Slashdot Mirror


LibreOffice 4.1 Released

An anonymous reader writes "The latest major release of the LibreOffice office suite has just been published, including an experimental improved sidebar based on the work of Apache OpenOffice, embedded fonts, better Microsoft Office compatibility (improving their exclusive capability in the free software world of not only being able to read but also write .docx and .xlsx files) and many further Improvements."

157 comments

  1. LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice should just merge in to one open source office suite.

    1. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice should just merge in to one open source office suite.

      Based on the history of the creation of the LibreOffice project, I think that would never happen.

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    2. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      LibreOffice already does this pretty much every release!

      The licensing for the two allows LO to take any of Apache's changes that they'd like (and they frequently do!), whereas the reverse would require Apache to change the OpenOffice licensing.

      Honestly though, as long as they both support the same file format, having two separate suites isn't a bad thing.

    3. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take Apache OpenOffice's slow, stable approach to releases over LibreOffice's any day. I certainly wouldn't want to see them merge.

    4. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the new Apache Office 4 is the best, feels like the good old office without those strange ribbon "innovarions"

    5. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So LO is the Canonical of office suite software?

    6. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the joke (tm).

    7. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that just about all the Linux distros contribute developers to LibreOffice, and most volunteers contribute there too...

    8. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by SteveFoerster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't it great that we have 300 different Linux distros? I bet that's why it was so successful with desktop consumers (in confusing them I mean).

      Yes, it is great that we have so many choices. The problem getting Linux onto most users' desktops hasn't been that there are so many options. Usually when it comes to "Linux on the Desktop!!!!" there's only been one main distro getting buzz at a time, most recently Ubuntu but going back at least as far as Caldera back in the late '90s. So I don't think brand confusion is the issue here.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    9. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      We can merge them and call it Mega Office!

    10. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Isn't it great that we have 300 different Linux distros? I bet that's why it was so successful with desktop consumers (in confusing them I mean).

      Look at it this way, Windows was already entrenched on the desktop by the time Linux came along (and especially by the time it was reasonably mature).

      Contrast that with smartphones, where Linux has been a massive success.

      So, maybe forking wasn't the dominant issue in the first place.

    11. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought this model was the whole point of open source software. What's with all the whining and bickering?

    12. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by PRMan · · Score: 0, Troll

      In my experience, the problem isn't getting Linux onto the desktop. It's keeping it there after an update crashes everything and the user says, "Screw that, I'm going back to Windows because it works."

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    13. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I don't know if it's "crashes everything" more often, or if it's usually just silly QA things where things are just not seamless, and malfunction in an inconvenient way that gets in the way of productivity. But broadly speaking I have to agree with you, and I say that as someone who's used Linux on the desktop for several years and no interest whatsoever in switching back to Windows.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    14. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by marcello_dl · · Score: 2, Funny

      > It's keeping it there after an update crashes everything and the user says, "Screw that, I'm going back to Windows because it works."

      Said no debian user ever.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    15. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Because they are people? People are whiny and like to get their own way. Open source is not a genetic engineering exercise.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    16. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Oracle Shill. Go suck Ellison's cock.

      Why? He's already got your mother to do that for him.

    17. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a linux fan but I've had both Debian and Ubuntu go full retard on various occasions.

    18. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Pfff

      How about this: Uberoffice

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    19. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      odd in my experience it is windows updates that break stuff. I haven't had a linux update break anything yet.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    20. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was OP whining, or making a point against a common criticism leveled at open source projects that do exactly the same thing LO does?

    21. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That is better, given the German origins.

    22. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by krammit · · Score: 1

      UbreOffice.

      --
      "Watch your cornhole, bud."
    23. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uhhh...the creation of Libre Office came about because Oracle was being their usual dickish selves, I doubt you are gonna see that same attitude anywhere in the Apache foundation so that isn't the problem. The problem is that Apache is more of a BSD license and Libre is GPL, no point in starting up THAT old flamewar so lets just say they agree to disagree and move on.

      Now that said I think we should all give the Libre Office team another year and a half before we even start judging their work, because frankly Sun left that code in pretty damned bad shape and when you are talking about a project THAT size? Well its gonna take a good while just to clean out the cruft and straighten out the messes. Considering the short amount of time they have had it its already getting better, its just a shame the LO guys can share improvements with the Apache guys but due to license incompatibilities I just don't see that happening.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    24. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by jimicus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Linux on the desktop has a whole heap of problems. Updates are one of them (particularly when your OS has an average life expectancy of 6-12 months), but there's no shortage of others.

      Off the top of my head:

        - An easy way to install drivers for peripherals. If your printer/scanner/MFC isn't supported out of the box, it's potluck if the manufacturer has produced anything. If they have, then it's potluck how well it works. Compare and contrast with Windows, which has Windows update and besides, nobody is about to produce hardware without Windows drivers.
            - Yes, I know you can hold peripheral manufacturers responsible for a lot of that. Guess what? That cuts precisely zero ice with Aunt Tillie.
        - An approach to desktop experience that is religion-driven rather than results-driven. Part of that is because of patent law (cf. Fraunhofer's MP3 patents), part of it is because of some sort of insane desire to re-invent the wheel every few years (precisely how many sound subsystems has Linux had over the years?).
        - A blind spot to anything that doesn't work very well. Anyone who's tried to do anything beyond a very vanilla setup knows all about this.

    25. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amusingly, that happening in Windows is what's sent several people to Linux in my experience. All systems can fail during an update. Just ask NASA.

    26. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by hairyfeet · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'll get hate but screw it, the reason linux goes nowhere is the same reason you name the distro and it won't pass the "Hairyfeet Challenge" which is already tilted badly in Linux' favor, and that is Linus Torvalds gives more care about religious dogma than designing an OS that works and since the vast majority of the public are NOT what I call "FOSSies" and do not give a rat turd about GPL purity Linux goes nowhere. I mean for God's sake guys, there is several orders of magnitude more people willing to risk tens of thousands in fines and possible jail time to steal the other guy's product than take yours for free, doesn't that set off a lightbulb above your head?

      The simple fact of the matter is that NOBODY uses Torvalds fucked up "Let the devs do it" driver model, not even the other free as in freedom OSes like BSD and Solaris and the reason why is it DOES NOT WORK, hell you can use basic math to show why it'll never work, ready? You have MAYBE 400 guys working with Torvalds and qualified to write and debug low level systems drivers, following so far? Now add in the fact that there is probably a good 10,000 new devices coming out per quarter MINIMUM and a good 100,000+ drivers that are ALREADY in the tree....see the problem yet? if you mainlined those devs on Bolivian Marching Powder so they NEVER slept and ONLY worked on drivers you'd have each driver getting around 20 minutes worth of time every 3 years or so, which is why you end up with drivers like these that were half assed and piss poor to begin with, only having half the hardware functional, and are poorly supported on top of that.

      But what do we get when we point this out, and what I'm sure to hear here? We don't need no steekin ABI and then you expect, with a straight face and without a trace of irony, for Joe and jane Average to do forum hunts, google for fixes, and be able to tweak piles of CLI crapola because thanks to Torvalds fucked up way of dealing with drivers, which worked in 93 when you had a couple of hundred drivers but just can't scale to the number we have today, leaves even Eric Raymond unable to get a printer to work over the network, a feature that the other guy has been doing since WinXP in 01 trivially. In fact the ONLY response you can show from the kernel devs is a RELIGIOUS argument, in fact the dev even wrote "and I hope we break none free drivers often!" which if that doesn't show you its about the GPL religion over having a functional OS then I don't know what will.

