Slashdot Mirror


Industrious Dad Finds the Genetic Culprit To His Daughters Mysterious Disease

First time accepted submitter bmahersciwriter writes "Hugh Rienhoff has searched for more than a decade for the cause of a mysterious constellation of clinical features in his daugther Bea: skinny legs, curled fingers and always the specter that she might have a high risk of cardiovascular complications. He even bought second hand lab equipment to prepare some of her genes for sequencing in his basement. Now, he has an answer."

3 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Origin by quacking+duck · · Score: 4, Informative

    Whenever I see a serious advocate of alternative-only medicine and vegan diets for treating/preventing terrible or even terminal illness, I point to the highest-profile example and how that did not work for him: Steve Jobs. What a damn waste--he had a type of pancreatic cancer that 95% of victims they had, i.e. the treatable, survivable kind of pancreatic cancer, and he squandered his luck by delaying conventional treatment for almost a year.

  2. Re:industrious dad by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative

    In 2008, Jay Flatley, chief executive of Illumina, offered Rienhoff the chance to sequence Bea's transcriptome -- all of the RNA expressed by a sample of her cells -- along with those of her parents and her two brothers.

    Unsatisfied, Rienhoff went back to Illumina in 2009 to ask for more help. He proposed exome sequencing, which captures the whole protein-encoding portion of the genome, and is in some ways more comprehensive than transcriptome sequencing. At the time, Illumina was developing its exome-sequencing technology, and the company again took on the Rienhoff family as a test group.

    The answer to his daughter's health problems was not found in his garage, with second hand equipment.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  3. Re:wait, what? by the+gnat · · Score: 4, Informative

    "A collaborator of Rienhoff is now engineering a mouse that shares Bea’s gene variant"
    That sounds far beyond the capabilities of our current technology. How the heck would they do that?

    Genome editing has gotten a lot better; here is a recent example, but I'm sure this isn't the only way to do it. Of course deliberately generating mutant mice is one thing; genetically manipulating live humans to make them healthy is much more difficult. (Hint: there's a lot of attrition in these mouse studies!)