Slashdot Mirror


Google Science Fair Finalist Invents Peltier-Powered Flashlight

GTRacer writes "Ann Makosinski, a Canadian student competing in Google's Science Fair, submitted a flashlight which uses temperature differentials to power its LEDs. Her long-time interest is alternative energy because, '[she's] really interested in harvesting surplus energy, energy that surrounds but we never really use.' Using Peltier tiles and custom circuitry, her design currently runs for 20 minutes or so and costs $26. A win at the September finals in Mountain View and/or outside investment could fund further development."

170 comments

  1. Current heat wave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Will not work so great with a 2 degree delta T

    1. Re:Current heat wave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew a girl with cold hands, but I don't think the LEDs in the flashlight would work with reverse polarity voltage.

  2. Invented??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    She "invented" it by finding an circuit online, copying it, and buying some Peltier tiles off of eBay? WTF?

    1. Re:Invented??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The circuit she used is probably covered by patents as well.
      I hope she enjoys getting sued.

    2. Re:Invented??? by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She "invented" it by finding an circuit online, copying it, and buying some Peltier tiles off of eBay? WTF?

      Yeah, and if you think that's bad, you should see how Intel does pretty much the same thing and they are making billions of dollars off of it! All they did was look up a transistor design from 50 years ago, hook up billions of them in an integrated circuit, stamp their name on it and sell it for hundreds (or even thousands!) of dollars to unsuspecting users that could have built it themselves if they wanted to.

      Losers! (sorry for the correct spelling, stupid autocorrect didn't let me type Loosers!")

    3. Re:Invented??? by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      Submitter here. According to the CBC write-up (and not covered in the TWO copy-pasta articles I had to wade through to GET to something that looked like original source!) she tried some custom designs, then found one online and bought the design.

      The article does not go into specifics of the transaction, so while she may still be legally on the hook, it can't be inferred from the info given.

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    4. Re:Invented??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Losers! (sorry for the correct spelling, stupid autocorrect didn't let me type Loosers!")

      Wait a minute.

    5. Re:Invented??? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Losers! (sorry for the correct spelling, stupid autocorrect didn't let me type Loosers!")

      Of course, if you really wanted to be properly geeky about it, you'd have spelled it "lusers."

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    6. Re:Invented??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're butthurt that a little girl is smarter than you.

    7. Re:Invented??? by GoogleShill · · Score: 1

      If you're autocorrect didn't let you type Loosers, than how did it show up at the end? I think they're parser isn't working up to there expectations.

    8. Re:Invented??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Submitter here. According to the CBC write-up (and not covered in the TWO copy-pasta articles I had to wade through to GET to something that looked like original source!) she tried some custom designs, then found one online and bought the design.

      The article does not go into specifics of the transaction, so while she may still be legally on the hook, it can't be inferred from the info given.

      So you're saying that even though the title of the article you submitted states that she invented a flashlight, she actually didn't invent shit?

  3. FlashDark? by AdamThor · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if you're hanging around the desert and the ambient temp is warmer than your hand, will it make things darker? That would be cool.

    --
    -- "Oh. This guy again."
    1. Re:FlashDark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Power is being generated based on the temperature differential. If the ambient temperature is higher than that of your hand, I would presume that the output polarity would be reversed. Hopefully she included a simple diode bridge in her circuit design to accommodate for such situations. Only other thing I can find lacking in her design is a small battery backup to make the flashlight more durable (your hand will recharge the device, rather than power it) and some copper sheets on the inside to make power generation a little more efficient.

    2. Re:FlashDark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So if you're hanging around the desert and the ambient temp is warmer than your hand, will it make things darker? That would be cool.

      No, it's for when you're lost in the arctic and freezing to death. Some of your wasted body heat will let you see the wolves circling...

    3. Re:FlashDark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you're hanging around the desert and the ambient temp is warmer than your hand, will it make things darker? That would be cool.

      No, deserts are cold at night. Go and see.

      If deserts are warm at night, the will be 30+C, which makes the temp. gradient too small to be useful. The real benefit for this stuff is when it is cold for when it is cold is when chemical batteries tend to fail most.

      Frankly, this is a good idea for emergency flashlight.

    4. Re:FlashDark? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2

      Well, she is from Canada, so it would make sense...

    5. Re:FlashDark? by FrankSchwab · · Score: 1

      I wish I knew who started that old wives tale about deserts being cold at night.

      Phoenix forecast for tomorrow: High 111, low 92.

      Sure, it's cold in December, but I don't think that's what you were referring to.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    6. Re:FlashDark? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Come live in the High Desert. 111F/75F day/night in the summer.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re:FlashDark? by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      What, 23 is cold??? You Yankee wimps, 23 degrees Celsius is warm for us Brits...

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    8. Re: FlashDark? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Informative

      It sounds like you never went to the Sahara. I went to the south of Tunisia, during the cooler months, and it was 25ÂC during the day and dropped to around or below freezing at night. The ice on the car in the morning was testiment to how cold it got.

      Reading online I see it can go from 40ÂC during the day to -6ÂC at night.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    9. Re:FlashDark? by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      Genuine LOL. N...ICE...

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    10. Re:FlashDark? by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      And you would die of heatstroke at 110-115f, quite common here in Texas.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    11. Re:FlashDark? by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      Probably. ;-)

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    12. Re:FlashDark? by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      At the risk of going completely OT, I used to live where sub zero (f, not c) was the norm all winter and 85-90f was considered hot in the summer, but since moving to TX I get quite cold anything below 40f and can tolerate 100f. Weird how one acclimates.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    13. Re:FlashDark? by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      You'd want to wait until the climax of the episode before you reverse the output polarity. It's more dramatic that way.

    14. Re:FlashDark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, 23 is cold??? You Yankee wimps, 23 degrees Celsius is warm for us Brits...

      You get acclimated to the weather. When I was in the USAF they sent me to Thailand, very close to the equator. It was above 90F every day I was there, and the coolest I saw was 74. On the way back to the US the next August we stopped over in Alaska wearing jungle gear, and were bumped for a firetruck. This was about midnight. It was about sixty degrees f. That was the coldest I ever was in my whole life. I didn't even get that cold under a car in the snow trying to replace a heater hose in -10f a few decades later.

