Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Use Sound Waves To Levitate, Move Objects

sciencehabit writes "The tragic opera Rigoletto may move you to tears, but here's a more literal application of the moving power of sound. Sound waves with frequencies just above human hearing can levitate tiny particles and liquid droplets and even move them around, a team of engineers has demonstrated. The advance could open up new ways to handle delicate materials or mix pharmaceuticals."

39 of 78 comments (clear)

  1. WFT is up with the summary? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just for the record all Opera moves me tears, what the fuck is up with the middle school rhetorical flourish?

    Also this is basically decades old. How much is /. getting for the clicks?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:WFT is up with the summary? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      What did you think I meant?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  2. Better summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Acoustic levitation is nothing new, what they've done is found a way to move stuff around while it's levitating.

    And here's a decent link for those who don't feel like contributing to someone's page counter.

    http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/07/10/1301860110

    1. Re:Better summary by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Acoustic levitation is nothing new, what they've done is found a way to move stuff around while it's levitating.

      And here's a decent link for those who don't feel like contributing to someone's page counter.

      http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/07/10/1301860110

      I move things around on a regular basis, but only when I have a ready supply of beans.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  3. How powerful? by White+Flame · · Score: 1

    Can the bottom of my car be a flat surface which vibrates sprayed water droplets, thus slightly levitating the vehicle and allowing forward movement via those particles?

    1. Re:How powerful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a boat?

    2. Re:How powerful? by LifesABeach · · Score: 2

      Yes, when you drive faster than 55 mph; the term is Hydroplaning.

  4. This is not new... by Grog6 · · Score: 2

    Sand on a 15" speaker, an amp, and a signal generator was a fixture of Hamfests in the 70's.

    Ever notice how sliding a desk across a floor is really heard to do, then gets easier?
    It's because it's levitating part of the mass on trapped sound waves under the sliding feet...

    This is old news by now.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    1. Re:This is not new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah i'm pretty sure it's not sound that helps you move desks.
      Once you overcome static friction it becomes easier because sustaining an objects speed at x is less energy intensive than accelerating it from 0 to x.

    2. Re:This is not new... by slew · · Score: 1

      Ever notice how sliding a desk across a floor is really heard to do, then gets easier?
      It's because it's levitating part of the mass on trapped sound waves under the sliding feet...

      I don't think so. I think the desk is an example of Stick/slip, not sound wave levitation...

      Of course this acoustic levitation stuff isn't new, every few years someone comes up with crap like this... Or somehow suggests that similar standing sound waves which cause sonoluminescence can be used for stuff like cold fusion.

    3. Re:This is not new... by CurunirAran · · Score: 1

      Ever notice how sliding a desk across a floor is really heard to do, then gets easier? It's because it's levitating part of the mass on trapped sound waves under the sliding feet...

      This is old news by now.

      What? It has nothing whatsoever to do with sound waves, but rather the fact that the coefficient of static friction is higher than that of kinetic friction.

      When you are stationary, you are working against static friction. Once you are moving, however, you are doing work against kinetic friction, which is a weaker force for most substances.

    4. Re:This is not new... by gnomff · · Score: 1
      From TFA:

      Poulikakos's team spent 4 years trying to budge their floating droplets from a standstill. Finally, they conceived of a chessboard-style setup with multiple vibrating plates, each generating its own sound frequency. By varying the frequency that each plate emits, they can move the acoustic field and the object trapped inside. Their new design, described online today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, can precisely control the lateral movement of liquid droplets while keeping them floating smoothly in midair.

      Its the lateral movement and fine control that's new, not the levitation.

    5. Re:This is not new... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      ...which TFA acknowledges:

      Sound waves don't discriminate, however, and physicists worked out the basic principle of "acoustic levitation" nearly a century ago. A vibrating plate generates a sound wave that bounces against another surface to create a stable standing wave. The points of lower pressure in this static pattern can trap a particle. Scientists have learned how to hold increasingly heavy particles including superdense iridium and even liquid droplets in this acoustic sweet spot.

      But until now, that was pretty much the extent of the trick, says mechanical engineer Dimos Poulikakos of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich. "It's like we had a car which we made fancier and fancier, but it stayed parked. We were never able to drive." Moving a liquid with sound is a delicate balancing act, he says. As you vary the acoustic force to push the droplet around, you run the risk of shattering it with too much pressure.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  5. Old news surely? by CRCulver · · Score: 1

    Back in the 1990s I heard the use of sound waves to move objects proposed as one of the fringe theories for how the pyramids were built, because "people could not have moved those great big blocks such long distances!". So, there must have been earlier work by scientists in moving things with sound waves that crank historians could twist for their own theories.

    1. Re:Old news surely? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

      > 'people could not have moved those great big blocks such long distances!'

