Slashdot Mirror


China Environment Ministry Calls Itself One of Four Worst Departments In World

hackingbear writes "According to the Telegraph, 'Zhou Shengxian was quoted by state media as saying: "I've heard that there are four major embarrassing departments in the world and that China's ministry of environmental protection is one of them." Mr Zhou, an economist and veteran Communist Party member, blamed his ministry's malfunctions on "overlapping" remits, which confused the agency's role in handling issues such as carbon emissions and water monitoring. The minister made no mention of the other three most embarrassing departments but Chinese micro-bloggers were quick to weigh in with their suggestions.' Those suggestions including the navy of China's landlocked neighbour, Mongolia, Taiwan's foreign ministry, and China's petitioning department where officials are tasked with hearing and acting on the grievances of ordinary Chinese but can't handle/solve anything. Perhaps Zhou's department should be applauded for its honesty. What are your list of the other three most embarrassing departments in our world?"

126 comments

  1. Door was left wide open there by DJ+Jones · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot's User Interface Design Department

    1. Re:Door was left wide open there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding? Yahoo. Case closed.

    2. Re:Door was left wide open there by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      /.'s poll editorial board. [ducks]

    3. Re:Door was left wide open there by Kjella · · Score: 2

      They'd have to have one first, I heard a wild rumor that they had one in the 90s but I think it's just an urban legend. If they once did I'm pretty sure they got laid off before I joined.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  2. My list by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2

    DMV would be number ONE!

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, its the Obama administration.

    2. Re:My list by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      I haven't physically had to enter a DMV since I got my license years ago. I handle everything necessary through online systems. I won't have to be back in one till my license picture is invalid.

    3. Re:My list by sosume · · Score: 1

      If you think the US is bad, try the EU..
      1) The EU 'leadership', fail in so many ways it isn't funny
      2) The NSA, for obvious reasons
      3) The Chinese Environment dept, for obvious reasons
      4) Slashdot's editors department, for obvious reasons

    4. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If your side had anything compelling to say, maybe they would have won that election.

    5. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you claiming that superstition and white-male supremacy are not compelling? They sure seem to move ignorant, bigoted voters.

    6. Re:My list by Russ1642 · · Score: 2

      I moved from BC to Alberta over a decade ago. In BC there were DMV offices that were run by the Patty and Selma's of the world. Here in Alberta they have privately run registries. Wow, what a difference it makes. In and out in under five minutes. Nobody growling at you. It's great.

    7. Re:My list by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      If your local DMV has an online appointment system, it's way better than it used to be with the old show-up-and-wait system. Was in and out within 15 minutes last time.

    8. Re:My list by egamma · · Score: 2

      Are you claiming that superstition and white-male supremacy are not compelling? They sure seem to move ignorant, bigoted voters.

      ...because superstition and white-male supremacy are the reason that Obama won the past two elections? I'm not sure I follow. Or are you saying that you yourself are ignorant, and bigoted against white males, and that's why you voted for Obama?

    9. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on what state/country you're talking about. Even within a US state, how bad or good the DMV is depends on who runs it. In Illinois under Ryan (they just let him out of prison recently) Illinois' DMV was terrible. Long lines, terrible bureaucracy, and worse, bribery and corruption. It all changed when Jessie White took over; getting your license renewed is easy and only takes a few minutes now.

    10. Re:My list by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      He is stating that either you vote for Obama and like his policy's, or, you are a scared, ignorant, white male, who is rich and evil, plus you are a biggot and are uneducated.
      Because anyone worth anything agrees with the way you voted.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    11. Re:My list by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      Mine does, but the one time I was there it wasn't any better. If you have an appointment, you show up and wait for an hour in one line. If you don't, you show up and wait for an hour in a different line.

    12. Re:My list by Wintermute__ · · Score: 1

      It depends on what state/country you're talking about. Even within a US state, how bad or good the DMV is depends on who runs it. In Illinois under Ryan (they just let him out of prison recently) Illinois' DMV was terrible. Long lines, terrible bureaucracy, and worse, bribery and corruption. It all changed when Jessie White took over; getting your license renewed is easy and only takes a few minutes now.

      Bribery and corruption? How does that work, you slip the guy a fiver to jump to the head of the line?