    15. Re:FlashDark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? Go upwind twenty miles outside of the city into the desert. Take a thermometer with you. Report back. Protip: take a jacket.

    16. Re:FlashDark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree.. I live in Prague (Czechia, EU), and 24 C is a maximum temperature in which I can feel comfortable... Also because of melted roads and hot concrete everywhere... I prefer temperatures around 18-20 C or slightly lower...
      For a 2 weeks now, temperatures are over 25 C (except few days with rain from heat), but to my luck - in work, there is air conditioning and at home I have 2,4 litre package of icecream - one was already depleted, this is second one...

  4. What creates the temperature differential? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does she put it in the fridge before using it or something?
    Or does it use the difference in temperature between your hand and the flashlight.

    Also, since this is generating electricity from a temperature differential, rather than generating a temperature differential from electricity, wouldn't this be the Seebeck effect?

    1. Re:What creates the temperature differential? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      She's from Canada, so there's likely a pretty massive delta between the ambient air temperature and human body temperature. It, like elections, probably doesn't work in Florida.

    2. Re:What creates the temperature differential? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Informative

      Does she put it in the fridge before using it or something? Or does it use the difference in temperature between your hand and the flashlight.

      The latter.

      If you RTFA you'll see she's using the aluminum flashlight body as a heat conductor and the "head" and other exposed portions of it as an air-cooled heatsink.

      She's stuck the handle of the light into an insulating plastic pipe, cut a hole in the pipe, and stuck the peltier cell in the hole, with the "cold" side in contact with the flashlight handle and the "warm" side in contact with the hand. (I expect the next step is to wrap an outer aluminum tube around it to conduct heat from the whole hand to the cell, rather than just heating it with a patch of palm directly contacting it.)

      Voltage boost converter between the peltier assembly and the LED (because the peltier cell she used was not stcked for the right voltage to drive the LED.) The LED shines as long as you hold it, if the air is cool enough. (She's used it for 20 minutes running.)

      Also, since this is generating electricity from a temperature differential, rather than generating a temperature differential from electricity, wouldn't this be the Seebeck effect?

      Yes. Seebeck discovered current generation from heat differential (with dissimilar metal wires and a compass needle), then Peltier discovered heat-pumping with current.

      But, like most rotating electric machinery (where the same device is a motor or generator depending on whether you power it or twist it), the same effect is a heat pump or heat engine (depengding on whether you apply a temperature difference and pull power or apply power and pump heat).

      The effect is now often called the "Peltier-Seebeck effect" in textbooks. The cells are typically called Peltier Cells because the efficient ones are manufactured mainly for heat-pumping, though they work just fine both ways.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:What creates the temperature differential? by barc0001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      She's from Victoria, BC. It was almost 90F in Victoria over the weekend. Which is apparently about what it is in Miami right now. It's not all a frozen wasteland up here ya know.

    4. Re:What creates the temperature differential? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It wasn't almost 90F in Victoria over the weekend. It was 32C.

    5. Re:What creates the temperature differential? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, I don't "C". Pics or it didn't happen.

    6. Re:What creates the temperature differential? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for making /. a bit more like Reddit, that's what this place needs.

    7. Re:What creates the temperature differential? by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      What do you think "almost" means? 32C is 89.6F.

  5. Why is this story getting so much press? by Jadware · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone told me this girl will become a billionaire if she can figure out how to make a heat-based car engine out of Peltier tiles. I replied with a long sigh and this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stirling_engine The Stirling engine was invented in 1816.

    1. Re:Why is this story getting so much press? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      My car has a heat based engine. So did the Stanley Steamer.

    2. Re:Why is this story getting so much press? by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      I like the Stirling solar engines, myself.
      Image of a field of them.

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  6. Re:Only until I need glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. I guess we're both spending too much time on the Internet.

  7. Energy Crisis Averted by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of Quantum Paleontology...."throw the switch, energy crisis averted."

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLoOI5Laplo

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  8. She'll go far by Smallpond · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Makosinski admitted there were points in the experiment when she thought it would never work, but said "You just kind of have to keep going.

    Way more important lesson than the circuit design.

  9. The amazing thing is the LEDs by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Being able to get light out of such a tiny current source as a thermocouple is amazing. Since it's just two dissimilar metals in electrical contact to provide the electricity there's plenty of scope to improve the design and get something mass produced for a lot less than $26.
    The summary may confuse people since they may be thinking of peltier cooling, which is providing electricity to create a temperature difference, but the same hardware produces electricity from a temperature difference (and is normally known as a thermocouple in that mode).

    1. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by _merlin · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not thermocouples with dissimilar metals. It's Seebeck effect using semiconductor junctions. (Peltier effect is the use of voltage to generate a temperature differential, Seebeck effect is use of a temperature differential to generate voltage, but you can use the same devices for both.)

    2. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's not a tiny current source, but a tiny voltage source.

      The current provided by a thermocouple can be quite significant despite the very low voltage. Many security valves like those in gas powered water heaters are operated with the current generated by a thermocouple. Even a thermocuple powered electromagnet can easily hold several pound.

    3. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The summary and article are incorrect. The Peltier effect is converting a voltage difference into a temperature difference. In this case, it is the Seebeck effect being used to convert a temperature difference into a voltage difference. So-called "Peltier devices" can work both ways, but aren't typically called thermocouples ("thermocouple" usually used for a device intended to convert temperature to voltage), even if they are in strictly technical terms.

      The Seebeck effect was discovered first, so referring to it as the Peltier effect should be considered inappropriate (if not insulting to Thomas Johann Seebeck).

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      I saw commentary about Peltier versus Seebeck before I wrote the summary. The CBC will have to explain their position. In any case, what I read, and it goes without saying that IANAEE, is that Peltier and Seebeck are reversible from a strictly technical point of view based on how the differential is handled. I think?

      I'm open to being educated in this regard, if you so feel the need.

      In any case, I thought it was an interesting article and I hope that, should she get funding, the issues with maximum output and cost can be solved with more engineering or economies of scale. But seriously, she's 15, been competing in fairs since 6 (IIRC) and has done something way cooler than the typical fair fare!

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    5. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by msauve · · Score: 0

      No direct criticism of the summary, it was following the terminology in the article.