      At the end of the day you have to be either the most arrogant prick on the planet or fucking deluded to look and see that EVERY SINGLE OTHER OS does it one way, BSD, Solaris, Windows, OSX, iOS, fuck even OS/2 and your "dear leader" goes for the exact opposite approach, one that NOBODY other than him uses, and then to believe he is actually right and they are wrong, that he is fucking smarter than ALL those OS devs put together? I'm sorry but that is bullshit and ironically the community knows it too even if they won't say it out loud. after all what does everybody on the forums tell you to buy from graphics? Nvidia a NON FREE DRIVER because what do you know, the driver actually WORKS. sadly Nvidia is the only company it seems willing to blow that much money supporting Linux, the rest aren't gonna pay an entire dev team to fix what Torvalds and Co. break and Joe and jane sure as fuck ain't gonna put with updates shitting all over drivers and forum hunts for fixes.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    27. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Riiiight.

      I've operated and admined thousands of Windows based PCs and I have never once seen a system update that broke anything. Likewise, I've never seen a Linux update break anything...worse than it was already broken. Unless you specifically custom build a PC with parts for Linux, there will almost certainly be something that doesn't work correctly. That doesn't happen under Windows; everything just works.

    28. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linus Torvalds maintains only the kernel (AKA Linux). He doesn't do any work for any of the Linux based operating systems.

      The driver problem exists because the people who work on Linux distros are cheap. If they simply paid the hardware makers to produce drivers, then stuff would work as they should instead of being a half-assed, broken mess.

    29. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by blackest_k · · Score: 2

      You make it sound as if there is just one version of windows and the fact is driver support for peripherals can be problematic.

      As an example I have a mint condition card reader from pny which does compact flash and smart media and a printer with card slots that can't handle anything over 128 meg so I plugs it into my linux box and find only the cf side is recognised no problem thinks me i'll just use it with windows instead no biggie was I wrong the only drivers are for 98se not xp, not 2000, vista, windows 7, or 8.

      That may be an extreme example and the problem solved by linux being able to mount the card via mass storage device using the printer as a mass storage device.

      However whilst on the subject of printers you may also run in to issues of limited functionality in later versions of windows, manufacturers tend to target a particular windows version and while my old ink jet will work in windows 7 with an inbuilt windows 7 driver, border-less printing is only available in XP. meanwhile in linux hplip got an update last week.

      Theres also downgrading issues too or are you too young to be familiar with the problems of buying a laptop with Vista and trying to install XP.

      Clearly not everything is supported in Linux but also equally clear Windows is a range of operating systems with varying levels of support for particular hardware. Incidentally you may have missed the fact libre office is available on Windows too.
           

    30. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Possibly.

      But we live in a world where hardware is so cheap it's considered disposable. If the printer no longer works (for whatever reason; you'd be amazed how many people don't even understand the idea that there's nothing wrong with the damn printer; it's the manufacturer's own commercial decision) then a new one is on the cards.

      When the new one may or may not work - and linuxprinting.org recommends a list of printers where the most recent one was discontinued in 2011 - then you have a problem. A hardware compatibility list is no damn good if all it lists is hardware that hasn't been seen in the wild in five or ten years.

    31. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a great example of why GPL will always be better than BSD-style for open source products.

    32. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by robmv · · Score: 1

      I prefer LibreOffice approach, release 4.1, and maintain with real critical fixes the 4.0 branch. On the 3.x cycle they always recommended to use the previous stable release, for example 3.4.3 when 3.5.0 was released, when they reached 3.6.0 they switched their recommendation to 3.5.x. Dream you will have real fixes for the 3.x branch of Apache OpenOffice

    33. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      > It's keeping it there after an update crashes everything and the user says, "Screw that, I'm going back to Windows because it works."

      Going back to Windows because IT works?

      Excuse me. My jaw just hit the floor. I've got to go find a shovel and retrieve it.

    34. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Hairy --

      Embedded requires drivers Linux is a huge player
      Server requires drivers Linux is a huge player
      Android requires drivers Linux is the kernel
      Tizen will require drivers and Linux is the kernel of that too

      So obviously the model does work. It doesn't work well for low end Windows hardware. The Linux community, including Linus has mostly given up on that community. Linux failed at its original goal of a desktop replacement for Windows and was hugely successful at a dozen others. The kernel group is not going to damager the more important products like server and embedded to do better running on $300 machines. They just don't care that much.

      As for iOS it most certainly does use the Linux model as does OSX. And heck yeah a GPLed operating system does not want closed source components becoming crucial. If you disagree with the GPL, here is Microsoft's business card.

    35. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Microlith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Linus Torvalds gives more care about religious dogma than designing an OS that works

      Not only is this ridiculous hyperbole, it's hyperbole that isn't even remotely true.

      since the vast majority of the public are NOT what I call "FOSSies" and do not give a rat turd about GPL purity Linux goes nowhere.

      Actually, it's why the silly FSF-approved distros will go nowhere.

      not even the other free as in freedom OSes like BSD and Solaris

      Coincidentally, the BSD kernels have moved nowhere near as fast. And solaris is not "Free as in Freedom," Oracle cut it off so at best you have the kernel from Solaris 10 - an OS that was closed source for ages.

      You have MAYBE 400 guys working with Torvalds and qualified to write and debug low level systems drivers, following so far?

      Not when you're blatantly pulling bullshit numbers out of your ass.

      Now add in the fact that there is probably a good 10,000 new devices coming out per quarter MINIMUM and a good 100,000+ drivers that are ALREADY in the tree....see the problem yet?

      10000? I doubt that. But the difference is that they know that they have to support Windows, so they write Windows drivers (it's the advantage being a monopoly gets you.) Of course, the drivers in the tree don't need -constant- maintenance. And virtually every one of them who is qualified as an owner, most of which are employed by the company that produced the device.

      But what do we get when we point this out, and what I'm sure to hear here? We don't need no steekin ABI and then you expect

      Well:

      - You link to "tmrepository," a site pretty much the geek equivalent of Stormfront, just about as twisted in upon itself, irrational, ignorant and hateful.

      - The stable ABI argument is nonsense because you then bind yourself to whatever the closed source vendors are using. You are hamstrung for the sake of a bunch of driver writers who refuse to cooperate for no good reason and you don't dare fix it for fear of breaking some proprietary driver the vendor hasn't updated in years.

      > The primary reason it's bullshit is because if you're so insistent on being proprietary, you target a specific distro's kernel, say, RHEL 6.3 or Ubuntu 12.04. Upstream is an entirely different beast, but given your ignorance I would assume you know nothing other than what the hate-filled people at "tmrepository" have cherry picked to mock.

      > Conversely, what you're saying is that the Linux team shouldn't do it their way, they should do it a different way. One that gives 100% of the benefit to proprietary vendors and zero benefit to vendors that actually cooperate and upstream their drivers.

      - You're in over your head in making this argument and resort to CAPS, name calling, and constant vulgarity while completely failing to present anything resembling a convincing argument.

      Nvidia is the only company it seems willing to blow that much money supporting Linux

      Yeah, they're the only company pushing a binary driver that actually puts money into supporting Linux. It's not like driver development is free, it costs money to support Windows too. Interestingly, Nvidia also has lots of customers on Linux, so unsurprisingly they invest in the drivers and make sure it works.