      Other than the usual selling blank ID templates out the back door for the fake ID makers and identity thieves, that is...

    13. Re:My list by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      You misspelled bigot. And, you left out racist.

    14. Re:My list by dk20 · · Score: 2

      Come to Ontario. We have both the old school government "patty and Selma" and new "privatized" ones.
      We also had "service kiosks" where you could get ripped off for your $75 license plate sticker without being spoken to in a condescending way by someone making twice what you do for sitting at that desk.
      The Kiosk use to actually charge you a $1 "convenience fee" for saving the government money by not using their resources (only government could do something like this, most places would offer a discount for doing it yourself).
      Anyhow the kiosks were closed due to "security concerns".
      Now your choices are:
      - to hit and miss (selma or a private org)
      - do it online.
      Since the government site is so terribly designed they take about the same amount of time. It is SERIOUSLY bad. You go there and enter your postal code. It then takes you to new page to validate this and select the address which matches you code. You then go back to the main page to continue adding your address.

    15. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume there are only 2 sides. This is a major problem in U.S. politics today. And even if there are only 2 sides, they should work together. Enough of this us against them mentality.

    16. Re:My list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it wasn't contracted out? It sounds like something that private enterprise would do, then charge you a fortune.

    17. Re:My list by internerdj · · Score: 1

      I'm a little confused. Shouldn't a card carrying Democrat imply that Education and Richness are positively correlated or have I missed something since I gave up on them?

    18. Re:My list by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      They do not have to have their arguments hold up logically.
      They "Feel" it is correct. If you attempt to use logic to attack their "Argument" then you will be yelled at with higher and higher volumes till you give up.
      They then get to "Feel" that they won.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  3. The editing department of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Does such a department even exist?

    1. Re:The editing department of Slashdot by osu-neko · · Score: 2

      Does such a department even exist?

      Of course it does. One does not accidentally create a headline so well fine tuned to misrepresent the contents of a story or contradict its conclusions. It requires careful editing...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:The editing department of Slashdot by Dishevel · · Score: 2

      Of course it does. One does not accidentally create a headline so well fine tuned to misrepresent the contents of a story or contradict its conclusions. It requires careful editing...

      So they are real pros. Just like NBC, Fox, MSNBC, and CNN.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  4. Intentionally poor regulation is worse than none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In the end, greed ends humanity. Biblical or something.

  5. the 3 others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DOD, DOJ, US patent office

    1. Re:the 3 others by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

      Well, technically Congress isn't a department, but they certainly are embarrassing.

  6. LOL ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    Wow, a landlocked navy and a complaints department that can't do anything.

    Glad to see that China suffers under the same bureaucratic crap as the rest of the world. Possibly even more.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:LOL ... by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Mongolia is not China, it's the country to the north of China.

      (Inner Mongolia is an autonomous region (some kind of province) in China.)

    2. Re:LOL ... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Wow, a landlocked navy and a complaints department that can't do anything.

      Not much a complaints department can do about a landlocked navy. They should contact the Department of Canal Construction or the Department of Scrap Metal Recycling.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:LOL ... by jd.schmidt · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Ha, China literally invented bureaucratic gridlock, they got it shortly after the invention of paper. China has a long an proud history of bureaucracy that the rest of the world is trying to emulate. Franks Kafka was a noob by comparison. But we are catching up.

    4. Re:LOL ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (Inner Mongolia is an autonomous region (some kind of province) in China.)

      What China officially calls an "autonomous region" has little bearing on reality.

      Tibet is, according to that designation, an Autonomous Region -- and in practice, there's no autonomy whatsoever from the Chinese government.

      Just because it's part of official propaganda doesn't mean you should take it on face value.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:LOL ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the main thing that was trying to be expressed is Mongolia is not Inner Mongolia (China).

      Inner Mongolia is part of China, Mongolia is a separate country.

    6. Re:LOL ... by osu-neko · · Score: 2

      Just because it's part of official propaganda doesn't mean you should take it on face value.

      They weren't. They were pointing out that the Mongolia being referred to in the story is the independent country that's not a part of China, and making the distinction between the two Mongolias without getting bogged down in a discussion of internal Chinese politics that would be utterly irrelevant to the point being made.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    7. Re:LOL ... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      a complaints department that can't do anything. Glad to see that China suffers under the same bureaucratic crap as the rest of the world. Possibly even more.

