Slashdot Mirror


MySQL Man Pages Silently Relicensed Away From GPL

An anonymous reader writes "The MariaDB blog is reporting a small change to the license covering the man pages to MySQL. Until recently, the governing license was GPLv2. Now the license reads, 'This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited.'"

15 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like a mistake. by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They offer things under two licenses: GPL and commercial. IMO, it is far more likely that some build script broke and failed to replace the copyright notice on the GPLed export than that Oracle has decided to try to take the man pages proprietary.... :-)

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    1. Re:Sounds like a mistake. by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a tried and true practice of Commercial software to charge extra for documentation. I'm willing to bet this is completely intentional.

    2. Re:Sounds like a mistake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I generally assume incompetence over malice, except when I'm dealing with Oracle.

    3. Re:Sounds like a mistake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      With Oracle, you can often safely assume both!

    4. Re:Sounds like a mistake. by nryeng · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're right. This is an unintentional change that will be reversed. http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=69512

  2. This affects distributions by Cassini2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most distributions include the documentation with any software packages distributed. Without a GPL or free software license on the documentation, the distributions must either:
    (a) comply with the license,
    (b) provide a third-party download (like Adobe with Flash), or
    (c) stop including MySQL.
    Given the existence of MariaDB, it might be simplest to stop including MySQL in the distribution.

    1. Re:This affects distributions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (d) provide the old documentation, which didn't come with any such restrictions.

      The Correct way to look at this situation, is that MySQL has died and is no longer being maintained by its owner. The last [GPLed] version was the last version.

  3. Re:Is this legal? by Hewligan · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, MySQL has always required copyright assignment for stuff to be included.

    --

    "If God created us in his own image, we have more than reciprocated"

  4. Just use Postgres by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just use Postgres - and get on with whatever it is you have to do :)

  5. Re:good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    How so? If they own the copyright, they are free to relicense a piece of data (and more importantly any new versions of it) under any terms they wish.
    This doesn't change the fact that the copy you downloaded previously under the GPL stays that way, and you can redistribute it indefinitely.

    captcha: darlings

  6. No secret where this is going by AmericanBlarney · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think Oracle has been pretty clear the whole way that they are trying to slowly kill off MySQL and drive users towards their more enterprise grade (read: grossly overpriced) product. They've jacked up the license fees substantially a couple times and pretty much every step of the way signaled that they're not really interested in supporting an open source DB, so I'm actually not even sure why this is newsworthy. I actually find a number of features of Oracle's DB offering fairly interesting, but wholly unnecessary for most web applications, so I expect everyone will move on to MariaDB and PostgreSQL. Nice of Oracle to provide a little window for everyone to switch, not that it was their intention.

  7. Re:good by bws111 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is not possible for the copyright holder to commit a license violation.

  8. Enough already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You've been kicking this one back and forth for a decade or more! If you knuckleheads would have used BSD licensed PostgreSQL from the git-go instead of MySQL's crazy now-you-see-me-now-you-don't license you would have freed up so much time and intellectual horsepower that you'd have your fucking flying cars by now.

    Slashdot. It's like herding cats, except cats are cleaner.

  9. Re:User trust violation by davydagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and just like OpenOffice became libre office, mysql became MariaDB.

    Everyone saw the writing on the wall and switched to MariaDB a few months ago. In for a repeat show?

    This is the great thing about free software, once its free, you have a hard time closing it back up. Someone just forks the last free version and keeps going, and you get ignored unless you can contribute something the Free versions don't, which is unlikely.

  10. Re:They're making friends like nobody's business! by adolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IBM isn't known for dumb moves

    Your memory of IBM differs from my own.