Slashdot Mirror


Signs Point To XKCD's Time Ending

CaptSlaq writes "According to the current imagery, it looks like Randal Munroe has finished the story he was telling with the Time series. The long running series that has spanned over 3000 images and spawned multiple methods of viewing and comment appears to have come to an end."

65 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. Nooooooo!!!!!! by d33tah · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:Nooooooo!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

      XKCD's "Time" is ending?

      You know what this means...

      Only one thing!

      RAGNAROK!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  2. oblink by yo303 · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:oblink by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Informative

      #1190 is ending, not XKCD is ending. #1190 is titled Time.

    2. Re:oblink by Narrowband · · Score: 2

      Cool! I guess it's ending at Andrew Henry's Meadow... I loved that book when I was very little.

    3. Re:oblink by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

      1190 is a slow pseudo-animation, posted without any special announcements. It updated one frame roughly every hour since March. You can see the whole sequence (we think its the whole sequence) only on fan sites, such as this.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  3. Well good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's about time.

    1. Re:Well good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You both suck at reading comprehension.

    2. Re:Well good by unixisc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is there an XKCD that captures the essence of this story?

  4. Misleading summary by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just because the comic titled "Time" may have reached its final panel doesn't mean that xkcd itself is ending any time soon. We'll see on Monday whether there's a #1244.

    1. Re:Misleading summary by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know I'll be strung up for saying this, but XKCD is like The Onion. A thing that exists, which I don't ever remember exists until those couple times per year when someone randomly sends me a link and says "did you see this yet?" and I go look at it and think "huh... yep, that's The Onion/XKCD". It's kind of too cutesy for its own good. I usually kind of feel like I'm watching the comic-strip equivalent of seeing a young couple being overly cutesy and cuddly in public.

      That isn't to say I don't think it's any good . . . it just falls into the category of one of those things it seems like geeks spill way too much jizz over.

    2. Re:Misleading summary by icebike · · Score: 2

      Couple times per year?

      You must not read many threads here on Slashdot, because there seems to be an obligatory link in every story.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:Misleading summary by DG · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agreed! How dare people enjoy something!

      (Oh, I think Kevin Bacon may be teaching your daughter how to dance. You should probably check into that)

      --
      Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book
    4. Re:Misleading summary by Art+Challenor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Couple times per year?

      You must not read many threads here on Slashdot, because there seems to be an obligatory link in every story.

      Citation Needed! http://xkcd.com/285/

    5. Re:Misleading summary by icebike · · Score: 2

      Well played sir!

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:Misleading summary by Bengie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Everything stopped being funny YEARS ago

      Welcome to being old.

    7. Re: Misleading summary by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      Which is what, oh mighty priest? There's many viewpoints to XKCD, and I do not see GP's being one particularly off the bat.

    8. Re: Misleading summary by FuzzNugget · · Score: 2

      I think both are bloody brilliant. XKCD because ... well, it gets me. It just gets me. The Onion because they nail it every damn time and they do it with style. They're so good you good, you could be forgiven for not knowing it's satire.

    9. Re:Misleading summary by Fortran+IV · · Score: 2

      XKCD stopped being funny to me when I was no longer a 20-something.

      FTFY.

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    10. Re: Misleading summary by OptimalCynic · · Score: 2

      The point you're missing is that the post isn't talking about XKCD itself, it's talking about one particular comic that's being regularly updated.

    11. Re:Misleading summary by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everything stopped being funny YEARS ago

      Welcome to being old.

      Actually, as someone who turned 50 in May, I find many things/people getting funnier/stupider as I get older. Probably as I gain perspective and realize how ridiculous and unimportant most things really are, especially in contrast to how serious and important people think those things are. Losing my wife of 20 years to brain cancer in 2006 (just 7 weeks after diagnosis) probably helps with that perspective -- Remember Sue...

      All life's little problems are just a distraction from the one big problem - that there's no fucking point to anything. (Just my 2 cents.)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    12. Re:Misleading summary by Jaruzel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dude...