      If it's China's equivalent of "the right of the people...to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." that may be a feature, not a bug.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:LOL ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is worse in some ways. Deal with some of the state offices/entities.

      Sometimes you stand in line to get a ticket to stand in another line. That way two people are employed instead of only one but this is rapidly changing.

    9. Re:LOL ... by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant that Mongolia has no navy? Probably. Who needs facts on the internet?

    10. Re:LOL ... by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      In some ways I think they were considerably more advanced. A government controlled by eunuchs? I can think of plenty of government officials who ought to be castrated right off the top of my head.

  7. In soviet UK... by Smivs · · Score: 1

    all the ministries own you.

    1. Re:In soviet UK... by philipmather · · Score: 1

      Yeah but at least we've got The Ministry of Sound and Ministry of Silly Walks.

      --
      Regards, Phil
  8. United States Gov't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we group the US government into one department, for the purposes of this exercise?

  9. DMV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does absolutely nothing that high schools can't (Drivers Ed and school nurses) except take your money and waste your time.

    1. Re:DMV by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Does absolutely nothing that high schools can't (Drivers Ed and school nurses) except take your money and waste your time.

      You do nothing that a small shell script can't except post silly comments and waste our time. :p

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  10. For those to lazy to read the article by schneidafunk · · Score: 2

    I found this paragraph particularly fascinating:

    "The environment minister's admission came as a new study claimed that severe air pollution in northern China had slashed life expectancies there by more than five years compared to the south, potentially robbing 500 million Chinese of a total of 2.5 billion years of life"

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:For those to lazy to read the article by TheRon6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How appalling! Has anyone reported this to China's Petitioning Depart-... oh wait.

      --
      Does this rag smell like chloroform to you?
  11. In totally unrelated news.... by sasquatch989 · · Score: 2

    Zhou Shengxian was found dead by what Chinese officials are claiming is suicide

    1. Re:In totally unrelated news.... by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to imply the Chinese version of CSI should be on the list?

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    2. Re:In totally unrelated news.... by sasquatch989 · · Score: 2

      If they are using ip addresses of 344.13.1003.86 then yes

    3. Re:In totally unrelated news.... by ulatekh · · Score: 1

      The Chinese police concluded that he shot himself and then hid the gun.

      --
      "Once we've identified and embraced our sickness, we'll have strength...and that's when we get dangerous." - John Waters
  12. Easy by Antipater · · Score: 5, Funny

    The US Departments of Commerce, Education and the -- what's the third one there? Let's see. ... OK. So Commerce, Education and the -- ... The third worst department I think -- I would have to say it's the Education, the ... Commerce and -- let's see -- I can't. The third one, I can't. Sorry. Oops.

    --
    Everything is better with chainsaws.
    1. Re:Easy by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      All my mod points. All of them.

      It's time for the GP to retire...

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Easy by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      For those missing the joke: original

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  13. Most embarrassing department in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That would have to be the United Nations. A black hole when it comes to funds. A lot of pomp and circumstance, but very little action.

    1. Re:Most embarrassing department in the world by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      That would have to be the United Nations. A black hole when it comes to funds. A lot of pomp and circumstance, but very little action.

      Flawed from day 1, by organizing it with 5 permanent members, some of whom don't like each other at all, and each holding unilateral veto power over *anything*. Small marvel that it hasn't changed the world.

      The only surprise is that any other countries joined in the first place.

      BTW, it isn't an agency.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Most embarrassing department in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called realpolitik. Generally the countries that can blow the entire world up need to agree before things can happen.

      The interesting thing though - is there any provision in the charter for adding/removing permanent security council members?

    3. Re:Most embarrassing department in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they could be removed doesn't that make them not a permanent member?

    4. Re:Most embarrassing department in the world by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Is there any provision in the charter for adding/removing permanent security council members?

      Yes, and it has happened. On Oct. 25, 1971, Taiwan was kicked out of the security council and replaced with the People's Republic of China.

    5. Re:Most embarrassing department in the world by Teancum · · Score: 2

      Is there any provision in the charter for adding/removing permanent security council members?

      Yes, and it has happened. On Oct. 25, 1971, Taiwan was kicked out of the security council and replaced with the People's Republic of China.

