Slashdot Mirror


Study Finds Fracking Chemicals Didn't Pollute Water

RoccamOccam sends this news from the Associated Press: "A landmark federal study on hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, shows no evidence that chemicals from the natural gas drilling process moved up to contaminate drinking water aquifers at a western Pennsylvania drilling site. After a year of monitoring, the researchers found that the chemical-laced fluids used to free gas trapped deep below the surface stayed thousands of feet below the shallower areas that supply drinking water."

5 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. That's even worse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    So what the hell is being done about keeping your damn hippie drinking water from contaminating my fracking solution??

  2. Not possible by onyxruby · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not possible! The results are politically incorrect and will go against the dogma of 'we must be miserable'. Not to worry, someone will quickly find a way to bury this, spin this or otherwise make this moot. We can't let science speak, that's what we have greenpeace for.

  3. Obvious conclusion. by alexhs · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, they didn't test water pollution, only checked that fracking didn't contaminate water by using markers.
    Hower, other studies showed a correlation between fracking and presence of water pollutants.

    Therefore, the only logical conclusion is: water pollution causes fracking !

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  4. Re:From a comment on the story - so this is bogus by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're obviously right, they use paragraphs.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  5. Re:Fire water? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

    And suppose the fracking chemicals themselves don't migrate.

    . . . they could be carried by a swallow . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!