      I just read this:

      http://remembersue.tumblr.com/remember

      Wow. :( Made me cry a little.

      I won't say I'm sorry, as I don't know you, but thanks for sharing; There's so much shit on the Internet not worth reading these days, it's nice sometimes to find something so real and emotive.

      -Jar

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    13. Re:Misleading summary by DrXym · · Score: 2

      I think XKCD only exists so some wit can stink up every /. story by posting an "oblig link" to a tenuously relevant cartoon.

  5. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    so....it has come to this...

  6. Sequel by MavEtJu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm waiting for the sequel: More time.

    (before anybody flames, I follow it every couple of days via http://geekwagon.net/projects/xkcd1190/).

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  7. The concept of a geek card by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it just falls into the category of one of those things it seems like geeks spill way too much jizz over.

    Like when people say "turn in your geek card" when someone fails to get an inside joke related to an uncited quotation from some science fiction movie like Blade Runner or WarGames.

    1. Re:The concept of a geek card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a geek cargo cult out there, and it's populated with people that desperately wished they finished that astro physics degree or didn't drop out of DeVry. They believe that by adorning themselves with tokens and fetishes of geekdom, that they will become smarter or work hard by osmosis. This typically happens later in life as an attempt to masquerade their way through technical interviews. I honestly don't care all that much about Dilithium crystals because the real world operates on fossil fuels and electricity, but that doesn't stop these charlatans from wishing it did.

    2. Re:The concept of a geek card by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is a geek cargo cult out there, and it's populated with people that desperately wished they finished that astro physics degree or didn't drop out of DeVry. They believe that by adorning themselves with tokens and fetishes of geekdom, that they will become smarter or work hard by osmosis.

      Either that, or it just happens to be another fashion phenomenon, and doesn't say anything at all about their inner lives or philosophy or willingness to look directly into reality's hard face, as you have apparently done. Maybe they just, you know, enjoy sci-fi and tech stuff and chicks in horned-rim glasses.

      Like tattoos. People who don't have tattoos seem to want to create an entire psychodrama in their heads about the motivation and world-view of the person with the tattoo. But sometimes, it really is just because somebody wanted a fleur-de-lis on their calf because they like the way it looks.

      Everybody is so anxious to diminish other people as this AC seems to want to do. I wonder what's made so many people so grumpy that they feel the need to try to minimize others with such ersatz psychological profiles based on data picked out of their underpants. Maybe it's the economy. Or maybe it's just that grumpy people seem more apt to complain loudly.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:The concept of a geek card by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Like tattoos. People who don't have tattoos seem to want to create an entire psychodrama in their heads about the motivation and world-view of the person with the tattoo. But sometimes, it really is just because somebody wanted a fleur-de-lis on their calf because they like the way it looks.

      I think it's a little more complex than that. The way I see it (as a non-tattooed person who thinks they're kinda stupid), there's a big, big difference between someone with a smallish tattoo on their calf, or 2 or 3 tattoos in various places, and someone whose arms and legs or other body parts are entirely covered in them. The first person is just someone who wanted to adorn themselves, much like someone who wears earrings (except that tattoos can't be taken out easily when you get tired of them), whereas the latter is someone with an obsession. Tattoos are not cheap, so having large amounts of skin covered with them adds up to a lot of money, and it says something about someone who wants to spend that much money on adorning themselves instead of making a house downpayment, investing, or saving for their kids' college tuition.

      As for adorning yourself with tokens of geekdom, it doesn't cost anything to read XKCD or other such things online, and to post links to your favorite ones. You can drop XKCD like a hot potato any time you want and read some other webcomic instead. Tattoos, OTOH, are expensive, and permanent. I'm not so sure that's a very good analogy.

    4. Re:The concept of a geek card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tattoos are not cheap, so having large amounts of skin covered with them adds up to a lot of money, and it says something about someone who wants to spend that much money on adorning themselves instead of making a house downpayment, investing, or saving for their kids' college tuition..