      Technically all that happened is that the "People's Republic of China" with the representatives from Beijing were recognized as the legitimate government and the "Republic of China" representatives from Taipei were ignored as merely provincial leaders (aka like a state governor's representative). It wasn't a real change of membership.

      The Soviet Union has been pushing for this for some time, and when America gave in to the idea, the UK basically rubber stamping the US decision, it was up to France to make the final veto to make the change. France decided to side with the Soviet Union (not much of a surprise at that even) so the change happened. The rest of the General Assembly wasn't even going to object too strongly with all of the rest of the permanent members going along with this idea, and nobody was going to stand up to keeping the "Republic of China" as the "lawful" government of the whole of China.

      The whole notion was that China was such a large country that it simply needed to be one of those big guys, and at the end of World War II the leadership of China was still up in the air with Chiang Kai-shek's government nominally still recognized as the official government of the whole country, even when they ended up retreating to Taiwan after a bloody civil war against the communists. I'll note that even today both Chinese governments claim to be the lawful government of the whole of China, both claiming that Taiwan is merely one of the provinces of the much larger country. That the "Republic of China" really only effectively controls Taiwan and that the "People's Republic of China" is powerless to act as a government on Taiwan or enforce laws there is irrelevant.

      Essentially, all that happened in 1971 is that the UN finally recognized that a coup d'état took place in China and that the current government was in fact the communists. It wasn't really changing membership, but rather governments of one country or rather just recognizing the government of that country. It was also silly to recognize the government as the one only controlling 5% of the population of that country and ignoring the other 95%.

  14. Montey Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ministry Of Funny Walks.

    1. Re:Montey Python by show+me+altoids · · Score: 1

      The Department of Redundancy Department.

      --
      I feel sorry for people that don't drink, because when they get up in the morning, that's as good as they're gonna feel
    2. Re:Montey Python by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Ministry of Silly Walks

      Very effective department, but embarrassing none the less.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  15. In the USA... by Bardez · · Score: 1

    The Congress. While not strictly a Department, it sure as shit is embarrassing.

    --
    Perception is the thin dividing line between reality and fiction.
    1. Re:In the USA... by Teancum · · Score: 1

      The Congress. While not strictly a Department, it sure as shit is embarrassing.

      By design. Congress is supposed to be slow, inefficient, and prone to never make decisions except in rare circumstances. That they've designed the rest of the federal government to be worse than Congress is more that they started with a bad model in the first place.

  16. What About the Ministry of Censorship? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What are your list of the other three most embarrassing departments in our world?

    Surely the Environmental Ministry cannot be as harmful as the Chinese Ministry preventing this quote from being carried in Xinhua, China Daily or any major news source in China?

    Tell me about the uproar that must have erupted from North of the Huai River when it was announced that the lack of environmental compliance has reduced life expectancy on average by five years in the northern half of China. Show me the state sponsored news source that ran that story. Go ahead, compare that article with with this one. The latter makes it sound like it was second hand smoke as the primary source of limited life spans. It's like reading two completely different health reports!

    Solve your censorship problem and you will solve a lot of your other problems. Just be prepared to see high turnover in your leadership -- something that has been needed for a very long time in China.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solve your censorship problem and you will solve a lot of your other problems. Just be prepared to see high turnover in your leadership -- something that has been needed for a very long time in the US.

    2. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solve your censorship problem and you will solve a lot of your other problems. Just be prepared to see high turnover in your leadership -- something that has been needed for a very long time in the US.

      Ooooh, god that's so deep and profound ... yeah, it's a problem in the United States. But I can still say "fuck the United States government" without any fear and I still have unrestricted internet access to news, historical accounts and goddamn basic facts.

    3. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another interesting source of news on China (in English) is "News China" magazine, which has offices in Beijing, as well as New York, Toronto and other major cities -- http://www.newschinamag.com/

      I've been getting the paper magazine for a few months, from one of those "get magazines for airline miles" deals... A mix of stories, some positive, many about corruption and environmental problems.

    4. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: If you ever see anything from Xinhua, assume it's state propaganda and contains no objective information, and probably not any facts.

      Every time I see a press release form Xinhua, it is pretty apparent that it's a fiction spun around the official party line.