      Whereas with my employer, we work and push directly to the kernel, in addition to supporting the specific kernels of select distributions. Net result is that the driver is better than it was before we released it - not that there was anything special about it before. I suspect the same is true for most drivers.

      But here we are again, another unsupported, empty, emotional spew from hairyfeet about things he doesn't actually understand.

    36. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that used to be true, but since Windows 7, it is very much "pot luck" if you are going to get the proper driver support ON WINDOWS for a lot of hardware, now ...and it is getting worse with 8

    37. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Embedded and mobile is actually a great example of major hardware vendors who don't actually cooperate with the upstream Kernel. They fail to upstream a lot of their drivers and, as a result, have to spend time porting them forward when Google moves to a new kernel.

      The sad bit is that all of that forward porting would be done for them if they went upstream, but since the hardware vendors integrate all sorts of custom Android-isms and they don't focus past the time their dev teams transition to the next handset, they end up expending more resources for no good reason.

    38. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      haha Ubre!

      It sounds so much fancier

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    39. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      In the 18 or so years that I've been running Linux, the only distros where I've had "everything crash" (other than when I've done something stupid, of course, which doesn't count) as the result of a bad update have been (in chronological order) with RedHat and Arch. Slackware never (ever) breaks, Debian is reliable, my LFS and Gentoo systems have been reliable (if tedious to maintain), and I can never persuade myself to stick with Ubuntu for long enough before it pisses me off.

    40. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have to agree with it, and although my username would suggest otherwise, I would love to run Linux full time, it's some of this basic stuff that breaks with updates that keeps me away. It's the "lets create another sound API instead of fixing the broken stuff" and "Lets reinvent the UI instead of fixing the broken stuff" that keeps me away.

    41. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      I had Windows XP become unstable (nice new buggy Ethernet drivers...) and even completely die on me after a service pack update. But thanks to the way Linux works, with its elegant use of separate system and home partitions (if desired), the ability to just scrap / and set the mount point for /home right during install means I never experience what you're talking about. I just nuke the system and use my existing user data, and a fresh install is up and running with all my customizations in no time. A few system-wide settings may need to be re-adjusted or backup configuration files copied back over, but in general I don't have to worry about that. Some programs might need to be installed also, but again, because Linux distributions tend to come with a good selection of packages that's never too much of a problem either.

      Don't even get me started on my abysmal experience with Windows, from the mid 1990s to 2006 when I jumped ship just in time for Vista. Installing, setting up and maintaining it is no fun at all. It's a fucking chore, and it tends to be about as useful as a V-Tech kid's electric learning toy until you've populated it with enough third-party programs.

    42. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      particularly when your OS has an average life expectancy of 6-12 months

      Really? Let's have a look.

      The current 3.x kernel series has been going for only 2 years or so, so maybe I'll give you that.

      The 2.6 kernel (started 2004) is still actively supported. The 2.4 kernel (started 2001) had its latest update in May of this year. I would say that sort of indicates more commitment to long term support than just about any other software available.

      Back in the '90s (I remember) you had to give some about how well your hardware would be supported, but nowadays pretty much anything worth having works just fine with Linux.

    43. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu, I can believe. Debian, I can also believe--if using testing or unstable, and/or generally not knowing what you're doing. So I would guess on the Debian side, it would have to be a classic case of PEBKAC, or willfully doing something that could potentially be dangerous. I figure RHEL and its derivatives would be equally rock-solid, though I'm sure if you really want to destroy one of those systems you could. For what it's worth, I tend to prefer the cleanliness of a fresh install though, while keeping my /home partition intact.

    44. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by blackest_k · · Score: 2

      The hardware list is just a list, the situation with printers has improved greatly over recent years. I'm currently downloading an update to hplip a week after installing the previous version. That covers HP printers, I'm in the market for a new inkjet and Canon seems to be the best option. Canons been contributing to open source drivers since 2009 obviously I do google for linux support for each model i am considering and I haven't found an issue yet with canon.

      Most current generation printers are better than ever many with built in duplex supporting air print, eprint card readers pictbridge some even collect webpages for you or create collages from that days facebook pages.
      Epson is another leading brand which is quite well supported too, although I no longer favour Epson since every Epson i have had has failed with blocked jets. Brother supply Linux drivers for their printers. I used to use a Brother label printer for own branded products Libre office was grand for that job too. Samsung laser printers are supported by Samsung on Linux.

      So the situation used to be that printers could be a bit hit or miss on Linux with third parties reverse engineering drivers. Now the major manufacturers work to produce drivers in house or in combination with outside developers. The advent of Smart Phones with cameras has produced a demand for printers which work with android and ios and the printer manufacturers are responding with printer models that work directly with the smart phones and tablets.

      It is no longer a windows dominated market when it comes to printers some of the most demanding users are using macs , macs use cups as does Linux its pretty much a certainty that if Apple has support so has Linux. One fairly big name with no linux support for Inkjets is Lexmark which is getting out of the printer market. Worth noting with the laser printers even Lexmark had to support Linux.

      I have to admit I have never seen this printer list you mention, I've always just googled Linux or ubuntu and the printer model but the reason it hasn't been updated is probably because there is little need for it any more.

      If you print a lot you buy a laser printer, if you want high quality prints its really a choice of the big 3 Epson, Canon or HP. Canon do pretty decent printers for around â40 upwards depending on features and the thing is thou they make a lot of variations there are a limited number of print engines. Which makes supporting them with multiple operating systems a lot simpler. I think canon are the strongest in the market currently, HP seem to suffer with build quality issues from the customer reviews i've read sometimes doa or not long after.

      If you have an unsupported printer on linux these days you can find a better replacement for less than the cost of replacement cartridges. Seriously a canon 2250 retails for â50 which has around â27 worth of ink in it, doesnt support apple or android directly but it is using the same engine as the 3250 which does and has a duplexer built in. Meanwhile you could have a dell which has to have dell ink at around â60 which have to be ordered from Dell you might as well throw out the Dell...

      Unfortunately with printers having the razor blade model there is nothing to be gained buying a second hand printer even a reasonably good one as Canon practically give them away for nothing. You want â30 - â50 for your old inkjet with no ink its not going to happen and because of the weight ebay is a waste of time for buying a printer since you can usually buy new cheaper.
         

    45. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Printers that can understand postscript are dirt cheap now so the simple answer is not to buy a crappy printer that is cheaper than dirt. I'd say give it only a year or three and people will be insisting on printing from their phones, so instead of hoping that there is some sort of driver just get something that just about anything from an Atari ST onwards can print to.

    46. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      I've operated and admined thousands of Windows based PCs and I have never once seen a system update that broke anything.

      Lucky you.

    47. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by hairyfeet · · Score: 0, Troll

      You know why you hate TMRepo, which BTW you should be fucking ASHAMED of comparing a JOKE SITE to Stromfront you douchebag, but you know why you hate it? Because like all good jokes its FUNNY BECAUSE ITS TRUE.

      I can answer ALL of your arguments with the top 20 TMRepos, you know why? Its the SAME FUCKING EXCUSES the FOSSies have been using for a fricking decade, that's why! How do you think TMRepo came to be? a guy got tired of hearing the same old FOSSie bullshit and decided to just start listing them and tada! TMRepo.