      Just a case of MSM not editing or understanding what they're reporting on.

      I could also complain about claiming an "invention" (it's really a discovery - nothing new found or created, just a new [?] application of something already known), but I'm not sure where that claim came from.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    6. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Both are tiny.

    7. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Who modded this up? Merlin, I suggest you look up what a thermocouple is and you'll see the way it works is the Seebeck effect. There's no point throwing around words you do not understand in the face of a far simpler explanation that was written to try not to confuse readers such as yourself by adding a third term.

    8. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Also the semiconductor junctions are a junction of dissimilar metals.

    9. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no point throwing around words you do not understand

      That never seems to stop you.

    10. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by _merlin · · Score: 1

      They aren't dissimilar metals at all - they're semiconductor metalloids that are N- or P-doped, i.e. silicon or germanium with impurities added, just like the active devices in integrated circuits.

    11. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who modded this up? Dbill, I suggest you look up what a semiconductor is and you'll see the way it works is solid state physics. There's no point throwing around words you do not understand.

    12. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Which gives the silicon different (as in not similar) electrical properties, just as with a type K thermocouple it uses the junction between two different nickel alloys.

    13. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

      Who modded this up? Dbill, I suggest you look up what a semiconductor is and you'll see the way it works is solid state physics. There's no point throwing around words you do not understand.

      Who modded this up? Anonymous, I suggest you look up what semiconductors are and you'll see the way they work is quantum physics. There's no point throwing around words you do not understand.

    14. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by GTRacer · · Score: 2

      Agreed on MSM - and that was after two links from barely-modified copies of the original to GET to the MSM. And I second the "invention" observation as well.

      We do need a new, commonly-understood and accepted word for engineering something new out of existing (or closely related to existing) tech. Maybe... "engineered"? Someone call the CBC! ^^

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    15. Re:The amazing thing is the LEDs by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      way cooler than the typical fair fare!

      Of course it's cooler... That's how it's being powered.

      (But seriously, won't this thing "feel cold" in your hand? Do you really want to hold onto a cold flashlight continuously?)

  10. Hope she's learned something by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Her long-time interest is alternative energy because, '[she's] really interested in harvesting surplus energy, energy that surrounds but we never really use

    The thing her presentation is missing is any acknowledgment that she has actually learned something, and realizes now that her flashlight is a neat little science trick, but otherwise terribly impractical.

    It only works for a few minutes, as the flashlight heats up to match your body temperature, and wouldn't work at all where ambient temps are remotely similar to body temperature. She also got only a tiny amount of power and light out of it, which could be provided for weeks or months by a watch battery without the expensive peltier in the mix.

    Slightly more interesting than vinegar and water mixed together in a model volcano, but the real question is whether she learned something valuable in all of this.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Hope she's learned something by Xyrus · · Score: 2

      I have to agree.

      It's fairly simple to use something like a Joule Thief circuit in conjuction with peltier tiles and an LED to make a low power flashlight, but it is fairly impractical. Even mass produced these would still cost more than a standard LED flashlight, and the standard flashlight will have higher light output and more life.

      It's a cool high school science experiment, but not really ground-breaking.

      --
      ~X~
    2. Re:Hope she's learned something by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you have a better design?

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    3. Re:Hope she's learned something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      wouldn't work at all where ambient temps are remotely similar to body temperature.

      She is Canadian. It wont be a problem.

      Slightly more interesting than vinegar and water mixed together in a model volcano

      Every third grader knows that vinegar and baking soda are required ingredients to make a model volcano. She may not have learned something, but at least you have.

    4. Re:Hope she's learned something by RKThoadan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The last time I needed a flashlight I really only needed it for a few minutes to find candles and such. The time before that I was just looking for something in my trunk at night. 20 minutes is more than enough for either of those circumstances. The last time I needed a flashlight to last longer than 20 minutes was probably spelunking over a decade ago.

      In most cases ambient temp was decently lower than my body temp just because it's usually evening/night time when it's needed. I used to have one of the shake-style flashlights, but it seems to have vanished. You pretty much had to shake it constantly for it to work, which made actually looking for things with it quite difficult. In any case, having a flashlight around that I know will work regardless of battery quality is a good thing.

      In short: I would absolutely buy one of these.

    5. Re:Hope she's learned something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Someone smart enough to go through trial and effort experimentation and end up with a working device has obviously learned something on the way. She does refer to some problems she overcame in the presentation, and the article discusses more fully. The presentation is a video abstract, not an in-depth dissertation and if YOU haven't learned enough to figure THAT out, you probably shouldn't be commenting in public without someone to proofread your posts for you. And yes, my snide, sarcastic comments are in response to snide, sarcastic comments on a science fair project that is the epitome of what a good science fair project is--an opportunity to formulate some theories, do some experimentation and demonstrate results. You sound like the type of person who would criticize Thomas Edison for experimenting with several hundred different materials for the filament of an incandescent bulb before finally hitting on Tungsten. Sheesh.

    6. Re:Hope she's learned something by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      I don't usually do this, but I'm feeling contrary this week. The linked article covered the fact she's been doing science fairs for years and for this one, tried some designs of her own before settling on an of-the-shelf piece. It's implied but not stated in the source that she's personally invested and not just going through motions.

      Also, what's the point of doing one with a battery? We *have* those already! Her idea would be great in a pinch if the longevity could be fixed. Which Google prize money or venture capital would allow. Am I missing something?

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    7. Re:Hope she's learned something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do. its called a "maglite".

    8. Re:Hope she's learned something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. I think if you could concentrate the suns rays on the flashlight body you could conceivably create a solar powered flashlight.

    9. Re:Hope she's learned something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The better design is to use a battery.

    10. Re:Hope she's learned something by fredprado · · Score: 1

      The longevity can't be "fixed", it depends exclusively on environment and for a given environment it won`t change, Google prize money or not. It is an interesting idea for a high school science project but it is not really a viable product.

      If you want to convert body energy into light there are dynamo based flashlights that are far more efficient to do this and do not lack this design hindrances.

    11. Re:Hope she's learned something by fredprado · · Score: 1

      I mean "lack these design hindrances".

