Slashdot Mirror


Database Loophole Lets Legislators Avoid Photo Radar Tickets

lemur3 writes "State legislators in Colorado have not been receiving speeding tickets due to inadequacies in the implementation of a DMV database. The current system ties plates to vehicles rather than to individuals, the special plates for legislators are issued to individuals. The result is that there is no entry in the database for the special plates when the automated photo radar system is triggered, this means nobody receives a citation. In one case a Colorado resident, who had vanity plates reading '33,' received the photo radar citations intended for Senator Mike Johnston representing district 33, whose vehicle was identified by a '33' on his special plate. Lt. Matt Murray of the Denver Police, speaking of the system commented, 'Our system works, the database works. What needs to happen is the state's database need to be complete.'"

31 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. The photos should include the driver by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 5, Informative

    The way this works in Germany is that two pictures are taken - one of the numberplate and one of the driver. I received a letter several years ago saying that my car had been caught speeding and that the driver was obviously not me - their face recognition software recognised a female driver. The photo was included and my (by then ex-) girlfriend paid the fine.
    German courts do not consider the numberplate alone to be adequate ID, a practice going back decades.

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    1. Re:The photos should include the driver by edman007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In the US they don't either (at least not in NY), the solution is to not fine the driver. They fine the vehicle owner, but it's not considered a violation against the driver, thus it doesn't show up on your record and it doesn't affect insurance. Basically it's done the same way parking tickets are handled (which also don't need anything other than a license plate).

      Sounds to me like that's the root of the problem, the tickets are for the vehicle owner, and the legislator plates are not tied to the vehicle, thus the system can't pull the owner from the database. They could send it to the driver, but generally that doesn't stand up in court so the systems don't do that.

    2. Re:The photos should include the driver by gmanterry · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the US they don't either (at least not in NY), the solution is to not fine the driver. They fine the vehicle owner, but it's not considered a violation against the driver, thus it doesn't show up on your record and it doesn't affect insurance. Basically it's done the same way parking tickets are handled (which also don't need anything other than a license plate).

      Sounds to me like that's the root of the problem, the tickets are for the vehicle owner, and the legislator plates are not tied to the vehicle, thus the system can't pull the owner from the database. They could send it to the driver, but generally that doesn't stand up in court so the systems don't do that.

      That's interesting. Here in Arizona, if the picture isn't the owner and the owner won't rat the actual driver out, then the ticket is thrown out.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    3. Re:The photos should include the driver by FuzzNugget · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed, a plate number is not a human being (hmmm... sounds awfully familiar) and they should be required to capture both the plate number *and* a clear, recognizable photo of the driver's face. This should merely be evidence collected for the state (or crown, depending on where you live) and not considered a foregone conclusion.

      Where I live, a facial photo is not required and there have been numerous occasions where the cameras were rigged.

      My dad received a ticket for "speeding" in a construction zone on a Sunday afternoon WHEN NO ONE WAS WORKING. He was doing the posted speed limit, but not the implied lower speed limit for a construction zone that only applies when workers are present. Someone obviously "forgot" to switch the trap off. Reports of miscalibrated radars, hidden traps, shortened yellows and predatory enforcement abound.

      And they know *exactly* how to keep you on the hook for it: a photo radar ticket is slightly less expensive than taking a day off to fight it in court, it doesn't count against your driving record (making less worthwhile to fight and they can keep dinging you endlessly) and court dates can be set *years* into the future.

      Any photo radar system that doesn't require a human to be irrefutably identified a flat-out scam, plain and simple.

    4. Re:The photos should include the driver by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And I should also note that, according to TFA, the problem is not duplicate numbers in the DMV database, because these special plates (issued to people, not vehicles) are not in the database.