      So go back to your circle of loon, go back to pretending that the OEMs haven't all walked away from your broken mess because they got tired of the broken shit which even ESR can't make work while claiming that android is Linux.

      Know what the definition of insanity is? Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result and that is Linux in a nutshell which is why me and every other B&M retailer and OEM have run away screaming from your mess, why even Dell hides it on a back page and gives you multiple warning before they will even sell it to you and just FYI unlike the Windows versions NO SUPPORT because even they know that shit is gonna break. I mean for the love of God fricking God Windows 8, the most hated windows since MSBob, got more users by its second month than Linux has in its entire history, what more proof do you fucking need that your current bullshit direction ain't working?

      BTW know why I can produce so many citations and all you can produce is insults? because just like TMRepo I've heard the same excuses from FOSSies for so damned long i know EXACTLY what to type into a search engine to cut through your lies, but you hang onto your bullshit but if you have the balls take the Hairyfeet challenge, I dare you, double dare you to film it and upload it, you'll find that even giving Linux just HALF the support cycle of Linux it WILL fail, know why? Because the "let the devs do it" driver horseshit is just that,total fucking horseshit and IT DOES NOT WORK, it will NEVER work, and THAT is why even the other free OSes refuse to use his fucked up driver model!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    48. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      The problem is that Apache is more of a BSD license and Libre is GPL, no point in starting up THAT old flamewar so lets just say they agree to disagree and move on.

      Actually, they agree to cooperate and move on.

      3."Do you share code with Libre? sub question A: If so, will you soon both be even more similar -- in effect unforked? Sub question B: If you are not using each other's code, why not?"

      We cooperate and coordinate and share with LibreOffice, as well as other open source and even proprietary application vendors, in several ways

      https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/your_top_questions_answered

      That's the great benefit of FOSS projects. Their goals don't include locking users or developers down.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    49. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Or Google could itself organize an Android kernel which works back and forth with Linus the way RedHat maintains their own separate features kernels. That would allow Androidisms to be in their kernel but have it ported forward. The hardware vendors will hopefully get the spirt of the GPL at some point.

      But regardless Linux on embedded is successful.

    50. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is called PBIC, you PEBKAC

    51. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Mike+Frett · · Score: 1

      Yeah but those Windows users will spend hours hunting down drivers for old hardware or spend days trying to find cracks and such to get some old Game to work. It really boggles the mind as to why they can't spend five minutes to solve their issue via forums or IRC. It does help to have a friend or family member repairing the issue for you, ask mine.

    52. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Since we're going to be dragged totally off topic...

      You know why you hate TMRepo, which BTW you should be fucking ASHAMED of comparing a JOKE SITE to Stromfront you douchebag

      Back to the childish insults I see. I compared it because that's what it comes down to. They pigeonhole everyone that disagrees with them into a stereotype and attack that with all the same fervor. It's a joke site to them, because they sit back, stereotype people, and mock them because of it, all the while believing themselves to be superior.

      Because like all good jokes its FUNNY BECAUSE ITS TRUE.

      Stereotypes have some kernel of truth to them, doesn't make them good or justification for entire sites where people basically pat each other on the back because they disagree with people who hold other opinions.

      I can answer ALL of your arguments with the top 20 TMRepos, you know why?

      Answer? Or just provide a pathetic contradiction?

      Its the SAME FUCKING EXCUSES the FOSSies have been using for a fricking decade, that's why!

      Excuses? Or the same answers to the same questions?

      How do you think TMRepo came to be? a guy got tired of hearing the same old FOSSie bullshit and decided to just start listing them and tada! TMRepo.

      So one guy decided that he didn't like a handful of people and decided to stereotype everyone that he could pigeon hole under that banner. Sadly, more people joined him because they have the same sad lack of maturity.

      And now we get your spew of links. I'll ignore the one from TechnoStormfront, since it isn't relevant outside that site.

      As for your second, Project Sputnik is still alive and well. Of course, the OEMs mostly focus at the enterprise level because the Windows monopoly on the desktop persists. It's one of the downside of a monoculture: one vendor gets all of the attention and the rest languish. Your third link I answered many, many months ago, specifically that the unit discussed in the article was never supported by Ubuntu because it used the old GMA500 chipset, one that even Intel did a shit job supporting.

      ESR and CUPS

      So for your argument to be relevant we have to assume it's 2004 all over again and that absolutely nothing has changed. Yet right after ESR posted his article things started changing. But the most important thing about his article is that it is constructive criticism and not antagonistic name calling and venom spitting.

      X.org

      So we're going to blame Linux, as a whole, for the failings of what is generally regarded as a decrepit graphics stack with replacements on their way? I mean, don't go thinking that people are blind to this, if they were then things like Wayland wouldn't be getting done (and before you bitch about them taking a long time, consider how long X11 and the X.org codebase have been around. Would you prefer it done shitty and fast, or take a little while and get done right? Unfortunately, I suspect that for you it's wrong no matter what and the Linux world can never do anything right.)

      I mean for the love of God fricking God Windows 8, the most hated windows since MSBob, got more users by its second month than Linux has in its entire history, what more proof do you fucking need that your current bullshit direction ain't working?

      Considering that Windows 8 was guaranteed to get that many, this is a non-sequitur. Again, the advantage of a monopoly where the OEMs will, in accordance with your licensing agreements, switch fully over to the new platform the moment it is released.

      Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result

      S

    53. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by vettemph · · Score: 1

      ApacheLibreOffice --> ApLOffice
      (pronouced Apple Office) :)

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    54. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Rutulian · · Score: 2

      What peripheral drivers would you like to install? What is it about Linux that prevents you from installing them? Is it because they are not available? That would be the manufacturers fault. There really is no excuse for this. The facilities for producing userspace drivers for just about anything have been available in Linux for a long time. Manufacturers don't have to open source or submit them to upstream repositories, but they do have to write them. If they don't...who's going to write it for them? And no, just because it is bad for Aunt Tillie does not mean it is a fault with Linux, anymore than the D-Link DWA-130 not working on OS X is a problem with Apple.

      (precisely how many sound subsystems has Linux had over the years?)

      Uh, one: ALSA since the 2.6 kernel. I will agree that certain desktop distributions (I'm looking at you Ubuntu) like to beta-test and screw around for no apparent reason resulting in breakage, but you can easily install a Linux desktop and have the sound work out of the box with no messing around. For a period of time that wasn't Ubuntu, though.

      A blind spot to anything that doesn't work very well. Anyone who's tried to do anything beyond a very vanilla setup knows all about this.

      Define "work well." I mean we all have our own standards. Some things are just irritating because it may be bad scrollbar behavior, or something, but not everybody is bothered by these sorts of things. It's easy to criticize Ubuntu for the things they miss or break (because these irritate us the most) and forget the good things they have contributed (they were the first distribution to make a proprietary driver installer for the desktop, for example). I don't know, it's not perfect, but I've never used a desktop, Linux or otherwise, that was.

    55. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even she wouldn't touch that diseased prick. You know who was staying at his place last weekend? John Fucking McAfee. Enjoy your VD.

    56. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      - An easy way to install drivers for peripherals. If your printer/scanner/MFC isn't supported out of the box, it's potluck if the manufacturer has produced anything. If they have, then it's potluck how well it works. Compare and contrast with Windows, which has Windows update and besides, nobody is about to produce hardware without Windows drivers. .

