Slashdot Mirror


CubeSats Spurring Satellite Revolution

kkleiner writes "Thanks to the miniaturization of electronics, small CubeSat satellites have quickly become the standard for orbital Earth monitoring. Their modular design and lower cost makes them accessible to many, from university researchers to backers of crowdfunding campaigns. This year, the number of CubeSats launched will at least double the number in orbit to date."

15 of 59 comments (clear)

  1. Next year's news... by msauve · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The popularity of cubesats has caused a great increase in "space junk," which increases the threat to satellites which support critical infrastructure.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Next year's news... by ModernGeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe that the orbit of these is so low that it degrades relatively quickly, and is out of the way of any real satellites.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    2. Re:Next year's news... by msauve · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If 10-15 years is "relatively quickly," yes. The majority of satellites are in LEO, and it's where there is the most concern about space junk.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:Next year's news... by SB9876 · · Score: 2

      There are currently almost 20,000 pieces of space debris at least 5 cm in diameter that we are tracking. The addition of a few hundred CubeSats which generally have a short lifetime in orbit is not a significant increase in the orbital space debris load.

    4. Re:Next year's news... by msauve · · Score: 2
      Really? If you're going to make claims, you should substantiate them. A very brief amount of research (as simple as clicking on one of the links in the article) would show that there is a real concern, such as this statment:

      good engineering projects for students, but of little use otherwise--and possible, in large numbers, an orbital debris nuisance.

      or you might even find, with a simple Google search, that CubeSat collisions have already occurred.

      Or, you can simply go on blindly putting your foot in your mouth, criticizing comments on subjects you know nothing about.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Next year's news... by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      From your link: "At 05:38 GMT on Thursday 23rd May, Ecuadorâ(TM)s first and only satellite collided with the fuel tank of an S14 Soviet rocket, which was launched in 1985."

      Yes, there was a collision between Ecuador's satellite (TFA doesn't say how big) but the satellite wasn't the debris, it was the discarded fuel tank that when jettisoned should have been thrown so that it would have come back down that was the debris. But the space junk problem hadn't really come up a quarter century ago. The rest of the article just showed the naming conventions of various satellite sizes.

      Give me a link where two functional devices that were actually being used at the time collided. Space junk is a problem, but these de-orbit at EOL, unlike Russian fuel tanks.

  2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Great, just what we need, even more ... Damnit. First post AC beat me to it! But I had time to skim TFA and didn't see a reference to de-orbiting them.

    They're in low-earth orbit. It's not an issue, because they deorbit naturally.

  3. Re:Great by Spy+Handler · · Score: 4, Funny

    If they charged a "redemption fee" for each cubesat - similar to what many states do with aluminium cans - you could have homeless people clean up the mess.

  4. CubeSat / Skybox Imaging satellites by auric_dude · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looks like this format of satellite is finding a good few uses http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/06/startup-skybox/ aswell as smallish satellites from Guildford University UK http://www.surrey.ac.uk/ssc/activity/phd_projects/small_satellite_sar.htm.

  5. Re:Great by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2, Funny

    because they deorbit naturally.

    Otherwise known as the "Duck and Cover" de-orbiting method.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  6. Re:Great by bandy · · Score: 2

    There's a perfect sound track for this: "Space Junk", by DEVO

    --
    "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
  7. Terrible Trend--Space Junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I really think we should, instead, be building a small number of super-satellites to stop the proliferation of space junk around the Earth. There could be other advantageous as well, such as shared energy and infrastructural components.

    The risks of too many eggs in too few baskets would entail higher risks. I think making these manned space stations would, therefore make sense.

    Matthew

  8. Re:Great by khallow · · Score: 3, Informative

    You do realize that the Earth gets hit every day by stuff that would destroy your car's paint job (and perhaps the garage it was in) - if there wasn't something in the way.

    To reach Earth's surface, a vehicle would have to dissipate several tens of millions of joules of energy per kilogram of the vehicle. And it will, by heating up the atmosphere and vaporizing the vehicle. If the cubesat isn't designed for reentry, then most of the vehicle will probably be vaporized long before it reaches the Earth's surface. Even if somehow, it were made of unobtainium, that could withstand the heat of reentry intact, it'd still slow down to terminal velocity in the lower atmosphere. That might mess up someone's car, but it's not nuclear bomb-scale "duck and cover".

  9. Obligatory AMSAT plug by Dishwasha · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's hard to believe an article like this gets posted without somebody mentioning AMSAT. They've been building satellites since the 60's on a much larger scale. Help support the latest AMSAT model called the FOX-1.

  10. Dallas TX Workshop on CubeSat by MauiJerry · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you are in (or willing to be in) south central USA next month, Citizens in Space is holding a 2 day "Space Hacker Workshop" July 20-21 http://www.citizensinspace.org/2013/06/citizen-science-and-space-exploration-in-the-lone-star-state/ The Space Hacker Workshop will provide hands-on exposure to a variety of microcontrollers, sensors, imaging systems, and other components. With these components, participants will learn how to design and build microgravity, fluid-physics, life-science, and engineering experiments. Each paid participant will receive a hardware package to take home after the workshop. The focus here is on SubOrbital flights - they are less expensive and CiS has booked 10 flights on the XCOR Lynx suborbital craft to carry 10 small sats and a citizen scientist payload specialist.