      As a heavily tattooed geek, I have to disagree. Being a geek/nerd is about caring about something to the point of wierdness. That is what we are. I live so far into my own head about gastronomy that I am a freak amongst Chefs, the guys who make a living by cooking. My tattoos are less permanent than my nerd style, as long as my mind runs it will think about food. I have spent more on cooking books than on ink. A maniac with a potato peeler and an hour would get rid of my tatts. Being passionate about stuff is for life. The meat is just for the weekend.

    5. Re:The concept of a geek card by TheCarp · · Score: 2

      > and it says something about someone who wants to spend that much money on adorning
      > themselves instead of making a house downpayment, investing, or saving for their kids' college
      > tuition.

      So any "large" amount of money (what is large anyway? The amount it would cost to be covered head to toe in tatoos looks like a lot less compared to my salary now than it did, say, 10 years ago) that isn't spent on making a house downpayment or investing, or saving for their kids' college (assuming they have/want kids) is a waste?

      Have you never spent a dime on anything you didn't need? Are your walls all stark white with nothing hung on them?

      Pretty much anything someone would like to do, you can put up against something you feel is more important. Why do people go on vacations and travel the world when they could be putting that money towards a house or kids college?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    6. Re:The concept of a geek card by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      With the people I see covered in tattoos, it's pretty obvious that they aren't making a lot of money in their careers, and probably don't get much above minimum wage. You don't see lower-income people traveling the world, but for some reason you do see a subset of them spending all their money on tattoos. If you have plenty of money, spending some on frivolous stuff is fine, but if you're barely hanging on, and you have kids, it's extremely irresponsible.

    7. Re:The concept of a geek card by Evanisincontrol · · Score: 2

      With the people I see covered in tattoos, it's pretty obvious that they aren't making a lot of money in their careers, and probably don't get much above minimum wage.

      You imply that people who like to cover their body with tattoos are somehow less valuable in the workforce, but you have it backwards. It is not tattoo lovers being unable to perform, but society who rejects tattoo lovers. I have three tattoos so far and I make just shy of six figures. The only thing stopping me from being "covered in tattoos" is that many (most?) employers won't hire people with visible tattoos.

      Before you reply with "oh then you're the exception to the norm," let me cut you off and say that you're wrong. I know plenty of others like me. You seem to think you can judge someone's income based on their tattoos (how exactly are you doing that again?) and then you reinforce your own beliefs by looking at others who fit your predetermined model. This is textbook confirmation bias.

      Tattoos can be many things to many people (symbolic, art, memorial, decoration), but in general they are a form of self-expression. Like any form of self-expression, you're forgiven if you don't understand people's motivations. You should, however, show some respect rather than disparaging those who like different things than you, and you definitely shouldn't make the mistake of thinking you can categorize tattoo lovers as lower class and irresponsible. That mindset is poisonous and it's as ignorant as any other racial or cultural bias.

    8. Re:The concept of a geek card by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      I work as a programmer at Ubisoft. I have sleeves on my forearms, and I know lots of guys that work here that have plenty of large tattoos (and/or piercings). My arms DID cost me a lot of money.

      Sure, these are a bit frivolous and are 100% aesthetic choices for me, but so are clothes, and these tattoos will last longer. You've got a lot of weird pre-conceived notions of people that have tattoos. As it happens, I have a job and have chosen a field where people don't mind that I have tattoos. I have friends that work in more conservative careers, and they have less obvious tattoos if they have any at all. I wear a lot of casual clothing and short sleeves at work, too, and my lawyer friends always have long sleeve shirts and jackets on. You'd never even guess at the kind of ink they have.

      I agree that spending money that you don't have is irresponsible, but you can't judge whether or not they have enough money to make those decisions based on what they look like, or even what their current job is.

      Anyway, don't judge people by what you can immediately see. You don't know their story.