      This is so funny. Been on Linux for years now. And I actually don't need an easy way to install drivers, because I don't have to install them! Everything just works. Been that way since I switched to Ubuntu. Sometimes I have to tick a radio button to let the OS know I do want proprietary drivers, that's all.

      Windows needs an easy way to install drivers since: it requires you to install drivers. My Windows 7 install couldn't even read my external hard drive before I dug up drivers somewhere for the USB3 card. And that was after the install of the OS itself which still after all this years takes countless reboots. Felt like the nineties all over again.
      Since I used to install Windows on machines in the past as my job (OK, long time ago) I think I can say that I am no beginner in that field either.

      --
      ---
    57. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are seriously prejudiced.

      I invite everyone to just spend 30 minutes reading the mail archives of both Apache OpenOffice and LibreOffice development mailing lists (since there are months of public activities online) and it will become abundantly clear which project is about making the code better and who is being a dick.

    58. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about CubaLibreOffice. But only on Friday afternoons.

    59. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second this. I follow both and one of them also has a hell of a lot more traffic -- all of it about improving the code and fixing bugs --- than the other, which is mostly Rob Weir talking about his latest blog post of excuses why Apache OO hasn't put out any releases.

      Code talks, bullshit walks.

    60. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by helix2301 · · Score: 1

      I agree

    61. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Don't be an ass. Linux does not "go nowhere", it rules the world at the moment, or didn't you notice that you are surrounded by Linux devices because you are too busy admiring the daily poop you excrete onto Slashdot.

      There is exactly one major computing segment where Linux does not rule the world, and that is PCs, where Microsoft owns and operates a thuggish racket involving illegal exercise of market power over vendors. And that one is starting to show cracks.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    62. Re: LibreOffice & Apache OpenOffice merge by colablizzard · · Score: 2

      Windows _just_ works. I began using Linux Mint a few months ago for learning. And I find it harder and harder to find latest software packaged for it, they all expect me to be on the latest release. With a release every 6 moths, that is not very good at upgrading, I think a lot of people would like to be on Windows. Where XP users (10+ yr old OS) are happily installing 99.99% of all available software in the latest versions without a hitch. Of course, I am on Win 8 with ClassShell start menu. That is the max customization I need. AND nothing has broken due to me installing the start menu, and I know nothing will. Windows has one of the BEST backward/forward compatibilities I have every seen for any OS. (Seen Solaris, Linux (RHEL/Ubuntu) and Windows of-course). Any decently written software from 15 yrs ago will still install and run. Without requiring a exponentially increasing, cascading list of dependencies. On linux, if you are not on the latest version of the OS and are installing the latest version of the software, they will require specific versions of components where you have a newer version of the same and installing both simultaneously requires being a IT equivalent of a Gymnast.

  2. 3,000 bug fixes by Trashcan+Romeo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How many to go?

    1. Re:3,000 bug fixes by NotFamous · · Score: 2

      To Infinity and Beyond!

      --
      Some settling may occur during posting.
    2. Re:3,000 bug fixes by Synerg1y · · Score: 3, Insightful

      including an experimental improved sidebar

      Infinity sounds about right...

    3. Re:3,000 bug fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the LibreOffice Bugzilla, 2937, if you don't count NEW bugs.

    4. Re:3,000 bug fixes by steelfood · · Score: 3, Informative

      You need to consider that it's a suite of applications, with each one at a different level of maturity.

      Three thousand would seem like a big number. Except if you break it down, it might (hypothetically) be a hundred in Writer, a hundred in Calc, and two thousand in Base. And, I wonder how much of these are behind-the-scenes fixes, like changing exception handlers to do something useful instead of logging and then throwing the exception away.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    5. Re:3,000 bug fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in my QA days we used to call certain bugs "features"

    6. Re:3,000 bug fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too much...

      If they resove too many bugs, they have to introduce new ones to keep it compatible with Micosoft Office...

    7. Re:3,000 bug fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still do....

    8. Re:3,000 bug fixes by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      aaaaahhh. so you're the one who worked for Microsoft

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    9. Re:3,000 bug fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Commenting to call you a fag.

    10. Re:3,000 bug fixes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three thousand would seem like a big number.

      No, three thousand would seem like marketing BS. The alleged improvements in reading the plaintext xml-based Microsoft formats does sound like someone is actually working on the problems, but a count of "bugs fixed" means nothing. A typo on a menu entry could be listed as a bug fix. Or rewriting the entire imitation PowerPoint so that it stops crashing when you try to paste a image could be listed as one bug. (note that I have not spellchecked the menus or tried to use the imitation PowerPoint at all, just listing those as possible examples of "1 bug" being fixed)

      Off to download and see if it actually works now.

  3. Automatic Update by BenJury · · Score: 1

    Have they fixed the automatic update system yet? Or do I need to go and do it manually again like its the 90s?

    --
    Blatant Advert: Android Apps!
    1. Re: Automatic Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't it just "apt-get upgrade" to update?

    2. Re:Automatic Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the bug # ?
      Thanks in advance!

    3. Re: Automatic Update by DiamondGeezer · · Score: 1

      No.

      --
      Tubby or not tubby. Fat is the question
    4. Re: Automatic Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you're doing it wrong.

    5. Re: Automatic Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have the LibreOffice ppa then: yes.

  4. Exclusivity of read+write? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    improving their exclusive capability in the free software world of not only being able to read but also write .docx and .xlsx files)

    Is this really true? I mean, not an office suite, but PHPExcel can read and write Excel files.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Exclusivity of read+write? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LO can read/write OOXML - AOO can't.

  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. Please note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...there is already a site more or less dedicated to announcements about Libre Office updates. It's called libreoffice.org, and I think most people around here know about it, so we so not need another one.

    1. Re:Please note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now if we just had a site to aggregate those announcements/news from all over the web that would make it easy for people to get tech news... Someone should invent that site.

  7. Open Source by CritterNYC · · Score: 3, Informative

    LibreOffice is free to take everything OpenOffice releases under the Apache license and release it under GPL/LGPL 3.0 of their release. Unfortunately, OpenOffice can't do the reverse without switching their license.

    1. Re:Open Source by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, OpenOffice can't do the reverse without switching their license.

      It's not really unfortunate when it's by design. LibreOffice wants to make Apache OpenOffice become so redundant the project just gives up. This is how open source developers protest work that they feel is being done poorly. They fork the project in a way that allows only one-way code copying, and then try to starve the original of resources and its user base.

    2. Re:Open Source by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      It's not that great of a strategy. LibreOffice is a derivative of OpenOffice and they do risk appearing to be simply a downstream GPLed version of OpenOffice.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    3. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's not really what happened. LibreOffice forked back when Oracle had the copyright to OpenOffice and wasn't doing anything with it (including allowing outside commits!). Then, after Libre progressed a bit, Oracle donated the OpenOffice copyright to the Apache foundation.

    4. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LibreOffice is a derivative of OpenOffice.org

      Apache OpenOffice is a somewhat younger derivative of OpenOffice.org

      LibreOffice happen to have a license where they can merge stuff from Apache OpenOffice. Why shouldn't they? The Apache developers are explicity using the Apache licence so that people can use their code as they see fit.