    12. Re:Hope she's learned something by Jmc23 · · Score: 0

      Well, we all learned you're an idiot because you haven't learned anything important.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    13. Re:Hope she's learned something by stenvar · · Score: 0

      More importantly, like many "alternative energy" devices, this one doesn't actually generate any renewable energy once you take into account the huge amount of energy needed for making the components.

    14. Re:Hope she's learned something by evilviper · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The "shake" lights are a terrible design, almost as gimmicky as this one . You can go with solar powered lights, so the battery will be kept charged. Or you can go with crank-type flashlights, which will turn a minute of work into several minutes of light.

      Personally, I'm happy with batteries. Low self discharge NIMH batteries are extremely impressive. I have a single, seperate solar battery charger in the event of power outage or hiking, and can be used to power radios, phones, or anything else. And I've got the freedom to select whatever design of light I want, inexpensively, from pocket sized units I carry around, to room-illuminating lantern-replacements, to high intensity lights.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    15. Re:Hope she's learned something by quax · · Score: 1

      ".... where ambient temps are remotely similar to body temperature."

      She's from CANADA you insensitive klutz.

    16. Re:Hope she's learned something by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Anything you can buy is better.

      Crank or squeeze flashlights do a fine job.

      Solar powered flashlights do a very good job, and are hassle-free.

      NiMH LSD batteries (AAA/AA/D/9V) are only about 3x the price of disposibles, hold a charge forever, work in any common flashlight, and can be recharged with the cheapest and simplest solar battery chargers, as well as conventional chargers.

      If you want a thermocouple design... Mount the peltier to a stove, and hook the leads to a battery charger.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    17. Re:Hope she's learned something by evilviper · · Score: 0

      She bought a peltier, and hooked it up to a joule thief circuit design she found online. She's learning something about finding electronic components, and putting them together, but that's not a science experiement.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:Hope she's learned something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps; However if you also take into account the cost of generating, transmitting, and storing electricity, making a battery, and add in losses from that battery being unused for most of a flashlight's lifespan, then you might be surprised at the comparative efficiency of this approach.

    19. Re:Hope she's learned something by Skinny+Rav · · Score: 1

      It only works for a few minutes, as the flashlight heats up to match your body temperature, and wouldn't work at all where ambient temps are remotely similar to body temperature. She also got only a tiny amount of power and light out of it, which could be provided for weeks or months by a watch battery without the expensive peltier in the mix.

      Slightly more interesting than vinegar and water mixed together in a model volcano, but the real question is whether she learned something valuable in all of this.

      Others already commented, but the fact is that a flashlight is rarely used for more than 15 minutes and temperatures in whole Europe and most of North America (especially Canada) are almost all the time and everywhere significantly below body temperature, especially when/where a flashlight is needed (e.g. at night or in a basement).

      I agree about batteries, but they have a very bad habit of running out of juice just when they are most needed. And it is difficult to look for a replacement battery in darkness ;) This thing is zero-maintenance, so a perfect emergency source of light, not a whole-night-march-through-woods source of light.

    20. Re:Hope she's learned something by evilviper · · Score: 2

      a flashlight is rarely used for more than 15 minutes

      Perhaps, but is it in your hand the whole time? If I set it down next to me as I change my tire, this thing won't produce any light.

      This thing is zero-maintenance

      So is a solar flashlight, so is a wind-up flashlight, so is a plug-in rechargeable flashlight, etc.

      And in an emergency is not the time to mess around with a toy like this that gives out barely any light, because there's so little to be had from the temperature differential.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    21. Re:Hope she's learned something by martin-boundary · · Score: 2

      The last time I needed a flashlight I really only needed it for a few minutes to find candles and such.

      Whoa, me too! The last time I needed a fleshlight it was only for a few minutes as well! Oh wait, wrong site.

    22. Re:Hope she's learned something by nblender · · Score: 2

      Yes. She's learned that she can engineer something cool as long as she has some tenacity.. She's a 15 year old.. This idea is not likely to change the world but what world changing technology did you come up with when you were 15? My son has been 'inventing' since he was 6... He's almost 12 now and his inventions are starting to become interesting and I can see a steady progression to useful. This is just a notable datapoint on her life trajectory...

      Her parents probably encouraged her and clearly she has the self confidence to believe she can succeed. If any child of yours ever has a seed of an idea, you will likely squash it in its infancy and your kid will just plop himself/herself back down in front of the xbox.

    23. Re: Hope she's learned something by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      So negative, you should brighten up a little.

      This is the first model and if there is enough interest this will spurn research into how to get around these limitations. Even if the problem isn't solved for this particular scenario, there are bound to be other scenarios where waste energy is still hotter than the ambient air. Think of a furnace for example.

      Part of the challenge of innovating is doing stuff despite being told it shouldn't work and finding a suitable application when it finally does work.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    24. Re:Hope she's learned something by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      You don't think there are possible efficiencies in the Peltier/Seebeck circuit? Or more thermally-conductive metals/materials that would help with moving heat around? Or options for storing current on board for use later?

      If this device was working at 100% efficiency, then yes, it's pretty much a dead end. But is it?

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    25. Re:Hope she's learned something by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      What about the part where she tried circuits of her own design (quoth the article) before settling on the off-the-shelf Peltier thief?

      As a parent involved in about 7 science fairs between two kids, let me tell you - I'd be ecstatic if either of mine actually designed and tested anything on their own. Most of their projects were of the "hypothesis - test something - record and analyze - validate/refute hypothesis" type where they did work but not a lot of creation. They picked some interesting topics to be sure, but nothing tangible came out, only data and conclusions.

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    26. Re:Hope she's learned something by jnowlan · · Score: 2

      'shake' flashlights are great. No need to wonder if you have a charge, just shake the thing. Great for when you just need the occasional minute of light, like at the cottage when you need to find the outhouse in the middle of the night. Batteries are always dead when you need them most.

      I've used different ones and some are definitely better quality than others.

    27. Re:Hope she's learned something by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      They're probably thinking of the canonical "powerless village in Africa" scenario where any 2-bit technology will "save lives" and "expand freedom".

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    28. Re:Hope she's learned something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a parent involved in about 7 science fairs between two kids, let me tell you - I'd be ecstatic if either of mine actually designed and tested anything on their own. Most of their projects were of the "hypothesis - test something - record and analyze - validate/refute hypothesis" type where they did work but not a lot of creation. They picked some interesting topics to be sure, but nothing tangible came out, only data and conclusions.

