants. There isn't as much leftover to solve the world's problems.
There is already 3D priniting of cheap disease detection kits. This will be a big game changer in developing countries.
I vehemently disagree about the praise for the 3.5mm headphone jack. The same problems it had in the '80s are still with us today. It wears out ridiculously fast. I've had to find the "sweet spot" on an untold number of 3.5mm jacks. You either have to twist the plug to the perfect angle or apply pressure on the correct side, or else you get no sound or severely diminished sound. Plugs that can do both audio and a microphone seem to suffer this fate even faster.
Slashdot Mirror
Google Maps have yet to fully augment the 2D image of the map that's currently viewable on your screen. Google developers minds are still stuck too closely to the paper maps they're modelling.
A paper map weakness: you can only print the name of the street so many times. One visually finds the line representing the road they want. Then they have to trace their finger up or down that line to find the printed name. Then they can return back to the point on the map they're interested in.
The mobile app still relies on this "hunting" model. It's worse, in that you sometimes have to scroll several screen lengths to find the street name. Each screen repaint can potentially take a long time on a slow connection, as the device struggles to pull up EVERYTHING about the new viewport, which is way, waaaay more than just that one street name you're trying to find. When you do find it, you will have to do more scrolling/zooming to get back to where you came from, which depending on caching, can cause more repaints and network hops.
The app needs to MOVE the names of every street to match the viewport. NOT make you fiddle with the viewport to match the street name. If the line density is high, there needs to be a gesture to reveal/hide street names around your finger without causing a change to the viewport.
Fitbit collects the wearable data. The employer only sees it in aggregate form across its entire employee population. The employer does not collect the health information, nor have access to it in an identifiable way.
Will all the gestures/options be supported? Does Apple protect any with patents, thus cannot be ported? (Or even offered by another piece of hardware) You laugh, but look at all the silly mobile device UI patents all the Big Players engage in.
The plates on Earth's surface are in constant flux due to the movement of liquid rock far beneath our feet.
In terms of the Earth's radius, the liquid rock is not that far. It's close. It's so close. So scarily, scarily close!
"Before The Devil Knows Your Dead" showed you don't need hax0r skillz at all to pull this off.
Counterattack with an army of tick-eating possums.
I only had to click on four related links before an article author FINALLY bothered to explain what a notch in this content even $%^&ing means! Arrogantly, one article began, "You’re all aware of the smartphone notch takeover."
No. No, we most certainly are NOT!
If the state can persecute you for "false speech", then it's not free anymore.
The state can and does. See libel, slander, defamation, and fraud. You are free from government consequences if you state an opinion, even if later you re-evaluate it and think it's wrong yourself. At the time, you thought it was right. But if you knowingly utter falsehoods, especially with intent to harm, you can be persecuted.
You started off Comcast's quote with an opening double quote, but you never closed it. So it looks like the rest of the summary is the quote when it's clearly not.
Even if an infrared device can read all your conscious thoughts, it still can't inject them as-is into another brain. It has to be tokenized. The tokens are transmitted to the recipient brain. That brain has to run the tokens through its own neural net to hopefully produce a lossy facsimile, assuming it has all the contextual clues and enough cultural touchstones in common with the sender.
This won't be telepathy. But maybe it can produce a system of generating and parsing tokens that's faster than speech or typed natural language.
I never trust the number of stars users have voted on. It's worthless.
Twice I've reported a non-live video posted to Facebook with homicide in it. Not an artistic re-enactment or imaging. Actual people being killed. Within an hour I got a response saying it didn't violate Community Standards. So clearly, hiring a bunch of people is not enough. They have to know how to enforce policy. Higher-ups also need to draft a better policy.
They meant to hire 10,000 more in India and accidentally did it in Indiana, instead.
Maybe this is why whenever I flag a video for showing actual homicide, it never gets taken down.
This teaches the wrong behavior and makes them less prepared for roads without lightlines or malfunctioning lightlines.
All app stores, yes. That's a very solid point.
you're not trying to teach a behavior, you're trying to change a behavior. I've go GPG implemented. It's completely unused because nobody I know cares.
It's actually worse than that. You're not trying to change your behavior. You're trying to change everyone else's behavior. Your GPG implementation relies on everyone sending emails to you to cooperate.
And yet flagging non-fictional snuff videos does nothing. They promptly reply it's not against Community Standard. AKA, there are No Standards. Except a female human nipple.
You are totally correct about Skype and Office on Mac.
Meanwhile, I've reported two videos on Facebook showing actual homicide. Each time they said it did not violate Community Standards.
In Carl Sagan's Cosmos, he lamented that for decades 50% of the world's scientists were devoted to the nuclear arms race. Today the best mathematical minds are financially enticed to become quants. There isn't as much leftover to solve the world's problems.
There is already 3D priniting of cheap disease detection kits. This will be a big game changer in developing countries.
Makes in sound like Grumpy Cat pirated a Coffee maker.
I vehemently disagree about the praise for the 3.5mm headphone jack. The same problems it had in the '80s are still with us today. It wears out ridiculously fast. I've had to find the "sweet spot" on an untold number of 3.5mm jacks. You either have to twist the plug to the perfect angle or apply pressure on the correct side, or else you get no sound or severely diminished sound. Plugs that can do both audio and a microphone seem to suffer this fate even faster.
You're not alone in this misread!