      I wonder if the DMV database can even cope with a license plate that is issued to a person and not a vehicle? There are also dealer and manufacturer plates which are not assigned to a vehicle: I wondoer if they are in the database?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:The photos should include the driver by guruevi · · Score: 2

      In the city I'm at they don't even consider it a fine. They consider it a surcharge that you have to pay to the company that owns the red light camera's. The city probably gets a cut from it but you can't fight it in court because it's not a recognized fine under local or state laws. However if you don't pay the surcharge, they can still suspend your license because not paying the surcharge is recognized in the law. So you can go to court when they suspend your license during which proceedings (6 months for the next court date) you don't have a license (which in the US is practically a death sentence). You can then get your license back on a constitutional technicality (right to a speedy trial) but since the surcharge remains pending, every 12 months they'll re-suspend it.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    6. Re:The photos should include the driver by KPU · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is there any legitimate usage of the word surcharge or does it always mean scam?

    7. Re:The photos should include the driver by sjames · · Score: 2

      If it can mean anything but scam, I have yet to see it.

    8. Re:The photos should include the driver by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      much simpler than that. Wife's car is registered in my name, my car in hers.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    9. Re:The photos should include the driver by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 2

      Sounds to me like that's the root of the problem, the tickets are for the vehicle owner, and the legislator plates are not tied to the vehicle, thus the system can't pull the owner from the database. They could send it to the driver, but generally that doesn't stand up in court so the systems don't do that.

      Sounds to me like the root of the problem is legislators getting special license plates. But when it's your job to give out favors to your supporters, why not have a few favors for yourself?

  2. Just as intended by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Our system works, the database works.

    System works as intended, by placing the responsibility of defense on the accused.

    I wonder how long it took for that person with vanity plates 33 to get his ticket annulled. He probably had to go to court and speak to a clerk or two.

    I am surprised they do not yet send occasional random tickets to 2%-3% in the database. What do they have to lose? Either the person would pay the fine or they would spend hours of their life trying to avoid paying it -- maybe they will be browbeaten into paying a fraction instead.

    1. Re:Just as intended by wiredlogic · · Score: 2

      I would say the system is broken if it was possible to get a vanity plate bearing a number already in use.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:Just as intended by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 2

      oh no - their masters know full well what the rules are and accept protests immediately, it is the one handing out the tickets who does not 'get it'.

      This happened a couple of years ago and I caught the person responsible a day later. We had a friendly, civilised (really!) exchange of views on the subject and she went off to check. A couple of days later we saw each other again and she apologised, telling me exactly what to write when I objected.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    3. Re:Just as intended by pspahn · · Score: 2

      I've lived in Capitol Hill for about eight years now. It should go without saying that I have had plenty of parking tickets (though, a good amount of those weren't actually parking tickets, I just happened to be parked at the time).

      For every ticket that was questionable, I went down to the city building, waited a short amount of time to have my story heard, and the tickets were nullified.

      It really couldn't be any easier.

      Also, I actually like a number of the red light cameras. Drivers are actually starting to understand that running red lights/stale yellows is dangerous, and they are not doing it as often. I don't know how many times I've tried to cross 6th avenue from alley to alley (because of one-ways) and nearly been hit by someone running a red light because you can't see them due to a large parked vehicle blocking the view.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    4. Re:Just as intended by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For every ticket that was questionable, I went down to the city building, waited a short amount of time to have my story heard, and the tickets were nullified.

      It really couldn't be any easier.

      Taking time off during the workday to go to court to fight a ticket that shouldn't have been issued in the first place is easy?

      Sounds like Stockholm syndrome to me.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  3. The real question for me is... by hedgemage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do legislators need special license plates? What sets them apart from us plebs in the rank and file? I'm sure that they don't have problems parking at the statehouse, so other than notifying law enforcement that they're 'special' why different plates?

    1. Re:The real question for me is... by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lawmakers driving between legislative events have immunity from prosecution under legislative privilege.
      A tight vote could be swayed by stopping a few key political people.
      So they write in a free movment rule - the ability not to be stopped while going ~to vote.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:The real question for me is... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lawmakers driving between legislative events have immunity from prosecution under legislative privilege.

      A tight vote could be swayed by stopping a few key political people.

      So they write in a free movment rule - the ability not to be stopped while going ~to vote.

      Bullshit. I mean, that is likely the story they tell people....

      The real reason is that no cop is going to pull over and ticket a legislator once they see the plate. Police budgets are set by legislature, don't bite the hand that feeds you. It is the same reason why cops have that FOP (Fraternal Order of Police) sticker on their licence plate or car.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:The real question for me is... by manu0601 · · Score: 2

      I believe legislators are immune from being arrested. Here it is just a fine.