      What Xinhua is to China, Fox and CNN are to the Republicans.

    5. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Solve your censorship problem and you will solve a lot of your other problems. Just be prepared to see high turnover in your leadership -- something that has been needed for a very long time in China.

      Interesting point here... I think a lot of people aren't up to speed on current politics in China; leadership used to be for life, but is now for a set period with mandatory retirement. The result is that this generation has seen significantly more movement in the meritocracy than ever before, and a notable decrease in cronyism and general corruption. Still a long way to go, but it's a start -- and surprisingly, improving censorship has been more of a slow-forming result than a cause.

    6. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Solve your censorship problem and you will solve a lot of your other problems. Just be prepared to see high turnover in your leadership -- something that has been needed for a very long time in the US.

      Ooooh, god that's so deep and profound ... yeah, it's a problem in the United States. But I can still say "fuck the United States government" without any fear and I still have unrestricted internet access to news, historical accounts and goddamn basic facts.

      Because the machine is in place.

      Speech is still free in the "free" world because it's now meaningless. People communicating unpopular opinions are called conspiracy nuts, even when the crazy dripping out their mouths winds up being confirmed. Free speech is now more about being able to rap about shooting cops and raping bitches than it is to discuss ideas. Hell, even political discourse is now a trench warfare of strawmen, ad hominems, and manipulated statistics.

      In places where censorship is a part of daily life, words still have great power to unify and inspire... because people use them to unify and inspire. And that is what truly leads to change and can dismantle the machine.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    7. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Surely the Environmental Ministry cannot be as harmful as the Chinese Ministry preventing this quote from being carried in Xinhua, China Daily or any major news source in China?
      [...]
      Solve your censorship problem and you will solve a lot of your other problems. Just be prepared to see high turnover in your leadership -- something that has been needed for a very long time in China.

      Let me guess which ministry you are referring to...

      Ah, must be the U.S. Department of Education. Since it obvious doesn't teach you Chinese and consequently causing you unable to
        read this same news in Chinese news and make up false conclusion.

    8. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that always true?

      The funny thing about "restricted internet" is how would you know?

      Take a read of your past: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthism

      How many US presidents abused the FBI/CIA/NSA for personal gain?

    9. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely the Environmental Ministry cannot be as harmful as the Chinese Ministry preventing this quote from being carried in Xinhua, China Daily or any major news source in China? [...] Solve your censorship problem and you will solve a lot of your other problems. Just be prepared to see high turnover in your leadership -- something that has been needed for a very long time in China.

      Let me guess which ministry you are referring to...

      Ah, must be the U.S. Department of Education. Since it obvious doesn't teach you Chinese and consequently causing you unable to read this same news in Chinese news and make up false conclusion.

      Apparently your reading comprehension is also a product of the same Department of Education like the OP asked for, Sina is not a major news source in China! Sina is not completely controlled by the Communist Party. Furthermore, that is the reposting of a BBC news article! The beginning of that article says so!

    10. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that places without free speech have freer speech than places with free speech?

    11. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      If sina.com (and online news portals sohu.com and netease.com which all carry the same piece) are not major Chinese news sources, I don't know what can be. Further the original sina.com link is contributed by Globe Times which is a subsidiary of People's Daily and is considered more pro-government than its parent. PD's website also carries the same news. And why is the re-posting of BBC article even logically relevant to this discussion of censorship here?

      Clearly another victim of Department of Education!

    12. Re:What About the Ministry of Censorship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't read Chinese, do the sources you list have the quote the OP was talking about? About it being one of the four worst ministries in the world?

  17. The Original Research by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

    I found this paragraph particularly fascinating: "The environment minister's admission came as a new study claimed that severe air pollution in northern China had slashed life expectancies there by more than five years compared to the south, potentially robbing 500 million Chinese of a total of 2.5 billion years of life"

    Why stop there when the original research paper is fully available to all*?

    * For values of "all" outside of China where it's probably considered "disharmonious."

    --
    My work here is dung.
  18. Good news for *your* agency! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    The chances of being in the bottom ten just decreased by 10%.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  19. POTUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama's department of change.

