Slashdot Mirror


Disney Research Creates Megastereo - Panoramas With Depth

mikejuk writes "Disney Research has made a breakthrough in implementing the technique of acquiring depth information from a simple camera scan of a scene. For a perfect panorama you need to rotate the camera around its optical center, i.e. just rotate the camera. However, if you just rotate the camera about itself you don't get any parallax effects — which is why it makes the stitching together easier. If you want to get 3D information from the sequence of shots you need parallax. This means rotating the camera mounted on an offset arm or just moving the camera along an arc in your outstretched hand. The big problem with this method is that the parallax makes it more difficult to fit the mosaic together, and this is the problem that the research team has been working on. Using a range of different scanning methods the results can be converted into high resolution panoramas automatically complete with 3D information."

13 of 48 comments (clear)

  1. Curious by StripedCow · · Score: 2

    Are there any algorithms out there that can take a movie, and produce a sharp photo (or a series of sharp photos)?
    By "sharp", I mean much sharper than each of the individual frames of the movie.

    I.e., the algorithm should use information between subsequent frames to sharpen the image.

    --
    If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    1. Re:Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes there are. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superresolution for methods and limitations. They are not yet in movie-scale but can convert a sequence of images from a single rigid target into a more detailed one if sub-pixel accurate registration is done between images.

    2. Re:Curious by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure, I see Abby do that on NCIS all the time.

      It works best if it's a reflection on a pair of sunglasses, though.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    3. Re:Curious by chrismcb · · Score: 2

      You have to have someone else stand over your shoulder and say "enhance image" otherwise it won't work.

    4. Re:Curious by drkim · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are there any algorithms out there that can take a movie, and produce a sharp photo

      Of course. And it's free:
      RegiStax
      http://www.astronomie.be/registax/index.html

      It's mostly used by astronomers, but works quite well for any series of images. Of course, it works on repeating frames. If things are moving, them they aren't 'repeating' and won't be processed correctly.

  2. Amazing! 3D and panorama enthusiasts rejoice. by Romwell · · Score: 2

    I've been a long-time panoramic and 3D photography enthusiast, and have gigabytes of data that could be fed straight into this software.

    Shooting a 3D photograph is easy (just take two frames, correct issues in software later); shooting panoramas is easy (let the stitchers do their job); shooting a 3D panorama has always been too much work for me.

    It's a pity I can't get my hands on any working code yet, and any commercial product is probably way off in the future.

    Also, here's a link to their paper[PDF] for those interested. It's quite readable.

  3. Very old news by Begemot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's based on this invention: http://www.vision.huji.ac.il/stereo/

    Yael Pritch (who was involved in this project in Disney) was also involved in this research in the Hebrew University.

    So it's a breakthrough, but a very old one and, more importantly, somebody else's

    1. Re:Very old news by Begemot · · Score: 2

      Sure, pleasure. Re commercial products. I found these guys: www.humaneyes.com and www.snapily3d.com. Not sure how successful they are. The app seems to be struggling (probably heavy duty calculations are not ready for mobile yet). I simply looked up what Yael Pritch did in the past, apparently she was the founder of this company. Also check out this: http://www.humaneyes.com/News/detail/130/66/. Apparently Sony have infringed this patent.

  4. Re:Reinventing the wheel by Romwell · · Score: 2

    Also, it would still be technically easier to to with two cameras or a stereo camera.

    Yes, it will be, but there is a serious lack of 3D stereo equipment on the market today. Affordable stereo cameras are not of high quality, and I have yet to see one with adjustable lens separation. Two camera solutions come at twice the cost, size, weight and battery worries.

    Also, if I can't afford one D3x, I surely can't afford two of those plus a sync kit and a tripod, nor would I want to carry such a setup with me on a hike. There are plenty situations when all you have is one camera, and you want to make the most with what you have.

    Additionally, there's plenty of panoramic data out there shot without a panoramic tripod that can be fed straight into their algorithm. I know I have plenty, since I've shot many panoramas, but never had a pano head (and many of those were shot hand-held).

    Therefore, while this may not be the best solution to shoot a 3D panorama, it still has plenty of applications in processing existing data or dealing with situations where specialized equipment is not available.

  5. Disney Creates? by onyxruby · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anytime someone reads Disney creates they should substitute the word "copies" until proven otherwise. Disney has a long and storied history of intellectual property theft when it was in their best interest. They are arguably the greatest hypocrites in the world about IP, even more so than Hollywood themselves. They are always the ones that hold the most radical of views in the MPAA and are very quick to hold condemn anyone else and take away their rights. They have also been stealing from the public domain and other individuals for ideas for decades. A quick Google search can find example upon example of their bad behavior.

    1. Re:Disney Creates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Disclaimer: I used to work for Disney Research.

      This may be true of other parts of Disney, but Disney Research is only a few years old, is managed by researchers, operates pretty much independently like an academic institution (though with the goal of developing tools the rest of Disney can use) and everything I've seen has been to the highest standards of scholarship. Take a look at the SIGGRAPH publications here: http://kesen.realtimerendering.com/ From the last few SIGGRAPHs and SIGGRAPH Asias almost 10% of the papers are from Disney Research (and they're mostly good ones too).

      A comment above says "So it's a breakthrough, but a very old one and, more importantly, somebody else's" -- but if you actually open the paper, you'll see that the very first comparison is to that previous work and the improvement is getting the quality and speed to the point of being usable. Anyone who's done research knows there are (almost) no "breakthroughs" -- only building on ideas prior researchers head.

  6. Re:Hollywood does this all the time. by The+Cat · · Score: 2

    This allows Hollywood to film a two-hour forty minute movie about a guy impersonating Superman who kills people with his bare hands and lets hundreds of thousands of people be brutally slaughtered while he punches a guy and calls him profane names.

    Hey Hollywood. Put After Effects down and hire a writer. Nobody gives a fuck about graphics any more. We're sick of watching cities get destroyed. Hire a fucking writer.

  7. Re:More psuedo-3D by chrismcb · · Score: 2

    You can't use this technique to convert and already filmed 2D to fake 3D. This technique works by filming those "occluded areas" already, much like a 3d camera would.