      It's a science fair. Your kids did science. Design and test is engineering. Then again, winning a science fair is really about marketing.

    29. Re:Hope she's learned something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to use a flash light and your solution is your solar charger ... think about that.

    30. Re:Hope she's learned something by fredprado · · Score: 1

      More efficiency would increases the current and allow for brighter or more leds, not more autonomy. More autonomy would require a LOT more efficiency, a battery and a charge circuit, at which point a dynamo or solar cells would be much better solutions as sources of energy to charge the battery. Even running at a much greater efficiency there isn't much energy to take from the system before the body and flashlight temperatures reach equilibrium and unlike dynamos the energy amount is highly dependent on the external weather.

    31. Re:Hope she's learned something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohh, a chemistry mistake I can hop on.

      "Slightly more interesting than vinegar and water mixed together in a model volcano,"

      That would be vinegar and baking soda that makes the volcano.

      All this talk of electronics was making me woozy.

    32. Re:Hope she's learned something by falkon.nightsdale · · Score: 1

      I really wonder, how the battery of solar powered light can keep charged, given some (minimal, but existing) selfdischarge and inability to charge back while in my pocket, bag......feel free to add other dark places, where these things are usually stored... :)

    33. Re: Hope she's learned something by evilviper · · Score: 1

      This is the first model and if there is enough interest this will spurn research into how to get around these limitations.

      There has been interest in improving peltiers for many decades, and this flashlight will make no difference.

      And for thermal power in general, you can't exceed the Carnot limit, so a flashlight or other body-temperature powered device will never be practical.

      there are bound to be other scenarios where waste energy is still hotter than the ambient air. Think of a furnace for example.

      And to replace your furnace, they sell products such as high efficiency condensing furnaces, which are up to 98% efficient. So much so, that there isn't even enough waste heat left-over to get the exhaust to climb though a 10ft chimney out your roof, and instead needs to be exhausted almost sideways.

      Part of the challenge of innovating is doing stuff despite being told it shouldn't work and finding a suitable application when it finally does work.

      That's fine, until you run up against well-tested theoretical limits, making your product impractical or impossible. All those zero-point energy freaks don't win science fairs...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    34. Re:Hope she's learned something by evilviper · · Score: 1

      She's learned that she can engineer something cool as long as she has some tenacity..

      Oh? Was this an engineering fair? And here I though it was a science fair....

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  11. The Matrix by NIK282000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is how it starts.

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  12. I hear you man! She's a moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    She "invented" it by finding an circuit online, copying it, and buying some Peltier tiles off of eBay? WTF?

    This stupid girl just did what every working engineer does - even the NASA engineers - take shit off the shelf and design from it!

    If she was REALLY smart, she's mine her own copper, done her own research, discovered chemistry and physics on her own, and well, just did it without all this nonsense of living in an industrial society!

    REAL inventors reinvent in the wheel everytime they need one!

    1. Re:I hear you man! She's a moron! by stenvar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This stupid girl just did what every working engineer does - even the NASA engineers - take shit off the shelf and design from it!

      Yeah, and that's why we call that "engineering". It's distinctly different from "inventing" anything or doing "science".

    2. Re:I hear you man! She's a moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think any real groundbreaking inventions or science have come from highschool science fairs in the last hundred years. If it were so easy that teenagers could do it, there would be no need for silly things like colleges or professional engineers. We would all be able to book weekend trips to Alpha Centauri and be complaining that it was too slow and the food is only four star quality. So what. She submitted something she engineered to a science fair.

      Expecting ground shaking disruptive technology based on brand new science being displayed by fifteen year old students at science fairs be the norm is deplorable at best. To take it another way, if this is so unimpressive to you I bet you have a flying car in your garage that runs on happy thoughts and you just haven't bothered to bring it to market because you cannot afford the fuel.

    3. Re:I hear you man! She's a moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is this insightful... sometimes inventing is the process of putting things together that no one thought of before... just because the parts are things other people invented makes it not an invention??

    4. Re:I hear you man! She's a moron! by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      I think you may misunderstand the GP.

      REAL inventors reinvent in the wheel everytime they need one!

      The quote, if I understood it correctly, means that a real inventor can and would create a new invention from existing inventions. Correct me if I am wrong.

  13. 5mw is small, but not worthless by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    She said she's getting about 5mw of power from it, which sounds pretty decent from just a 5 degC temperature differential *and* using circuitry to increase the voltage. Should be quite visible in the dark, even enough to read from if held close to a book. At least until the aluminum heats up from her hand and the hole in the middle turns out to be inadequate to sink enough heat to maintain the temperature differential under most conditions (though she's in Canada, so maybe that's not such a problem there :-) ).

    In comparison typical 2000mAh alkaline AA cell can support 5mw for about 600 hours, but if you can't afford alkaline batteries (or are someplace where you don't have easy access to them), then this flashlight may be better than nothing. Though a crank-up generator flashlight might be brighter and more usable.

    It may not save the world, but it's a great science fair project.

    1. Re:5mw is small, but not worthless by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      I wonder if it would work better as a glove, with the heat source (your hand) completely enclosed, and more surface area (the outside surface area, not the interior of a tube) to be chilled by the air.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:5mw is small, but not worthless by mjwx · · Score: 1

      In comparison typical 2000mAh alkaline AA cell can support 5mw for about 600 hours, but if you can't afford alkaline batteries (or are someplace where you don't have easy access to them), then this flashlight may be better than nothing. Though a crank-up generator flashlight might be brighter and more usable.

      It's not a question of affording AA batteries in some scenarios, it's a matter of getting them or being certain they'll work.

      Alkaline batteries have a shelf life. I once worked in a machine shop at a mine. As one of the lowest level peons one of my glorious tasks was testing all the battery powered devices in the shop and once every 2 months, replacing all the replaceable batteries in all the battery powered devices (regardless of if they worked) as if one torch (flashlight for the Americans) didn't work the safety inspectors would tear us a new one. Rechargeable were strictly verboten for safety devices as they had a terrible shelf life.

      If the company replaced every single torch in the place with a version that didn't need batteries they'd save a mint. Hundreds of units per site.

