Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Army Block Access To The Guardian's Website Over NSA Leaks

New submitter crashcy writes "According to a spokesman for the U.S. Army, the military organization is 'blocking all access to The Guardian newspaper's reports about the National Security Agency's sweeping collection of data about Americans' email and phone communications.' The spokesman goes on to state that it is routine to block access where classified materials may be distributed. The term used was 'network hygiene.' 'Campos wrote if an employee accidentally downloaded classified information, it would result in "labor intensive" work, such as the wipe or destruction of the computer's hard drive. He wrote that an employee who downloads classified information could face disciplinary action if found to have knowingly downloaded the material on an unclassified computer.'"

7 of 331 comments (clear)

  1. Re:network ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't about preventing employees from knowing. It's about keeping classified information off of unclassified networks.

  2. Re:network ignorance by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't about preventing employees from knowing. It's about keeping classified information off of unclassified networks.

    By blocking a publicly accessible journalism website?

    Oh, right this is the Army, where Process A Requires Solution B, So Do C Instead is command's modus operandi.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  3. A real distinction, which they're bungling by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I worked for a military contractor once and was told that there was a good reason not to talk about classified material even after it appeared in the press. Our enemies couldn't be sure that the press reports were right, not without confirmation from classified sources.

    The military has now done what I was told not to, confirming the authenticity of the Guardian report.

  4. Re:network ignorance by crashcy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why target the Guardian then, except spite that they broke the story and had (or have) direct contact with Snowden? The information has already spread all over the internet, they can't block access to it all.
    I don't know what the process is for officially declassifying the information, but I don't see how you can really call something that's public knowledge classified anymore.

  5. Re:They lied, even to their own people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which is why I chose to not re-enlist. Granted, my re-enlistment window was over a year ago (before this all came out), but what I saw our elected officials doing made me realize they were a greater threat to our freedom and constitution than any terrorist would ever be... I couldn't in good conscience swear an oath to defend the constitution from both enemies both foreign and DOMESTIC, and sleep well at night knowing I was breaking that oath every day I marched in step to the idiots that are leading our country into the "dustbin of history." I know Ronald Reagan isn't the most popular president here on Slashdot, but here is a very cogent remark he made:

    “Someone once said that every form of government has one characteristic peculiar to it and if that characteristic is lost, the government will fall. In a monarchy, it is affection and respect for the royal family. If that is lost the monarch is lost. In a dictatorship, it is fear. If the people stop fearing the dictator he'll lose power. In a representative government such as ours, it is virtue. If virtue goes, the government fails. Are we choosing paths that are politically expedient and morally questionable? Are we in truth losing our virtue? . . . If so, we may be nearer the dustbin of history than we realize.”

  6. Re:network ignorance by gerardrj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it is available from a public web site then the information is no longer "classified", but public knowledge. You can not put the genie back in the bottle.
    The internet has no delete button and the Army has no neuralizers.

    The thinking and the process here is flawed. Once information is leaked it should be "de-classified", since that's what it is. To continue trying to operate as though the leaked information is still somehow magically top-secret is insanity.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  7. Re:network ignorance by Bengie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By common sense, what is public knowledge cannot not be classified. Otherwise the government could classify the color of the sky and tell workers to not look up.

    It is nothing more than a state of denial.