  20. The USDA, All the Way by Schlemphfer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Such an easy question. The USDA totally caters to huge corporate interests like Monsanto and Smithfield, helping to ensure that America's food supply is dominated by sugary junk food, GMO crops, and the cruelest factory farmed meat and egg products imaginable. And don't even get me started about the sham that is American's meat inspection system. Nearly everything that's wrong with the Standard American Diet can be traced directly to USDA policies, that sell out the interests of consumers, the environment, and farmed animals at every turn.

    If the USDA doesn't deserve a spot on the list of the world's four worst government departments, I don't know what agency does.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:The USDA, All the Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USDA is not interested in your health. It is interested in maximizing GDP by ensuring the people have enough nutrition to work. It's not the responsibility of the USDA to control food intake on an individual basis.

    2. Re:The USDA, All the Way by martinQblank · · Score: 1

      The farmed animals don't vote. Neither do the cows, pigs and chickens.

  21. British Department of Health by seanellis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...currently headed by a Health Minister who is doing his best to sell off as much as possible, close A&E departments, believes in funding homeopathy as a treatment using taxpayers' money, and who co-wrote a book describing the NHS as a "sixty year old mistake".

  22. Slashdot Editors Department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1: Ignore spelling and grammar errors.
    Step 2: Don't fact check
    Step 3: Attach opinionated flamebait
    Step 4: ??? (everyone uses ad block)
    Step 5: Don't profit, sell the company!

  23. *sigh* only 3? by dwpro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    DHS (Department of Homeland Security) - inept, invasive, expensive, and superfluous.
    SEC (Security and Exchange Commission) - inept, impotent, and irrelevant. That or exceedingly corrupt.
    DEA (Drug enforcement Administration) - ridiculous drug scheduling, over the top enforcement based on this poor scheduling, and representative of some of the most fixable problems we choose to litigate and prosecute rather than try and solve.

    --
    Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    1. Re:*sigh* only 3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSA

  24. My opinion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - POTUS, doesn't matter who's in there.
    - Congress, doesn't matter which shade of purple is in there
    - Senate, ditto
    - DOJ, ditto

  25. It's all blank. by Kingston · · Score: 1

    This one would be embarrassed but it can't remember what it idid last night.

  26. Worst department is pretty clear to me by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

    The US SEC. Their utter failure to do their jobs wrecked the entire planet's economy. I mean, as bad as the Chinese are, they haven't managed anything quite that spectacular.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Worst department is pretty clear to me by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they aren't wrecking the world's economy, but the Chinese Environmental Ministry is doing its best to damage the worldwide environment. Most noticeably in their region, where smog blankets Chinese cities and sometimes other countries' cities, too.

  27. obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Italy was left out of the competition, as no one would have taken even the consolation prize...

  28. What Department could be worse than... by planarian · · Score: 0

    ...the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security?

  29. Israel's Ministry of Strategic Affairs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. It's real. No. I shit you not:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Affairs_Minister_of_Israel

    Though not as embarrassing as the following list:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_government_ministers_of_Israel

  30. first step to improvement by r2kordmaa · · Score: 1

    cant be all that bad, there must be thousands of departments of anything out there not admitting they have a problem

  31. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TSA, NSA, CIA, FDA.

  32. Re:Intentionally poor regulation is worse than non by osu-neko · · Score: 1

    In the end, greed ends humanity. Biblical or something.

    Yes, this gets predicted every day going back to the invention of language. Alas, it never happens. We continue to lurch and stumble forward into the future like the large group of incompetent boobs that we are...

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  33. "Calls itself"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, I haven't RTFA, but I don't see how:

    "I've heard that there are four major embarrassing departments in the world and that China's ministry of environmental protection is one of them."

    is the environment ministry calling itself anything.
     
    This is just a statement about what this individual has heard others say.

  34. Bureaucratic crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow. a landlocked navy and a complaints department that can't do anything.

    Glad to see that China suffers under the same bureaucratic crap as the rest of the world. Possibly even more.

    Actually I expect great achievements in the field of bureaucratic crap from the Chinese. They practically invented bureaucracy so they should have at least a couple of thousand years of experience with red tape production over bureaucratic novices like us here in the west whose ancestors (as my Chinese friends never tire of pointing out) continued to live in wooden huts and dress in animal hides for many centuries after the Chinese had built a high tech civilisation. We really must do more to close this capability gap with China, it is becoming embarrassing.