      Also, I can think of places that dont have regular supply or carrying spare batteries is wasteful like onboard ships or remote bases that get a resupply ship every 6 months where this would be useful.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    3. Re:5mw is small, but not worthless by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 2

      And, there, my friend, is the ultimate point of research and innovation...it has somebody thinking how to extend her work.

  14. Crappy summary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, of course I haven't read TFA. I'm really not interested in expounding on what a highschooler is interested in before knowing just what this said-to-be-neat little thing is and does. I'm not here for the human interest angle on youthful inventors of gadgets.

    THE GADGETS COME FIRST, DAMMIT. Editor, fire thyself.

  15. Re:Only until I need glasses by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Yes and no. I read that as "Fleshlight-powered flashlight".

  16. ... when I realized that humans are ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a great source of untapped thermal energy", said The Architect, while holding an unborn human fetus.

  17. 20 minutes by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming it works until the temperature differential equals out to something that the peltier tiles can't use, then it has to cool off. Immediate thought was that putting it in the fridge (or better yet freezer) for a few minutes would cool down the tube and provide for an even larger temperature differential during use, until the temperature again equals out.

    So, for continuous use, the obvious solution is to pack the hollow tube with a miniature refrigeration unit, run on batteries.

    Waaaait a minute...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:20 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or use a heatpipe and a handguard for the cooling side, like that used in a rapier basket.

  18. Re:Too bad she is pretty by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    You know, I don't think I've ever heard someone say "too bad she's pretty" before, especially in this context.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  19. Get OFF my Lawn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can not believe the comments I am reading here. There are initiatives all over the world to get more females into STEM stuff and everyone here seems to quibble about the technical details! She's a teenager. I first learned about the Peltier effect in my 4th year at University, yes that was 40 years ago. My kids didn't learn about it in their High Schools either. So much for the U.S. education system. Give the kid a break!

  20. Re:Too bad she is pretty by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3

    Dude, in a few years she'll be doing great things and you'll still be living in your parents' basement wishing you had an organic girlfriend.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  21. Re:Too bad she is pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did you last time see a pretty woman doing great things like that? Woman is either fugly and has no choice but study, or pretty and not compelled to do anything besides her hair and nails. This is the way how things are.

  22. PV is more practical by tepples · · Score: 1

    A photovoltaic panel would probably be far more efficient than thermal + Peltier/Seebeck for charging the battery in a solar-powered flashlight. At least all the solar-powered flashlights I could find on Google use PV.

    1. Re:PV is more practical by bjs555 · · Score: 1

      But it is solar powered. The sun shines on plants. The human eats plants (or, more indirectly, animals) to generate heat to power the flashlight. Of course, there are a lot of losses along the way so there isn't much energy left to power the LED.

      Congrats to her for coming up with an interesting, if impractical, science project. There's a link in the article to a video of her describing her project and it shows that she considered how much power is available from a Seebeck/Peltier device, how much is needed to power an LED, and what voltage is needed to overcome the forward LED drop.

      As an emergency power source, it might be better to mount the one surface of a Peltier device on a metal bar and heat the other end of the bar in the flame of a gas stove or a barbeque grill which would still work during a power outage. An enhanced temperature difference across the Peltier device could be achieved with a heat sink on the surface opposite the one touching the hot metal bar. Power from the device could be used to charge a battery for the flashlight. Or, instead of a flashlight, an LED on a stick might serve as an electronic candle for use during an extended power outage or for camping. The battery of the electronic candle could be charged using a stove, grill, or campfire during the daytime and then provide some light at night.

      The project was likely a good learning experience for her. In the comments below the video, someone mentions that both her parents are engineers. I don't know if that's true but, if so, who can claim that we don't all stand on the shoulders of giants? She just happened to be closer to some shoulders than many of us.

    2. Re:PV is more practical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article: Neither of Makosinski's parents have a post-secondary science education...

      which might be taken to mean that neither one is an engineer. So much for reading comprehension these days.

    3. Re:PV is more practical by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      You mean something like this: the Bio lite stove? That doesn't help you find your way in the cold dark when all batteries die because it's -20C outside. Her project would help.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    4. Re:PV is more practical by falkon.nightsdale · · Score: 1

      That just mean, that they don't have nicely painted paper on the wall (that confirms tertiary education), but says basically nothing about their freetime interests and real skills. ;)

  23. Re:Too bad she is pretty by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    The real question is: how much her prettiness helped her to win the Google science fair? The contest works both ways: a person who wins has his/her image associated to Google. Would Google choose a ugly person?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  24. Re:Too bad she is pretty by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    When did you last time see a pretty woman doing great things like that?

    My goodness, did you go to college? Work anywhere that had employees? I've been in classes with, studied under, and worked with numerous gorgeous women. From that subset of classmates, many are doing great things today.

    If you need an example from the famous super-genius echelon, the one that comes to mind most immediately would be Lisa Randall, though frankly it's the sapiosexual qualities that do it for me.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  25. Wrong effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This operates from the Seebeck effect. The Peltier effect generates temperature differentials from input electricity.

  26. Am I really the first to say it? by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Funny

    She just invented a new flashlight, and wants to use "energy that surrounds but we never really use."

    Like, the energy that surrounds us and penetrates us, and binds the galaxy together? Her "long time interest" is clearly building a light saber.

  27. Why does it only last 20 minutes? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't it work as long as the ambient temperature is lower than body temperature?

    Or does the battery she put in it after not getting it working in time only last that long?

    1. Re:Why does it only last 20 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      hand hot. hand warm lighty thing, make light no light. :(

    2. Re:Why does it only last 20 minutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only works by temperature differential through the substrate. Eventually the substrate heats to nearly the temperature of her hand and the power generated drops. She used a hollow metal core which would have a fairly high mass to heat up and would also radiate into the environment, but apparently not enough heat was being radiated.

      Next question would be is there enough spare energy for a fan in the middle? Then you could use heat fins to the center and force air through the cylinder to get more cooling.

    3. Re:Why does it only last 20 minutes? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Eventually the substrate heats to nearly the temperature of her hand and the power generated drops.

      So then you let go, and it comes back on... right? Or wrong?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Why does it only last 20 minutes? by sylivin · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't it work as long as the ambient temperature is lower than body temperature?