  8. Signs Point to XKCD's Time Ending ... by gargleblast · · Score: 3, Informative
  9. There's a Wiki and a replay site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:There's a Wiki and a replay site by De+Lemming · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know about a second replay site. It's not as good as the one on geekwagon.net, but it has sound :-)

      And don't forget the forum thread, which currently has 51583 posts. In this thread a new religion that worships the One True Comic was started. Also a few new standard units were introduced, based on the NewPix (half an hour), which was later replaced with the LongPix (one hour) when the update interval of the comic changed. People in the thread did extensive analysis of the comic, and later on some started analyzing the forum thread itself. The thread was also the starting point of the replay web sites.

    2. Re:There's a Wiki and a replay site by Fortran+IV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And you know, there's more acrimony and vitriol in the 80-odd posts already on this story than in the 51K posts of the forum thread. What does that say about xkcd fans and Slashdotters?

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
  10. Darmok and Jihad at Viagra by tepples · · Score: 2

    Because you quoted a character name, I could Google that it came from Blade Runner. But a lot of these allusions change a line's nouns, pronouns, and verb tense to fit the context, making it harder to search by exact phrase to figure out what people are talking about when they speak this Tamarian language of movie quotes. So yes, I'm for real. I'm trying to figure out what specific films, video games, webcomics, etc. I'd need to catch up on to keep a geek card current.

    1. Re:Darmok and Jihad at Viagra by tedgyz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Has anyone noticed it is impossible to be "current" anymore, geekly or otherwise? There are too many information streams.

      Damn you internet! Damn you all to hell!

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    2. Re:Darmok and Jihad at Viagra by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Funny

      It used to be possible but they killed Google Reader.

    3. Re:Darmok and Jihad at Viagra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're getting older. That's all.

    4. Re:Darmok and Jihad at Viagra by Mathinker · · Score: 2

      I will attempt the hopeless: a list of all content I remember being quoted here as meme-ish (not that I've seen/read/heard it all):

      Additional movies: Spaceballs, Galaxy Quest, The Princess Bride, (This is) Spinal Tap, Fight Club, every Star Trek movie (no matter how good or bad), ... (on the more esoteric side: Buckaroo Bonzai, Logan's Run, Tron, ...)

      TV : All of Dr. Who, every version of Star Trek, Babylon 5, Space 1999 (but usually only in reference to doing something to the Moon. not quotes), Battlestar Galactica (and reboots), ...

      Books: (Oh, God...) Everything considered science fiction or fantasy, but especially anything written by Heinlein, Terry Pratchett, Neil Gaiman, Neal Stephenson, J. R. R. Tolkien; The Wheel of Time; ...

    5. Re:Darmok and Jihad at Viagra by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 2

      and any thing written by Asimov when the topic even tangentially involves robots or sentient AI.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    6. Re:Darmok and Jihad at Viagra by fuzznutz · · Score: 2

      You left out all the Monty Pythons for movies and TV. And the Matrix and of course Aliens. The usual Aliens quote is in reference to nuking something from orbit. "It's the only way." Or mostly coming at night.

      Only the first Matrix movie is quoted. Curiously, none of the other Alien movies seem to have made the cut. Even the first one...

    7. Re:Darmok and Jihad at Viagra by Calydor · · Score: 5, Funny

      There are too many information streams.

      Just don't cross them and you'll be fine.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  11. Re:The Oracle by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sure, though some of them were harder to read than others. The key takeaway from them was that a big sea (what we later realize is the Atlantic) was about to flood into the smaller one where our protagonists built their sand castle (a version of the Mediterranean that the Oracle explained had been cut off from the Atlantic, dried up, but was now reconnecting with the Atlantic which was eager to flood into the lowlands of the dried up Mediterranean). If you looked at the maps indicating where the new shore would be, you'd see quite clearly that the places where the new shoreline stretches on the map go from what we know as the Iberian peninsula to Italy and Sicily.