      The MPL was chosen before AOO and the Apache licence even became an issue -- the plan was to migrate from LGPL to MPL. Now all the MPL changes have been rebased onto Apache code rather than being on top of LGPL. Meaning improvements from AOO can now be included, as the AOO developers intended. They could have not published their changes, or used the GPL if they didn't want LO to borrow their changes. Apache developers are free to take changes LO developers make, as long as they stay under the MPL. Where's the problem?

    5. Re:Open Source by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      The main risk is that the split in resources will cause both projects to be not good enough. Being perceived as a downstream version of another project, but with additions incompatible with their terms, that doesn't necessarily favor either end. There's a similar relationship between Debian and Ubuntu that turned out to make both more popular. What LibreOffice is trying to do is more like the XFree86 vs. Xorg split though.

    6. Re:Open Source by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Apache developers are free to take changes LO developers make, as long as they stay under the MPL. Where's the problem?

      The problem is your reading comprehension. I didn't say that LibreOffice was bad. I was replying to greg's comment and stated that trying "to starve the original of resources and its user base" by one-way code copying is not a great strategy because it risks having LibreOffice appear to simply be a downstream GPLed version of OpenOffice.

      The point is moot since LibreOffice appears to want a better office suite and I'm sure they aren't out to get anyone especially something that actually benefits them.

      LibreOffice is a derivative of OpenOffice.org [.] Apache OpenOffice is a somewhat younger derivative of OpenOffice.org

      Apache OpenOffice is not a younger derivative of OpenOffice.org. AOO is OpenOffice under an Apache license.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    7. Re:Open Source by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      OpenOffice has paid developers. The license allows the sponsor companies to make their own commercial versions with unique features as a way to get a return on their investment. Think Eclipse not XFree86.

      LibreOffice is a derivative of OpenOffice. It has features and bug fixes unique to its distribution. LibreOffice uses the GPL to protect their return on investment and not to specifically harm OpenOffice. I'm sure there are some people in LibreOffice that do think that way, but I think LibreOffice needs OpenOffice more than they care to admit.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    8. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LibreOffice has paid developers too, such as Michael Meeks.

    9. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't protect your investment with a license that makes it impossible to use the product truly freely. What you are doing is driving investors away.

    10. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no risk of appearing downstream of aonyone when anyone's contributions are dwarfed by all the rest of the activity in the codebase.

      Not to mention that a large part of the contributions of the specific anyone you're pointing to is putting a third-party code dump into shape, and once the third-party code trove is exhausted (it took years to accumulate) I doubt that particular anyone will be able to sustain even the current paltry activity level.

    11. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Apache OpenOffice is not a younger derivative of
      > OpenOffice.org. AOO is OpenOffice under an
      > Apache license.

      Yes, sure, that's why it suddenly deemed urgent to perform massive brutal codectomy for licensing reasons. There's little of OpenOffice.org in Apache OpenOffice, the OpenOffice community went to the other project or gave up, the coding team has been replaced by IBM people who didn't contribute to OpenOffice.org when it existed, the binary ecosystem it built on for years has been replaced in one go.

      The only thing it kept was the name and the poor users it managed to confuse and lure using this name

    12. Re:Open Source by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      You don't protect your investment with a license that makes it impossible to use the product truly freely. What you are doing is driving investors away.

      Depends on your investment. LibreOffice has invested volunteer hours as well as some sponsored work into making what they believe is a open and free product. The GPL protects their investment by ensuring that any work based on their efforts will also be an open and free product.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    13. Re:Open Source by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Yes, sure, that's why it suddenly deemed urgent to perform massive brutal codectomy for licensing reasons.

      From the FAQ from OpenOffice.org
      The source code for OpenOffice.org will be nearly all the source code in development for StarOffice. The source code not available for OpenOffice.org is source code or binaries which have been licensed to Sun Microsystems from external parties which Sun Microsystems is not entitled to distribute. Any code which cannot be distributed has been identified and removed.

      These changes were done by Sun and then Oracle to allow them to distribute and relicense the code base. Oracle gave OpenOffice to Apache foundation with the blessing of IBM. Apache OpenOffice is not a derivative of Oracle's OpenOffice like LibreOffice. Instead it is the actual property transferred to them from Oracle.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    14. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "business unfriendly" copyleft on LibreOffice has several companies with paid staff working on the project.

      The "business friendly" Apache license on AOO has only one company with paid staff working on the project, and that's IBM who told Oracle to drop it on Apache to satisfy their 2008 deal.

      If the Apache license was actually business-friendly then surely we'd see lots of companies working at AOO and none at LO -- but we see the other way round.

  8. Re:Ribbon by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    What kind of idiot public school teacher requires my children to do their work digitally then print it out on paper? Oh. Ones like you. Fucking idiots. Every last one.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  9. paying the bills by Almost-Retired · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having this done by a group of volunteers is nice & all that.

    BUT!

    These folks need to travel and smooze with others, both for the publicity, and to keep the ideas about how to do something fresh. Who knows, maybe one of them will put in that killer feature we've all been waiting for?

    So when you are done downloading it, take the time to donate, so maybe the 5.0 release can afford a bigger cake. The one I saw in the pix was about 5% of the size of the one it would take to feed all the volunteers a celebratory piece of cake, maybe even with a scoop of ice cream on top. IMNSHO, speaking as a retired person living on SS, I dropped the card to say thanks. Surely the working folks who will make better use of this than I ever will, can better afford to pull out the card?

    I would firmly suggest that others do the same if we want to see a 5.0 or higher release. Nothing kills a volunteer operation quicker than not being able to pay the bills.

    Cheers, Gene

    1. Re:paying the bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knows, maybe one of them will put in that killer feature we've all been waiting for?

      An EASY button that I can press to get everyone in my company and any affiliate companies to switch so I don't get hassled when something in the document doesn't look quite right in Word?

    2. Re:paying the bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the "Export to PDF" button; it's been in there since version one dot something.

    3. Re:paying the bills by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      Who knows, maybe one of them will put in that killer feature we've all been waiting for?

      Like making it able to write clean structured HTML for people who want to write (not code in a text editor)? That would be great, but I wouldn't count on it.

      Still waiting for the killer new generation word.processor which focuses on HTML instead of Letter/A4 printing...

    4. Re:paying the bills by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      So when you are done downloading it, take the time to donate, so maybe the 5.0 release can afford a bigger cake.

      This! Microsoft's stronghold on the Office front requires competition and the world in general needs an open office suit (creating documents is a basic task). Making software is hard and sponsoring it gives a nice boost to advance development.

  10. What fills in for Outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a long-time MS Office user I find Outlook to be very useful. I've attempted to migrate from Office to OS but LO doesn't have an Outlook replacement, so LO is a non-starter and I'm back where I started with Office. I've tried Zimbra and Evolution with bad results, and I don't want an online/cloud approach. LO would be fine for me if I could find an OS Outlook alternative. What are your thoughts?

    1. Re:What fills in for Outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy Outlook for emails/contacts/caldendar and use Openoffice/Libreoffice for the rest.

    2. Re:What fills in for Outlook? by readingaccount · · Score: 1

      Spoken by someone who has no idea Outlook does more than just emails. Or does not understand that people like GUIs.

    3. Re:What fills in for Outlook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GUIs are for babies and Star Trek. If you're not willing to use a computer efficiently then fuck right off.

  11. Re:Ribbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or they could just save it to PDF and print from any modern OS/computer.

    And while you may love the ribbon, not all of us do.

