Slashdot Mirror


Google Chrome 28 Is Out: Rich Notifications For Apps, Extensions

An anonymous reader writes "Google today released Chrome version 28 for Windows and Mac. The new version features a notification center, although it's only available on Windows (in addition to Chrome OS of course). You can update to the latest release now using the browser's built-in silent updater, or download it directly from google.com/chrome. This is also the first release of Chrome that ships with Blink instead of WebKit. You can check the Blink ID yourself tag by navigating to chrome://version/."

20 of 90 comments (clear)

  1. Rich? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Okay, but how do those of us in the middle class get notifications?

  2. Re:28? by hedwards · · Score: 3, Informative

    Because Google always used this numbering system, and Mozilla changed it for inexplicable reasons. What's more, I don't think that version number changes have the same effect on killing extensions that it does on Firefox.

  3. Re:A build without google communication by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    He "sounds needlessly paranoid"? That's kind of an odd thing to say, given that you posted anonymously. Is your name Sergey or Larry, perchance?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  4. Re:A build without google communication by DavidRawling · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Oh sure, that'll be the same build that finally figures out that some organisations have web servers with names that don't end in .com.

    It's woefully consistent - type a server name that is a "recognised external" URL (so something ending in .com, .co.uk, .fr, etc) and it'll go straight to the site. Type an internal server name (either a plain server name or an internal DNS name) and it will insist on searching Google, because quite obviously the user DIDN'T want localsite or site.network.internal after all. No if you want an internal server, you'll need to get the users to type in the full URL including protocol (because then the same keystrokes that were obviously wrong are suddenly obviously right).

    Couple that with the new "requirement" for Chrome if you want to download the Google Talk [wait no it's Hangouts now] on the desktop (they can pry the desktop Talk client from my cold dead fingers) and the continual forcing of Google+ to view an image in a chat, it's clear Google has already turned into Microsoft V2 and is working on digging in deeper. (Hangouts? Seriously? No, it's not a "hangout" when I send an IM to my son to put the damn garbage out!)

  5. Re: 28? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For the record, they're dropping support for extensions using HTML desktop notifications in this version, which made their new "rich" notifications look old and crotchety. A number of extensions, including a couple of my own, lost a massive amount of functionality overnight because of this.

  6. Re:A build without google communication by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think there is anything done on the web that Google isn't aware of these days so you may as well just make it easier for them.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  7. Re:28? by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    none of the version number changes in chrome has broken anything for me. chrome doesn't start and pop up a box, run checks for minutes, and then saying half my plugins are no longer supported.

  8. Re: A build without google communication by chill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh man do hangouts suck. With Talk on my phone I could tell if people were online or not. Hangouts doesn't indicate (on Android).

    They also take 5-10 seconds to activate. Like the dam thing isn't * phoning * home, it is composing a letter long hand.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  9. Re:Well that explains why the killed google Reader by peragrin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wish they would stop making it so easy to integrate stuff into chrome.

    I was testing software packages for work and I spent 30 minutes removing self installing tool bars from chrome. I would remove one extension but by the time I got to remove the second one it would install the first one again.

    I don't want 4 extension 3, toolbars, 2 home page settings, each with the ability to install software by themselves.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  10. Re:A build without google communication by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2

    Why not just force load it in incognito mode? And I'd rather Chrome talk to Google than IE talking to MS.

  11. Re:Well that explains why the killed google Reader by colfer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And the extension webstore hosts malware. I have reported "Facebook Adblock" several times and it is still there, months later. The negative comments keep getting pushed down by cheerleaders, and the older reviews just drop off the list.

  12. --disable-new-menu-style no longer works by dsinc · · Score: 2

    Chrome 29 ignores the --disable-new-menu-style switch. Another strange choice made by the devs (remember the useless outcry when they cancelled the option to hide the download shelf?)...

    1. Re: --disable-new-menu-style no longer works by Nukky+Cisbu · · Score: 2
      I now have to scroll to see all my bookmarks, thanks to the idiotic double-spacing.

      Much as I otherwise like Chrome, it's back to Firefox for me. It's a bad decision to sacrifice ergonomics for ... well, whatever it was that motivated this dumb decision.

    2. Re: --disable-new-menu-style no longer works by gnurfed · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google says they did the extra padding to create a "unified experience" for all. Meaning us normal users get to suffer because we somehow need to have the same interface as people using tablets. Like you, I'm going back to Firefox as my primary browser, or Waterfox to be exact.

  13. v28 on Linux Isn't Blinking by Zamphatta · · Score: 2

    Sure v28 is built on Blink? I just put chrome://version/ in my address bar, and it shows my UA string as -- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.71 Safari/537.36

  14. Re:A build without google communication by t0y · · Score: 2

    You'll be happy to know that google talk doesn't work on windows 8.1.

  15. Re:Another new feature of Chrome 28 by Elbart · · Score: 2

    No idea if that is the reason for that error, but Google dropped support for RHEL6 with Chrome 28.

  16. Google Chrome - a new EMACS? by Skinny+Rav · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google Chrome shapes into a really nice OS, it just lacks a decent browser.

  17. Re:64-bit official builds? by kthreadd · · Score: 2

    64 bit is often just a recompile away on Mac and Linux. Windows is a very different beast. A lot of Windows software does not support 64 bit, or offers only experimental support for it.

  18. Blink by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I think I'm going to switch to Firefox again. The Doctor warned us about this rendering engine in pretty strong words.