      I always hate it when people say this, because it instantly indicates they have no idea what they are talking about.

      I don't think *you* are implying this, I'm just pointing out how silly it is.

      Even examining the sentence makes no sense whatsoever... 'people could not have'... People *did*. There isn't any room for 'could not have'.

      Just like the t-shirt says

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Old news surely? by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

      Back in the 1990s I heard the use of sound waves to move objects proposed as one of the fringe theories for how the pyramids were built, because "people could not have moved those great big blocks such long distances!".

      In other news, bumblebees cannot fly.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    3. Re:Old news surely? by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      Ppl couldn't have using the technology we think they were limited to. If we limit ourselves to what we think their technology was, can we recreate what they did? That's the meaning of the sentence that seems to have made you respond in such an emotional manner.

    4. Re:Old news surely? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 2

      Well, sort of. At such low Reynolds numbers it is more like swimming.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  6. In some similar research with sound and movement by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    . . . you can't beat the good old Brown Note: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_note

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  7. Cue the wingnuts by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Some people might think this sort of discovery will vindicate claims made by dubious inventors like Keely. Be on the look out for anyone here mentioning "vibratory sympathy".

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Cue the wingnuts by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      Why are you using ad homs instead of the scientific method?

  8. My wife dropped a vase once by Megahard · · Score: 5, Funny

    The sound levitated the cat about 2'.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  9. This has been working for years already by thewils · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just play any, for example, Justin Bieber tune and the resulting sound waves instantly move me out of the room. Most commercials on TV work the same way, unless I'm in control of the remote.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  10. Screwdriver by Livius · · Score: 1

    When will they turn screws using sound?

    1. Re:Screwdriver by feufeu · · Score: 2

      Check. "Unscrew these screws !" to any sufficiently technically literate subordinate will do.

  11. Re:Can we cross-hype this with 3D printing? by blue+trane · · Score: 1

    Like Simon Newcombe and Lord Kelvin proving that heavier-than-air aircraft were impossible!

  12. Not news.. by houbou · · Score: 1

    Many sounds make things move, for example, the sound of my wife reminding me of chores usually gets me moving pretty swiftly.

  13. Re:Sound doesnt move a thing by White+Flame · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because resonances can often get you more bang for your energy buck than direct impulse.

    That, and they want to move things carefully and precisely. This seems like it would be a lot more stable than using air flows.

  14. Re:Sound doesnt move a thing by kermidge · · Score: 1

    Frequency.

  15. we may... by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 1

    ...even be able to image human foetuses.
    Sorry -- just thinking out loud.

  16. Re:This OLD news by camperdave · · Score: 2

    That's electromagnetic levitation, not sonic.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  17. Re:Can we cross-hype this with 3D printing? by blue+trane · · Score: 1

    We have the tech, and the ppl willing to go. Only the political will and a culture of artificial scarcity is stopping us.

  18. Hovercraft Use Soundwaves by Jhyrryl · · Score: 1
    --
    Jhyrryl
  19. Can it levitate frogs? by umafuckit · · Score: 1

    But can it levitate a frog? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1vyB-O5i6E

  20. Re:Sonic Screwdriver by pipedwho · · Score: 1

    Could this be the technology behind The Doctor's sonic screwdriver?

    Maybe prior to the reboot. But with the last few seasons, the Doctor's "sonic screwdriver" has been increasingly used as a generic device to magically resolve plot holes and compensate for poorly thought-out stories.

    It used to turn screws and open locks. These days it does everything from neural force field generation to automatic computer hacking. Basically, whenever the bad guys provide a challenge that the Doctor can't solve, he just pulls the 'sonic' and ... zaaap ... problem solved!

    Need a medical scanner, no problem, just pull the 'sonic'. Bad guy is projecting a super plasma/neural/whatever beam, no probs, just pull the 'sonic'. Computer system taking over the world? No probs, 'sonic' to the rescue.

    They don't even bother calling it a "sonic screwdriver" anymore.

    I just wish I had my own 'sonic' to deal with the incoming moderation black hole that may be coming this way.

  21. Assuming /. readers are opera fans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And here I was worried the new owners wouldn't understand the readership when DICE bought /.

  22. reminds me by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    of when I use my "these aren't the droids you're looking for" sound/hand wave to levitate flies. They shoot straight off. Unfortunately, flies have a very short memory, and two seconds later they're back for more. Definitely too short to be stormtroopers, flies.

  23. Move by sound? by OneFangCat · · Score: 1

    Who cares? $800 dollar Honda Civics have been doing this with $2500 dollar strereo systems in my neighborhood for years!

  24. It's not old by juancn · · Score: 1

    The paper was submitted on January this year, and approved for publication on June 8. This is a change in design that allows transport and handling rather than just levitating it in air. The flourish was in the original article BTW.