    1. Re:Bureaucratic crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something positive about China? You sure you belong here?

      Normally this site is just full of negative posts from people who have no clue what they are speaking of, have never been to China and probably don't even have a passport.

    2. Re:Bureaucratic crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to re-read the post you are replying to...

  35. US Congress by guygo · · Score: 1

    The US Congress is useless for anything other than a waste of time and money.

  36. Seriously? Education? by bussdriver · · Score: 2

    You need to read more. The Dept. of Education? It is a political punching bag and not much more. Dept of Commerce? They are just redundant, as most the government works for the forces of commerce.

    The worst isn't a static thing:

    FEMA wins for 2006. (you don't need department in your name)

    Interior Department. Especially before the BP oil spill (and it's no better today.) They are captured by the industries.

    TSA. EVERYBODY complains about the TSA and their illusion of security since it's inception- and more so since they became pedophiles.

    FCC: A public resource management dept beating a dead horse when LITERALLY millions said to STOP media consolidation. Not many years passed and here we are again... but without public comment.

    FDA. Captured by industry, must be near the worst of the captured (or undemocratic, you pick.) You have to prove many people died to take something off the market; NOT prove it is safe before putting it on the market. They also don't even test things but let the corps do the testing-- EVEN when people died... There was a recent news story on just that common practice. Unfit shit used to be sold to the world at their risk, but now we accept more risk... the EU can test it out on us, unless it's cheap then it can go to Africa...

    NSA. it's in the news. Effective? yes. worst by another measure.

    The State Dept. could be considered the worst depending on what you mean by worst... effectiveness? no, they are most effective. evil? Worlds biggest corporate lobbyist... In that case they'd be near the top all the time. They task things to other depts too, set policies - they make decisions that make others look bad.

    The Military / Pentagon Depts since WW2 when it changed from the "Dept of War" to "Dept of Defense" and ever since. "military intelligence" is a wide spread joke! Losing billions in their budgets every year... multiple overlapping sub-depts / branches... etc. Not to mention the corruption...

    CIA. It's charter is solely about processing information for decision makers but it deviated so far one could say it is the worst - because it doesn't follow it's job description. Plus they also made some big mistakes in recent history (or just took the blame.)

    IRS: Always resented. People will imagine new ways to hate them.

    1. Re:Seriously? Education? by Antipater · · Score: 1

      Good grief. The joke was explained to you in the post just above yours, and you still whooshed.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    2. Re:Seriously? Education? by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 1

      wooooooooosh

      --
      Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    3. Re:Seriously? Education? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      I start the post BEFORE it was modded funny and before the above post. Does everybody write their posts externally and paste them it quickly or what?? a phone call or two and... whatever.

    4. Re:Seriously? Education? by Teancum · · Score: 2

      In fairness to the Department of Commerce, they actually earn money for the U.S. federal government from taxes that they personally collect. Indeed the U.S. Navy was originally a part of that department and then spun off into its own department, later to merge with the "War Department" to form the "Department of Defense". That is also why the U.S. Coast Guard was a part of that same department until the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (IMHO one of the least effective departments of the U.S. federal government and singularly incapable of doing its job).

      That some of those businesses paying taxes to Commerce Department agents may also be engaged in bribes shouldn't be a shock: it is a government agency. Of course there are bribes and influence peddling in the form of other bribes (called "campaign contributions") to the right people.

      The big thing under the Commerce Department other than customs agents is the FAA, who also act as the traffic cops of the airspace above America as well as nominally regulate and monitor aircraft manufacturers as well as regulate launching private commercial spacecraft.

      BTW, I agree with you on FEMA. The one other even more useless agency is the Selective Service. It is the one agency that purposely spends money on things that are not wanted, and if its services were ever needed would likely be completely replaced by another agency. I swear its continued existence is only due to bureaucratic inertia alone, and if the agency was disbanded it wouldn't even be missed by the people in that agency. I doubt they'd even notice it was disbanded.

    5. Re:Seriously? Education? by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      NSA. it's in the news. Effective? yes. worst by another measure.

      I'd posit their aren't all that effective either.

  37. Re:Intentionally poor regulation is worse than non by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2

    Next time I grope someone and they ask why I'll say "cause you're an incompetent boob".

