Slashdot Mirror


IQ Test Pegs ConceptNet 4 AI About As Smart As a 4-Year-Old

An anonymous reader writes "Artificial and natural knowledge researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago have IQ-tested one of the best available artificial intelligence systems to see how intelligent it really is. Turns out–it's about as smart as the average 4-year-old. The team put ConceptNet 4, an artificial intelligence system developed at M.I.T., through the verbal portions of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence Test, a standard IQ assessment for young children. They found ConceptNet 4 has the average IQ of a young child. But unlike most children, the machine's scores were very uneven across different portions of the test." If you'd like to play with the AI system described here, take note of the ConceptNet API documentation, and this Ubuntu-centric installation guide.

5 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. More like autistic-savant 4 year old by schneidafunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article: “If a child had scores that varied this much, it might be a symptom that something was wrong,” said Robert Sloan, professor and head of computer science at UIC, and lead author on the study.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:More like autistic-savant 4 year old by Metabolife · · Score: 5, Funny

      Similar to how a typical Slashdot user might score amazingly well on the math section and then never score in real life?

  2. Sample output when tested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No!

  3. Misleading crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We are nowhere near getting an AI that can navigate the world at the level of a 4 year old. All the program can do is simple tasks in vocabulary and such with no real understanding of those words. Nothing to see here.

    1. Re:Misleading crap by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We are nowhere near getting an AI that can navigate the world at the level of a 4 year old. All the program can do is simple tasks in vocabulary and such with no real understanding of those words. Nothing to see here.

      The headline is the usual attention grabbing junk, but the article itself does a decent job of explaining it:

      Sloan said ConceptNet 4 did very well on a test of vocabulary and on a test of its ability to recognize similarities.

      “But ConceptNet 4 did dramatically worse than average on comprehension—the ‘why’ questions,” he said.

      One of the hardest problems in building an artificial intelligence, Sloan said, is devising a computer program that can make sound and prudent judgment based on a simple perception of the situation or facts–the dictionary definition of commonsense.

      Commonsense has eluded AI engineers because it requires both a very large collection of facts and what Sloan calls implicit facts–things so obvious that we don’t know we know them. A computer may know the temperature at which water freezes, but we know that ice is cold.

      “All of us know a huge number of things,” said Sloan. “As babies, we crawled around and yanked on things and learned that things fall. We yanked on other things and learned that dogs and cats don’t appreciate having their tails pulled. Life is a rich learning environment.”

      IQ tests mean little enough for a human being, for AI they're little more than cute. Most 4 year old's know if someone is mad at them (expression, tone of voice, etc.) and, from past experience, often know why someone is mad at them. They're also clever enough to pretend they don't know why someone is mad at them. Most importantly (and practically), they know to start acting cute before somebody kills them. Let me know when an AI program can do that.

      P.S. This is not to disparage the AI work, just to keep things in perspective.