Slashdot Mirror


Farm Workers Carry Drug-Resistant Staph Despite Partial FDA Antibiotics Ban

An anonymous reader writes "New research out of the University of North Carolina now shows factory farm workers actually carry drug-resistant staph. Europe has long ago banned the use of antibiotics in livestock, but the FDA remains behind the curve with a partial ban. Thanks to large industrial farming operations, we all remain continuously at risk as our last line of antibiotics is wasted on animals."

5 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. This is kind of fun by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 5, Funny

    Y'know, evolution being the path by which this happened, and americans being unable to blame it because that would aknowledge its existence.

    I guess it will get blamed on socialism, Obama, terrorists er something.

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
  2. And this is kind of sad by c0lo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sad, because the EU may had imposed the ban for nothing: unless they also impose a quarantine against anything/anyone coming from outside, the drug-resistant staph will get into EU (directly from US or via other routes).

    One wonders: would this staph strain they bred qualify to WMD?

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    1. Re: And this is kind of sad by ericloewe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You seem to be missing the point. Randomly giving animals (or people, but that's harder to control) antibiotics without them needed said antibiotics will eventually create antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

      Your point is a typical "We can't fix everything, so let's fix nothing!" attitude I've seen applied way too often on this website.

      Also, these antibiotics aren't banned. Uncontrolled administration of any antibiotic for non-medical reasons is. What would you suggest we do? Stop using antibiotics and hope not to die because of something that could've been easily treated with antibiotics but wasn't due to a fear that some bacteria will develop a resistance against it?

      It's not a matter of eliminating the problem, it's a matter of controlling it, limiting it to situations where the probabiility of some mutant strain appearing is acceptable compared to death.

  3. Antibiotics not banned in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Contrary to what it say above, antibiotics are not completely banned in Europe for preemptive use in farm animal production. However, there is a list of approved antibiotics for such uses, and relevance of the antibiotics for human medicine is a factor in the rules.

    Here is a link to the Danish treatment guidelines: http://www.foedevarestyrelsen.dk/english/SiteCollectionDocuments/25_PDF_word_filer%20til%20download/05kontor/Behandlingsvejledning_2011_engelsk.xls (warning: Excel). In column J there is a ranking of relevance to human medicine.

  4. Re:"behind the curve" by Teun · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The fact the claim of over-indulgence in pre-emptive antibiotics use in cattle is a cause of resistant bacteria strains affecting humans is under-reported in the mainstream US media does not mean it is not supported by reputable scientific studies.

    This has nothing to do with pro EU or anti-US but everything with pro-shady business or anti-consumer.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."