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  38. Oh please by Bruce66423 · · Score: 2

    Given that the Stafford Hospital scandal occurred in a public sector hospital, there's no rational reason for assuming that the public sector will provide better health care than private contractors. The core value of the NHS is high quality health care that is free to the patient. The rest is decoration. And of course given that most GPs surgeries are privately owned by the GPs, most NHS care is already private.

  39. Why? by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    Israel's still there; that's their primary role... The bombs have stopped going off in the buses and cafes.

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha? You think the role of the Ministry of Strategic Affairs was\is to stop bombs from going off in buses? Do you think anyone of Israel's 29 ministries has a specific role to begin with?
      Let me spell it out for you as a (possibly fellow?) Jewish Israeli, the corruption runs so deep in our government that you can't even find a mission statement or any explanation of what exactly does "Strategic Affairs" entails. It's not even a state secret or anything. They just didn't bother. In other countries they at least try and fake it by raising issues and passing jurisdictions and jobs for their made up positions. Here, they don't even bother. They just make up a scary\impressive sounding name.
      If you take this China's Environment Ministry thing, or any such equivalent office anywhere. This is your typical after-thought regulatory agency. Instead of expanding the responsibilities of whatever ministry in charge of either public health or industrial safety regulation, an entire ministry \ agency was cooked-up after whatever random public outcry hit the news. With time, these offices either prove their worth, get absorbed into some other ministry, or fall apart completely.
      I suspect Americans are just used to having huge governments so they don't even flinch seeing such a list. i.e. Staying on the topic, in the States, the EPA have their own federal agenda which supersedes local authority but it doesn't mean the local laws can't rule on such subjects in addition. It does spark the occasional conflicts though. But their is a constitution and SOME measure of sanity to the system to keep things from becoming completely dysfunctional.
      Well, back here in Israel, we have an office for just about every political power straggle we ever had. 7 million citizens with just about the fattest government (per capita) in the western world. No one has a clear jurisdiction on anything and laws are enforced arbitrarily depending on who is in power.

      Technically speaking, we don't even have borders since we never proclaimed holding any given territories. Even the government is illegal since our declaration of independence clearly states we were supposed to draw a constitution in 48' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Laws_of_Israel)...
      Well, the rule of law is gentiles as far as Israel is concerned.

      Captcha: envious
      Yes I am.

  40. Only three? EASY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The House of Representatives
    The Senate
    The Presidency

  41. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    including the navy of China's landlocked neighbour, Mongolia

    I chuckled, it's right up there with the tank-battalions of Sealand and the Eskimo Intelligence Agency.

  42. eHealth Ontario ... by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 1

    Would be one ... for the other two:
    US patent office
    FIFA

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
  43. Re:Intentionally poor regulation is worse than non by Anguirel · · Score: 1

    I'm sure we'll get it right soon. Just give us a few more decades...

    --
    ~Anguirel (lit. Living Star-Iron)
    QA: The art of telling someone that their baby is ugly without getting punched.
  44. worst department in the world by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    The entire European Commission seems eligible to me, but it was not the most active offender in the building of current EU crisis. All European Union governments seems also good picks. And we should not forget the European Central Bank.

  45. #1 with a bullet: by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    The Pentagon

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  46. Russian Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is one of the three major embarrassing departments in the world.

  47. Can think of only 2 atm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finnish police license "department"
    TSA

  48. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms by Quila · · Score: 2

    They've done nothing to promote any of those three things.

  49. Wrong article linked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me about the uproar that must have erupted from North of the Huai River when it was announced that the lack of environmental compliance has reduced life expectancy on average by five years in the northern half of China. Show me the state sponsored news source that ran that story.

    Here's the official xinhua news story: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-07/11/c_132533452.htm

    And the same in chinese for comparison: http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2013-07/12/c_124997416.htm

    Go ahead, compare that article with with this one. The latter makes it sound like it was second hand smoke as the primary source of limited life spans. It's like reading two completely different health reports!

    You sure got that right, the xinhua story you linked is based on a different report, different researchers and all...

    Solve your censorship problem and you will solve a lot of your other problems. Just be prepared to see high turnover in your leadership -- something that has been needed for a very long time in China.

    Never pass up a chance to bash China, spoken like a true sockpuppet...