Asus CEO On Windows RT: "We're Out."
symbolset writes "AllThingsD's intrepid reporter Ina Fried has an interview up where Asus chairman and CEO Jonney Shih says they will not make any more Windows RT devices until Microsoft proves demand for the product. This leaves Dell as the only OEM who has not sworn off Windows RT. Dell is seeking to take itself private, relying on a $2 billion loan from Microsoft."
Turns out people want things that are the size of a laptop to work as well as a laptop.
So that you can make hardware that doesn't depend on MS?
For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
How many MBAs does it take to miss that mind-boggingly obvious fact?
Here's some free advice if anyone important is reading this (haha):
Want to be wildly successful? Go invest a lot of time and money into figuring our how to make a 8.5 x 11" replacement for paper. That includes being able to write and draw engineering diagrams with a 0.2mm tip.
I've wanted one of those forever, I'd be willing to bet a lot of professionals out there have the same problem - the ipad is close, but not quite big enough, and it doesn't have written input.
"Me too" doesn't cut it. Have some vision, Microsoft. I dare you.
..don't panic
A version of MS Office which supports touch poorly is not a killer app.
Also even if Asus was in it still, there are millions of RT units from MS sitting out there unsold to compete with. I would say that someone at MS was wildly optimistic about RT projections or very bad at math. While we don't know the actual number some estimates have it at 6M unsold RT units. Surface RT was launched Oct 26, 2012 and was only sold at MS stores which only number two dozen or so. 6,000,000 units / 25 stores / 275 days / 12 hours means a MS store would have to sell 72 Surface RT units optimistically. And those are in addition to the ones already sold. I don't think that even Apple stores sell that many iPads during holiday season. What was someone thinking?
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
You're missing my point.
I have three 30" screens I work on. It is wonderful.
I want a device that acts like my trusty pad of paper, but better. I like to be able to read and flip through reference papers leaned back in my chair, or over a coffee. I'm not going to sit down and work in that environment - certainly not to code, design a CAD part, work out a tooling process, design a PCB, figure out a circuit, or even write a long memo. I have a great work setup for those tasks.
Microsoft completely missed the mark and the consumers have spoken. You and some others want to work on a tablet, fine - most don't.
..don't panic
Indeed, reality is that people are willing to pay a premium to avoid Windows...
This is one area where Ballmer's decision to build a cult to rationalize away the glaringly unethical and predatory nature of the Windows monopoly is hurting them big time.
And Android has never claimed that you would be running full Linux on your device. Microsoft's blunder wasn't that they made a tablet OS, it's that they tried to pass it off as their full fledged desktop by giving it the same name when they had already spent 8 years with their desktop software already on tablet computers, and doubled down by simultaneously releasing a looks-and-feels identical version which really did run all of Windows desktop software.
Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
The main strength of Windows was its ability to maintain an impressive amount of backwards compatibility. A few applications aside, things I bought 10 years ago still work on my Windows 8 x64 machine (without virtualization or emulation). To attack two well entrenched competitors Microsoft went in guns blazing without what is historically been the most compelling feature of Windows. I have an MBA, and even I saw this coming...
Linux netbooks didn't really take off
Except they did every store had more netbooks than anything else, Microsoft heavily discounted XP to compete(11 years old only if your stupid enough to count from launch), and then with Intel limited its specifications and Microsoft limits its OS (and it ran badly) to not cannibalise its more profitable none existent Ultrabook and its existing laptop market. They successfully killed it of...and then Apple launched the iPad which had none of the limits, some advantages...and a killer price (then not now) and obvious the brand.