    Apparently, the protagonists lived somewhere south of France in the middle of the Mediterranean, but their territory was swept away by the flood. The castle where the Oracle was located, which was supposed to be just above the new waterline, roughly corresponds to the location of Marseilles.

    Though I haven't seen it said elsewhere, this may be a new fiction for the creation of the Atlantis myth.

  12. Re:XKCD "experimental comics" by Tridus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Okay, and the author has expressed any of that... where, exactly?

    All he did was make a comic. Other people turned it into a thing, and that somehow makes him a diva?

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  13. Re:And I for one say "Thank God" by tinkerton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Geez, what a manipulative waste of time. Randal is a smart guy; maybe that was the point of the exercise: To see just how many morons out there (including myself) followed this banal story to its bitter and anticlimactic end.

    I enjoyed it. But then, over time I got to see Munroe as generous and friendly rather than cynical and manipulative. So no, to me that was definitely not the point of the exercise.

  14. Re:Time + 53? by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Time is what's ending, not XKCD. Time is a single comic (one of the current 1,243) which itself has over 3000 frames. What makes it unique is that they were released one at a time (originally on the half hour, which later changed to hourly). The story itself isn't overtly interesting, but the way it was released one frame at a time kept people guessing. The official XKCD thread for 1190 is massive, mostly full of speculation and even odder than normal people.

  15. Re:title plus the comic is full message by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

    And then we find out it was a nine line Python script that wrote, drew and uploaded the entire 1190 comic.

  16. Re:XKCD "experimental comics" by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... and Tolstoy wrote fiction books. The medium has changed, the audience has changed, but it's still art, and I think it's quite insightful for the most part. Look at the number of times it's referenced here on SlashDot. Randall has vision, a good understanding of math and science and a great sense of humour. Personally, I wish a lot more people were like him, rather than bitter critics.

  17. Apropriate Babylon 5 quote: by Hartree · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Londo Molari: "My shoes are too tight, but it doesn 't matter, because I have forgotten how to dance."

  18. What the chirp is wrong with people? by Fortran+IV · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a comic, guys. I don't read Cathy, but I don't feel obliged to mustard all over Cathy Guisewite because her comic doesn't amuse me. Why do people dump so hard on xkcd and Randall Munroe? If you don't like the comic, don't read it, and don't read Slashdot articles about it—and shut the chirp up and let the rest of us enjoy it in peace.

    I found it fun. That's all. It was fun. It was original, and intriguing, and a little challenging, and a nice change of mood when I got home from work (or when I needed a break at work).

    And it was something I don't believe any webcomic had ever done before. When I submitted the original Slashdot story about "Time", I thought that aspect might interest people. Instead, the story got the same sort of molpy-chirping geek-elitist hate posts that this one is gathering.

    For the record: "Time" was followed by college students and septuagenarians (I'm in my 50s, and xkcd regularly makes me laugh). Musicians, math teachers, writers, and astronomers contributed to the forum thread. The last figure we saw was that over 2 million words of original material had been posted to the thread. We weren't doing it for geek cred; we were doing it because we enjoyed ourselves.

    Grow up a little, guys, OK?

    --
    I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    1. Re:What the chirp is wrong with people? by thoth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly!

      Sure, not every XKCD comic is brilliant, but plenty are funny, appealing to a tough demographic for subject material.

      I think his various infographics are fantastic (money, radiation) and a handful of info comics are similarly amazing (gravity wells, ocean depths, movie plots). His "What If?" series is also extremely interesting.

      Sites that feed off the "XKCD is overrated" vibe come across as pathetic calls for attention from people too lame and stupid to produce their own work. Basically some members of the geek community have this bizarre calling to drop their pants and publicly poop all over whatever they think is overrated. The fact is their sum total contribution to the world is being a shit stain on the fabric of the web.