      Or does the battery she put in it after not getting it working in time only last that long?

      The device is powered by the heat differential. Both your hand and the LED inside are sources of heat, while the only way to remove any heat is via the air. Once the aluminum body is >= to your body heat the device will no longer work.

      You can probably get it to last longer by storing it in the 'fridge beforehand, or waving it around like a crazy man to carry off more heat. Either way, after not using it for a period of time it should cool down to background temperatures and will be useable once more. Granted, this isn't going to change the flashlight world, but a batteryless flashlight that works in an emergency as long as the house is less than 90 degrees F might be useful in quite a few places in the world.

      Also, remember that waste heat is one of the main forms of inefficiency is almost any device made by humanity. From power plants to cars to electronics - they all have to deal with the problem of waste heat. If she makes even one company decide to focus their attention on larger scale devices to use waste heat in a productive and economical manner then she has helped us all.

      Giver her some props. After all, this is way more impressive than your baking soda and vinegar volcano science fair project.

  28. Re:Too bad she is pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just an FYI - I knew an Oxford genetics researcher who wasreally pretty - she dyed her hair brown and wore glasses because she felt that people took her more seriously when she resorted to such tactics. Having been on the receiving end of patronising behaviour myself, I know where she's coming from. After all, when geniuses like Andy Schlafly tell us that men are more intelligent than women, who can possibly argue?

  29. Re:Too bad she is pretty by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Marissa Mayer as a counter example..

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  30. Re:Too bad she is pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this the 'real question'?

  31. Re:Too bad she is pretty by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Just an FYI - I knew an Oxford genetics researcher who wasreally pretty - she dyed her hair brown and wore glasses because she felt that people took her more seriously when she resorted to such tactics. Having been on the receiving end of patronising behaviour myself, I know where she's coming from. After all, when geniuses like Andy Schlafly tell us that men are more intelligent than women, who can possibly argue?

    Um, any sapient person?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  32. Re:Too bad she is pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, but what about the republicans?

  33. EMERGENCY LIGHT - winter! by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Ever have a flashlight in a car? not only do the batteries wear out but in the winter they don't work either! This thing will work well in the cold and for short periods at other times... and not at all in the summer.

    1. Re:EMERGENCY LIGHT - winter! by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Ever have a flashlight in a car? not only do the batteries wear out but in the winter they don't work either! This thing will work well in the cold and for short periods at other times... and not at all in the summer.

      I think even your "dead" batteries are going to put out more light than this 5mw light. I keep a 2 AA LED light in the car with lithium batteries (and an extra set of batteries) -- lithium's last much longer than alkalines, have a 10 year shelf life and work fine even in termperatures well below zero. That's in addition to the 3D cell Maglite in the trunk, which has never failed me even though I only rotate the batteries out every year or two.

  34. Why is this interesting? by cyn1c77 · · Score: 0

    Not to be harsh but why is this on slashdot? Is it because it was invented by a young female? (If a nerdy boy with really thick glasses invented it, would people care less? Probably.)

    Reasons why the light is not interesting:

    1. She is using an established technology (Seebeck effect), Peltier coolers are commonplace.

    2. It runs for up to 20 minutes.

    3. It isn't that bright.

    4. You have to have to hold it for it to work.

    When I use a light to see in the dark, I generally either (a) want it to be really bright and/or (b) I don't want to hold it so that I can have my hands free to work. This device satisfies neither of those objectives.

    1. Re:Why is this interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is exactly that thing that should be on /. Oh, and you suck, BTW.

    2. Re:Why is this interesting? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Reasons why the light is not interesting:

      I'd say not practical rather than not interesting.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Why is this interesting? by sylivin · · Score: 1

      Not to be harsh but why is this on slashdot? Is it because it was invented by a young female? (If a nerdy boy with really thick glasses invented it, would people care less? Probably.)

      1. Because it is nerdy. Hellloooo science fair.

      2. Because the item involved is a common household item (flashlight) and nerds like innovations on common household items.

      3. Because she is a girl.

      Girls are rare in science which makes their contributions more newsworthy. Maybe someday in the future that will change, but probably not in our lifetimes.

      Don't worry - I'm sure once the winner of the Google science fair is announced we'll have a story on slashdot for that as well and I'm sure it will be an interesting topic to talk about also.

  35. Cool. I suggested something similar like that .... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    about 8 years ago on this site. However, I was suggesting it for buoys, as well as road signs. What peltier counts on, is temp differentials. So, if a post is 3' in the ground, then the temp is normally different than air. By simply designing a system to carry heat up and down, then it is possible to get the difference. The buoy is even easier. The air is rarely the same temp as water. As such, it would be possible to charge a battery or even an ultra-cap to provide power during the x-over.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  36. In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one could call it a Fleshlight?

  37. she got the idea off youtube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are plenty of video on youtube - peltier to generate electricity

  38. Re:Too bad she is pretty by H0p313ss · · Score: 2

    When did you last time see a pretty woman doing great things like that? Woman is either fugly and has no choice but study, or pretty and not compelled to do anything besides her hair and nails. This is the way how things are.

    The most beautiful woman I ever met was a mathematician who was working on her Phd. Her idea of small talk was Pi. When she walked down a hallway every man she passed literally stopped walking as soon as she passed by and drank her in. I have never seen men behave that way, before or since.

    One of my cousins is a lawyer who worked through college as a fashion model.

    Perhaps one day you'll get to move out of Mom's basement.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  39. Re:Too bad she is pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Stallman.

  40. Why so negative? by TheSimkin · · Score: 1

    When someone comes up with an awesome idea and wins a google award this is generally a good thing. Why is everyone trying to knock her? She's a 15 year old inventor who created something pretty awesome through a lot of tinkering, research and hard work. I can see many uses for this and would very much like to get one if they are ever mass produced.

  41. batteries suck. by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    I have a hand crank generator flashlight in my car. It had a battery but I replaced it with a super capacitor... which cost more than the cheapo flashlight.

    Oh, its about 4V. Yeah, I put some contacts to the outside; I can power a cell phone, not sure how long - i didn't test it.

  42. Re:Okay, so you are an idiot by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Batteries and generators in mechanical torches wear out over time. This device does not.

