Slashdot Mirror


Former Student Gets Year In Prison For College President Election Fraud

Gunkerty Jeb writes, quoting Threatpost: "A former Cal State San Marcos student was sentenced to a year in prison this week for election tampering by using keystroke loggers to grab student credentials and then vote for himself. Matthew Weaver, 22, of Huntington Beach, Calif., stole almost 750 students' identities to try and become president of the San Diego County college's student government. His plan went awry when the school's computer technicians noticed an anomaly in activity and caught Weaver with keystroke loggers as he sat in front of the suspicious computer."

20 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. This guy has got a bright future ahead of him by Apharmd · · Score: 5, Funny

    in national politics. But who will get him, the Dems or the Republicans?

    1. Re:This guy has got a bright future ahead of him by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Diebold.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  2. Job Offer by overlook77 · · Score: 5, Funny

    He did receive a job offer from the NSA afterwards however.

    1. Re:Job Offer by ArcadeMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      The ones that cough are diseased.

    2. Re:Job Offer by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know why, he was sloppy. Well, I guess they could train him in the details but his heart was in the right place.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    3. Re:Job Offer by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They want the ones with no sense of ethics or morality.

      Actually, they probably want ones with a strong sense of ethics that can be bent in a direction of their choosing. You don't get nearly as hard work out of someone ethically unmoored as you do out of someone who is acting for a "greater good," and you get even more work out of someone who doesn't even see the lesser evil. Worse for the former, you may get junk data since they don't care enough.

      No, no greater evil is committed than by those who believe they are doing a great good. There are plenty of people in this country that passionately believe the principle that only those who do wrong have something to hide and that privacy is nothing but a shield for criminals. That's a form of strong ethics, though it's one I'd disagree with.

      Hire those people, and you're golden.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  3. Settings examples by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He's small time, he cheated, he got caught and made an example of. If only we could have this sort of efficiency and insight into real politicians.

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    1. Re:Settings examples by Kookus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If someone steals my credentials, I'd expect that kind of punishment. I don't think he's being made an example, he's actually getting off light.
      There's a lot of other things that he could potentially do, or has exposed those students to by capturing their passwords. It's not that he was caught trying to rig an election, it's that he was impersonating other individuals, stealing their identities.

  4. True Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I did something similar at "Canada's Premiere Undergraduate Experience"

    Long story short, one of the people running for Student Union President won my House election the year before. He did so by getting the competition kicked out on technicalities. No, I wasn't running, and No, I wasn't friends with anyone who did. Since every day a poster is up is a "violation" they racked up fast. This guy was going out with the person who's job it is to notify people of potential violations, and they were never warned.

    Fast forward two years, and I logged in as every. single. student. from a MacDonalds down the road. Didn't actually vote, just logged in, logged right back out. Then repeated 8k times. Once a student logged in, they had an hour to finish. Since everyone's hour was up at 9AM, almost no one voted.

    Somehow, there was still a landslide win. Not only did he have 90% of the votes, he had more votes than there were students in the entire university.

    The whole election should have been thrown out. People complained on official forums, topics were deleted as fast as they went up.

    It pays to play dirty apparently.

  5. Re:Mixed feelings by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the problem is that this job comes with a stipend. Once you actually make money from this sort of thing (even a relatively small amount), it's financial fraud and taken a lot more seriously.

  6. If only by JavaBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If only they would take the real elections half as seriously, maybe then we'd regain a (small) measure of confidence in the election process.

  7. Prison by ArcadeMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He's probably going to prison for accessing the students accounts, not for the election fraud itself.

    1. Re:Prison by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's probably going to prison for accessing the students accounts, not for the election fraud itself.

      That's why you don't do this, kids. You start with logging other people's strokes and you end up stroking other people's logs.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  8. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    How about the mayor in Florida that lost voting machines that were later shown to contain many more votes for the Ds than those for R. The mayor is a stanch R supporter, and when questioned how the fuck did these voting machines get lost, she replied "it happens, voting is a complex business". Yup, so complex, they were deliberately disconnected, moved to another room, and covered in a pile of boxes to disguise they were there.

    That's just one example of the Bush / Fox / FL stolen election.

  9. Re:Plea bargaining by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pleading guilty avoids certain un-pleasantries.

    That's extortion. If someone were bullied by the government out of their right to criticize the government, would you say "Not criticizing the government avoids certain un-pleasantries"?

    The whole point of having rights is that the government cannot make your life more unpleasant for exercising them. Getting extra charges tacked on for exercising your right to a trial is no more just than getting extra attention from the IRS for exercising your right to criticize the government.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  10. Re:Ah, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not that he rigged an election, it's that he stole and impersonated many students identities.

  11. Re:Ah, no... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can see them being punished by the school, but WTF...Federal Prison?!?!?

    No matter where he did this, he stole people's credentials (illegally), and used it to access system (illegally).

    CFAA is a federal statute, so he broke federal law -- and therefore gets federal prison.

    I have no sympathy for him. None at all.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  12. Read the full article. This is NOT harmless. by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wow...just wow.
    I can understand him getting kicked out of school, but freaking federal prison for a year for just messing with a STUDENT school election?!?!
    [...]
    This is a freaking school election...not a federal / city/state election..it is college, it means NOTHING....

    Read the full article (especially the utsandiego.com link). He committed wire fraud -- the winner of the presidential election gets a $8000 stipend, and the vice-president gets $7000. He planned ahead (even putting together a PowerPoint presentation the year before for his frat brothers to run for the #2 slot) to "win" these prizes. Fraud over wire for financial gain is a serious federal crime with a maximum of 20 years in prison.

    He also attempted to cover up his crime once caught *red-handed* at the machine he was entering the votes from in a computer lab by later creating Facebook profiles in other real people's names and generating a lot of fake comments intended to make it look like those people had conspired to frame him, and he sent it to local media outlets. It was stupid in way that shows how much smarter he thinks he is than the people around him.

    This kid is a budding con artist. He was acting for financial motive to defraud the school, and he was willing to trash the lives of others to try to get out of paying the penalty for something he did. This kid has displayed blatant, selfish disregard for others and a willingness to hurt or exploit them for profit.

    This isn't a harmless prank. These are the actions of a malicious liar with an inflated sense of his own capabilities who doesn't seem to grasp the idea that consequences should apply to him for his actions. They should have thrown the book at him. Imagine the harm he could have done if he'd waited a few more years to "ripen" as a criminal and landed himself in management somewhere.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  13. Re:Read the full article. This is NOT harmless. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exactly. This is hardly a case of a kid doing something stupid without thinking it through. This guy had plenty of time to examine his actions, he had plenty of opportunity to back out, and he was repeatedly shown that his actions had consequences. And yet, at every step of the way, he chose to proceed. Even after he was caught he chose to perpetrate a cover-up! These are not the actions of a silly kid, they are the actions of a criminal. This kid deserves the punishment he received.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  14. Re:Ah, no... by Golddess · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or do you believe somebody putting a keylogger trojan on your computer should be legal?

    Just because someone thinks the punishment is excessive, doesn't mean they think that the crime should be legal.

    Likewise, just because someone thinks the punishment was excessive in one scenario, doesn't mean they'd think it excessive in other scenarios. You wouldn't punish someone for stealing a snickers bar as harshly as you would if they'd stolen an iPad, would you?

    --
    "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-