    2. Re:What the chirp is wrong with people? by narcc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't feel obliged to mustard all over Cathy Guisewite because her comic doesn't amuse me. Why do people dump so hard on xkcd and Randall Munroe?

      My guess? Cathy Guisewite isn't a pretentious ass that panders to the bottom 1% of self-described "rationalists".

      The constant flow of links on forums like this along with the wasteful printouts that find their way inexplicably to my desk makes xkcd difficult to ignore. Cathy, in contrast, is happily confined to the back of the local paper and rarely (if ever) brought to my attention.

      I'll admit that I used to be a regular xkcd reader. I checked out this article as "Time" seemed like it could be interesting. I was wrong. It's the same nonsense that I and others outgrew years ago.

    3. Re:What the chirp is wrong with people? by osu-neko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll admit that I used to be a regular xkcd reader. I checked out this article as "Time" seemed like it could be interesting. I was wrong. It's the same nonsense that I and others outgrew years ago.

      People's interests change over time. They get bored with some things and move on. But trolls like to use the word "outgrew" to try to offend current fans, and particularly immature people view these sorts of continuous, inevitable shifts in interests over time as signs of increasing maturity on their own part, not so much to offend anyone, but as a way of making themselves feel superior. Often then aren't smart enough to realize that's what they're doing.

      (Yes, in case it wasn't obvious, the irony is intentional...)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:What the chirp is wrong with people? by dywolf · · Score: 2

      translation: I hate this and you should too because I have passed judgement on it

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  19. Re:The Oracle by Fortran+IV · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, "Time" appears to have been set in the remote future, about 11 millenia from today, after Gibraltar Strait has already been closed up again for a thousand years or more (no back story for that was ever given). At one point the comic presented nearly a hundred frames of night sky, with recognizable planets and constellations. Readers versed in astronomy were able to find a date 11,000 years ahead, with consistent displacements for nearby stars (within the limits of a 553x395 image resolution). Also, the castle of the "oracle" (nicknamed Rosetta in the forum thread, after her role as a translator) appeared to be the Chateau d'If of Count of Monte Cristo fame, in Marseilles harbor.

    --
    I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
  20. Antares by xiphmont · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't forget Antares was missing from the night sky; I cling to my theory that it going supernova damaged to ozone layer sufficiently to precipitate an ice-age that dropped the ocean levels, closing Gibraltar.

    1. Re:Antares by minogully · · Score: 2

      Having followed the "Time" comic from the start, I am amazed that this level of detail was put into the artwork. But what amazes me even more, is that fans such as you have managed to connect the dots!

      Thank you so much for sharing!

    2. Re:Antares by jc42 · · Score: 2

      Interested folk might want to dig up the archaeologists' writings on several events that are precedents for this story. The best documented case is the flooding of the Mediterranean basin, but that was about 5 million years ago, before humans exist. A similar event occurred about 8000 years ago, when rising sea waters broke through the Straight of Bosporus, and flooded the Black sea, which was lower due to lack of water sources during the earlier ice age. There is also some evidence for an ice-age drying up of the Red Sea, and a similar flood that filled it. There is weak evidence that this has happened multiple times in the Black and Red Seas, as the ice sheets expanded and retreated.

      So the idea that this may happen again in the future is not especially radical; it's just a repeat of something that has happened repeatedly. If you live near the channel that fills the basin, it's probably pretty dramatic for the months or years that it takes. In other areas, it's just a slow rise of the sea, flooding out your homes.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  21. Re:XKCD "experimental comics" by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Incredibly stupid people frequently project the over zealousness of fans onto humble authors. Because, you know, you can tell how big an ego an author has by how much his fans talk about him. If someone says you're really good at what you do, that means you've got a big head, right? Yeah, it almost hurts trying to psychoanalyze that level of stupid...

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  22. Re:who fucking cares by osu-neko · · Score: 2

    ...

    I don't click on stories that don't interest me. That'd be an utterly stupid waste of time. Moreso to take the time to comment on them.

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."