    Peltiers wear out over time, too. That's why stores sell replacement thermocouples for furnaces, water heaters, etc. I recently had to throw out a tiny refrigerator because the peltier gave up. They're also very finicky, and die much more quickly in humid climates, and similar.

    no coils to corrode, no mechanism to seize up.

    If the spring in your dynamo flashlight is corroding, you'd have big problems with any type of flashlight, including this one, as they've all got METAL wiring throughout.

    This thing could be strapped to your glove compartment or next to your bed WITHOUT having to worry about battery life or maintenance.

    Even a tiny battery powered flashlight can put out a lot of light for several hours. This thing dies after "20 minutes or so".

    It's always nice to be called an idiot by someone who is simultaneously demonstrating that they have ZERO knowledge of the topic, and also couldn't even completely read the short summary, which clearly mentioned the shortcomings.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  43. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was all over the internet about a week ago. Where have you been, Slashdot?

  44. Alternative flashlights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While we're at alternatively powered flashlights, here is a spring loaded one:

    http://lavrans.laading.net/book/projects/Windup_Flashlight/

  45. Transformer? Use a voltage multiplier... by funkboy · · Score: 1

    A bit of googling turns up this cheap IC that would do the job (it's specifically made for running USB or LED devices off of low-voltage power sources).

    But kudos to her for making the thing work & winning the prize. Anything that encourages kids to get into STEM is a good thing.

  46. 20 Minutes? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    A robust flashlight has to run theoretically 20 years on a charge. That is, it has to be ready to use when you want, and self-sustaining. What was this demo flashlight doing before being picked up to use for 20 minutes? Charging for 20 hours?

    The whole idea of capturing and using ambient temperature differences to produce energy has to be: to produce as much as used, as its being used in the environment it is being used in.

  47. Moon Bases by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    I always wondered why this effect couldn't be used as a power source on tidally-locked bodies such as the moon. Permanent shadow keeps the cold side cold and permanent sun keeps the hot side hot.

    Hmm. Maybe it isn't being proposed due to the iron-clad McDLT patent.

  48. That's it... by The+Excluded+Middle · · Score: 1

    The Matrix is inevitable now.

  49. Did not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She did not invent the first Peltier powered flashlight.

    First, it's not Peltier effect, but the opposite, a thermocouple effect.

    Next, I'm sure lots of people, like thousands, have considered powering things with thermocouples.

    Going back about 100 years, old gas furnaces have had micropower thermostats, powered from a thermocouple over the furnace pilot light.

    Going back 50 years, I recall a magazine article about folks in Siberia putting thermocouples around a kerosene lamp and getting enough power to run a small transistor radio.

    And most of them quickly realized that thermocouples, being like 6% efficient, and putting out millivolts, were not going to be a big win. Like not being able to pay back their cost within 10 years, or ever.

    In the real world, she would have followed the same path, maybe getting as far as proposing it to the marketing folks, who would haev said: An extremely weak flashlight that will have to sell for $129 to make a profit? Not likely, not even on SkyMall.

  50. Won't someone PLEASE think of the undead?? by QilessQi · · Score: 2

    Vampires and zombies are already at room temperature; this is USELESS for them! What about THEIR flashlight needs?

  51. Re:Too bad she is pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am very sorry to see she is quite a good looking girl.

    This girl is 15. Thinking she is good-looking makes you an instant pedophile. In 2.X years when she is 18, and likely looks basically the same, you're allowed to think this, but not now.

    Those are the rules.

  52. Re:Too bad she is pretty by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    (raises hand...) Don't believe everything you hear from Piers Morgan. Actually, it's a good idea not to believe everything you hear from anyone.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  53. So why isn't it an *Engineering Fair*? by ron_ivi · · Score: 1

    I totally respect her and her accomplishments; but think it'd be better for everyone (both the field of science and the field of engineering) if they rename the contest to "Enginering Fair" if they want this kind of entry.

    1. Re:So why isn't it an *Engineering Fair*? by Holi · · Score: 1

      Why, it was a "Science Fair" not an "Invention Fair".

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  54. the other side of this technology by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Flashlights are neat but there's superior technology. Charging from physically spinning a tiny alternator in current models by squeezing a trigger in the handle is far more effective and energy can be stored in gigantic capacitors instead of a battery.

    What I'd like to see is a peltier tile suit that effectively cools the user. An air conditioning suit that operates based on electricity from a heat differential would be amazing. The only catch is, human skin temperature is like 82 Fahrenheit or something on average and you'd probably want cooling on a 90 degree day so technically, you'd have to reverse the tiles and grab the energy from the outside air.

    While thinking about this potential technology, I noticed that if you ran an air conditioner on the inside of the suit and kept grabbing heat from outside, the temperature differential would keep rising and thus providing more cooling which would make the differential higher and soon your suit is -200 fahrenheit. It's sort of like the exact opposite of a perpetual motion or free energy device. But given enough insulation, would this magic self-sustaining coldness engine actually work?

  55. 20 minutes? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    What happens after 20 minutes? If this setup really generates enough energy, shouldn't it last indefinitely?

  56. Squeezelights are better than shakelights by far by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    All shake flashlights are pretty horrible compared to old Russian squeezelights.

    Just like with shakelights, quality varies, and some have batteries in them that will not last. But you can continuously use a good squeezelight for a half hour or more (depending on your hand strength - I can use mine for hours because I type a lot) and the light beam will stay focused right where you want it the whole time - which is impossible with any shakelight.

    Also, since shakelights have powerful neodymium magnets in them and the housings are plastic, they screw up magnetic media (like credit cards) that get too close. The dynamos in the old no-battery Russian squeezelights never do that.

    My squeezelight is at least 15 years old, and probably older, and sees regular use. I did have trouble finding a replacement for the primitive CCCP lightbulb it uses, but when I found some on eBay I bought 30 of them for a couple bucks so no worries now. The bearings in this thing are made of oiled wool, it's incredibly robust and repairable.

    The only downside is dynamos are noisy, so when you're camping with the family everybody complains if you get up in the night to water the shrubbery.

  57. Arrgh... Not logged in... :( by falkon.nightsdale · · Score: 1

    I was overly distracted by heat and bowl of pisstacia icecream from abovementioned package... :)