Australian Air Force's Recruiting Puzzle Shown To Be Unsolvable
KernelMuncher writes "Australia's Royal Air Force has been left red-faced after a job ad asked applicants to solve a complex math problem that was revealed to be unsolvable. The service posted the puzzle in a bid to attract the country's best minds to its ranks. 'If you have what it takes to be an engineer in the Air Force call the number below,' it read, above a complicated formula which candidates had to crack. But there was a slight difficulty: The problem had typos and ended up not giving potential operatives the correct contact information."
Maybe its a test of character?
much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
It's the Kobayashi Maru!
When people pointed out two key typos, the military bosses thanked them and said they were 'exactly the kind of people they are looking for.'
"Eh, sarge, I think this war is a mistake..."
...and contact us at our secret phone number, we *really* want you.
Several potential recruits complained after getting error messages from the Wolfram web page that reduces integrals.
Your problem may be solved by means of a most ingenious proof I have, which the margin of your ad is too small to contain.
I have to go lie down now, I'm not feeling well.
much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
One thing I love about fresh water school of economics, not only do they claim they can write an equation describing a modern industrial economy, but solve it too.
You find out that they are mistaken. So, you don't solve it, do a fake solving, or report them that they made a mistake? Considering how they approach to vulnerability reports the last option could get you in prison, while the problem will still have the same mistake.
It was solvable, just the solution wasn't the intended phone number.
... the only winning move is not to play.
You just need a cocky young man that can reprogram the test and then casually win the test while eating an apple.
jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
Mathematicians don't bother with such low-level expressions. This is indeed a problem for engineers. A good engineer would know how to load the problem into Matlab (or whatever symbolic solver engineers use), and lean back while it computes the answer.
And in particular people that know the limits of their own skill. Dunning-Kruger effect at work. People that know the limits of their own skill get help when faced with something beyond them. People that do not know these limits mess it up.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
WTF does Australia do with its Air Force anyway? They're hopefully not teaching algebra.
Apparently they don't have to teach algebra since they seem to be looking for candidates that already know Algebra and Calculus.
They were looking for someone with enough common sense to not bother solving it and just look up the recruiter's number in the phone book or on the web.
A good engineer would know how to load the problem into Matlab (or whatever symbolic solver engineers use), and lean back while it computes the answer.
This. Most of what I'll -- for lack of a better term -- call applications engineering is done this way. You learn the math in high school and college so you understand the problems, not so you can solve them in your head. Even in research fields it's unusual to solve equations of this size by hand.
No wonder I kept getting a Chinese take out joint.