Disney's Titling Problem With Its Star Wars Movies
An anonymous reader writes "When George Lucas produced his Star Wars movies, he subtitled them 'Episode I,' 'Episode IV' etc. But that style will become inappropriate and confusing with Disney producing a new Star Wars movie each year, observes blogger Christopher Knight: 'Those were individual chapters of one story in an epic fantasy setting. And it suffices for that one multi-generational epic on film. Except now, there is the intent to produce several stories in that same setting. And they aren't necessarily going to pertain to the tale of the Skywalker family from Anakin to Luke to whoever it will be in the next trilogy.' Knight's solution is to retroactively amend the titles of Episodes I through IX to reflect it being the Skywalkers' saga, just as Lucas retroactively subtitled the first movie to be Episode IV."
They should just name them after the action figure each one is made to sell.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
How about this? Stop making stupid Star Wars movies and come up with a new idea.
My studio - www.graylands.ca
What's the problem? There is almost 40 YEARS of novels and they never seem to have any trouble.
Don't forget about the Endor Holocaust
How many contractors died on death-star 2?
All the ones that didn't care Alderaan had been blown up by the first one.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
. . . you know, like A.D., as in, "Anno Disneyi" . . . ?
. . . and BCE . . . "Before Crap Era" . . .
BCE == Before Copyrights were Eternal.
John
News for nerds, stuff that matters?
I come here for the love
The studio did say 9 very early on, after the initial release. However based on how they scripted things on the fly in the next two films, even changing major story lines, I seriously doubt Lucas had things planned out beyond a rough idea. The first movie is clearly a standalone one, and roughly follow the thematics parts of The hidden Fortress instead of being open ended.