  12. Re:Ribbon by timeOday · · Score: 1
    Formatting differences would appear onscreen, just as much as in print.

    That said, I think it was just a troll... nobody actually likes the Ribbon do they?

  13. One more fix they need... by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    The one change i really want to get them to implement is the two tone colors in the row and column headers in the spreadsheet program. As it is the top half of the column headers and the left half of the row headers is light grey, while the other half of each is dark grey. That probably seems like a pretty trivial complaint, and maybe it's just me, but something about having half the area light and the other half dark plays havoc with my brain and makes it hard to read the labels, especially for the row headers where the line dividing the colors aligns with the numbers.

    As a moderate user of spreadsheets this is the only thing that Excel handles better than OpenOffice/LibreOffice. Well okay, that and copy/pasting HTML content. Excel handles that just fine, but in OO/LO it hangs for awhile when i do the paste, and then if i undo the paste the text goes away but the formatting and images stick around forever. (This generally happens when trying to transfer tabular data from a webpage. Once it's in the spreadsheet i'll copy it again and do a Paste Special->Unformatted Text.)

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  14. Re:Ribbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a fucking teacher you are. How about telling your students to print their work to pdf. There presto, no more last minute formatting problems. A pdf renders the same on any OS and especially prints the same on any OS.
    If yours is the kind of intellectual flexibility that is tought in college may GOD save us. We're all doomed.

  15. Re:Ribbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow some anger issues there Dishevel?!?

    There are many valid reasons to have print it out on paper.
    1. Locations to mark/edit: I am not a school teacher but I will print out my own work and then I can review it on public transit, at a coffee shop, laying down in bed, or where ever.

    2. For many if not most mistakes are easier to see on paper. When I am given docs to review I will sometimes print them out and look at them as a bigger picture and find things that I did not find on the screen.

    3. Editing. It is easier to circle parts and use standard marking terms to indicate what is incorrect or what can be improved. For example circle a sentence or paragraph and draw an error to where it should be moved.

    4. When going over the corrections and suggestions with your students it is easier to go over the print out then have to carry a computer around to each and every students desk.

    But then again you can just calling them idiots ignoring their education, and experience... we have an adjective for this... oh ya, ignorant, because if it inconveniences you there can be nothing good of it...

  16. Java to Python by RoccamOccam · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I'm reading the new features page correctly, they appear to be seeing some pretty sizable code reduction in the utilities where they are replacing Java with Python. To avoid misunderstanding, let me point out that I am aware that only a few parts of the project were coded in Java and the bulk is in C++.

    1. Re:Java to Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Xisco Faulí has been very busy during the 4.0 and 4.1 development cycles getting rid of the Java dependencies. I think it's great. I uninstalled Java a few years ago when all those vulnerabilities were being exploited one after another. I didn't use Java (so I thought) and thought I would be safer than sorry. I don't regret that, but it means a few features in LO didn't work, such as the letter wizard. So hooray for Xisco Faulí and Javier Fernandez and the work they have been doing to reduce the dependency on Java. That'll be one less thing necessary to take full advantage of LO.

    2. Re:Java to Python by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and they could still reduce it to a tenth of that by using Haskell.

      But that doesn't mean it's necessarily less. It might just be more dense, since Java is a pretty verbose language. (Not that python is *that* dense, but it borrowed a lot of things from Haskell.)

      The question then becomes: What level of density can the developers handle.
      I know that most developers have trouble handling full-on Haskell. And they have just as much trouble, even when I'm coding in abominations like PHP or C/C++ with that density.

  17. Apache ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm expecting Apache to pull their typical BS any way.

    First they decide: the product isn't generic enough.,/p>

    Then they make a new product that's more generic, but break backward compatibility. Which is also nearly unusable, by design..

  18. Re:Ribbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's, sadly, still easier to show students where and how they fucked up their spelling, grammar, and etc with a red pen on paper. Office suites are still a PITA to use for showing corrections.

  19. Re:Ribbon by Teun · · Score: 1
    That's why the students prints it out on his own computer to a pdf (the Export option in LO) and brings the pdf to school for paper printing.

    Doofus...

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  20. Re:Ribbon by EvanED · · Score: 1

    A stylus-based tablet is actually a decent compromise. You get the benefits (and drawbacks) of being electronic, but still get to scribble on it to your heart's content.

  21. Re:Ribbon by Alex+Vulpes · · Score: 2
    I understand that LibreOffice has compatibility issues with MS Office formats, and this can make LibreOffice a poor choice in many professional environments. However:

    It's hard enough dealing with the differences between MS Office 2010, Office 2011, and Office 2013. God forbid if someone wanted to use Office 2008.

    If, by your own admission, MS Office has trouble being compatible with itself, should LibreOffice really be blamed for running into problems here?

  22. Re:Ribbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because every family can afford a few of those.

  23. OneNote by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Ribbon/No-ribbon. Sidebar/No-sidebar. Phah! Where's LibreOneNote?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  24. Re:Ribbon by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    It was not the differences I was complaining about. It is the teachers demanding that something be created digitally then printed and handed in. Happens at my children's school all the time. Fucking stupid.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  25. Re:Ribbon by Dishevel · · Score: 0

    Annotations work great in the real world. Public school teachers come in two varieties.

    New.

    Useless Fucks.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  26. Re:Ribbon by EvanED · · Score: 1

    What? Only the teacher needs one.

    Though I did intend to say something about many teachers will feel they're not being paid enough to buy one, though.

  27. Page Break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Still no Page Break line while in Web Layout view.

    The biggest setback from having LibreOffice implemented in my company. Word 97 had this feature!

    1. Re:Page Break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? Sponsor it by taking 25% of the money your company would save from moving to LO. Then spread the love and let others use this feature too, in the next release...?

    2. Re:Page Break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PROTIP: If you are writing your web pages in a word processor (or any other kind of WYSIWYG editor)... YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG.

      All you need, is a good XHTML editor. (The X means, it actually checks the thing for errors, so your browser actually knows what you means instead of making wild guesses and coming out wrong.)
      One that lets you separate content/structure and visual style. By not rendering it in the visual style while you're writing content, as you should never mix the two. Ideally, the style sheet should be completely separate (to prevent copypasta), re-usable by different documents (Say you don't want to re-invent the wheel for every new document, and keep a consistent corporate identity style), and quickly replaceable (Say you want to change all your documentation to your new corporate identity.).

      And how do you define a "page break" in a web page anyway? That term is not defined in that context. Unless you plan on printing it out like it's still the 80s.

  28. Re:Ribbon by TheEyes · · Score: 1

    The Ribbon's not so bad; it's just a tabbed toolbar that's extra-thick so it can display more information than a normal one. I just want to be able to search the menus too, like you can in LO/Ubuntu.

  29. Re:Ribbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't say I was a teacher. You think the teachers do the grading? The TA's do the grading. The TAs all have more important stuff to do than grade papers. They want to grade them as fast as possible. The professors set the policies, like requiring it on paper. The TA's don't make that decision idiot. And we ask for paper, because how to you grade digitally? You put in electronic comments and stuff? Do you realize how much longer that takes to do? Grading digital work would add hours to our grading load, and we aren't paid enough to put up with that. Every time we do accept a late assignment, a digital copy, etc, it creates a lot more work for us, and we don't get paid any extra. Imagine if the whole class did digitally every week? It'd be a nightmare. Then, you would have to individually email them back their corrected assignments. Do you want to write 44 emails every week? On paper, you can hand it back to them in class, while you are watching them anyways.

