Slashdot Mirror


Every Public School Student In LA Will Get an iPad In 2014

Jeremiah Cornelius writes "After signing a $30 million iPad deal with Apple in June, the Los Angeles School Board of Education has revealed the full extent of the program that will provide tablets to all students in the district. CiteWorld reports that the first phase of the program will see pupils receive 31,000 iPads this school year, rising to 640,000 Apple tablets by the end of 2014. Apple previously announced that the initiative would include 47 campuses and commence in the fall." Certain companies (not just Apple) stand to benefit from this kind of outlay.

8 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. Can't wait for the dog to eat the homework. by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How many will break in the first week?

  2. Money better spent on education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Giving students computers? When you could, oh, I don't know, spend those millions on teacher education, classroom supplies and capital improvements that are probably critically needed but neglected because of retarded earmarked funds like this?

  3. Re:so... 900 bucks for one or fifty? by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Paper books can be used over the course of several years with several classes of students. I wonder if the licenses in this case will only apply to a single student.

  4. Re:That's not news by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    FWIW I am close to a school district in California that is considering this iPad giveaway. I asked a person in charge why they are doing it (especially when they've been low on cash for a while), and the answer was that they couldn't just give the money to the teachers because of regulations that dictate how school money must be spent. So that's what they were doing.

    Doesn't make it any better, just explains why it happens.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  5. Re:That's not news by pspahn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I get the point, really I do, but I don't think simply raising their pay is the answer, not to mention the economics of your suggestion are way off target.

    LA Unified had over 27,000 teachers in 2012, quite a bit higher than the 1000 you suggest. Also, the average teacher pay in the district for 2012 was $66,000/year.

    I do agree that you will get some improvement in quality of teachers if you started paying them more, but I don't think it will be significant. Education majors already have some of the worst SAT scores. Simply offering to pay them more isn't going to improve that much as you still have the very real issue of people simply not wanting to be teachers because it is a terrible job. You do have people who actually love teaching, but those folks are incredibly rare, and rarer still are those who love teaching and are good at their job.

    You'd do more to improve the quality of public school education by making the job itself more attractive, not the pay. There are too many teachers burning out early in their careers which says a lot more about the job's environment than it does the compensation. I know that the main reason I quit working in education wasn't because the pay was shit, the main reason was because administrators often are too out of touch with the modern classroom that the students have no desire to learn, and the teacher ends up being nothing more than a baby sitter for 8 hours.

    Class rooms are broken. Fix them and you will find more student engagement, which will improve the teachers' morale, which will result in a better education. Now, a snazzy piece of tech in each kids' hands might be a move in the right direction, but it just screams of a band-aid fix when instead it should be introduced as part of a comprehensive overhaul of the entire system.

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  6. Re:That's not news by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does that higher spec'ed Nexus 7 include all of the Pearson curriculum and electronic textbooks that the iPads are coming with?

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  7. Re:That's not news by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not to mention the only one that will be getting squat out of this long term will be Apple, the iPads themselves will end up stolen, on eBay, or in a junk drawer somewhere with a dead battery. I have seen it before with a local private school demanding all the students get laptops, the laptops ended up being used more for time wasting than schoolwork, teachers began banning them from class because the students were watching stupid cat videos instead of working, the whole thing turned out to be a waste to everyone but the ones selling the hardware.

    as a geek i naturally love tech but this fad of trying to fix education with tech? Just not gonna work. What you need is good teachers, involvement from the parents in the lives of the kids, and kids that actually want to be there and learn. None of that can come in a box, I don't care if it comes from Cupertino or not.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  8. Re: That's not news by Haawkeye · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I will be the first to admit I don't have any studies to back this up only 15 years of teaching. The biggest impact of smaller classes is the fact that I know and can respond to individuals better. If I have a class of 25 students I end up knowing them all much better than if I have 35. This also allows me to differentiate the instruction to fit each student. Now I teach grade 5 so this probably does not help much. However also being a father of 4 I want my kids to be inspired and cared for at school. This means the teachers must have a good relationship with each of the students. So while I don't have any studies or papers to back up my opinion I hope my years of experience do carry some weight. I would love ipads in my class but only if they could print!