  4. Silly rabbit ... by Gription · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because they made the rules, so of course they made them to their own advantage.

  5. Is't there something that can be done... by sootman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .... about fucking retarded shitheads like this speaking in public and telling lies?

    "Our system works, the database works. What needs to happen is the state's database need to be complete."

    WRONG, fuckface. 1) If, according to the evidence, the system isn't working, then the system isn't working. Expected behavior: the correct person gets tickets. Observed behavior: the wrong person gets tickets. How can you say that "works"? 2) If a part of the SYSTEM isn't working (like the database), then the SYSTEM isn't working, because a SYSTEM is "a regularly interacting or interdependent group of items forming a unified whole."

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  6. Re:Don't vacation there and avoid driving through by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    No, that's Wisconsin, and Speeding/Redlight cameras are still illegal here. Although I'm sure it's only a matter of time.

  7. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by icebike · · Score: 2

    Now this one is something that could easily fall into Hanlon's / Heinlein's Razor but it does seem a bit like somebody really favors the politicians these days.

    Even if you favor politicians, how do sneak duplicate plates bast your database software?

    The way the story reads, there are two cars with the exact same plate number, 33, both on the street and in the database.

    How is that even possible? Wouldn't you expect the plate number to be a unique key in the database? Or is the story just wrong?

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  8. The System works... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

    'Our system works, the database works. What needs to happen is the state's database need to be complete.'"

    Sounds as if he's got a one track mind.

  9. Re:Don't vacation there and avoid driving through by blankinthefill · · Score: 2

    Colorado has one of the largest and most vibrant microbrew cultures in the country. I've heard Oregon comes close (Some people will even say it beats Colorado, but they are clearly biased), but I don't know... There's a ton of craft beers and neighborhood brew pubs in Colorado. And yes, a lot of it is very good. :)

  10. Colorado photo radar tickets don't have to be paid by michaelmalak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Photo radar tickets in Colorado don't have to be paid anyway unless they go to the trouble of serving you in person, which they never do.

  11. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

    One plate for a private citizen, another plate for a politically designated office, possibly another plate for commercial vehicles. and possible yet another for public service vehicles. The private citizen's plate was never very likely to duplicate a plate for any other pool of vehicles, but it happened when the guy ordered his own special vanity plate.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  12. Hate to... by WillyWanker · · Score: 2

    ...break it to him, but if legislators aren't getting tickets and innocent civilians are getting tickets that should be going to legislators then your system DOESN'T work. It's BROKEN.

    Not that it should surprise anyone that these "special" plates are conveniently missing from the DMV database and/or treated differently than regular plates. Just an unfortunate coincidence or oversight I'm sure. Riiiiight.

  13. California is Worse by schwit1 · · Score: 2

    http://www.infowars.com/special-license-plates-shield-officials-from-traffic-tickets/

    California DMV "Confidential Records Program," which was created 30 years ago to keep records of police officers private from criminals. The program has since expanded to cover "hundreds of thousands of public employees â" from police dispatchers to museum guards â" who face little threat from the public. Their spouses and children can get the plates, too.

    Drivers covered under the Confidential Records Program abuse the system by evading toll road charges, running red lights at intersections with red light cameras, parking illegally, and breaking other traffic laws with impunity.

  14. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by modecx · · Score: 2

    Legislators' plates such as these are registered to a person, not to a particular vehicle, which is what we all expect. If the legislator has 1+ daily drivers (car / truck), he may receive more than one set.

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  15. Re:Gotta love those mistakes... by Khyber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, the system is designed to prevent that.

    What likely happened is the purely large '33' on one plate got mistaken for a smaller-grouped '33' on a different spot on another plate in conjunction with a specialized license plate number already-printed on the plate. You'll see stuff like this on Disabled Veteran vehicular plates, certain tax-exempt cross-country trucker plates, gov't official plates, and county/city service plates.

    Source: Former plate inspector in a Mississippi state prison (one of my 'jobs' before I hit the RID boot camp program for my sentence.)

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.