    You know, the students can choose to print to PDF to solve that problem. But you know what, in the real world, most of them do not. We are talking around 18-20 year olds usually. They aren't the most mature or smart people. I do tell them on the first day to print to PDF. THEY DON'T LISTEN!

    And I know how to spell, but spelling correctly takes longer and I had places to go. I haven't even taught in a couple years. I don't have dsylexia, and college was easy.

    The ribbon is organized well, and has most features on it, when using an HD screen. You don't have to hunt for options buried 3 levels deep. The ribbon makes all features obvious. You see a button, and go, I wonder what that does. You don't have to go 3 levels deep. Before the ribbon, you had to add custom menu buttons just for superscript and subscript. With the ribbon, those buttons are right there, by default.

    Not only have those who criticized never have tried to being a college TA, I don't think you even were a student. I have years of TA experience.The students don't listen, they don't plan ahead, they don't manage their time well, they aren't very bright. You will get a few good students. But it's the worst students that you worry about. The poor students take up all your time, cause you the most trouble, bring down your grade average, and give you poor teaching evaluations. Some of the students are truly stupid and don't belong in college at all. I dealt mostly with freshmen. Freshmen don't even care about their grades, except the premeds and the smart ones. Most of them haven't realized they need to study hard to keep their scholarships. They are too busy partying and stuff to worry about that their first semester.

    Don't talk about what you don't know about.

  30. Killer feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OneNote clone.

    1. Re:Killer feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed!

  31. Re: Ribbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although you are not a teacher (apparently) you clearly aren't new, so that'd make you...

  32. Re:Ribbon by blackest_k · · Score: 1

    Libre Office is available for Windows and the smart cookies would print to pdf from libre office and print the pdf for you to mark.

    Meanwhile my University Professors were getting my open office documents in doc format opening them in open office and marking them. It's been a while since I was submitting papers, before oracle.

    Is your faculty aware of your discrimination towards your students? Not every student has a silver spoon or working parents. Maybe it really is a question of finance especially since you suggest some of your students can not afford a printer. It seems hardly likely they have the money for Microsoft Office either. Of course they could pirate it but that hardly prepares them for life as an honest upstanding member of the community.

    Are you in the business of educating or leaching a pay check from the public purse?

     

  33. Re:Ribbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not convinced that all the items are in sensible places. Then there are those full screen 'options' which obscure everything. Office 2003 was not quite logical either, perhaps it is familiarity, but I could find stuff. From what I can see, Office 2003 -> 2010 - a few minor improvements and a wtf change in UI.

  34. Re:Ribbon by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I got sick of the entire mess when one minor variant of Word 97 could not read files produced by another minor variant of Word 97 (and vice versa), yet both programs came on media with identical labels. Having to reinstall the thing from the same CDROM in every desktop computer in an entire University engineering department was an annoying waste of time.

    Meanwhile there's software here that is happily reading in files from the late 1960s because THEY ARE IN A PROPERLY DOCUMENTED STANDARD FILE FORMAT. MS Office was a step backwards with file compatibility and they knew better than to do it, but for sleazy weasel product lock-in reasons we were stuck with it, and due to their mismanagement of this "feature" you are punished by incompatibilities even if you do stay locked in with them.

  35. Two criticals things still missing by hobarrera · · Score: 2

    There's two really critical (IMO) things that the LO devs keep missing:

    - Loading time: Libreoffice is the only application which takes time noticable time to load - anything else just pops up instantly. There's even a progress bar. That's too 1999. Only games take that long (or more) to load.
    - OS integration: Why is the look and feel so slightly alien on my desktop. I've set it to look gtkish, but it still looks alien, the icons have are different from the ones in my .gtkrc-2.0, and most text can barely fit the controls (since they don't seem to resize along with the text, which does respect DPI settings). All this makes me feel like I'm using something totally alien to my desktop, and I feel the need to get done with it and close it ASAP.

  36. Re:Ribbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Ribbon's not so bad; it's just a tabbed toolbar that's extra-thick so it can display more information than a normal one. I just want to be able to search the menus too, like you can in LO/Ubuntu.

    ...except it actually displays less useful information than the old, smaller menu/tool bar.

  37. They don't need to merge by readingaccount · · Score: 1

    There's no need for OpenOffice and LibreOffice to merge. Yes it would be nice in so far as consolidating manpower and reducing confusion, but in terms of functionality and features, anything that is introduced in OpenOffice, the team at LibreOffice take and integrate into their package because they're perfectly allowed to by virtue of the license.

    So sticking with LO means you get the maximum number of features with no real loss apart from a less marketable name (which I'm beyond caring about at this point - if it were that important I'd have giving up on GIMP a long time ago).

  38. Re:Ribbon by gslj · · Score: 1

    [snip] Do you know what happens when a student tries to make their lab report in LibreOffice, or on a mac or something, and then uses a school windows computer to print it 2 minutes before class? The formatting gets all messed up, and I doc them points because of it. So you make extra work for yourself. You either have to save time to re work on your document, or you have to own your own printer and save time to use it before class.

    Save as pdf. Print the pdf. Where's the problem?

    I'm no fan of monopoly.

    -Gareth

  39. Re:Ribbon by Sperbels · · Score: 1

    Who are these people who love the ribbon? He's the first one I've ever heard of.

  40. Re:Ribbon by readingaccount · · Score: 1

    I find LO to be more garbage than MS Office. It has a terrible lack of polish. For example, adjusting the row or column position of a table using the mouse in LO Writer in Windows, causes a dotted line to remain on the page after having made the adjustment. It's not supposed to remain because you can clearly see it get wiped off if you scroll down then up the page again. Minimize+maximize resolves the issue, but the fact the developers don't give a shit about such details shows a lack of care towards the user experience (it might work fine in Linux, but given most people use Windows it might be worth giving Windows a bit more attention sometimes, LO developers).

    That and the fact you can't resize a table using the mouse, you can't interactively crop an image like you can in Word, and a multitude of things which irritate me when compared to how fucking easy they are in MS Office, and I finally realized why NO ONE uses LO by choice unless you have no self-respect (or use Linux on the desktop, in which case the same applies).

    Oh yeah. LO's dictionary recognizes the word movie, but not the word movies. Shit like this makes me question why I bother sometimes.

  41. Re:Ribbon by readingaccount · · Score: 1

    Oh they exist. You just choose to hang around with those who hate it, most likely. Not saying the ribbon's good or bad, but FFS, it was released in 2007. Can't geeks learn how to use it by now? If it was really that useless you'd think the world would have fallen apart by now given how widespread Office is.

  42. Still can't open encrypted/passworded files. by antdude · · Score: 1

    For example, I have clients who use passwords on their Word docx file in their Mac 2011 and Windows 2010 versions. Both OO and LO can't open them still. Full compatibility is still an issue for me. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  43. AOO broken out box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I try Apache see sidebar, but no edit of master page at all. Useless for slide. I try LibreOffice he work just fine.

  44. Re:Ribbon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure that people could say the same about certain internet ragers.

  45. Re:Ribbon by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    Except of course for the fact that the internet is doing fine. Education gets more money and less results. Public Teachers that give money to their evil union are criminal and destroying our youth. They do not care. They just want better insurance and less hours. Fuck Them.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?